Discussion:
President Trump Denies Trying To Fire Mueller In June
(too old to reply)
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-26 23:33:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."

When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
MattB
2018-01-27 01:11:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore. How many times has their breaking story
been Bullshit?
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-27 03:02:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
MattB
2018-01-27 04:51:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?

That is like saying Glen Back always had the gist of the story right.
Please you liberals are as crazy as any teabagger.
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-27 06:11:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
MattB
2018-01-27 11:38:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-27 19:48:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MattB
2018-01-27 20:52:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
So you can't. About what I expected.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MSM has already done that.
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-27 20:55:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
So you can't.
No need - Fox has already done it. I don't waste time reinventing wheels.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MSM has already done that.
Nope. You just lied.
MattB
2018-01-27 21:18:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
So you can't.
No need - Fox has already done it. I don't waste time reinventing wheels.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MSM has already done that.
Nope. You just lied.
Then you admit the leftists MSM had already done it. Good that is a
start.
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-27 21:19:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
So you can't.
No need - Fox has already done it. I don't waste time reinventing wheels.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MSM has already done that.
Nope. You just lied.
Then you admit the leftists MSM had already done it.
I made no admission of any kind. You lied. You said the mainstream
news media have cited some of their own stories that were fundamentally
false. That's simply a lie. You can't cite a single instance of a
mainstream news medium stating that an earlier story it ran was wrong.
That's because it has never happened.
MattB
2018-01-27 21:39:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
So you can't.
No need - Fox has already done it. I don't waste time reinventing wheels.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MSM has already done that.
Nope. You just lied.
Then you admit the leftists MSM had already done it.
I made no admission of any kind. You lied. You said the mainstream
news media have cited some of their own stories that were fundamentally
false. That's simply a lie. You can't cite a single instance of a
mainstream news medium stating that an earlier story it ran was wrong.
That's because it has never happened.
There are more but

https://hotair.com/archives/2017/06/26/cnn-source-people-will-disciplined-retracted-russia-reporting/
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-28 00:46:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
So you can't.
No need - Fox has already done it. I don't waste time reinventing wheels.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MSM has already done that.
Nope. You just lied.
Then you admit the leftists MSM had already done it.
I made no admission of any kind. You lied. You said the mainstream
news media have cited some of their own stories that were fundamentally
false. That's simply a lie. You can't cite a single instance of a
mainstream news medium stating that an earlier story it ran was wrong.
That's because it has never happened.
There are more but
https://hotair.com/archives
There aren't any - that wasn't one.
MattB
2018-01-28 04:31:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
So you can't.
No need - Fox has already done it. I don't waste time reinventing wheels.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MSM has already done that.
Nope. You just lied.
Then you admit the leftists MSM had already done it.
I made no admission of any kind. You lied. You said the mainstream
news media have cited some of their own stories that were fundamentally
false. That's simply a lie. You can't cite a single instance of a
mainstream news medium stating that an earlier story it ran was wrong.
That's because it has never happened.
There are more but
https://hotair.com/archives
There aren't any - that wasn't one.
Sure. Your credibility just got lower and I didn't think that was
possible.
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-28 22:41:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
So you can't.
No need - Fox has already done it. I don't waste time reinventing wheels.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that. You are full of shit as normal.
No, I'm right, and you admit it: you can't cite a *single* "MSM" story
that was false.
MSM has already done that.
Nope. You just lied.
Then you admit the leftists MSM had already done it.
I made no admission of any kind. You lied. You said the mainstream
news media have cited some of their own stories that were fundamentally
false. That's simply a lie. You can't cite a single instance of a
mainstream news medium stating that an earlier story it ran was wrong.
That's because it has never happened.
There are more but
https://hotair.com/archives
There aren't any - that wasn't one.
Sure.
Yes.
M.I.Wakefield
2018-01-27 21:44:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
There are real journalists at Fox News, and you get the feeling they're as
embarrassed as hell by the shills like Hannity, Carlson, and the Fox and
Friends couch of idiots.
MattB
2018-01-27 21:56:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
There are real journalists at Fox News, and you get the feeling they're as
embarrassed as hell by the shills like Hannity, Carlson, and the Fox and
Friends couch of idiots.
I haven't seen Carlson for some time. Did you see Rachel Maddow on
election night or the days following she looked rabid. You have to
take all the talk shows with a grain of salt. These talk shows are
there for the rating and to promote a agenda, those from the MSM or
Fox.
Uriah's Heep
2018-01-27 23:11:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
There are real journalists at Fox News, and you get the feeling they're
as embarrassed
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


It's bad enough you are hopelessly ADDICTED to US politics, but your
propensity to outright LIE about them is sinful!

