Discussion:
Muslims And Their 72 Virgins
(too old to reply)
i***@gmail.com
2013-05-23 04:43:25 UTC
Permalink
I have reason to believe that the 72 virgins that are promised to Muslims who kill infidel are going to be male and gay.

I am looking at this matter from the perspective of some in Christianity, according to whom Mohammad was given the Quran not by Allah but by Satan.

Now what do we know about Satan? We know that he is a liar, and a very skilled liar. He would tell you what you want to hear, but would omit some crucial details. The result would be you getting technically what you expect to get, but it would not be what you are actually expecting.

One case known in Western literature was in one of Shakespeare's plays. A man gets a prophecy that he would not be killed by anyone born of a woman. The man thinks that this means that he would not get killed at all; instead what it really means is that he would get killed by someone not naturally born and brought to life through a Caesarean.

With Muslims and their 72 virgins in heaven prophecy, we have reason to expect the exact same thing. They would get their 72 virgins, but they wouldn't be the kinds of virgins that they are expecting. They will get 72 gay male virgins or 72 women who are virgins because of being extremely obese. The Muslim would realize that he has been deceived by Satan; but it would be too late.

While there are more Christians claiming pagans or followers of the Eastern religions to be Satanists than there are Christians claiming Muslims to be Satanists, if their claims of Jesus being the one true way are true then Muslims are serving the Satan as well. Which means, according to the logic of such Christians, that Quran was authored by the Satan. And if it is in fact authored by the Satan, then we should expect it to operate according to the logic of the Satan: The logic of credible-sounding deceptions that claim to give you what you want but in fact give to you something completely different.

The people who kill for God on all directions are serving Satan. Not only does an omnipotent entity not need your help, but this same omnipotent entity has commanded you to be good to one another. If a religious text tells you to kill for God, then that religious text was not authored by God. God could kill anybody himself if he wanted to; and if he does not then that means that he does not want them killed.

From the position of Christianity therefore, Quran was authored by the Satan, and there is every reason to expect it to operate according to the logic of the Satan: The logic of credible-sounding lies. And from the position of reason, the people who kill for God are living in ignorance. God does not need people to kill anyone. He is omnipotent and can do this himself. A real God would not be proud of any such conduct by his followers; and if a religious text says that he would then that religious text cannot be credited to God.
Zerkon
2013-05-23 14:04:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by i***@gmail.com
If a religious text tells you to kill for God, then that religious text
was not authored by God.
"Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not
spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and
sheep, camel and donkey.’”"
Bret Cahill
2013-05-24 04:44:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zerkon
Post by i***@gmail.com
If a religious text tells you to kill for God, then that religious text
was not authored by God.
"Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not
spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and
sheep, camel and donkey.’”"
What did the ox, sheep, camel and donkey do?
Topaz
2013-05-24 01:19:10 UTC
Permalink
The West is the White race.

The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.

And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.

Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.

Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan

"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."



http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
i***@gmail.com
2013-05-24 01:31:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
The West is the White race.
You're an idiot.

What foolishness it is to identify with a race, and not with something meaningful such as science, arts, technology, prosperity, humanity or life as a whole.

We have seen the gender debate represented by the worst in men and the worst in women; but the race debate is represented by absolute scum. These are people who have nothing to be proud of except the color of their skin.

Most black people are better than you. Most Jewish people are better than you. For that matter so are most Hindu, Chinese, Native Americans, Latinos, or Australian aborigines.

A person who really identifies with Western civilization would produce work that benefits the Western civilization. He would not be posting idiotic rants about how white people are the best and how Hitler was right in his atrocities.

It's people like you that give the Western civilization a bad name. And the sooner you go off this Nazi idiocy, the sooner you have the chance to actually benefit the Western civilization.
Topaz
2013-05-24 20:55:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by i***@gmail.com
You're an idiot.
You're a Jew.


No Way Out But Through the Jews
A Review of Paul Gottfried's The Conservative Movement
by Alex Linder

Executive summary: The Jews have taken over the American right, and
they have the money and media access to shut out any contenders.
Meaning: Unless you build a movement that explicitly forbids Jewish
participation and focuses on Jews as the political enemy, you are
destined to be coopted or crushed. Or at least rendered impotent, like
the Old Right, and left broke and fuming on the sidelines. Caveat: The
Internet isn't accounted for in Gottfried's calculus.

...the review

In his 1993 book The Conservative Movement, Jew Paul Gottfried
provides an excellent short history of post-WWII conservatism, and one
that provides a clear, if implicit, message for today's White
nationalist. That message is the title of this review: No way out but
through the Jews. If you plan to pursue the political goal of a
civilized White America, these Jews will be at your throat every step
of the way. So you might as well not kid yourself about that but set
your phaser on "kill" from the start.

Gottfried never comes right out and says it, but the upshot of his
history is that the right has been taken over by Jews. Centered around
the Podhoretz and Kristol families, this Jewish movement pushes an
anti-American ideology. Where George Washington and Thomas Jefferson
advocated no entangling alliances abroad and local rule at home, the
neocons promote a plus-sized managerial state at home, and global
democratic crusades abroad. Since their infiltration in the late
sixties, early seventies, says Gottfried, these Jewish "conservatives"
have garnered the lion's share of money and media access,
marginalizing the traditional right. And although he nowhere mentions
talk radio or the Internet, Gottfried sees virtually no options at the
disposal of those who would usurp the usurpers.

Who are the neoconservatives? Essentially, they are a small group of
East Coast Jewish intellectuals of regular private morality. They are
former reds or red-diaper babies who departed from the New Left when
it started advocating odd sex and communism and other policies they
felt were potentially anti-Semitic. As they emerged from this sixties
morass, they gravitated to the right, where they found allies in the
anti-communist cause; friends with foundation money that could be used
to construct a bulwark against their crazier New Left brethren. Over
the course of the seventies, the Jewish neoconservatives took over one
foundation after another, supplanting the Christian traditionalist
bias of American conservatism with their detailed policy studies and
position papers. These bore proof of their sociological and
statistical cast of mind, different from the Kirkian
religious-literary bias of traditionalists.

By the time of Reagan, they had achieved dominance. Any conservative
hoping to make a career of it, whether in politics or writing or
commentating, had to hew to their specific vision of the America they
wished to conserve if he wished to preserve his own office, air-time
or sheet space. Any vestigial strains of racial feeling or regional
sympathy were anathema to these racist philo-Semitic anti-racists who
are unstinting in their anathematizing of anyone who diverges from
their pluralist, democratic dogmas. Any American, that is. The
dogmatic democratic pluralism disappears when it comes to Israel,
where Semitic chauvinism is, quite rightly they think, the law. What
White racialists want for America is no different from what Jewish
neoconservatives want for Israel. But they will try to shout down
anyone who makes the equation, just ask Joe Sobran. Only Jews have a
right to an ethnostate; democratic pluralism is good enough for the
rest of us. This hypocritical double-standard springs directly from
the gut Jewish feeling that an America made up of many conflicting
groups, riven by cultural standards, divided by ethnicity, history and
behavior, is the America in which the Jew is safest, and can move
about most freely. A strong, sure White nation scares the Jew. So
whether it's America or Europe, he tries to undercut it with
anthropological lies about the unreality of race, falsified histories
("diversity has always been our greatest strength") support for open
immigration, suppression of free speech and the destruction of free
association-all in the name of "civil rights." Neoconservatives are
Jews, no need to look further than that. Jews, whether left or right,
ask only one question: Is it good for the Jews? They hide behind
universalist rhetoric, but their concern is for themselves. And you
can be absolutely sure of this: Their interests are not our
interests..

David Horowitz would be a prime example of an expert deployer of a
plausible, counterfeit theory and history of America to suck in
potential White racialists and get them four-square behind a nutty,
extremist, ahistorical view of politics that can only lead America
into South Africa's pit of horrors. The triumph of individual rights
in Black lands means the triumph of the jungle. It is extremist,
rationalist and counter-historical to elevate a political process over
the character of the people. How can ignorant, 75-IQ blacks produce
civilization protecting the individual rights these neoconservatives
claim to love? Can one-man, one-vote really produce that miracle? Of
course not, and these Jews know it. And they know that the Founders
knew it. So they lie. The truth, as they know and cover up, is that
the Founders understood that only civilized, self-controlled White men
were capable of civilization, and that to expect dissolute, lazy,
TV-drenched slobs mixed with mulattoes and Negroes and Mexicans to
vote in ordered liberty was to expect the impossible. But David
Horowitz, living in Los Angeles, can look out the window and tell you
it's possible. Never underestimate the power of Jewish duplicity in
furthering Jewish self-interest. That's a second corollary to
Gottfried's study.

We asked above whether or not these neoconservative Jews were really
conservative. Perhaps that question isn't important. One point
Gottfried does develop, writing in 1993, is just how little difference
there is in today's political discourse between left and right. As I
write, George W. Bush is battling Al Gore, so the point is hardly
stale. Effectively, the left and right may differ in degree, but
everybody supports a capitalist welfare state and global democracy.
Everybody is "inclusive." Everybody bows before the great God of
Diversity. Are the Jews conservative? In the deeper sense, no. They
are still radicals, intent on spreading their lies about human
fungibility, from which they aone are exempt as the "Chosen" people.
Left or right, they are eager to destroy our White civilization to
further their group interests.

On the second most important political issue of the day-leaving the
borders open to the third world-the Jews speak with one voice: no
patrols. Note this well: Never in American history has a majority of
Whites favored colored immigration. The Jews alone favored it, for
reasons outlined above. Now whose policy is followed today? -- that of
the Jewish minority, which doesn't think like you and I do. You
thought the majority was supposed to prevail in a democracy? Wrong.
Political control in a democracy, as Aristotle observed, is vested in
those who control television. This is part of what certain Americans
are getting at with the 'ZOG' formulation that all the
pseudo-sophisticated college-educated folk laugh at (as TV has taught
them to). The Jews almost to a man push open-borders immigration, and
they denounce anyone who differs as an evil racist/nativist/xenophobe.
All the Jewish lies dovetail intellectually, and all of them advance
Jewish interests. I recommend, I urge, I wish I could force everyone
who hasn't to read Kevin MacDonald's paper on the Jewish influence in
the hundred years of debate preceding the nation-killing 1965
immigration act that opened the floodgates to the third world. The
Jewish hatred of the White world is the story that doesn't make the
news, even as it remakes your neighborhood. I doubt the plush-paunched
Republicans watching TV politics as spectator sport will ever pick up
on it. You will run a long way before you meet an average American
with the slightest historical awareness-nor the interest in developing
one. But the arguments are lying there, exactly as I've presented
them, and perhaps in a crisis people will take a hard look at what
brought us to our current position. For all the disinformation out
there, it's still not too hard to detect the patterns once you have
the facts. . .

So we've seen that Jews claiming themselves "conservatives" but not
all that different from their leftist brethren have come in and
dominated the right. Where does this leave whatever is left of the
non-Jewish right? I would break this set into two subsets: those who
are openly racist (which Gottfried avoids) and those who make veiled
or open Semitically Incorrect arguments while attempting to maintain
their "respectability." The former have no political power, while the
latter are desperate to hang on to their columns and speaking
engagements.

Although there are a handful of Jews pushing standard White-racist
arguments, and who would receive even less notice than they do get if
they weren't Jewish, these same never take into account that Jews can
never simply be another ethnic group assimilated into a purified White
America. The nature and qualities and history of their group shows
just that-they are a group. And since they are a group that recognizes
itself as a group and fights against other groups on that basis-they
must be opposed as a group. This is not so much guilt by association
as guilt by genetics and behavior and history. As a group they have
strategized to destroy the civilized White America they felt
threatened by, and anything we do to them in return is more than
deserved. Treating them as individuals, just like we are, has failed.
The correct path is to treat them as the radical alien outsiders and
eliminate their influence. We need to take their flag off the
courthouse, so to speak.

Getting back to the lesson at the top of the page, Jews have so
strategized their evolution (see Kevin MacDonald's work) as to be
considerably more intelligent than their hosts, with an average IQ of
115, a standard-deviation above the White mean. This intelligence and
their proven historical character combine to ensure Jews will always
be the yeast, the irritants, the makers-uncomfortable, the
revolutionaries. Wherever they exist in White society they will be a
force for disruption. The fact that some can exist as peaceful ethnics
among the White majority does not negate this Big Truth (for if there
can be Big Lies, there can also be Big Truths). Because
class-arguments can be abused, and because injustice will be meted out
to individual non-Whites when we rebuild civilization, the Jews
enforcing their dogma of individualism will always have points to make
that resonate with our myopic right-wing individualists. But just as
surely as these Jews averted their eyes from the general horrors
ensuing in South Africa after their racial-and-political equality
dogmas were enacted, the pro-White right must be louder than ever in
showing that their ethnic Jewish self-interest can only end in the
extinction of the White race. Really. Those are the stakes.
The media neoconservatives can't afford to admit the evidence of the
failure of their dogma in South Africa, rape and murder capital of the
world; rather they redouble their insistence on individualism to evade
the Big Truth that colored demographics and political democracy doom
White minorities everywhere. And taking a global perspective-as we are
all supposed to do, nowadays-the White race is a small minority, and
growing smaller every day. Our White kinsmen are already being
butchered in their homes and driven off their farms in South Africa
and Zimbabwe. Literally tens of millions of Whites have become victims
of violent Black assault in America since the Jew-eased passage of
"Civil Rights" legislation. The Jews well know these facts, and that
is why they avoid reporting them. They hated South Africa when it was
ruled by civilized Whites. They don't give a damn what happens to
Whites once their beloved Negroes are carrying the whip. Foolish,
foolish White man-will you not wake up while there is time?

What we are discussing is a very simple: the Jews are a class fighting
to dominate other classes, just as Benjamin Stein saw in his report on
the TV Weltanschauung, The View from Sunset Boulevard. Jew Stein, like
Jew Michael Levin (Feminism and Freedom), will never name his people
as that class, pointing to "writers and producers," "feminists," and
"neoconservatives." (It is really truly amazing the way that Jews are
able to camouflage their interests, always presenting their specific
goal as a general good, and that their terms are tacitly accepted in
their opponents' rhetoric. It's like we all are under contract to
agree that the Jews aren't a group and don't have any specific
interests and certainly don't work to advance those interests and even
if they do, they aren't in conflict with ours. But notice that on the
flip side, the opposite conditions obtain: Jews always attack their
opponents by class (right-wing Christian extremists, racist haters,
Arabs), lingering lovingly on the specific interests of their
undifferentiated opponents; always forestalling counter-arguments as
"anti-Semitism" driven by the only motive Jews ever allow their
opponents-all together now-"hate." The Jews can only get away with
this clever I-criticize-you-and-you
criticize-that-bag-of-flour-over-there setup because they exert
extraordinary control over television and newspapers. And their backup
line of defense, of course, is to denounce anyone who notices the
strategies behind their tactics as an anti-Semitic conspiracymonger.
This is a second aspect of what the 'ZOG'-minded are pointing to.
Stein is writing about the class of TV writers and producers;

Gottfried is writing about neoconservatives; Levin is writing about
feminists. All of them mean Jews, none of them can afford to say it.
When you become a Jew, it's almost as though you have to sign a sheet
saying you will either avoid mentioning negative Jewish
characteristics or-pace Marx and Freud-reinterpret specific, offensive
Jewish behaviors or patterns as generically human: i.e., repression,
or characteristic of an exploited class. (An excellent book, The
Ordeal of Civility, by John Murray Cuddihy, covers this topic in
depth.) The one thing none of these rightist Jews wants is a civilized
White society where Jews are nonexistent. Or ghettoized. Or looked
down on socially. Or in which you are free to speak and write and talk
about Jews as specific people who act, look and think in generalizable
ways. Jews may be physically ugly duplicitous socialist troublemakers,
but they don't want you saying that. They will propagandize through
the schools and TV until you are practically unable to notice it
because the whole context in which you might make such an observation
has been destroyed. They will make hard to find the few books that
dare discuss it. (Just try finding Cuddihy's book.) History is nothing
but a propaganda tool to them. In living memory they were kept out of
the better hotels and clubs and colleges, and since treatment of the
Jews, to Jews, is the true measure of civilization, any time they were
legally or socially treated as other than the God-sent gift they
present themselves (that is, all history up until about fifty years
ago) must be falsified into Dark Ages (Jews out of power) preceding
today's Enlightened Age (Jews running the show). Let alone the
ghettoes of old Europe, these people are capable of portraying the
fifties in America as some sort of racist hellhole, saved only through
heroic Blacks led by saintly Jews in the name of civil rights or
federal tyranny, if you prefer your descriptions accurate. What is
clear to every Jew seems to be unclear to most White Americans,
especially those on the right who ought to know better:

this is a war of classes, a war for power and dominance between a
small but smart and well-positioned ethnic group and the vast majority
of civilized White people. The Jews instinctively recognize this
battle, feel it in their blood, and are fighting hard for their side.

