Discussion:
"Judge David Lampe rules for Tastries Bakery"
(too old to reply)
#BeamMeUpScotty
2018-02-07 17:25:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
There is no involutnary servitude, fuckhead. Nobody forces anyone to be a baker and make cakes for gays,
If a marriage license can *NOT* tell you who *you* *must* *engage* *in*
*marriage* *with* depending on their sexual identity (Because it's
unconstitutional) how can a business license tell you *who* *you* *must*
*engage* *in* *commerce* *with* depending on their sexual identity? Is
it or isn't it UNCONSTITUTIONAL for government to use a license to
mandate/limit participation depending on sexual identity...?

It's the government's limitation that is being violated, the point of
the Constitution is the government is limited in what they can do, NOT
me. ;)

As per your own Liberal decisions from the Supreme Court, it is
unconstitutional for government to decide who I can use a license to
interact with (the gay marriage decision), It is also supported by the
fact that they banned JIM CROW laws where government told business
owners who and where to serve the public. Also in the 14th where is
says (equal protection of the law). The Constitution says we are equal
so a "law" that purports to make a business owner submit to a customer
because they are gay (gays being equal not superior) violates the
constitution's clear intent that the business owner and the gays are
equal and either one can decide NOT to engage in commerce as equals.
There is no provision for discrimination other than the government being
banned from engaging in it. And the government does engage in
discrimination against all but gays when they allow others to be
forced/mandated to engage in commerce with gays. The gays can decide NOT
to engage in commerce but all others are stripped of the RIGHT to not
engage in commerce. An obvious unequal outcome of the unconstitutional
and contradictory laws from Liberalism.

There have also been rulings against government mandated "Affirmative
Action" which is another ruling that stops Government from making
choices as to who is to be mandated into involuntary servitude or become
a second class citizen.

When you have a BLACK and a Mexican with "all else equal" COMPETING for
the same Government JOB, which one receives the "Affirmative Action"
points that gives them the job?
--
That's Karma


*Rumination*
" majorities simply by virtue of being majorities do not also gain
the virtues of wisdom and justice." -Henry David Thoreau-
#BeamMeUpScotty
2018-02-07 17:56:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
ss
Of course, if you are denying that you are
a Christian then that changes things entirely....;)
I'm NOT a Christian and I have a RIGHT to refuse service. It's
explained in the 13th amendment. The government nor the you can force
me into involuntary servitude without first being duly convicted of a crime.
Correction: It should read "The government ... SHOULDN'T force me into involuntary servitude"
But they can, and they do. They have all the power and you (and me) are just helpless citizens.
Sort of.... there is always civil disobedience.... Go into the court
room and use "jury nullification" against the GOVERNMENT when possible.
And do other things to protest the government abuse and theft of
inalienable RIGHTS. Maybe we need a jury of 120 average people that are
selected randomly to vote like a jury on what the Supreme court has
decided?

Liberals nominating Judges that ignore the Constitution, and nullify
our rights because they can.... once they are sworn in. So can we the
people do that to them once we are in a position where we can on a jury
or elsewhere.

It may be time for Republicans and the TEA PARTY to step up their game
to the next level, I said a long time ago that the Tea Party and
Republicans needed to stand up and start to pay attention to the
Judiciary, because the Liberals were using it to violate the
constitution and then it all exploded in the Courts with TRUMP and the
courts stopping his Executive Orders and TRUMP appointing Niel
Gorsuch..... And now people are noticing on their own that the FBI/DOJ
and judiciary are all being Corrupted by the Liberals and Obama
Marxists. That is where they choose to undermine America.

Well.... I may have helped point out the Liberals conspiracy along the
way, but I'm just one voice. But people are starting to understand what
I've been saying, even though when I started by saying years ago at the
beginning of the ObamaRegime, Obama WEAPONIZING the Judiciary was the
problem that the TEA PARTY needs to be concerned with. It took time and
a lot more obvious links to Obama WEAPONIZING the FBI and the DOJ and
and the Obama appointed judges.... which is now out there. Connecting
the dots shows that the constitution is under assault by Leftists
through the courts and the path leads back to HARVARD where they produce
those MARXIST lawyers and Judges.

And I know you've heard me rant against the Harvard Judges and Marxist
Obama and how HARVARD needs to be RAZED to the GROUND and the earth
salted so nothing will ever grow there.
--
That's Karma


*Rumination*
Speech writers are all from those same colleges that teach the same
Liberal - Socialist vernacular using the same vocabulary so all speeches
sound like they were written by a Millennial Political Science graduate
with no life experience. Naturally they use the same buzz words as
their idiot Marxist professors.

The only thing it proves is that COLLEGES INDOCTRINATE their student
into Liberalism rather than educate them so they can grow intellectually.

This is what it's come to, it's all made of *Liberal* ticky-tacky and
they all look just the same.


#BeamMeUpScotty
2018-02-07 18:09:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
ss
Of course, if you are denying that you are
a Christian then that changes things entirely....;)
I'm NOT a Christian and I have a RIGHT to refuse service. It's
explained in the 13th amendment. The government nor the you can force
me into involuntary servitude without first being duly convicted of a crime.
Correction: It should read "The government ... SHOULDN'T force me into involuntary servitude"
There is no involutnary servitude, fuckhead. Nobody forces anyone to be a baker and make cakes for gays,
No one forced gays to get married but when they wanted to get a license
the courts said they could NOT be forced to marry a person of the
opposite gender. No one forced a gay to get married to the opposite
gender, they could have simply decided to NOT get married.

You just made the argument for limiting marriage to "man and woman"
being Constitutional.

You see the contradiction don't you?

You can't have it both ways.

If the baker has the choice to "NOT be a baker" then the gays also had
the choice to "NOT be married" since they both need a license... which
court decision is the wrong one, because they can't both be correct.

Your logic is flawed.
--
That's Karma


*Rumination*
40 - Deciding how much Socialism is too much, is like deciding how much
dog shit in your ice cream is too much.
Loading...