Grow a life, at least pretend to act like a patriotic Canucklehead (if
there is such a thing).

You ignore your own simple dull nation, absorb your mind into ours.

Literally you dismiss your own walk-in beer cooler of a country as
insignificant to the point you refuse to even engage in commentary or
analysis of your own politics.

You evince the classic Canuck "widdle brudda" mentality, always chasing
after the USA in a desperate attempt to coattail on OUR national affairs.

You demonstrate how bereft Canucks are of any national pride and how
desperately you need to use the USA as a whipping post to excuse
yourselves from your own national blunders and dearth of presence on the
global stage.

It must SUCK to be a Canuck, for sure!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Uriah's Heep
2018-01-28 18:24:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Fox has already done it.
There are real journalists at Fox News, and you get the feeling they're
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


It's bad enough you are hopelessly ADDICTED to US politics, but your
propensity to outright LIE about them is sinful!

Grow a life, at least pretend to act like a patriotic Canucklehead (if
there is such a thing).

You ignore your own simple dull nation, absorb your mind into ours.

Literally you dismiss your own walk-in beer cooler of a country as
insignificant to the point you refuse to even engage in commentary or
analysis of your own politics.

You evince the classic Canuck "widdle brudda" mentality, always chasing
after the USA in a desperate attempt to coattail on OUR national affairs.

You demonstrate how bereft Canucks are of any national pride and how
desperately you need to use the USA as a whipping post to excuse
yourselves from your own national blunders and dearth of presence on the
global stage.

It must SUCK to be a Canuck, for sure!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-31 07:16:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that.
There is nothing "strange" about it - no one expected you to be able to
refute any MSM story.
MattB
2018-01-31 18:18:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that.
There is nothing "strange" about it - no one expected you to be able to
refute any MSM story.
Why should I provide evidence it isn't needed. Maybe I have a
anonymous source.......
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-31 18:43:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that.
There is nothing "strange" about it - no one expected you to be able to
refute any MSM story.
Why should I provide evidence it isn't needed.
It is needed. You're saying the story is false, but you can't do
anything to show it.
MattB
2018-01-31 19:42:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that.
There is nothing "strange" about it - no one expected you to be able to
refute any MSM story.
Why should I provide evidence it isn't needed.
It is needed. You're saying the story is false, but you can't do
anything to show it.
Anonymous sources.... Has to be true.
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-31 19:48:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that.
There is nothing "strange" about it - no one expected you to be able to
refute any MSM story.
Why should I provide evidence it isn't needed.
It is needed. You're saying the story is false, but you can't do
anything to show it.
Anonymous sources.... Has to be true.
The anonymity of the sources has nothing whatever to do with the truth
of the story.
MattB
2018-01-31 22:11:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that.
There is nothing "strange" about it - no one expected you to be able to
refute any MSM story.
Why should I provide evidence it isn't needed.
It is needed. You're saying the story is false, but you can't do
anything to show it.
Anonymous sources.... Has to be true.
The anonymity of the sources has nothing whatever to do with the truth
of the story.
Without knowing who and what they are how do you know?
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-31 22:37:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that.
There is nothing "strange" about it - no one expected you to be able to
refute any MSM story.
Why should I provide evidence it isn't needed.
It is needed. You're saying the story is false, but you can't do
anything to show it.
Anonymous sources.... Has to be true.
The anonymity of the sources has nothing whatever to do with the truth
of the story.
Without knowing who and what they are how do you know?
Their anonymity has no bearing on the truth of what they tell the reporters.
MattB
2018-01-31 23:31:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
Strange that.
There is nothing "strange" about it - no one expected you to be able to
refute any MSM story.
Why should I provide evidence it isn't needed.
It is needed. You're saying the story is false, but you can't do
anything to show it.
Anonymous sources.... Has to be true.
The anonymity of the sources has nothing whatever to do with the truth
of the story.
Without knowing who and what they are how do you know?
Their anonymity has no bearing on the truth of what they tell the reporters.
So with you it just depends on if it is say Fox or CNN?