Most on our side aren't even aware a war is going on.
Gottfried points to two symbolic episodes that show the transfer of
power from the traditional right to the neocons: 1) Rockford's firing
of John Neuhaus, and his subsequent denunciation of traditionalist
racism and anti-Semitism among the Old Right; and, 2) the neocons'
successful defeat of M.E. Bradford, a traditionalist historian, as
head of the National Endowment of Humanity. What was the traditional
right to do? Basically, it retreated, licked its wounds, and looked
about in search of allies and money and media outlets. What has
happened, and this is clearer now than when Gottfried completed the
book, is that the American political system under Clinton has gotten
so corrupt that even average people began to notice. This alone has
strengthened the traditional right's never-too-strong confidence, and
strengthened its new ally, the libertarians, too. And both sides have
benefited hugely from the Internet, which at once strengthens small
groups and somewhat threatens established media institutions. By 2000,
there were enough ganglia of pro-Whites on the Internet to get
mainstream Jewish groups scribbling "hate crimes" model statutes,
anti-gun legislation, and politically correct browser censorware at
top speed.

It might have been expected that the loss of power and funding would
have resulted in the radicalization of the traditional right, at least
to the point of open talk about taking the American right back from
the Jews. There was very little of such talk, none of it open-at least
among those with one eye on "respectability," that ever leftward
moving boundary observed by fools.

What we still see on the right in the year 2000 are leading non-Jewish
right-wing Whites couching what they know to be racial arguments in
regional or race-neutral terms. Sam Francis speaks of Middle American
Revolutionaries. He means Whites, but he's afraid to come out and say
it. Of course, he gets called racist just the same. And he got fired
from the neocon Washington Times just the same. But Jews, to him, are
just people with a different religion, and he can still find a way to
fit minorities into that Middle American revolution.

Then there are the various Southern separatist groups. All are
carefully non-racial. All get accused of being racist. All fail to
draw the correct conclusion. It is amusing in a sick and increasingly
irritating way. Is there nobody left who can think clearly and isn't
afraid to voice his conclusions publicly? No, the Southern Semitically
Correct separatists present as sorry a face as they always do. Always
trying for that elusive respectability, always failing to achieve it,
and always losing the few-and merely symbolic-battles they do engage
in. For people who brag incessantly "on" their heroic Confederate
ancestors, they show little courage and less intelligence.

I'll say it again, a little louder now, so Johnny Reb can hear me:
THERE IS NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS. IT DOES YOU NO GOOD TO BE OR
PRETEND TO BE NON-RACIST. YOU ARE THREATENED AS A GROUP, BY A GROUP,
AND YOU'D BETTER GET THOSE GROUPS STRAIGHT IN YOUR HEAD TO HAVE ANY
HOPE OF PRESERVING THE LAND AND PEOPLE YOU LOVE.
A little more on the Southern-rights groups. The left always froths
over them, as though people too scared and powerless to say what they
mean openly are going to achieve anything. This frothing is more a
measure of media boredom and the fact that the left is so dominant it
has forgotten what real opposition feels like that it goes overboard.
The left so buys its own frothing demagoguery it can't even realize
these people have ceded the essential point before they even start
arguing. Pity the poor Southern separatist. He can't even keep the
flag in the air or the Blacks from pooping on the statue of his
great-grandaddy. Even with all that Confederate heroism running in his
blood, he's still selling his problem as Northerners, not Blacks. As
though America hasn't been homogenized by TV into one big mall or
airport lobby. As though the guy in Arkansas is worried about the
White man just over the Missouri line, more than the Black next door.
How pitiful and obvious he is, our man of gray, thinking the media
will buy that he's really not racist. He can't see that it doesn't
matter in the slightest if he isn't, and if he is, he's contemptible
for not arguing openly. Ditch the gray and go for black and white,
Southern Man.

How many times does the right have to learn that the media really is
controlled by Jews, by intimidation where not by ownership; that Jews
really are leftist; and that anyone preaching anything remotely
resembling White pride gets treated like a human showing emotion in
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (that is, squawked at and pointed out
to the cops by the aliens who are taking over the planet) - so that he
might as well oppose the Jew's anti-White hatred openly. You can't win
where the other guy defines the terms, sets the labels, interprets the
law. You must oppose him openly, directly, explicitly and give him no
quarter. Why are you always on the defensive? Could it be the same
reason you always lose? Here we come to a deep-lying problem with
conservatism. First of all, nobody's ever satisfactorily defined it. A
branch of that problem is that there is no philosophical basis for
incorporating political attack. A new conservatism must be envisioned
that incorporates not merely the preservation of custom and tradition,
but one that can accommodate formless spiritual or psychic drives that
are even more important than patterned behaviors: questing,
exploration, simple competitiveness. Even blood-lust. What could be
more conservative than blood-lust? But where do you find it among the
Republicans; over at the Jew-intimidated National Review? Among the
foundation-based low-tax remonstrators?

The funny thing is that once you say, Yes, I am a racist. Just like
George Washington. And you are a White-hating Jew-the poison is drawn.
They have set the terms of this political game we all play, and only
by refusing to play do we stand a chance of winning. It is utmost
foolishness, as anybody who has published conservative articles
anywhere in the world will tell you, to try to escape the racist tag.
You can't, and in any case it ain't a meaningful word, people-it's
just a way to smear and discredit you. Fight the smearers and
discrediters directly, refuse to play on their terms. Love and
fairness no more conquer hate than they conquer bullets. Prefixing
your conservative arguments with "I'm not a racist, but..." and
expecting to achieve your political goals is like one of those African
rebel guerillas smearing himself with magical pig grease thinking it
will stop bullets.

Apart from your opinion of the Nazis, consider their tactics. Did they
win-democratically-by adopting the tactics of the respectable American
right, or did they gain converts by their physical courage and their
willingness to confront the Jew-led communists? How much worse can the
Old Right do than it is doing right now? Not much. The mainstream
right-as I write, G.W. Bush and the Republican convention are in full
swing, every other speaker addressing the hall is a colored-has
decided to ape the liberals. In the words of the song, Freedom's just
another word for nothing left to lose. Well, what on earth do the Sam
Francises and Thomas Flemings and the Pat Buchanans have left to lose?
A column in an obscure magazine? A speech to a few dozen like-mindeds?
Is it possible they will turn to effective tactics out of sheer
boredom? Sam Francis (you'll serve as representative here), how could
you possibly do worse than you are doing now by openly criticizing
Jews instead of making pusillanimous attacks on East Coast elitists
and New World Order bureaucrats? How could you possibly fare any worse
by defending the Black-and-White truths of the Founders in
black-and-white terms?

Then you've got the libertarians, trying to get government off our
backs without any recourse to racial explanations or group interests
in explaining human behavior. Trying to understand the world one
person at a time. Some of these libertarians are products of Silicon
Valley, and to the extent they philosophize, they are Randian
individualists. They believe in free trade and free movement of
peoples, and make no distinctions between them. Libertarians seem to
instinctively turn away from any historical recognition of the
circumstances under which the freedoms they demand were actually
realized. Even their few (and in many ways impressive) intellectuals
who are interested in history tend to fall in line with the
politically safe Jewish lie about the non-racial aspect of our
founding, building their future utopias in that tired old,
misunderstood, misrepresented "all men are created equal."
Politically, libertarians are laughable, beyond their useful ability
to supply policy papers. Imagine a whole bunch of computer geeks and
economics professors marching on Washington under the fear-inspiring
banner of "Me!" Now there's an Army even our heroic neo-Confederates
could take! Libertarians maybe never will realize that, again I yell,
BLOOD AND RACE ARE WHAT MOVE PEOPLE, NOT THE RIGHT TO SMOKE DOOBIES
AND BUGGER YOUR BOYFRIEND. NOT EVEN ECONOMICS. Am I really the only
idiot to notice that when Whites ruled America, White people were
free? And that when Jews and Blacks rule America, they're slaves? But
most "right-wing" libertarians would rather support a minimum wage
hike than acknowledge this simple historical fact. They are too
rationalist in temperament, too much like our liberal dictators. Too
in love with their idea of
people-as-individuals-in-the-low-tax-multicultural-utopia-of-tomorrow
to pay attention to street-level political and historical reality.
Many of us want individual liberty, but it only obtains under certain
circumstances. There sure doesn't seem to be much of it around in
these days of "civil rights" for everybody except the people who
created the idea of 'em in the first place. If there's anything that
gives the lie to what passes for "conservatism" these days, it's right
here: Genuine civil rights-association, property, speech,
self-defense-were much better protected in the days before the prating
Jews and their colored parasite minions rose to the fore. Yet
recognition of the race-based nature of practical, effective, genuine
freedom will get you kicked out of the Libertarian party faster than
you can say Don't Do Drugs!

Libertarians take one aspect of looking at the world and inflate it
into the entire cosmos. This is their built-in bias. When you combine
it with their standard right-wing fear of crossing the Semitical
Correctness line, you have a second hurdle between them and racialism.
The conservative Christians share these political flaws. Their concern
is not for the race or the group, but for the salvation of the
individual soul. Of course, since in years past the Good Book has been
used to support virtually every position under the sun including
communism, there is a bit more hope for their conversion on the racial
issue, should the powers that be change. TV Christians have proven
able adopters of the Semitically Correct line. Israel is good and
racialism is bad. That's the message they're getting from New York,
and that's the message Pat Robertson is putting out to rural North
Carolina. The libertarians have their hated parties, but these are
always anonymous "bureaucrats" or "statists," or "socialists"-never
anyone you can actually get your hands on. Same with the Christian
conservatives. They are the equivalent of the libertarians in that the
former are excellent at certain types of economic reasoning (Why We
Should Privatize Trash Collection) while the Christians retain solid
moral and character-development advice. They are both good on the
small-picture stuff. But neither group can take a realistic look at
the general; they are both concerned about saving Heaven or Liberty
one soul at a time. They both simply refuse to make necessary
generalizations.

Christians, again like Libertarians, invariably throw their
opprobrium on carefully generic targets: Atheists, secular humanists
(gays are the one exception, and even here they say "Hate the sinner,
not the sin," as though that doesn't conflict with their doctrine of
free will). A Jew or a black or a Mexican is a vivid image,
immediately recognizable. The abstractions countered by the Christians
and the libertarians are creatures that nobody would recognize on a
public street. They are fighting abstactly against abstractions,
instead of coherently for something concrete.

Never do the Christians go after the Jews who are killing their
doctrines; never do they speak the name of their real enemy despite
the spittingly obscene provocations to which he has subjected them.
This is why, with tens of millions in numerical advantage, the
Christians aren't even masters of the civilization they created. In
fact, much of the leadership class of the Christians has become so
enthralled with Jewish ideas that now the church will bend any which
way the Jews require, whether it's removing the Commandments from the
classroom the way the Jew judge and Jew-created and -run ACLU tell
them to, or rewriting history to avoid the fact that Jews condemned
their own Savior to die (as in the revised [read: Semitically Correct]
Passion Plays)! They may think they are only turning the other cheek,
but self-abasing worms is what these new Christians truly are. This
used to be a religion whose adherents killed others in glorious
crusade for their Truth, and died at the stake before renouncing their
Faith. Today, the biggest name in Christendom hobnobs with nutty
Buddhists and faxes apologies to Jerusalem. For all its residual focus
on humility and self-discipline (welcome antacids to the Jewish public
school lies about self-esteem, which is really self-absorption and
self-worship; in a word, selfishness), the Christian church in America
is today furthering the racial evils that Jewish ideologues,
especially those misappropriating the name conservative, have
subjected us to. Pat Robertson has no problem with those influxing
Mexican chicken-pluckers heaping his collection plates, and has
publicly advocated miscegenation as the long-term solution to our
racial ills. If he preached miscegenation as a sin, as his hardier
forebears did, he would be burned at the stake. Pardon me, I mean, he
wouldn't be on TV. The fact that any evangelicals are on TV at all is
conditioned on their support for Israel and their multiracialism. This
is what makes their leaders despicable-not the hypocrisy and
White-trashiness the left and right would have us sneer at them for.
Recently Bush's first national campaign ad aired. It shows him at a
school surrounded by little black and brown kids, all well on their
way to becoming the computer programmers and doctors and lawyers and
Republicans of tomorrow. It seems the GOP has made up its mind which
way it's going. It's everyvato's party; down with the homies, too.
Make any show that persuades in order to capture power. The old
Clinton strategy. After all, reality is that waves of wets wash over
the border every night, and at some point they and their kids will
vote. The bulk White population is fading, and the core demographic
supporting conservative principles simply won't be there to swing a
presidential election in another ten years.

Even Jew-genuflecting National Review has noticed this Californication
of America, as has been termed in a different context. But sucking up
to the powers that be, angling for a spot, doing what he's told, is
something the middle-manager mind that makes up the Republican ranks
well understands. Ya got to roll with the punches, ya know?

White man, you have to decide. If you choose not to decide, you still
have made a choice, to make a phrase. You can pull a Christian
Scientist, and pretend that that brown spot on our national chest will
just go away if we think positive thoughts long enough, refuse to
acknowledge it. But it won't. Those coloreds swamping the border,
those grasping welfare niggers, those lying Jewish press manipulators
won't disappear of their own accord. Twenty years from now, George
Bush-Brown will be president, and all the things you fear today-
your kids blood-libeled at school; yourself discriminated against on
the job; your taxes higher than ever; your wife subject to insults,
rape or assault; your big cities gang-dominated; your small cities
dominated by nigger "music" and clothing pollution; your guns
outlawed; your political opinions criminalized; your TV louder and
more intrusive and hateful-will be worse. As Paul Gottfried shows,
but doesn't tell, the same Jews that have made the present possible
are working hard to make this future inevitable. But there is still a
window of opportunity. But only if you recognize that we-you and I
and the others reading this-are part of the White race, share
interests, and must band together. And that, politically, culturally
and socially, to achieve a civilized future, there is
NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS!

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/v1/index5.htm

http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
i***@gmail.com
2013-05-25 09:51:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Post by i***@gmail.com
You're an idiot.
You're a Jew.
That is correct, I am.

The Jews have been the most highly contributing members of the Western Civilization.

The number of Nobel Prizes won by Jews is comparable to that of England and Germany combined, even though the Jewish population is a fraction of the population of either country.

The Jews make your best scientists, your best doctors, your best filmmakers, your best financiers and some of your best businessmen.

The reason is not racial, it is cultural. The Jewish culture stresses hard work and intelligence, whereas people like you stress brutality and dullness. For this reason Jews contribute far more per unit of population than any other group, ethnic or cultural, whereas idiots like you become parasites on the Western civilization, spreading idiocy and influencing your betters to become as vile as yourselves.

I am reminded of Poland. They have maybe 800 Jews, but the whole country is antisemitic. If Jews were a destructive influence, then Poland, with 800 Jews, would be far ahead of America, with 6 million. Instead America with its large Jewish population continues to dominate, and Poland is nowhere near.

Losing the Second World War was the best thing that could have happened to Germany. They got themselves a real democracy and became an economic powerhouse. So now, a German person does not need to go to Nazism to feel proud; his country has done well enough in absence of Nazism. If Germany had remained Nazi, it would have accomplished nothing of what it has accomplished under democracy.

A person who actually values the Western civilization will value Jews as its highest contributors. And he will also adjust his actions so that he is contributing at a high level as well.
Topaz
2013-05-26 09:19:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by i***@gmail.com
That is correct, I am.
The Jews have been the most highly contributing members of the Western Civilization.
The West is the White race.

The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.

And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.

Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.

Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan

"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
i***@gmail.com
2013-05-26 12:42:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
The West is the White race.
I see you chose to repost what I've responded to.

I am going to do likewise and re-post a link to my earlier response to you:

http://my.nowpublic.com/world/addressing-anti-jewish-beliefs
Topaz
2013-05-27 09:38:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by i***@gmail.com
Post by Topaz
The West is the White race.
I see you chose to repost what I've responded to.
I didn't look at the previous posts in this thread. This may be new:


"One of the most astounding instances of Jewish hypocrisy was uttered
by a Jew named Isi Leibler, who is no less than the chairman of the
governing board of the World Jewish Congress. Now Isi Leibler is
well-known as a powerful Jew in Australia, where he was for years the
official head of the Jewish community there. He now lives in Israel.

In an interview with a Jerusalem newspaper, he stated about Israel
"This is a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country
for the Jews." In an essay he wrote for the World Jewish Congress, he
decried intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews as a kind of racial
suicide, and likened assimilation with non-Jews as a slow bleeding to
death of the Jewish people. He emphasized that focus of Israeli policy
should be to sharpen and intensify Jewish identity and that even
giving up territory was acceptable if it meant getting rid of non-Jews
and making Israel a more nearly all-Jewish state. Leibler argues that
post-Zionists threaten Israel when they publish textbooks that
de-emphasize Jewish racial interests and replace them with
"universalist" history. In the interview mentioned, Leibler went so
far as to say: "Multiculturalism has no place in Israel. Israel was
created as a Jewish state for the Jews." That's the Jew Isi Leibler
talking about his own people's country, talking about Israel.

[Leibler, Isi: Is the Dream Ending? Post-Zionism and its Discontents -
A Threat to the Jewish Future, Institute of the World Jewish Congress,
Israel]

But what was Isi Leibler saying when he lived in Australia, a White
country, a non-Jewish country? What was Isi Leibler saying when he was
the head of Australia's powerful Jewish minority? Isi Leibler's advice
to Israel is to protect its racial and cultural heritage.

Isi Leibler's advice to Jews is to avoid intermarriage. Isi Leibler
thinks it's just fine -- even necessary -- to separate non-Jews from
Jews in Israel, to get non-Jews on the other side of a well-defended
border, to throw them out of Israel. But to Australians Isi Leibler
played quite a different tune. When Australian politician Pauline
Hanson was galvanizing White Australians in 1993 with her questioning
of the wisdom of non-White immigration to that country, Leibler warned
that "extremists" were threatening precious multiculturalism. He said:
"There is a need to sit together and establish a way in which
Australians can recapture that spirit of multiculturalism which I
think we are all proud being part and parcel of, and which is really
under threat?" [Australian Herald-Sun,
September 27, 2000]

How much clearer does it have to be before you see it? Leibler and his
fellow powerful Jews want racial nationalism for their own people,
because racial nationalism makes them strong and ensures their
survival. They want racial nationalism because they want their kind to
survive and racial nationalism is the key to survival. They're not
stupid. They want what is best for Jews.

But Leibler and his fellow powerful Jews don't want racial nationalism
for White people. In Australia and Europe and South Africa and the
United States - wherever White people live -- Leibler and his kind in
Jewish organizations and in the Jewish-controlled media do everything
in their power to destroy racial nationalism for White people,
everything in their power to keep us from having it, everything in
their power to make it disreputable and impossible and illegal. Just
the other day, Leibler said that one of the most important things in
the world to him was Israel's "right to exist as a sovereign Jewish
state." [Israel Insider, November 24, 2002]

But Leibler and his co-racialists in the Jewish ADL and other groups
devote their lives and their billions to preventing White people from
claiming their right to sovereign White states. Keeping Britain
British, or keeping America American, or keeping France French, is
anathema to them, it is the ultimate in evil and they never let us
forget that."




http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-05-27 11:33:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Post by i***@gmail.com
   The West is the White race.
I see you chose to repost what I've responded to.
"One of the most astounding instances of Jewish hypocrisy was uttered
by a Jew named Isi Leibler, who is no less than the chairman of the
governing board of the World Jewish Congress. Now Isi Leibler is
well-known as a powerful Jew in Australia, where he was for years the
official head of the Jewish community there. He now lives in Israel.
 In an interview with a Jerusalem newspaper, he stated about Israel
"This is a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country
for the Jews." In an essay he wrote for the World Jewish Congress, he
decried intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews as a kind of racial
suicide, and likened assimilation with non-Jews as a slow bleeding to
death of the Jewish people. He emphasized that focus of Israeli policy
should be to sharpen and intensify Jewish identity and that even
giving up territory was acceptable if it meant getting rid of non-Jews
and making Israel a more nearly all-Jewish state. Leibler argues that
post-Zionists threaten Israel when they publish textbooks that
de-emphasize Jewish racial interests and replace them with
"universalist" history. In the interview mentioned, Leibler went so
far as to say: "Multiculturalism has no place in Israel. Israel was
created as a Jewish state for the Jews." That's the Jew Isi Leibler
talking about his own people's country, talking about Israel.
[Leibler, Isi: Is the Dream Ending? Post-Zionism and its Discontents -
A Threat to the Jewish Future, Institute of the World Jewish Congress,
Israel]
But what was Isi Leibler saying when he lived in Australia, a White
country, a non-Jewish country? What was Isi Leibler saying when he was
the head of Australia's powerful Jewish minority? Isi Leibler's advice
to Israel is to protect its racial and cultural heritage.
Isi Leibler's advice to Jews is to avoid intermarriage. Isi Leibler
thinks it's just fine -- even necessary -- to separate non-Jews from
Jews in Israel, to get non-Jews on the other side of a well-defended
border, to throw them out of Israel. But to Australians Isi Leibler
played quite a different tune. When Australian politician Pauline
Hanson was galvanizing White Australians in 1993 with her questioning
of the wisdom of non-White immigration to that country, Leibler warned
"There is a need to sit together and establish a way in which
Australians can recapture that spirit of multiculturalism which I
think we are all proud being part and parcel of, and which is really
under threat?" [Australian Herald-Sun,
September 27, 2000]
How much clearer does it have to be before you see it? Leibler and his
fellow powerful Jews want racial nationalism for their own people,
because racial nationalism makes them strong and ensures their
survival. They want racial nationalism because they want their kind to
survive and racial nationalism is the key to survival. They're not
stupid. They want what is best for Jews.
But Leibler and his fellow powerful Jews don't want racial nationalism
for White people. In Australia and Europe and South Africa and the
United States - wherever White people live -- Leibler and his kind in
Jewish organizations and in the Jewish-controlled media do everything
in their power to destroy racial nationalism for White people,
everything in their power to keep us from having it, everything in
their power to make it disreputable and impossible and illegal. Just
the other day, Leibler said that one of the most important things in
the world to him was Israel's "right to exist as a sovereign Jewish
state." [Israel Insider, November 24, 2002]
 But Leibler and his co-racialists in the Jewish ADL and other groups
devote their lives and their billions to preventing White people from
claiming their right to sovereign White states. Keeping Britain
British, or keeping America American, or keeping France French, is
anathema to them, it is the ultimate in evil and they never let us
forget that."
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
So what's new, which capitalist does not want monopoly for himself and
cutthroat competition for all others?
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Topaz
2013-05-29 01:36:07 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 May 2013 04:33:19 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So what's new, which capitalist does not want monopoly for himself and
cutthroat competition for all others?
White people should not want Jews to control their media or to rule
over them:

"Imagine if Iraqi-American supporters of Saddam Hussein had control of
the American media. Suppose they controlled the national television
networks and were a majority of the owners, producers, and writers of
television entertainment and news. TV is an irresistible power that
reaches into every American home - the primary source by which most
Americans learn about the world. Consider the dangers of that enormous
power dominated by a tightly knit, Iraqi, Muslim minority that
supported the Hussein regime.
If the non-television media were still free, they undoubtedly would
treat Iraqi media domination as a great danger to America. Every
non-Iraqi source of media would proclaim that such control threatens
our freedoms. Congress would likely draft legislation to break up the
Iraqi stranglehold on television. Patriots would remind Americans that
if we were not free to obtain unbiased news, documentaries, and
programming, democracy could not work. The power of TV controlled by
one point of view would erode the foundation of all our freedoms: the
freedom of speech. Pundits would be outraged that non-Americans,
people with allegiance to a foreign power, had control over the
American mind.
Taking the analogy further, imagine if the rest of the media were also
in Iraqi hands. Suppose that the three major news magazines, Time,
Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report were run by Iraqis, that the
three most influential American newspapers, The New York Times, The
Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post - as well as a majority
of the remaining major newspapers and magazines - were controlled by
Iraqis. Imagine that Muslim Iraqis dominated the Hollywood movie
industry as well as book publishing and even book distribution.
Picture the Iraqis as also holding immense wealth in business and
banking, as thoroughly entrenched in entertainment and Hollywood,
academia, the judiciary, and the government. On top of all this,
suppose that supporters of Saddam Hussein had the most powerful lobby
in Washington and were responsible for the bulk of the fundraising of
both the Democratic and Republican parties. Suppose a dedicated Iraqi
was head of the National Security Council at the White House. Would
such a situation be dangerous for America?
If Americans awoke one morning and found Arabic names scrawled all
over their TV and movie credits, on their magazine and newspaper
mastheads and in the pages of their books, millions would say, "We've
been taken over!" Viewers would suspect the motives of everything they
see on television and read in newspapers, magazines, and books. They
would be especially wary of information about issues related to
Iraqis, Saddam Hussein, Islam, and the Middle East conflict. In very
short order, many Americans would cry out in the fashion of Howard
Beale: "I am mad as hell, and I am not going to take it anymore!""
David Duke


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-05-29 13:54:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Mon, 27 May 2013 04:33:19 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So what's new, which capitalist does not want monopoly for himself and
cutthroat competition for all others?
White people should not want Jews to control their media or to rule
As Jews if European are also white, I am rather confused. How do you
know which white is a Jew and which white is not? Was Churchill - the
greatest anti-Nazi - a Jew?
Post by Topaz
"Imagine if Iraqi-American supporters of Saddam Hussein had control of
the American media. Suppose they controlled the national television
networks and were a majority of the owners, producers, and writers of
television entertainment and news. TV is an irresistible power that
reaches into every American home - the primary source by which most
Americans learn about the world. Consider the dangers of that enormous
power dominated by a tightly knit, Iraqi, Muslim minority that
supported the Hussein regime.
The plain fact is that people are not rioting because of whatever the
allegedly Jewish media is doing. Which means they must be doing
something right so far as the dumb masses are concerned.
Post by Topaz
If the non-television media were still free, they undoubtedly would
treat Iraqi media domination as a great danger to America. Every
non-Iraqi source of media would proclaim that such control threatens
our freedoms. Congress would likely draft legislation to break up the
Iraqi stranglehold on television. Patriots would remind Americans that
if we were not free to obtain unbiased news, documentaries, and
programming, democracy could not work. The power of TV controlled by
one point of view would erode the foundation of all our freedoms: the
freedom of speech. Pundits would be outraged that non-Americans,
people with allegiance to a foreign power, had control over the
American mind.
Okay. But as they do live with the allegedly Jewish media, they
evidently want them. No doubt, there are deep influences at work
here, that cannot be easily understood. Why the USans love Jews and
not Muslims, may have to do with culture and history and skin colour
and naming and tradition...
Post by Topaz
Taking the analogy further, imagine if the rest of the media were also
in Iraqi hands. Suppose that the three major news magazines, Time,
Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report were run by Iraqis, that the
three most influential American newspapers, The New York Times, The
Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post - as well as a majority
of the remaining major newspapers and magazines - were controlled by
Iraqis. Imagine that Muslim Iraqis dominated the Hollywood movie
industry as well as book publishing and even book distribution.
Picture the Iraqis as also holding immense wealth in business and
banking, as thoroughly entrenched in entertainment and Hollywood,
academia, the judiciary, and the government. On top of all this,
suppose that supporters of Saddam Hussein had the most powerful lobby
in Washington and were responsible for the bulk of the fundraising of
both the Democratic and Republican parties. Suppose a dedicated Iraqi
was head of the National Security Council at the White House. Would
such a situation be dangerous for America?
I don't see how, if the dumb masses loved them as much as they
evidently love the Jews. The Muslim Iraqis would then have an
interest to keep their trusting charges properly coddled in about the
same way the Jews allegedly do.
Post by Topaz
If Americans awoke one morning and found Arabic names scrawled all
over their TV and movie credits, on their magazine and newspaper
mastheads and in the pages of their books, millions would say, "We've
been taken over!"
Yes, which is why the Iraqi Muslims have no chance. But the Jews have
been with the English-speakers for many centuries now, and over such
long time they have acquired domination which is evidently allowed by
the admiring wannabe-Jews. They (the wannabes) take Jewish names,
follow their God, internalised parts of their holy books, allowed them
to have the highest positions of trust, accept they are The Chosen
People, etc.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee


Viewers would suspect the motives of everything they
Post by Topaz
see on television and read in newspapers, magazines, and books. They
would be especially wary of information about issues related to
Iraqis, Saddam Hussein, Islam, and the Middle East conflict. In very
short order, many Americans would cry out in the fashion of Howard
Beale: "I am mad as hell, and I am not going to take it anymore!""
David Duke
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-05-29 21:26:49 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 May 2013 06:54:36 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
As Jews if European are also white, I am rather confused. How do you
know which white is a Jew and which white is not? Was Churchill - the
greatest anti-Nazi - a Jew?
I don't think so, he was a race traitor.


Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion. If a Jew
becomes a Christian or an atheist he still says he is a Jew. Most of
the Jews in the Jew country are atheist. They say that a Jew is anyone
that has a Jewish mother. Therefore it is a hereditary thing.

We are for having a nation of White people. Jews would be White enough
to join us if it weren't for other important factors. One factor is
that they don't want our race to live. They want to be the only
Caucasians to survive on the earth.

The Jews have their own Jew country, but they demand multi-culture and
pluralism for us. Their leaders agree with something Hitler wrote:

"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself to
the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must one
day become ruler of the Earth."


Jews are enemies of White civilization. Here are some quotes
from a very pro-Jewish book that was first published in 1925. The book
is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.

"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated
in the heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were
neither Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing
Jews at all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl
Marx, though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."


"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two
men who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."


"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite
evident reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage
in the pursuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed
a great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of
opportunity left open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning
they developed a certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The
world was cruel to them, so when the chance was theirs, they were
cruel in return..."

Who Is a Jew? DNA Can Hold the Key
The Telegraph (Britain)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7346496/View-from-the-Lab-Who-is-a-Jew-DNA-can-hold-the-key.html

.. .. Even 20 years later the thought of a genetic test for Jewish
descent would have been treated with horror. Now, one has emerged and
is not despised but hailed by many Jews themselves. A scan of half a
million variable sites across the genomes of several hundred Europeans
and Americans, each aware from their family history of having had a
recent Jewish or a non-Jewish ancestry, gave an absolute separation
between Jews and others: even a single Jewish grandparent was enough
to provide an unambiguous identity, written in DNA.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The plain fact is that people are not rioting because of whatever the
allegedly Jewish media is doing. Which means they must be doing
something right so far as the dumb masses are concerned.
No

By Jim Taylor

I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings. No other nation on this
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones. And to make
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me. Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this? Most
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.

The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Okay. But as they do live with the allegedly Jewish media, they
evidently want them. No doubt, there are deep influences at work
here, that cannot be easily understood. Why the USans love Jews and
not Muslims, may have to do with culture and history and skin colour
and naming and tradition...
Jews control the media and rule America.