#BeamMeUpScotty
2018-01-31 20:19:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
The MSM said Hillary was going to win the election....

They said human CO² Global Warming was going to kill us....

They blame fire and flood on Humans and Global Warming

They said we were headed for starvation due to loss of top soil in the
1970's.

They said Bill Clinton wasn't abusing women.....

did they check any of those stories for accuracy?
--
That's Karma

Like a three leg dog, Liberals swim in circles until they drown.






JFK sounds like a Libertarian

MattB
2018-01-31 22:12:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:19:32 -0500, #BeamMeUpScotty
Post by #BeamMeUpScotty
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and most news sources from time to time just don't
automatically believe and yes that includes Fox.
Fox is virtually a fake news site.
Can you prove that?
Have done already.
You keep saying that and yet you don't do it. You are rather insane
and a liar.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
How many times has their breaking story been Bullshit?
Never - not a single time. You can't identity a single story from the
New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, or any other mainstream news
medium that has turned out to be false. At the very worst, they maybe
misspell someone's name, or get a first name wrong (Alfred for Albert)
or some trivial, inconsequential flub like that. The gist of the story
is always accurate - 100% of the time. You know this.
You are crazy right?
No. What I said is correct. You can't cite a single "MSM" story that
was false. Some minor inconsequential details might have been messed
up, but the gist of the stories - 100% of them - is correct. You know this.
The MSM said Hillary was going to win the election....
They said human CO² Global Warming was going to kill us....
They blame fire and flood on Humans and Global Warming
They said we were headed for starvation due to loss of top soil in the
1970's.
They said Bill Clinton wasn't abusing women.....
did they check any of those stories for accuracy?
How dare you talk in such a way not politically correct at all.

The cause of Global warming might be over population of the planet.
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-31 07:14:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and
No, you don't.
MattB
2018-01-31 18:19:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and
No, you don't.
You need to stop posting like you are part of the MSM by editing a
post to fit your agenda. Sad you claim to be a libertarian and yet
act like a progressive nutcase.
Rudy Canoza
2018-01-31 18:43:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by MattB
Post by Rudy Canoza
President Trump on Friday denied a New York Times report that claims he
tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June.
When asked about the story by reporters at the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, Trump said: “Fake news, folks, fake news.”
That's the absolutely irrefutable truth that Trumpchev tried to fire Mr.
Mueller. Trumpchev calls *every* factual story that puts a bad harsh
light on him "fake news."
When Trumpchev calls anything "fake news", you know it is rock-solid
accurate news.
I wonder how many people except the far left even listen to the likes
of CNN or the Post anymore.
Every thinking person looks at them from time to time, especially the
Post. It's a first-rate newspaper.
I look at it and
No, you don't.
You need to stop posting like you are part of the MSM
I never started.
#BeamMeUpScotty
2018-01-27 21:17:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Trump wouldn't have to "try" to fire Mueller, he could just *do* it.
Nope. Rosenstein is the only person who can fire Mueller, at the moment,
and he says he won't without cause.
Trump could fire him at any time and that is a fact.
Trump may be forced to *fire Rosenstein and Mueller* if they are both or
even just Rosenstein is implicated in a conspiracy to undermine the
Presidency and the Secret Service should be the ones conducting this
investigation as they are there to protect the presidency and have been
in existence longer than the FBI.

Mueller and Rosenstein need to be getting a subpoena to answer questions
from the Secret Service and the President needs to be protected from a
slow Coup De`tat being undertaken by Democrats who have conspired in the
FBI the DOJ and the DNC who also colluded with Russia on election tampering.
--
That's Karma

Illegals and their families come for the *free stuff* NOT the freedom.
Loading...