This is what President Nixon said:

http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html

"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
I don't see how, if the dumb masses loved them as much as they
evidently love the Jews. The Muslim Iraqis would then have an
interest to keep their trusting charges properly coddled in about the
same way the Jews allegedly do.
Yes, which is why the Iraqi Muslims have no chance. But the Jews have
been with the English-speakers for many centuries now, and over such
long time they have acquired domination which is evidently allowed by
the admiring wannabe-Jews. They (the wannabes) take Jewish names,
follow their God, internalised parts of their holy books, allowed them
to have the highest positions of trust, accept they are The Chosen
People, etc.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-05-30 00:52:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Wed, 29 May 2013 06:54:36 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
As Jews if European are also white, I am rather confused. How do you
know which white is a Jew and which white is not?  Was Churchill - the
greatest anti-Nazi - a Jew?
I don't think so, he was a race traitor.
Why does his white race honour him so much today? Are they really-
really stupid, then? The warmonger Churchill lead them into a war
which cost them their empire and lots of lives, let alone the millions
of Bengalis starved to death that nobody cares about. Yet the man got
the Nobel Prize and that too for literature!!! and was elected the PM!
Post by Topaz
Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion. If a Jew
becomes a Christian or an atheist he still says he is a Jew. Most of
the Jews in the Jew country are atheist. They say that a Jew is anyone
that has a Jewish mother. Therefore it is a hereditary thing.
Yes, as an endogamous matrilineal group they form a caste.
Post by Topaz
We are for having a nation of White people. Jews would be White enough
to join us if it weren't for other important factors. One  factor is
that they don't want our race to live. They want to be the only
Caucasians to survive on the earth.
Where have they made this clear? I see the Jews as the leaders of the
white race, or at least the English-speaking white race. Making
advances in medicine they have increased white life expectancy. By
cleverly manipulating the global economy, corrupting the foreign
elites, porn-feeding the dumb masses into inertia, they have put
whites into supreme positions. Idiots like Kath and Kim of Australian
TV fame really live lives better than monarchs of the past! By ruling
the media they have put whites in the most advantageous positions;
whites are the standard and reference for non-whites. Of course they
will take a cut - a rather large cut - for providing such overwhelming
superiority over other races, and that too these days without
bothering to go out with a sola topee to conquer. With sheer cunning
instead, honed on golf courses, clubs, etc.
Post by Topaz
The Jews have their own Jew country, but they demand multi-culture and
pluralism for us.
Not all demands need be met. If whites value their whiteness they too
should have their own caste systems, like, non-Jew whites have to
marry only non-Jew whites.
Post by Topaz
"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself to
the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must one
day become ruler of the Earth."
Well, that is something all may agree about, then; though I hold
that the superior individual depends upon society, not the state, for
his superiority. For the good society fosters, while the state can
only promote conformity hence mediocrity at best. A good state
promotes good society - when the state is run by criminals the
societies all degrade.
Post by Topaz
     Jews are enemies of White civilization.  Here are some quotes
from a very pro-Jewish book that was first published in 1925. The book
is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
      "But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated
in the heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were
neither Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing
Jews at all.
      "For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
     "Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl
Marx, though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
      "Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two
men who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
Okay. Another point of view is that all these Jews were fighting for
the enslaved non-white who was not even regarded as human by the
whites. So these Jews have been very popular among the non-whites.
Thus the success of Marxism, etc. in non-white countries. Whites have
been denying non-whites of their humanity for centuries, as an
essential means to rob and demean them in every way. So the liberal
movement to the racist whites is naturally a plot, but to the non-
whites it is their best hope.
Post by Topaz
      "The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite
evident reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage
in the pursuit...
      "So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed
a great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of
opportunity left open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning
they developed a certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The
world was cruel to them, so when the chance was theirs, they were
cruel in return..."
Money-lending is not the only thing; keeping wealth secure is also a
very good idea. Without banks, we would be robbing and killing each
other as our assets would not be safe. To not borrow, is always an
option for the careful. Money-lenders cannot force loans. If there
were no banks to lend money, where would one go if one needed money?
Taking loans makes one busy, in order to repay the loan. This busy
attitude, needed to repay loans, is beneficial to society. Otherwise,
a static society is formed. Leading to debauchery, laziness,
gluttony, snobby so-called culture, overall weakness etc.
Post by Topaz
Who Is a Jew? DNA Can Hold the Key
The Telegraph (Britain)http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7346496/View-from-the-Lab-Who-is-a...
.. .. Even 20 years later the thought of a genetic test for Jewish
descent would have been treated with horror. Now, one has emerged and
is not despised but hailed by many Jews themselves. A scan of half a
million variable sites across the genomes of several hundred Europeans
and Americans, each aware from their family history of having had a
recent Jewish or a non-Jewish ancestry, gave an absolute separation
between Jews and others: even a single Jewish grandparent was enough
to provide an unambiguous identity, written in DNA.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The plain fact is that people are not rioting because of whatever the
allegedly Jewish media is doing.  Which means they must be doing
something right so far as the dumb masses are concerned.
No
By Jim Taylor
      I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings. No other nation on this
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones. And to make
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me. Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this? Most
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.
But Israel is like an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the hostile
territory, so it is not dumb to maintain it. Evidently Jews'r'us for
most USans, so despite being very stingy people they do not mind
paying up. And there is some deep belief at work here, like I have
heard that Christians believe that the creation of Israel meaning Jews
going back their to the Holy Land is a necessary condition for the
Rapture. that is, the Lord Jesus Christ coming down from Heaven to
Earth, with the graves opening up and the dead rising to eternal life,
and pagan chaps like myself perishing in hellfire for eternity.
Post by Topaz
   The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.
The average white Christian American evidently does not care for the
not-white arab, but he does care for his sure chance for eternal life
which will happen when the Jews remain in Israel.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Okay.  But as they do live with the allegedly Jewish media, they
evidently want them.  No doubt, there are deep influences at work
here, that cannot be easily understood.  Why the USans love Jews and
not Muslims, may have to do with culture and history and skin colour
and naming and tradition...
Jews control the media and rule America.
Yes, that is what my Indian friends in US say. However, there is a
reluctance on their part to own up to this great responsibility.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my  policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
I don't see how, if the dumb masses loved them as much as they
evidently love the Jews.  The Muslim Iraqis would then have an
interest to keep their trusting charges properly coddled in about the
same way the Jews allegedly do.
Yes, which is why the Iraqi Muslims have no chance.  But the Jews have
been with the English-speakers for many centuries now, and over such
long time they have acquired domination which is evidently allowed by
the admiring wannabe-Jews.  They (the wannabes) take Jewish names,
follow their God, internalised parts of their holy books, allowed them
to have the highest positions of trust, accept they are The Chosen
People, etc.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2013-05-30 01:13:35 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
On Wed, 29 May 2013 06:54:36 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
As Jews if European are also white, I am rather confused. How do you
know which white is a Jew and which white is not? =A0Was Churchill - the
greatest anti-Nazi - a Jew?
I don't think so, he was a race traitor.
Why does his white race honour him so much today? Are they really-
really stupid, then? The warmonger Churchill lead them into a war
which cost them their empire and lots of lives, let alone the millions
of Bengalis starved to death that nobody cares about. Yet the man got
the Nobel Prize and that too for literature!!! and was elected the PM!
Post by Topaz
Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion. If a Jew
becomes a Christian or an atheist he still says he is a Jew. Most of
the Jews in the Jew country are atheist. They say that a Jew is anyone
that has a Jewish mother. Therefore it is a hereditary thing.
Yes, as an endogamous matrilineal group they form a caste.
Post by Topaz
We are for having a nation of White people. Jews would be White enough
to join us if it weren't for other important factors. One =A0factor is
that they don't want our race to live. They want to be the only
Caucasians to survive on the earth.
Where have they made this clear? I see the Jews as the leaders of the
white race, or at least the English-speaking white race. Making
advances in medicine they have increased white life expectancy. By
cleverly manipulating the global economy, corrupting the foreign
elites, porn-feeding the dumb masses into inertia, they have put
whites into supreme positions. Idiots like Kath and Kim of Australian
TV fame really live lives better than monarchs of the past! By ruling
the media they have put whites in the most advantageous positions;
whites are the standard and reference for non-whites. Of course they
will take a cut - a rather large cut - for providing such overwhelming
superiority over other races, and that too these days without
bothering to go out with a sola topee to conquer. With sheer cunning
instead, honed on golf courses, clubs, etc.
Post by Topaz
The Jews have their own Jew country, but they demand multi-culture and
pluralism for us.
Not all demands need be met. If whites value their whiteness they too
should have their own caste systems, like, non-Jew whites have to
marry only non-Jew whites.
Post by Topaz
"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself to
the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must one
day become ruler of the Earth."
Well, that is something all may agree about, then; though I hold
that the superior individual depends upon society, not the state, for
his superiority. For the good society fosters, while the state can
only promote conformity hence mediocrity at best. A good state
promotes good society - when the state is run by criminals the
societies all degrade.
Post by Topaz
=A0 =A0 =A0Jews are enemies of White civilization. =A0Here are some quote=
s
Post by Topaz
from a very pro-Jewish book that was first published in 1925. The book
is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
=A0 =A0 =A0 "But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participat=
ed
Post by Topaz
in the heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were
neither Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing
Jews at all.
=A0 =A0 =A0 "For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, bot=
h
Post by Topaz
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
=A0 =A0 =A0"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl
Marx, though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
=A0 =A0 =A0 "Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, =
two
Post by Topaz
men who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
Okay. Another point of view is that all these Jews were fighting for
the enslaved non-white who was not even regarded as human by the
whites. So these Jews have been very popular among the non-whites.
Thus the success of Marxism, etc. in non-white countries. Whites have
been denying non-whites of their humanity for centuries, as an
essential means to rob and demean them in every way. So the liberal
movement to the racist whites is naturally a plot, but to the non-
whites it is their best hope.
Post by Topaz
=A0 =A0 =A0 "The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite
evident reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage
in the pursuit...
=A0 =A0 =A0 "So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They develop=
ed
Post by Topaz
a great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of
opportunity left open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning
they developed a certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The
world was cruel to them, so when the chance was theirs, they were
cruel in return..."
Money-lending is not the only thing; keeping wealth secure is also a
very good idea. Without banks, we would be robbing and killing each
other as our assets would not be safe. To not borrow, is always an
option for the careful. Money-lenders cannot force loans. If there
were no banks to lend money, where would one go if one needed money?
Taking loans makes one busy, in order to repay the loan. This busy
attitude, needed to repay loans, is beneficial to society. Otherwise,
a static society is formed. Leading to debauchery, laziness,
gluttony, snobby so-called culture, overall weakness etc.
Post by Topaz
Who Is a Jew? DNA Can Hold the Key
The Telegraph (Britain)http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7346496/View-fr=
om-the-Lab-Who-is-a...
Post by Topaz
.. .. Even 20 years later the thought of a genetic test for Jewish
descent would have been treated with horror. Now, one has emerged and
is not despised but hailed by many Jews themselves. A scan of half a
million variable sites across the genomes of several hundred Europeans
and Americans, each aware from their family history of having had a
recent Jewish or a non-Jewish ancestry, gave an absolute separation
between Jews and others: even a single Jewish grandparent was enough
to provide an unambiguous identity, written in DNA.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The plain fact is that people are not rioting because of whatever the
allegedly Jewish media is doing. =A0Which means they must be doing
something right so far as the dumb masses are concerned.
No
By Jim Taylor
=A0 =A0 =A0 I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings. No other nation on this
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones. And to make
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me. Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this? Most
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.
But Israel is like an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the hostile
territory, so it is not dumb to maintain it. Evidently Jews'r'us for
most USans, so despite being very stingy people they do not mind
paying up. And there is some deep belief at work here, like I have
heard that Christians believe that the creation of Israel meaning Jews
going back their to the Holy Land is a necessary condition for the
Rapture. that is, the Lord Jesus Christ coming down from Heaven to
Earth, with the graves opening up and the dead rising to eternal life,
and pagan chaps like myself perishing in hellfire for eternity.
Post by Topaz
=A0 =A0The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.
The average white Christian American evidently does not care for the
not-white arab, but he does care for his sure chance for eternal life
which will happen when the Jews remain in Israel.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Okay. =A0But as they do live with the allegedly Jewish media, they
evidently want them. =A0No doubt, there are deep influences at work
here, that cannot be easily understood. =A0Why the USans love Jews and
not Muslims, may have to do with culture and history and skin colour
and naming and tradition...
Jews control the media and rule America.
Yes, that is what my Indian friends in US say. However, there is a
reluctance on their part to own up to this great responsibility.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my =A0policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
I don't see how, if the dumb masses loved them as much as they
evidently love the Jews. =A0The Muslim Iraqis would then have an
interest to keep their trusting charges properly coddled in about the
same way the Jews allegedly do.
Yes, which is why the Iraqi Muslims have no chance. =A0But the Jews have
been with the English-speakers for many centuries now, and over such
long time they have acquired domination which is evidently allowed by
the admiring wannabe-Jews. =A0They (the wannabes) take Jewish names,
follow their God, internalised parts of their holy books, allowed them
to have the highest positions of trust, accept they are The Chosen
People, etc.
http://www.ihr.org/=A0http://nationalvanguard.org/=A0http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Related:

History of the Jews in India

Wikipedia

The history of the Jews in India reaches back to ancient
times.

Judaism was one of the first foreign religions to arrive
in India in recorded history. Indian Jews are a religious
minority of India, but unlike many parts of the world,
have historically lived in India without any instances of
antisemitism from the local majority populace, the
Hindus. The better-established ancient communities have
assimilated a large number of local traditions through
cultural diffusion. The Jewish population in India is
hard to estimate since each Jewish community is distinct
with different origins; some allegedly arrived during the
time of the Kingdom of Judah,[citation needed] others are
seen by some[who?]as descendants of Israel's Ten Lost
Tribes. In addition to Jewish expatriates and recent
immigrants, there are five native Jewish communities in
India:[citation needed]

The Cochin Jews arrived in India 2,500 years ago and
settled down in Kerala as traders.

The Bene Israel arrived in the state of Maharashtra 2,100
years ago.

The Baghdadi Jews arrived in the city Mumbai from Iraq,
Iran, and Afghanistan, and Arab countries about 250 years
ago.

The Bnei Menashe are Mizo and Kuki tribesmen in Manipur
and Mizoram who are recent converts to Judaism.

The Bene Ephraim (also called "Telugu Jews") are a small
group who speak Telugu; their observance of Judaism dates
to 198

Continues at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_India

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2013-05-30 01:16:38 UTC
Permalink
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj/browse_thread/thread/996ff16fe8fe3141?hl=en#

(soc.culture.indian now included)

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Topaz
2013-05-31 00:20:28 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 May 2013 17:52:00 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Why does his white race honour him so much today? Are they really-
really stupid, then?
Jews control the media.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The warmonger Churchill lead them into a war
which cost them their empire and lots of lives, let alone the millions
of Bengalis starved to death that nobody cares about. Yet the man got
the Nobel Prize and that too for literature!!! and was elected the PM!
Post by Topaz
Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion. If a Jew
becomes a Christian or an atheist he still says he is a Jew. Most of
the Jews in the Jew country are atheist. They say that a Jew is anyone
that has a Jewish mother. Therefore it is a hereditary thing.
Yes, as an endogamous matrilineal group they form a caste.
Post by Topaz
We are for having a nation of White people. Jews would be White enough
to join us if it weren't for other important factors. One  factor is
that they don't want our race to live. They want to be the only
Caucasians to survive on the earth.
Where have they made this clear? I see the Jews as the leaders of the
white race, or at least the English-speaking white race.
They rule over us, but they hate the White race.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Making
advances in medicine they have increased white life expectancy. By
cleverly manipulating the global economy, corrupting the foreign
elites, porn-feeding the dumb masses into inertia, they have put
whites into supreme positions. Idiots like Kath and Kim of Australian
TV fame really live lives better than monarchs of the past! By ruling
the media they have put whites in the most advantageous positions;
whites are the standard and reference for non-whites. Of course they
will take a cut - a rather large cut - for providing such overwhelming
superiority over other races, and that too these days without
bothering to go out with a sola topee to conquer. With sheer cunning
instead, honed on golf courses, clubs, etc.
Post by Topaz
The Jews have their own Jew country, but they demand multi-culture and
pluralism for us.
Not all demands need be met. If whites value their whiteness they too
should have their own caste systems, like, non-Jew whites have to
marry only non-Jew whites.
True!
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself to
the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must one
day become ruler of the Earth."
Well, that is something all may agree about, then; though I hold
that the superior individual depends upon society, not the state, for
his superiority. For the good society fosters, while the state can
only promote conformity hence mediocrity at best. A good state
promotes good society - when the state is run by criminals the
societies all degrade.
True
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Okay. Another point of view is that all these Jews were fighting for
the enslaved non-white who was not even regarded as human by the
whites. So these Jews have been very popular among the non-whites.
Thus the success of Marxism, etc. in non-white countries. Whites have
been denying non-whites of their humanity for centuries, as an
essential means to rob and demean them in every way. So the liberal
movement to the racist whites is naturally a plot, but to the non-
whites it is their best hope.
White racialists don't want to exploit non-Whites at all or anything
like that. They want a nation for White people.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Money-lending is not the only thing; keeping wealth secure is also a
very good idea. Without banks, we would be robbing and killing each
other as our assets would not be safe. To not borrow, is always an
option for the careful. Money-lenders cannot force loans. If there
were no banks to lend money, where would one go if one needed money?
We need to scrap the debt-money system. This site explains it for
those who don't know:
http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm

We need a money supply that is not owed to bankers. The government
should print the money without borrowing anything from anyone. Money
would be brought into circulation by paying policemen and other public
servants. Once there is a debt-free money supply in circulation, the
police and other things would then be paid for by taxes. New money
would still be created when needed but we would control the amount of
it so there is no inflation.

Loans for houses and cars and business should be from the
government and at zero interest. This would initially add to the money
in circulation but when the loan is repaid the money would be removed
circulation, so there is no net increase and no inflation.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Taking loans makes one busy, in order to repay the loan. This busy
attitude, needed to repay loans, is beneficial to society. Otherwise,
a static society is formed. Leading to debauchery, laziness,
gluttony, snobby so-called culture, overall weakness etc.
There would be zero interest on the loans if the government was for
the citizens instead of for the parasites.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
But Israel is like an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the hostile
territory, so it is not dumb to maintain it. Evidently Jews'r'us for
most USans, so despite being very stingy people they do not mind
paying up. And there is some deep belief at work here, like I have
heard that Christians believe that the creation of Israel meaning Jews
going back their to the Holy Land is a necessary condition for the
Rapture. that is, the Lord Jesus Christ coming down from Heaven to
Earth, with the graves opening up and the dead rising to eternal life,
and pagan chaps like myself perishing in hellfire for eternity.
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.

Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses. There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.

Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim country.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The average white Christian American evidently does not care for the
not-white arab, but he does care for his sure chance for eternal life
which will happen when the Jews remain in Israel.
Unholy Alliance - Zionism and Christianity: Ted Pike, interviewed by
Texe Marrs, provides eye-opening insight into the great harm being
done by supposed Christian leaders who have bought into the
unscriptural Zionist scheme. Many of them, he reports, are richly
rewarded for their allegiance to earthly Israel. For example, Baptist
pastor Jerry Falwell was given a spanking new, multimillion dollar
executive jet by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin. Pat
Robertson's CBN Network was "blessed" by Israel with a television
station in Lebanon. But - surprise! - in fact, U.S. taxpayers
actually footed the bill for these toys which Israel so generously
showered on its Judaizer pals of the powerful U.S. evangelical lobby.

www.powerofprophecy.com
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Jews control the media and rule America.
Yes, that is what my Indian friends in US say. However, there is a
reluctance on their part to own up to this great responsibility.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-05-31 13:35:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Wed, 29 May 2013 17:52:00 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Why does his white race honour him so much today?  Are they really-
really stupid, then?
Jews control the media.
 The warmonger Churchill lead them into a war
which cost them their empire and lots of lives, let alone the millions
of Bengalis starved to death that nobody cares about. Yet the man got
the Nobel Prize and that too for literature!!! and was elected the PM!
Post by Topaz
Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion. If a Jew
becomes a Christian or an atheist he still says he is a Jew. Most of
the Jews in the Jew country are atheist. They say that a Jew is anyone
that has a Jewish mother. Therefore it is a hereditary thing.
Yes, as an endogamous matrilineal group they form a caste.
Post by Topaz
We are for having a nation of White people. Jews would be White enough
to join us if it weren't for other important factors. One  factor is
that they don't want our race to live. They want to be the only
Caucasians to survive on the earth.
Where have they made this clear?  I see the Jews as the leaders of the
white race, or at least the English-speaking white race.
They rule over us, but they hate the White race.
Making
advances in medicine they have increased white life expectancy.  By
cleverly manipulating the global economy, corrupting the foreign
elites, porn-feeding the dumb masses into inertia, they have put
whites into supreme positions.  Idiots like Kath and Kim of Australian
TV fame really live lives better than monarchs of the past!  By ruling
the media they have put whites in the most advantageous positions;
whites are the standard and reference for non-whites.  Of course they
will take a cut - a rather large cut - for providing such overwhelming
superiority over other races, and that too these days without
bothering to go out with a sola topee to conquer. With sheer cunning
instead, honed on golf courses, clubs, etc.
Post by Topaz
The Jews have their own Jew country, but they demand multi-culture and
pluralism for us.
Not all demands need be met.  If whites value their whiteness they too
should have their own caste systems, like, non-Jew whites have to
marry only non-Jew whites.
True!
Post by Topaz
"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself to
the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must one
day become ruler of the Earth."
Well, that is something all  may agree about, then; though  I hold
that the superior individual depends upon society, not the state, for
his superiority.  For the good society fosters, while the state can
only promote conformity hence mediocrity at best.  A good state
promotes good society - when the state is run by criminals the
societies all degrade.
True
Okay. Another point of view is that all these Jews were fighting for
the enslaved non-white who was not even regarded as human by the
whites.  So these Jews have been very popular among the non-whites.
Thus the success of Marxism, etc. in non-white countries.  Whites have
been denying non-whites of their humanity for centuries, as an
essential means to rob and demean them in every way.  So the liberal
movement to the racist whites is naturally a plot, but to the non-
whites it is their best hope.
White racialists don't want to exploit non-Whites at all or anything
like that. They want a nation for White people.
The latter demand is fine so far as non-whites are concerned. How all
European countries (if not English-speaking countries) are non-white
is difficult to see, though, as is difficult to see how Europeans or
people of European origin have not gone around exploiting non-whites
ever since they learnt to sail the oceans.
Post by Topaz
Money-lending is not the only thing; keeping wealth secure is also a
very good idea.  Without banks, we would be robbing and killing each
other as our assets would not be safe.  To not borrow, is always an
option for the careful.  Money-lenders cannot force loans.  If there
were no banks to lend money, where would one go if one needed money?
 We need to scrap the debt-money system. This site explains it for
 http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm
Well recently I have proposed that we the real people give every one
of us a million dollars as a birth right. Mr Tom Roverii has upped it
to 5 million. I think it should work if properly managed. It will do
away with bureaucracies, and give more jobs and business boost to all
parties.
Post by Topaz
 We need a money supply that is not owed to bankers.  The government
should print the money without borrowing anything from anyone. Money
would be brought into circulation by paying policemen and other public
servants. Once there is a debt-free money supply in circulation, the
police and  other things would then be paid for by taxes. New money
would still be created when needed but we would control the amount of
it so there is no inflation.
Yes, that is something practical. I never saw why govt. should borrow
anything from anyone as they can print on their own.
Post by Topaz
    Loans for houses and cars and business should be from the
government and at zero interest. This would initially add to the money
in circulation but when the loan is repaid the money would be removed
circulation, so there is no net increase and no inflation.
Taking loans makes one busy, in order to repay the loan.  This busy
attitude, needed to repay loans, is beneficial to society. Otherwise,
a static society is formed.  Leading to debauchery, laziness,
gluttony, snobby so-called culture, overall weakness etc.
There would be zero interest on the loans if the government was for
the citizens instead of for the parasites.
True. It is interest that is the pain. There is a historical reason
for this. When there is anarchy, there is no govt. to make money or
give loans. In such a situation, the moneylender is king when it
comes to giving money. Now, the only way the moneylender can get his
money back is to hire goons to break legs. Goons cost money. So the
moneylender has to charge high interest. Now if there is stability in
the nation, there is the police and bailiffs to do the leg-breaking by
occupation. They are cheaper than goons, so there is low interest
rate. Also, the banks can lend much more than the moneylender can, and
so profit with less interest rate.
Post by Topaz
But Israel is like an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the hostile
territory, so it is not dumb to maintain it. Evidently Jews'r'us for
most USans, so despite being very stingy people they do not mind
paying up. And there is some deep belief at work here, like I have
heard that Christians believe that the creation of Israel meaning Jews
going back their to the Holy Land is a necessary condition for the
Rapture. that is, the Lord Jesus Christ coming down from Heaven to
Earth, with the graves opening up and the dead rising to eternal life,
and pagan chaps like myself perishing in hellfire for eternity.
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.
Now what to say???
Post by Topaz
 Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses.
Some Marxists were motivated by idealism more than self-interest, but
atheism has been their biggest drawback. Being arrogant and ignorant,
they equated all religion with superstition and thus harmed good
religion and traditional values. On the whole they were more idiotic
than truly evil, save of course the incredible killers in Cambodia and
elsewhere who break all records in inhumanity.

There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
Post by Topaz
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.
  Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim country.
The average white Christian American evidently does not care for the
not-white arab, but he does care for his sure chance for eternal life
which will happen when the Jews remain in Israel.
Unholy Alliance - Zionism and Christianity: Ted Pike, interviewed by
Texe Marrs, provides eye-opening insight into the great harm being
done by supposed Christian leaders who have bought into the
unscriptural Zionist scheme.  Many of them, he reports, are richly
rewarded for their allegiance to earthly Israel.  For example, Baptist
pastor Jerry Falwell was given a spanking new, multimillion dollar
executive jet by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin.  Pat
Robertson's CBN Network was "blessed" by Israel with a television
station in Lebanon.  But - surprise! - in fact, U.S. taxpayers
actually footed the bill for these toys which Israel so generously
showered on its Judaizer pals of the powerful U.S. evangelical lobby.
www.powerofprophecy.com
Post by Topaz
Jews control the media and rule America.
Yes, that is what my Indian friends in US say.  However, there is a
reluctance on their part to own up to this great responsibility.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com   - Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Topaz
2013-05-31 21:55:12 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 31 May 2013 06:35:22 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
White racialists don't want to exploit non-Whites at all or anything
like that. They want a nation for White people.
The latter demand is fine so far as non-whites are concerned. How all
European countries (if not English-speaking countries) are non-white
is difficult to see, though, as is difficult to see how Europeans or
people of European origin have not gone around exploiting non-whites
ever since they learnt to sail the oceans.
If non-Whites want, Whites will not step foot in their non-White
countries at all. Whites have zero interest in exploiting anyone.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Well recently I have proposed that we the real people give every one
of us a million dollars as a birth right. Mr Tom Roverii has upped it
to 5 million. I think it should work if properly managed. It will do
away with bureaucracies, and give more jobs and business boost to all
parties.
You do need a money supply that is not owed to bankers. But that could
be done without inflation. Money should not be confused with real
wealth. It is only a means of exchanging real wealth.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
 We need a money supply that is not owed to bankers.  The government
should print the money without borrowing anything from anyone. Money
would be brought into circulation by paying policemen and other public
servants. Once there is a debt-free money supply in circulation, the
police and  other things would then be paid for by taxes. New money
would still be created when needed but we would control the amount of
it so there is no inflation.
Yes, that is something practical. I never saw why govt. should borrow
anything from anyone as they can print on their own.
Exactly
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
    Loans for houses and cars and business should be from the
government and at zero interest. This would initially add to the money
in circulation but when the loan is repaid the money would be removed
circulation, so there is no net increase and no inflation.
Taking loans makes one busy, in order to repay the loan.  This busy
attitude, needed to repay loans, is beneficial to society. Otherwise,
a static society is formed.  Leading to debauchery, laziness,
gluttony, snobby so-called culture, overall weakness etc.
There would be zero interest on the loans if the government was for
the citizens instead of for the parasites.
True. It is interest that is the pain. There is a historical reason
for this. When there is anarchy, there is no govt. to make money or
give loans. In such a situation, the moneylender is king when it
comes to giving money. Now, the only way the moneylender can get his
money back is to hire goons to break legs. Goons cost money. So the
moneylender has to charge high interest. Now if there is stability in
the nation, there is the police and bailiffs to do the leg-breaking by
occupation. They are cheaper than goons, so there is low interest
rate. Also, the banks can lend much more than the moneylender can, and
so profit with less interest rate.
Not a bad view, but the main point is that bankers are worthless
parasites. They make billions while doing nothing. Loans and such
should be nationalized and loans should not be for making a profit,
but just for helping the citizens.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.
Now what to say???
Yes, they do believe that.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
 Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses.
Some Marxists were motivated by idealism more than self-interest, but
atheism has been their biggest drawback. Being arrogant and ignorant,
they equated all religion with superstition and thus harmed good
religion and traditional values. On the whole they were more idiotic
than truly evil, save of course the incredible killers in Cambodia and
elsewhere who break all records in inhumanity.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-01 10:32:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
If non-Whites want, Whites will not step foot in their non-White
countries at all. Whites have zero interest in exploiting anyone.
Alex Vangel is not only a nazi, he's a stupid nazi... but then, aren't they
all?
All those who post in Usenet with their identities open and exposed,
such as I, are the stupidest of all human beings. I have paid the
price, by being hounded forever from employment and with no chance of
further employment, notice, advantage etc. under the present criminal
regimes, composed of frauds in top places, everywhere. They are
frauds, for they believe and act according to the wrong and evil
principles of einsteinian relativity, that has obliterated all
differences between good and bad, right and wrong. With disastrous
consequences for many, so far, save those who profit from this racket.

Still, I have not yet been murdered for my beliefs, and ditto for Mr
Vangel. Nor even imprisoned under false charges! So, I can't hold the
ruling anti-Arindam BigJew-GujJew (einstein-gandi) combo pack to be
totally evil. Thank goodness. Humanity has progressed somewhat,
after all.
--http://alturl.com/mciyq           My Ugly Selfhttp://alturl.com/szzfp           My Court Shellackinghttp://alturl.com/w7pww           My Shameful Legal History
My Name is William Grosvenor       Certified General Asshole
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-01 10:35:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Fri, 31 May 2013 06:35:22 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
White racialists don't want to exploit non-Whites at all or anything
like that. They want a nation for White people.
The latter demand is fine so far as non-whites are concerned.  How all
European countries (if not English-speaking countries) are non-white
is difficult to see, though, as is difficult to see how Europeans or
people of European origin have not gone around exploiting non-whites
ever since they learnt to sail the oceans.
If non-Whites want, Whites will not step foot in their non-White
countries at all. Whites have zero interest in exploiting anyone.
Well recently I have proposed that we the real people give every one
of us a million dollars as a birth right.  Mr Tom Roverii has upped it
to 5 million.  I think it should work if properly managed.  It will do
away with bureaucracies, and give more jobs and business boost to all
parties.
You do need a money supply that is not owed to bankers. But that could
be done without inflation. Money should not be confused with real
wealth. It is only a means of exchanging real wealth.
Yes, so what is real wealth? How much do you think your life is
worth? For how much would you allow your child to be taken away for
providing transplants by capitalists' gains? Please give a figure for
the last!

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Post by Topaz
 We need a money supply that is not owed to bankers.  The government
should print the money without borrowing anything from anyone. Money
would be brought into circulation by paying policemen and other public
servants. Once there is a debt-free money supply in circulation, the
police and  other things would then be paid for by taxes. New money
would still be created when needed but we would control the amount of
it so there is no inflation.
Yes, that is something practical. I never saw why govt. should borrow
anything from anyone as they can print on their own.
Exactly
Post by Topaz
    Loans for houses and cars and business should be from the
government and at zero interest. This would initially add to the money
in circulation but when the loan is repaid the money would be removed
circulation, so there is no net increase and no inflation.
Taking loans makes one busy, in order to repay the loan.  This busy
attitude, needed to repay loans, is beneficial to society. Otherwise,
a static society is formed.  Leading to debauchery, laziness,
gluttony, snobby so-called culture, overall weakness etc.
There would be zero interest on the loans if the government was for
the citizens instead of for the parasites.
True.  It is interest that is the pain.  There is a historical reason
for this.  When there is anarchy, there is no govt. to make money or
give loans.  In such a situation, the moneylender is king when it
comes to giving money.  Now, the only way the moneylender can get his
money back is to hire goons to break legs.  Goons cost money.  So the
moneylender has to charge high interest.  Now if there is stability in
the nation, there is the police and bailiffs to do the leg-breaking by
occupation.  They are cheaper than goons, so there is low interest
rate. Also, the banks can lend much more than the moneylender can, and
so profit with less interest rate.
Not a bad view, but the main point is that bankers are worthless
parasites. They make billions while doing nothing. Loans and such
should be nationalized and loans should not be for making a profit,
but just for helping the citizens.
Post by Topaz
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.
Now what to say???
Yes, they do believe that.
Post by Topaz
 Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses.
Some Marxists were motivated by idealism more than self-interest, but
atheism has been their biggest drawback.  Being arrogant and ignorant,
they equated all religion with superstition and thus harmed good
religion and traditional values.  On the whole they were more idiotic
than truly evil, save of course the incredible killers in Cambodia and
elsewhere who break all records in inhumanity.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com   - Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-03 04:49:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
True. It is interest that is the pain. There is a historical reason
for this. When there is anarchy, there is no govt. to make money or
give loans. In such a situation, the moneylender is king when it
comes to giving money. Now, the only way the moneylender can get his
money back is to hire goons to break legs. Goons cost money. So the
moneylender has to charge high interest. Now if there is stability in
the nation, there is the police and bailiffs to do the leg-breaking by
occupation. They are cheaper than goons, so there is low interest
rate. Also, the banks can lend much more than the moneylender can, and
so profit with less interest rate.
Not a bad view, but the main point is that bankers are worthless
parasites. They make billions while doing nothing. Loans and such
should be nationalized and loans should not be for making a profit,
but just for helping the citizens.
Making billions is fine, provided such billions trickle down as gentle
rain to the worthy people. I think your main point is that this is
not happening. Workers are producing lots, agriculture is very
efficient; energy systems are getting cheaper with solar; machines are
working hard for nothing in return, huge efficiencies are getting
generated by communication; so present technology is creating
trillions of dollars; but these huge moneys are abstracted by the
ruling elites and put in their own exclusive pockets through various
interesting ways. Such as "electing" some puppet who will print money
and give it to them. In order to secure their billions, the parasites
are pre-empting competition from worthy people by not letting this
trickle down happen; instead, the ruling elites circulate the billions
among themselves only, enjoying fat luxuries in the process, creating
wars, fooling the masses, etc.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.
Now what to say???
Yes, they do believe that.
Hopefully it will be realised that the corruption and
misrepresentation of a great and worthy religion, to which so many
adhere, cannot continue for ever. As a Hindu I see Christianity not
as a system of self-forgiving superstition that serve the crooks and
unites the simple, which popularly may well be the case; but as a
gentle and loving ideology providing the most noble and self-
sacrificing of ideals through the example of Christ. It is surpassed
in Hinduism by the voluntary self-immolation of so many wonderful
women known as the sati, or true or faithful wife. Thus, joyously
joining her dead husband in the afterlife, by providing a matchless
and too-glorious spectacle of spirituality, courage and devotion,
unknown in any culture anywhere save that of that of Dido of Carthage
(ref, Virgil's Aenid). In these times, such practices have no
meaning, so they are correctly banned. Still, the thoughts related to
these practices cannot but serve to inspire anyone who has a soul.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Topaz
2013-06-03 21:32:46 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:49:45 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Making billions is fine, provided such billions trickle down as gentle
rain to the worthy people. I think your main point is that this is
not happening. Workers are producing lots, agriculture is very
efficient; energy systems are getting cheaper with solar; machines are
working hard for nothing in return, huge efficiencies are getting
generated by communication; so present technology is creating
trillions of dollars;
Meanwhile bankers make billions by doing nothing but shuffling
paperwork around and creating their own money.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
but these huge moneys are abstracted by the
ruling elites and put in their own exclusive pockets through various
interesting ways. Such as "electing" some puppet who will print money
and give it to them. In order to secure their billions, the parasites
are pre-empting competition from worthy people by not letting this
trickle down happen; instead, the ruling elites circulate the billions
among themselves only, enjoying fat luxuries in the process, creating
wars, fooling the masses, etc.
Companies that build cars or whatever, and doctors and such, do useful
work. That is how they differ from banks and insurance companies.
Those two should be nationalized.

Even though other companies do useful things, still anyone with over a
million dollars should pay ten percent of their hoard per year. It's
not going to kill them. And the taxes are needed for many things.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Hopefully it will be realised that the corruption and
misrepresentation of a great and worthy religion, to which so many
adhere, cannot continue for ever. As a Hindu I see Christianity not
as a system of self-forgiving superstition that serve the crooks and
unites the simple, which popularly may well be the case; but as a
gentle and loving ideology providing the most noble and self-
sacrificing of ideals through the example of Christ.
In the past they made movies like "A Christmas Carol" which was for
helping others, and was against the greedy Scrooge. Today Christians
are for capitalism.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
It is surpassed
in Hinduism by the voluntary self-immolation of so many wonderful
women known as the sati, or true or faithful wife. Thus, joyously
joining her dead husband in the afterlife, by providing a matchless
and too-glorious spectacle of spirituality, courage and devotion,
Sati was a social funeral practice among some Indian communities in
which a recently widowed woman would immolate herself on her husband’s
funeral pyre. The practice was banned several times, with the current
ban dating to 1829 by the British.

The British were right about that. Helping others is good, but
self-immolation doesn't help anyone.

And there is no proof of an afterlife after death. Probably there is
no afterlife.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
unknown in any culture anywhere save that of that of Dido of Carthage
(ref, Virgil's Aenid). In these times, such practices have no
meaning, so they are correctly banned. Still, the thoughts related to
these practices cannot but serve to inspire anyone who has a soul.
Maybe some thoughts related to it were good. But it was still a
terrible practice.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
KCOM
2013-06-03 23:26:02 UTC
Permalink
Topaz <***@hotmail.com> wrote in news:***@4ax.com:

Alex Vangel, a notorious usenet troll calling himself "topaz", prefers 72
sheep, since women refuse to have anything to do with the nazi scumbag.
--
http://alturl.com/mciyq My Ugly Self
http://alturl.com/szzfp My Court Shellacking
http://alturl.com/w7pww My Shameful Legal History
My Name is William Grosvenor Certified General Asshole
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-04 11:37:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:49:45 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Making billions is fine, provided such billions trickle down as gentle
rain to the worthy people.  I think your main point is that this is
not happening. Workers are producing lots, agriculture is very
efficient; energy systems are getting cheaper with solar; machines are
working hard for nothing in return, huge efficiencies are getting
generated by communication; so present technology is creating
trillions of dollars;
Meanwhile bankers make billions by doing nothing but shuffling
paperwork around and creating their own money.
Actually normal plodding bank staff if not their biggest bosses are
doing a great job keeping savjngs money more or less safe, giving out
loans at low interest, promoting business, etc. Yes, doing away with
Glass-Steagall has been identified by some as piracy, for that led to
credit derivatives and other dodgy stuff I don't understand. Looks
like they promised a lot and pocketed the real thing, the fees.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
but these huge moneys are abstracted by the
ruling elites and put in their own exclusive pockets through various
interesting ways.  Such as "electing" some puppet who will print money
and give it to them. In order to secure their billions, the parasites
are pre-empting competition from worthy people by not letting this
trickle down happen; instead, the ruling elites circulate the billions
among themselves only, enjoying fat luxuries in the process, creating
wars, fooling the masses, etc.
Companies that build cars or whatever, and doctors and such, do useful
work. That is how they differ from banks and insurance companies.
Those two should be nationalized.
In India they were nationalised, and some nationalised banks and
insurance are still around and they are doing well. Private banks
have also come up. They claim to provide efficient service and I find
they are somewhat quicker and more responsive. However elderly people
seem to distrust them, they say that they give the moneys to their own
chums and who knows how well that will work.
Post by Topaz
Even though other companies do useful things, still anyone with over a
million dollars should pay ten percent of their hoard per year. It's
not going to kill them. And the taxes are needed for many things.
Are you talking of taxing assets or income? If you start taxing tax-
paid assets then soon the nation will become very poor as no one will
care to become rich and so will not work. No work, means no gain for
anyone, loss for all. 10% taxes on 1m seems very low. In those days
when I had a job, the top rate I paid was 49% at most in Australia,
but overall 30% of my modest salary went to the national govt. as
tax.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Hopefully it will be realised that the corruption and
misrepresentation of a great and worthy religion, to which so many
adhere, cannot continue for ever.  As a Hindu I see Christianity not
as a system of self-forgiving superstition that serve the crooks and
unites the simple, which popularly may well be the case; but as a
gentle and loving ideology providing the most noble and self-
sacrificing of ideals through the example of Christ.
In the past they made movies like "A Christmas Carol" which was for
helping others, and was against the greedy Scrooge. Today Christians
are for capitalism.
Yes, the Rand-Reagan combo pack has done that.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
It is surpassed
in Hinduism by the voluntary self-immolation of so many wonderful
women known as the sati, or true or faithful wife. Thus, joyously
joining her dead husband in the afterlife, by providing a matchless
and too-glorious spectacle of spirituality, courage and devotion,
Sati was a social funeral practice among some Indian communities in
which a recently widowed woman would immolate herself on her husband’s
funeral pyre.
It was never common, for only the queens and high-caste women had the
privilege to do so.

The practice was banned several times, with the current
Post by Topaz
ban dating to 1829 by the British.
The British were right about that. Helping others is good, but
self-immolation doesn't help anyone.
The idea was that the onlookers would know the meaning of courage and
devotion, taken to the highest possible point by a woman. This
practice helped to increase male regard for women; loyalty of women to
their men; with happy and faithful family existence as a consequence,
free from any need to pursue others for transient pleasures.
Certainly the most glorious memory of the sati has been of the
greatest help to the Hindu, just as the crucified Christ's memory
inspires genuine Christians.
Post by Topaz
And there is no proof of an afterlife after death.
That is a matter of belief. Life to me seems totally pointless, a
waste of breath, without any notion of afterlife. To always prepare
for death, is the way to live - such is the idealistic temperament of
the spiritual person.

As for proof, there is no hard proof but there are Ouija boards, any
number of mediums, ghost stories, and most tellingly our lives which
must end and hopefully lead to somewhere. Just as we live on Earth in
our mortal states, we could well be living somewhere else after
death. The probability that we live is 100%; that the probability
there is life after death is correspondingly non-zero.
Post by Topaz
Probably there is
no afterlife.
Probably there is. It is wise to think there is, otherwise any good
effort to behave properly without the threat of retribution, would be
pointless. That would not help social matters.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
unknown in any culture anywhere save that of that of Dido of Carthage
(ref, Virgil's Aenid).  In these times, such practices have no
meaning, so they are correctly banned. Still, the thoughts related to
these practices cannot but serve to inspire anyone who has a soul.
Maybe some thoughts related to it were good. But it was still a
terrible practice.
Of course. That is why the memory of the glorious sati (the devoted
and faithful wife) is so powerful.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-05 20:57:54 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 04:37:13 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Actually normal plodding bank staff if not their biggest bosses are
doing a great job keeping savjngs money more or less safe, giving out
loans at low interest, promoting business, etc. Yes, doing away with
Glass-Steagall has been identified by some as piracy, for that led to
credit derivatives and other dodgy stuff I don't understand. Looks
like they promised a lot and pocketed the real thing, the fees.
Banking should be nationalized.

To get a clearer picture suppose there is an island with ten workers
on it. The workers grow food and build cars and make a lot of
things. But there is a problem because they can't exchange their goods
that well without money. So to have a money supply in circulation a
banker rows his boat to the island and loans each of the workers $100
at 5% per year. The money circulates back and forth as the workers
buy things. But at the end of the year there is a total of $1000 on
the island and $1050 is owed to the banker, that is, more than the
money that exists on the island.

And where does the banker get the money? He simply creates it out
of nothing by printing notes on his printing press. Every month the
banker goes to the island to collect his payments, to make more loans,
and to buy cars and things with his profits. If someone can't make
their payment he takes their entire farm or business.

That is how the system is now. What the workers should do is get
their own printing press and make their own money. To make the initial
supply of money they would simply print $100 for each of them. This
money is not borrowed or owed and there is no interest. But there is a
money supply on the island and they can exchange their goods. As more
cars and houses are built, from time to time more money would need to
be created, to represent the more wealth that is now on the island.
No one of the ten workers should be allowed to create money. It is and
done at a town meeting.

A country is the same as the island. And the government is the same
as the town meeting. The government should create money and not
private bankers. The government should be for the people.

Today the bankers create the money and the government serves not the
people but the bankers.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
In India they were nationalised, and some nationalised banks and
insurance are still around and they are doing well. Private banks
have also come up. They claim to provide efficient service and I find
they are somewhat quicker and more responsive. However elderly people
seem to distrust them, they say that they give the moneys to their own
chums and who knows how well that will work.
Private bankers are parasites. They don't produce anything such as a
company that makes cars. It is a racket. Only the government has the
right to create money because it belongs to all of the citizens.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Are you talking of taxing assets or income?
Most people should only pay income tax. Overall wealth should only be
taxed if they have over a millions dollars.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If you start taxing tax-
paid assets then soon the nation will become very poor as no one will
care to become rich and so will not work. No work, means no gain for
anyone, loss for all. 10% taxes on 1m seems very low. In those days
when I had a job, the top rate I paid was 49% at most in Australia,
but overall 30% of my modest salary went to the national govt. as
tax.
Taxes should be low because we should not be wasting money on such
things as this:

By Jim Taylor

I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings. No other nation on this
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones. And to make
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me. Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this? Most
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.

The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
In the past they made movies like "A Christmas Carol" which was for
helping others, and was against the greedy Scrooge. Today Christians
are for capitalism.
Yes, the Rand-Reagan combo pack has done that.
It was never common, for only the queens and high-caste women had the
privilege to do so.
If their view about an afterlife was correct then it makes sense. But
it can't be good. That is why Christians made a rule that if you
commit suicide then you go to hell.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The idea was that the onlookers would know the meaning of courage and
devotion, taken to the highest possible point by a woman. This
practice helped to increase male regard for women; loyalty of women to
their men; with happy and faithful family existence as a consequence,
free from any need to pursue others for transient pleasures.
Certainly the most glorious memory of the sati has been of the
greatest help to the Hindu, just as the crucified Christ's memory
inspires genuine Christians.
Those are good goals, but they need to find a better way to show it
than suicide.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
And there is no proof of an afterlife after death.
That is a matter of belief. Life to me seems totally pointless, a
waste of breath, without any notion of afterlife. To always prepare
for death, is the way to live - such is the idealistic temperament of
the spiritual person.
Belief is what one does only after one is convinced by the evidence.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
As for proof, there is no hard proof but there are Ouija boards, any
number of mediums, ghost stories,
Houdini looked into mediums. He found that they were all fake.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
and most tellingly our lives which
must end and hopefully lead to somewhere. Just as we live on Earth in
our mortal states, we could well be living somewhere else after
death. The probability that we live is 100%; that the probability
there is life after death is correspondingly non-zero.
No doubt you sincerely want to live after death, but that is not
proof.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Probably there is
no afterlife.
Probably there is. It is wise to think there is, otherwise any good
effort to behave properly without the threat of retribution, would be
pointless. That would not help social matters.
Helping social matters is very important. But that doesn't even claim
to by any proof.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Maybe some thoughts related to it were good. But it was still a
terrible practice.
Of course. That is why the memory of the glorious sati (the devoted
and faithful wife) is so powerful.
That may be so. But it should be remembered as a tragedy, so that it
is not repeated.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-06 06:10:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 04:37:13 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Actually normal plodding bank staff if not their biggest bosses are
doing a great job keeping savjngs money more or less safe, giving out
loans at low interest,  promoting business, etc.  Yes, doing away with
Glass-Steagall has been identified by some as piracy, for that led to
credit derivatives and other dodgy stuff I don't understand. Looks
like they promised a lot and pocketed the real thing, the fees.
Banking should be nationalized.
  To get a clearer picture suppose there is an island with ten workers
on it.  The workers grow  food and build  cars and  make a lot of
things. But there is a problem because they can't exchange their goods
that well without money. So to have a money supply in circulation a
banker rows his boat to the island and  loans each of the workers $100
at  5% per year. The money circulates back and forth as the workers
buy things. But at the end of the year there is a total of $1000 on
the island and $1050 is owed to the banker, that is, more than the
money that exists on the island.
   And where does the banker get the money? He simply creates it out
of nothing by printing notes on his printing press. Every month the
banker goes to the island to collect his payments, to make more loans,
and to buy cars and things with his profits. If someone can't make
their payment he takes  their entire farm or business.
This is not the complete truth, is it? How about the increased
economic activity on the island making more wealth than the extra 5%?
Such as, with the loan money they make a university, and the students
leave the island to go elsewhere and send extra-island money home. Or
tourism picks off, so more wealth comes in. Ditto for mining,
farming, etc.
The 5% extra charge relates to printing money, account-keeping, hiring
security to take over the farms etc., bribing politicians for
monopoly, adverstising, travel etc. If there is no monopoly then
competition will bring the interest rate down. So the banker is just
providing a service, and takes his cut. Yes if the banker is the
govt. then it may look as if the govt. could be kinder with those who
do not repay loans, but in that case no one would repay the loans.
That would lead to inflation.
Post by Topaz
   That is how the system is now. What the workers should do is get
their own printing press and make their own money. To make the initial
supply of money they would simply print $100 for each of them. This
money is not borrowed or owed and there is no interest. But there is a
money supply on the island and they can exchange their goods. As more
cars and houses are built, from time to time more money would need to
be created, to represent the more wealth that is now on the island.
No one of the ten workers should be allowed to create money. It is and
done at a town meeting.
I fully agree, and add that instead of $100 they should all give
themselves $1000000 but in small doses and only as and when good plans
are put up by people of known worth. All get 1m, but only those who
show they can use it well can actually draw more than the maximum
amount given say monthly to all for survival.
Post by Topaz
   A country is the same as the island.
No. A country can import and export, can go to war, can do more
research and marketing, more education, social work, culture etc.


And the government is the same
Post by Topaz
as the town meeting. The government should create money and not
private bankers. The government should be for the people.
 Today the bankers create the money and the government serves not the
people but the bankers.
That may well be. But the good news about the bankers is there are
many of them, and you can go from one to another. If the Govt .is
crazy like US under Bush, or Cambodia under Pol Pot, or Germany under
Hitler, then you are all fully stuffed.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
In India they were nationalised, and some nationalised banks and
insurance are still around and they are doing well.  Private banks
have also come up.  They claim to provide efficient service and I find
they are somewhat quicker and more responsive.  However elderly people
seem to distrust them, they say that they give the moneys to their own
chums and who knows how well that will work.
Private bankers are parasites. They don't produce anything such as a
company that makes cars. It is a racket. Only the government has the
right to create money because it belongs to all of the citizens.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Are you talking of taxing assets or income?
Most people should only pay income tax. Overall wealth should only be
taxed if they have over a millions dollars.
That is not much these days.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
 If you start taxing tax-
paid assets then soon the nation will become very poor as no one will
care to become rich and so will not work.  No work, means no gain for
anyone, loss for all. 10% taxes on 1m seems very low.  In those days
when I had a job, the top rate I paid was 49% at most in Australia,
but overall 30% of my modest salary went to the national govt. as
tax.
Taxes should be low because we should not be wasting money on such
By Jim Taylor
      I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings.
Americans love Israel. What love! More like, as I have elaborated
later, they like the idea of Eternal Life.


No other nation on this
Post by Topaz
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones.
Aw, the writer's racism is showing.

And to make
Post by Topaz
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me.
Now that shows something.
Post by Topaz
Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this?
Well yes, Indians are dumber as they worship the poverty-boosting
Gandhi.

Most
Post by Topaz
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.
If Americans love Israelis so much, why don't they ask all of them to
come and live in the USA? They could give parts of Texas or Florida
to them, to form their own Zionist state right in their common One
True God's own great land.
Post by Topaz
   The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.
Which regular American bothers about Arab lives? The regular American
wants Heaven on Earth, eternal life, etc. and he thinks that with Jews
living in Israel the chances of that happening is more than zero.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
In the past they made movies like "A Christmas Carol" which was for
helping others, and was against the greedy Scrooge. Today Christians
are for capitalism.
Yes, the Rand-Reagan combo pack has done that.
It was never common, for only the queens and high-caste women had the
privilege to do so.
If their view about an afterlife was correct then it makes sense. But
it can't be good. That is why Christians made a rule that if you
commit suicide then you go to hell.
That rule does not work on those who are not Christian.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The idea was that the onlookers would know the meaning of courage and
devotion, taken to the highest possible point by a woman.  This
practice helped to increase male regard for women; loyalty of women to
their men; with happy and faithful family existence as a consequence,
free from any need to pursue others for transient pleasures.
Certainly the most glorious memory of the sati has been of the
greatest help to the Hindu, just as the crucified Christ's memory
inspires genuine Christians.
Those are good goals, but they need to find a better way to show it
than suicide.
Martyrdom is the highest ideal that Christ himself showed, albeit
without wanting to do so unlike the glorious satis; what is suicide
to the Christians is martyrdom to others. Yes, there is no more need
for sati-daaha; enough has been done already and their glorious memory
will suffice for all subsequent generations.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
And there is no proof of an afterlife after death.
That is a matter of belief.  Life to me seems totally pointless, a
waste of breath, without any notion of afterlife.  To always prepare
for death, is the way to live - such is the idealistic temperament of
the spiritual person.
Belief is what one does only after one is convinced by the evidence.
No, belief as such has nothing to do with evidence; the conviction
comes from fond assumptions. Scientific belief has to be based on
evidence. Not all belief has to be scientific.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
As for proof, there is no hard proof but there are Ouija boards, any
number of mediums, ghost stories,
Houdini looked into mediums. He found that they were all fake.
One example is not enough. There are mediums who are not fake.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
and most tellingly our lives which
must end and hopefully lead to somewhere.  Just as we live on Earth in
our mortal states, we could well be living somewhere else after
death.  The probability that we live is 100%; that the probability
there is life after death is correspondingly non-zero.
No doubt you sincerely want to live after death, but that is not
proof.
I never said it was. I said the probability of life after death is
non-zero, given the certainty of life in this mortal plane. There are
other indications, like Ouija boards, ghosts, mediums, post death
experiences, etc. that assure us of the life beyond death. There is
a very strong historical basis for this, in all cultures.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Probably there is
no afterlife.
Probably there is.  It is wise to think there is, otherwise any good
effort to behave properly without the threat of retribution, would be
pointless.  That would not help social matters.
Helping social matters is very important. But that doesn't even claim
to by any proof.
I am talking here from the engineering point, not from any
mathematical point.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Maybe some thoughts related to it were good. But it was still a
terrible practice.
Of course. That is why the memory of the glorious sati (the devoted
and faithful wife) is so powerful.
That may be so. But it should be remembered as a tragedy, so that it
is not repeated.
No, it was not a tragedy as everyone thought it to be great and
glorious; a most perfect demonstration of courage, devotion, faith and
love. Only the very best and noblest ladies, being queens or of high
rank, could have this privilege. They don't make such girls any more,
for times were very different then, so of course it should not be
repeated nor encouraged in our age of money and cynicism. I am very
proud of their memory, for as a Hindu their example means more to me
than the martyrdom of Jesus Christ. Yes, just as no one should be
crucified voluntarily or otherwise for whatever reason, the practice
of sati-daaha has to remain banned. Just as one Jesus Christ is
enough for faith, the glorious satis of the past need no increase in
their numbers.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-07 02:24:24 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:10:55 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
  To get a clearer picture suppose there is an island with ten workers
on it.  The workers grow  food and build  cars and  make a lot of
things. But there is a problem because they can't exchange their goods
that well without money. So to have a money supply in circulation a
banker rows his boat to the island and  loans each of the workers $100
at  5% per year. The money circulates back and forth as the workers
buy things. But at the end of the year there is a total of $1000 on
the island and $1050 is owed to the banker, that is, more than the
money that exists on the island.
   And where does the banker get the money? He simply creates it out
of nothing by printing notes on his printing press. Every month the
banker goes to the island to collect his payments, to make more loans,
and to buy cars and things with his profits. If someone can't make
their payment he takes  their entire farm or business.
This is not the complete truth, is it? How about the increased
economic activity on the island making more wealth than the extra 5%?
Such as, with the loan money they make a university, and the students
You could have all the activity you want but there is only $1000 on
the island, and $1050 is owed to the banker.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
leave the island to go elsewhere and send extra-island money home. Or
tourism picks off, so more wealth comes in. Ditto for mining,
farming, etc.
That would be foreign currency and the banker doesn't have to accept
it. He wants $1050 in the same notes that he made, and he knows the
people on the island can not pay.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The 5% extra charge relates to printing money, account-keeping, hiring
security to take over the farms etc., bribing politicians for
monopoly, adverstising, travel etc. If there is no monopoly then
competition will bring the interest rate down. So the banker is just
providing a service, and takes his cut. Yes if the banker is the
govt. then it may look as if the govt. could be kinder with those who
do not repay loans, but in that case no one would repay the loans.
That would lead to inflation.
Only the government should be allowed to create money. And the costs
of account-keeping etc, could be paid by taxes. No profit should be
made in the creation of money. It should just be for the benefit of
the citizens. No parasites should be getting rich from it. Loans
should be at zero interest.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
I fully agree, and add that instead of $100 they should all give
themselves $1000000 but in small doses and only as and when good plans
are put up by people of known worth. All get 1m, but only those who
show they can use it well can actually draw more than the maximum
amount given say monthly to all for survival.
There needs to be a money supply in circulation that is not owed to
any bankers. To create it we should pay policemen and other government
workers in the normal amount until there is the desired amount of
currency in circulation. After that, the police should be paid with
taxpayer money.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
   A country is the same as the island.
No. A country can import and export, can go to war, can do more
research and marketing, more education, social work, culture etc.
So can the island. Import and exporting should be done without money.
Countries, or islands, should barter with what they have to get what
they need.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
That may well be. But the good news about the bankers is there are
many of them, and you can go from one to another. If the Govt .is
crazy like US under Bush, or Cambodia under Pol Pot, or Germany under
Hitler, then you are all fully stuffed.
The US is ruled by the Jews and that is the problem.


Franklin Roosevelt did some things to help people. But he didn't
really upset the money bag parasites who rule over us. Only Hitler did
that.


When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty
of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people,
demanding that Germans repay every nation's cost of the (First World)
war. These costs totaled three times the value of all the property in
Germany.

Jewish currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet,
precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A
wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of
bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms
were lost to Jewish speculators and private banks. Germans lived in
hovels. They were starving.

Nothing like this had ever happened before - the total destruction of
the national currency, plus the wiping out of people's savings and
businesses. On top of all this came a global depression. Germany had
no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international Jewish
bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power. At
that point, the German government thwarted the international Jewish
banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by
declaring a global economic boycott of Germany.

Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public
works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and
private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals,
and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no
longer came from the private international Jewish bankers.

The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion
units of the national currency. To pay for this, the German
government issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury
Certificates. In this way, the National Socialists put people to
work.

Under the National Socialists, Germany's money wasn't backed by gold.
It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the
government. Hitler said, "For every mark issued, we require the
equivalent of a mark's worth of work done, or goods produced." Workers
spent those Certificates on other people's goods and services, thus
creating more jobs for more people. In this way, the German people
climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the Jew bankers.

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and
Germany was back on it's feet. It had a solid, stable currency with
no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the US
and other Western countries were still out of work. Within five
years, Germany went from being the poorest nation in Europe to the
richest!

Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the global
boycott by Jew-owned enterprises, and the denial of foreign credit by
Jew-owned banks. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment
and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system
that cut the Jew bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since
barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits.

Germany's economic freedom was short-lived; but it left several
monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive
superhighway. This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with
the German people. Germany was rescued from English economic theory,
which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned
by a private and secretive banking cartel - such as the Federal
Reserve, or the European Central Bank - rather than issued by the
government for the benefit of the people.


In "Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People" (1984), Shelton
Emry commented:

"Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which
accounts for Germany's startling rise from the depression to a world
power in five years. The German government financed its entire
operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took
the entire Capitalist and Communist worlds to destroy the German
revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Jewish
bankers."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Most people should only pay income tax. Overall wealth should only be
taxed if they have over a millions dollars.
That is not much these days.
It is much more than anyone actually needs.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Americans love Israel. What love! More like, as I have elaborated
later, they like the idea of Eternal Life.
Unholy Alliance - Zionism and Christianity: Ted Pike, interviewed by
Texe Marrs, provides eye-opening insight into the great harm being
done by supposed Christian leaders who have bought into the
unscriptural Zionist scheme. Many of them, he reports, are richly
rewarded for their allegiance to earthly Israel. For example, Baptist
pastor Jerry Falwell was given a spanking new, multimillion dollar
executive jet by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin. Pat
Robertson's CBN Network was "blessed" by Israel with a television
station in Lebanon. But - surprise! - in fact, U.S. taxpayers
actually footed the bill for these toys which Israel so generously
showered on its Judaizer pals of the powerful U.S. evangelical lobby.

www.powerofprophecy.com
Post by Arindam Banerjee
No other nation on this
Post by Topaz
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones.
Aw, the writer's racism is showing.
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.

All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
And to make
Post by Topaz
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me.
Now that shows something.
Post by Topaz
Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this?
Well yes, Indians are dumber as they worship the poverty-boosting
Gandhi.
If Americans love Israelis so much, why don't they ask all of them to
come and live in the USA? They could give parts of Texas or Florida
to them, to form their own Zionist state right in their common One
True God's own great land.
That is interesting.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Which regular American bothers about Arab lives? The regular American
wants Heaven on Earth, eternal life, etc. and he thinks that with Jews
living in Israel the chances of that happening is more than zero.
Post by Topaz
If their view about an afterlife was correct then it makes sense. But
it can't be good. That is why Christians made a rule that if you
commit suicide then you go to hell.
That rule does not work on those who are not Christian.
Martyrdom is the highest ideal that Christ himself showed, albeit
without wanting to do so unlike the glorious satis; what is suicide
to the Christians is martyrdom to others. Yes, there is no more need
for sati-daaha; enough has been done already and their glorious memory
will suffice for all subsequent generations.
Post by Topaz
Belief is what one does only after one is convinced by the evidence.
No, belief as such has nothing to do with evidence; the conviction
comes from fond assumptions. Scientific belief has to be based on
evidence. Not all belief has to be scientific.
It is folly to have unscientific beliefs.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Houdini looked into mediums. He found that they were all fake.
One example is not enough. There are mediums who are not fake.
If there was proof of one, it would probably be all over the news.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
I never said it was. I said the probability of life after death is
non-zero, given the certainty of life in this mortal plane. There are
other indications, like Ouija boards, ghosts, mediums, post death
experiences, etc. that assure us of the life beyond death. There is
a very strong historical basis for this, in all cultures.
All cultures may wish there was life after death. But I don't know of
one ghost story or anything else that is proven true. It may be
possible that the media is covering it up, but if a ghost story is
proven fact, why isn't it on the six o'clock news.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Probably there is.  It is wise to think there is, otherwise any good
effort to behave properly without the threat of retribution, would be
pointless.  That would not help social matters.
Helping social matters is very important. But that doesn't even claim
to by any proof.
I am talking here from the engineering point, not from any
mathematical point.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Of course. That is why the memory of the glorious sati (the devoted
and faithful wife) is so powerful.
That may be so. But it should be remembered as a tragedy, so that it
is not repeated.
No, it was not a tragedy as everyone thought it to be great and
glorious; a most perfect demonstration of courage, devotion, faith and
love. Only the very best and noblest ladies, being queens or of high
rank, could have this privilege. They don't make such girls any more,
for times were very different then, so of course it should not be
repeated nor encouraged in our age of money and cynicism. I am very
proud of their memory, for as a Hindu their example means more to me
than the martyrdom of Jesus Christ. Yes, just as no one should be
crucified voluntarily or otherwise for whatever reason, the practice
of sati-daaha has to remain banned. Just as one Jesus Christ is
enough for faith, the glorious satis of the past need no increase in
their numbers.
If you put it that way it sounds reverent, and it could be a good
religion.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-07 10:29:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:10:55 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
  To get a clearer picture suppose there is an island with ten workers
on it.  The workers grow  food and build  cars and  make a lot of
things. But there is a problem because they can't exchange their goods
that well without money. So to have a money supply in circulation a
banker rows his boat to the island and  loans each of the workers $100
at  5% per year. The money circulates back and forth as the workers
buy things. But at the end of the year there is a total of $1000 on
the island and $1050 is owed to the banker, that is, more than the
money that exists on the island.
   And where does the banker get the money? He simply creates it out
of nothing by printing notes on his printing press. Every month the
banker goes to the island to collect his payments, to make more loans,
and to buy cars and things with his profits. If someone can't make
their payment he takes  their entire farm or business.
This is not the complete truth, is it?  How about the increased
economic activity on the island making more wealth than the extra 5%?
Such as, with the loan money they make a university, and the students
You could have all the activity you want but there is only $1000 on
the island, and $1050 is owed to the banker.
The $50 extra will be replaced by $500 with increased activity.
Post by Topaz
leave the island to go elsewhere and send extra-island money home.  Or
tourism picks off, so more wealth comes in.  Ditto for mining,
farming, etc.
That would be foreign currency and the banker doesn't have to accept
it.
It would be a condition that he has to accept it, so far as those
taking loans are concerned.
Post by Topaz
He wants $1050 in the same notes that he made, and he knows the
people on the island can not pay.
Unless the people are very stupid or helpless, he cannot hope to fool
them this way.
Post by Topaz
The 5% extra charge relates to printing money, account-keeping, hiring
security to take over the farms etc., bribing politicians for
monopoly, adverstising, travel etc. If there is no monopoly then
competition will bring the interest rate down.  So the banker is just
providing a service, and takes his cut.  Yes if the banker is the
govt. then it may look as if the govt. could be kinder with those who
do not repay loans, but in that case no one would repay the loans.
That would lead to inflation.
Only the government should be allowed to create money. And the costs
of account-keeping etc, could be paid by taxes. No profit should be
made in the creation of money. It should just be for the benefit of
the citizens. No parasites should be getting rich from it.  Loans
should be at zero interest.
Zero interest nations have not been great economic successes. I mean
Dark Age Europe, modern communist nations, etc. They are far too
lazy, bigoted and stupid. Paying off loans makes people work hard and
thus do economies prosper. The idea is to keep interest rates low,
and that happens when there is peace in the land and honesty and hard
work among the population.
Post by Topaz
I fully agree, and add that instead of $100 they should all give
themselves $1000000 but in small doses and only as and when good plans
are put up by people of known worth. All get 1m, but only those who
show they can use it well can actually draw more than the maximum
amount given say monthly to all for survival.
There needs to be a money supply in circulation that is not owed to
any bankers. To create it we
who is we? Who wants to pay policemen and govt. workers? The bankers
need them the most in order to collect their loans, both principals
and interest. With no bankers, police etc we become a hunter-gatherer
society, or a stone age society based upon barter. Such systems were
very stable, for they lasted for thousands of years.

should pay policemen and other government
Post by Topaz
workers in the normal amount until there is the desired amount of
currency in circulation. After that, the police should be paid with
taxpayer money.
If no one works as no one has money to pay for work, how can there be
money for paying taxes? The Govt has to print money to pay police et
al, and that means there will be inflation and the value of currency
will go down. Like in Zimbabwe.
Post by Topaz
No.  A country can import and export, can go to war, can do more
research and marketing, more education, social work, culture etc.
So can the island. Import and exporting should be done without money.
Countries, or islands, should barter with what they have to get what
they need.
Money was invented as barter does not work very well. Bartering leads
to a very static society. Which means that surpluses and shortages
are not well balanced so there is spoil and deficiency.
Post by Topaz
That may well be. But the good news about the bankers is there are
many of them, and you can go from one to another.  If the Govt .is
crazy like US under Bush, or Cambodia under Pol Pot, or Germany under
Hitler, then you are all fully stuffed.
The US is ruled by the Jews and that is the problem.
No problem for most USAns, evidently. You are in the minority.
Post by Topaz
   Franklin  Roosevelt did some things to help people. But he didn't
really upset the money bag parasites who rule over us. Only Hitler did
that.
And how.
Post by Topaz
When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke.  The Treaty
of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people,
demanding that Germans repay every nation's cost of the (First World)
war.  These costs totaled three times the value of all the property in
Germany.
Jewish currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet,
precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times.  A
wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of
bread.  The national treasury was empty.  Countless homes and farms
were lost to Jewish speculators and private banks.  Germans lived in
hovels.  They were starving.
Really?
Post by Topaz
Nothing like this had ever happened before - the total destruction of
the national currency, plus the wiping out of people's savings and
businesses. On top of all this came a global depression.  Germany had
no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international Jewish
bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power.  At
that point, the German government thwarted the international Jewish
banking cartels by issuing its own money.  World Jewry responded by
declaring a global economic boycott of Germany.
If there was a national currency, then I don't understand how the
Nazis started to issue their own money. Every sovereign country can
issue its own currency - that is one of the most key aspects of
sovereignty. I cannot see how the Jews or anyone can stop any
sovereign country from issuing its own currency.
Post by Topaz
Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public
works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and
private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals,
and port facilities.  All these were paid for with money that no
longer came from the private international Jewish bankers.
Where did he get that money from? Who was the creditor and what
credit did he have?
Post by Topaz
The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion
units of the national currency.  To pay for this, the German
government issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury
Certificates.  In this way, the National Socialists put people to
work.
So the Jews did not like this and so called for a global boycott?
Post by Topaz
Under the National Socialists, Germany's money wasn't backed by gold.
It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the
government. Hitler said, "For every mark issued, we require the
equivalent of a mark's worth of work done, or goods produced." Workers
spent those Certificates on other people's goods and services, thus
creating more jobs for more people. In this way, the German people
climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the Jew bankers.
But how did they pay back the debt owed to the Jewish bankers? Did
the Jews take the certificates? Was the debt ever repaid in any way?
I just don't understand this.
Hitler must have done something wonderful, to change the public mood
so drastically. But what exactly did he do?
A receipt has no worth, as it is not gold nor anything useful.
What Hitler seems to have done is what I now call Quantitative
Explosion, that is, releasing a very large amount of money (in this
case as certificates) into a honest and hard-working population. Wow
that worked didn't it!
Post by Topaz
Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and
Germany was back on it's feet.  It had a solid, stable currency with
no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the US
and other Western countries were still out of work.  Within five
years, Germany went from being the poorest nation in Europe to the
richest!
Wow, QEx did it, now I understand.
Post by Topaz
Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the global
boycott by Jew-owned enterprises, and the denial of foreign credit by
Jew-owned banks.  Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment
and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system
that cut the Jew bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since
barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits.
All trade is barter anyway - money is just the medium of exchange.
What Hitler really did, from what I understand, is that he suddenly
released a vast amount of valid money into the system in the form of
certificates. These certificates were under tight control, so would
not inflate. They stoked internal growth that made barter possible
with other countries.
Post by Topaz
Germany's economic freedom was short-lived; but it left several
monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive
superhighway. This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with
the German people.  Germany was rescued from English economic theory,
which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned
by a private and secretive banking cartel - such as the Federal
Reserve, or the European Central Bank - rather than issued by the
government for the benefit of the people.
What about China and Japan? Do they follow this model?
Post by Topaz
In "Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People" (1984), Shelton
"Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which
accounts for Germany's startling rise from the depression to a world
power in five years. The German government financed its entire
operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt.  It took
the entire Capitalist and Communist worlds to destroy the German
revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Jewish
bankers."
Well, this is revealing. It is not difficult to see why the Jewish
bankers are loved so much. It should have to do with religion, with
the masses thinking very highly of the Jewish bankers just because
they are Jewish and so, the Chosen People. Seems to me, they will do
anything for any chance to go to Heaven and so loving the Jews is the
wisest option. Paying interest to keep them happy, or fighting world
wars for their sake, losing empires, etc. seems but a small sacrifice
when Eternity is at stake.
Post by Topaz
Post by Topaz
Most people should only pay income tax. Overall wealth should only be
taxed if they have over a millions dollars.
That is not much these days.
It is much more than anyone actually needs.
Oh I need a lot more than that, to do what I want.
Post by Topaz
Americans love Israel.  What love!  More like, as I have elaborated
later, they like the idea of Eternal Life.
Unholy Alliance - Zionism and Christianity: Ted Pike, interviewed by
Texe Marrs, provides eye-opening insight into the great harm being
done by supposed Christian leaders who have bought into the
unscriptural Zionist scheme.  Many of them, he reports, are richly
rewarded for their allegiance to earthly Israel.  For example, Baptist
pastor Jerry Falwell was given a spanking new, multimillion dollar
executive jet by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin.  Pat
Robertson's CBN Network was "blessed" by Israel with a television
station in Lebanon.  But - surprise! - in fact, U.S. taxpayers
actually footed the bill for these toys which Israel so generously
showered on its Judaizer pals of the powerful U.S. evangelical lobby.
www.powerofprophecy.com
No other nation on this
Post by Topaz
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones.
Aw, the writer's racism is showing.
    The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
Rubbish. Whites were nothing much only a few centuries ago.
Unscrupulous conduct made them rich and powerful. RICH meant Rob India
Come Home in the colonial days. At least they were honest after a
fashion. Japan and Korea were not much only a few generations ago. The
blacks have their own priorities, much like Indians. The Arabs were
nothing much except as a military force once upon a time , and only
oil has given them something. China was very great in the past, but
like India they have slipped but now they are coming back with a
vengeance.
Post by Topaz
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race.
Then why are they the slaves to the Jews, as you say? At least, no
black race is so subservient to the Jews. Whites cannot be so smart
if they are so stupid as you quoted one Nazi as saying about American
attitudes regarding Israel.


The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
Post by Topaz
people in India.
And a lot less racist to Indians than what the whites were. Japanese
have never considered Indians to be less intelligent based upon
colour. \\\
Post by Topaz
    All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks.
Which then makes it galling for them to have a black US president, no?
Post by Topaz
White people invented just about everything
important.
What they consider important. Most others have lived without their
inventions for millennia, and had far superior languages, music,
culture, religion, literature, mythology, agriculture, mining and
metallurgy, animal rearing, town-planning, pyramids, moral codes, art,
literacy, grammar, far superior cooking, manners, regard for truth,
family values, regard for law, spirituality, mathematics, astronomy,
medicine etc etc etc.


Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
Post by Topaz
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Those leftists are just as racist as other honest racists. IQ tests
prove nothing except the bias of the testers. Given same chances, all
races do equally well. This is proved by the quality of prize winners
in multicultural public schools of Australia. I was impressed to see
Post by Topaz
And to make
Post by Topaz
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me.
Now that shows something.
Post by Topaz
Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this?
Well yes, Indians are dumber as they worship the poverty-boosting
Gandhi.
If Americans love Israelis so much, why don't they ask all of them to
come and live in the USA?  They could give parts of Texas or Florida
to them, to form their own Zionist state right in their common One
True God's own great land.
That is interesting.
It is also a solution.
Post by Topaz
Which regular American bothers about Arab lives?  The regular American
wants Heaven on Earth, eternal life, etc. and he thinks that with Jews
living in Israel the chances of that happening is more than zero.
Post by Topaz
If their view about an afterlife was correct then it makes sense. But
it can't be good. That is why Christians made a rule that if you
commit suicide then you go to hell.
That rule does not work on those who are not Christian.
Martyrdom is the highest ideal that Christ himself showed, albeit
without wanting to do so unlike the glorious satis;  what is suicide
to the Christians is martyrdom to others.  Yes, there is no more need
for sati-daaha; enough has been done already and their glorious memory
will suffice for all subsequent generations.
Post by Topaz
Belief is what one does only after one is convinced by the evidence.
No, belief as such has nothing to do with evidence; the conviction
comes from fond assumptions.  Scientific belief has to be based on
evidence.  Not all belief has to be scientific.
It is folly to have unscientific beliefs.
Science itself is provisional. Science has nothing to do with emotion
and emotion is the province of all beliefs.
Post by Topaz
Post by Topaz
Houdini looked into mediums. He found that they were all fake.
One example is not enough.  There are mediums who are not fake.
If there was proof of one, it would probably be all over the news.
Why should that happen? The medium could be known only to those
around him. Not everyone wants publicity.
Post by Topaz
I never said it was.  I said the probability of life after death is
non-zero, given the certainty of life in this mortal plane.  There are
other indications, like Ouija boards, ghosts, mediums, post death
experiences, etc.  that assure us of the life beyond death.  There is
a very strong historical basis for this, in all cultures.
All cultures may wish there was life after death. But I don't know of
one ghost story or anything else that is proven true. It may be
possible that the media is covering it up, but if a ghost story is
proven fact, why isn't it on the six o'clock news.
Because the media is not everything, except to the most gullible of
fools. Also, I am not saying that the afterlife is a proven fact like
sliced bread.
Post by Topaz
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Probably there is.  It is wise to think there is, otherwise any good
effort to behave properly without the threat of retribution, would be
pointless.  That would not help social matters.
Helping social matters is very important. But that doesn't even claim
to by any proof.
I am talking here from the engineering point, not from any
mathematical point.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Of course. That is why the memory of the glorious sati (the devoted
and faithful wife) is so powerful.
That may be so. But it should be remembered as a tragedy, so that it
is not repeated.
No, it was not a tragedy as everyone thought it to be great and
glorious; a most perfect demonstration of courage, devotion, faith and
love.  Only the very best and noblest ladies, being queens or of high
rank, could have this privilege.  They don't make such girls any more,
for times were very different then, so of course it should not be
repeated nor encouraged in our age of money and cynicism.  I am very
proud of their memory, for as a Hindu their example means more to me
than the martyrdom of Jesus Christ.  Yes, just as no  one should be
crucified voluntarily or otherwise for whatever reason, the practice
of sati-daaha has to remain banned.  Just as one Jesus Christ is
enough for faith, the glorious satis of the past need no increase in
their numbers.
If you put it that way it sounds reverent, and it could be a  good
religion.
No, while the act had the blessings of the priests and the adoration
of the onlookers, essentially it was an exhortary act for improving
the temper of the people - making them better able thus to cope with
life's problems. Indian kings loved their people. They wanted to show
their greatness by example. For instance, one of the greatest kings,
Chandragupta Maurya, died of starvation just to prove a point - to
stretch the limits of endurance. That very high suffering was
dedicated to the people, to shown them fortitude by the most
significant personal example. He was the male equivalent of the sati.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-07 22:23:59 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 03:29:20 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The $50 extra will be replaced by $500 with increased activity.
Debt-free money could increase activity just as well. And the entire
money supply would not be owed to bankers, along with the interest
which was not created but it still owed.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
That would be foreign currency and the banker doesn't have to accept
it.
It would be a condition that he has to accept it, so far as those
taking loans are concerned.
Foreign money is owed to other bankers somewhere, plus the interest on
it. The island makes the situtation simpler and more clear.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
He wants $1050 in the same notes that he made, and he knows the
people on the island can not pay.
Unless the people are very stupid or helpless, he cannot hope to fool
them this way.
That is how the system works right now.

Marriner Eccles, then chairman of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, in testimony before the
Banking and Currency Committee of the House of
Representatives on the Banking Act of 1935. Mr. Eccles
testified: "In purchasing offerings of Government bonds,
the banking system as a whole creates new money, or bank
deposits. When the banks buy a billion dollars of
Government bonds as they are offered -- and you have to
consider the banking system as a whole, as a unit -- the
banks credit the deposit account of the Treasury with a
billion dollars. And they debit their Government bond
account a billion dollars, or actually create, by a
bookkeeping entry, a billion dollars."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Zero interest nations have not been great economic successes. I mean
Dark Age Europe, modern communist nations, etc.
ITEM: In 1922 the Soviets formed their first international bank, It
was not owned and run by the State as would be dictated by Communist
theory, but was put together by a syndicate of private bankers for
profit. These included, not only former Tsarist bankers, but
representatives of German, Swedish, and American banks. Most of the
foreign capital came from England. The man appointed as Director of
the Foreign Division of the new bank was Max May, Vice President of
Morgan's Guaranty Trust Company in New York.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
They are far too
lazy, bigoted and stupid. Paying off loans makes people work hard and
thus do economies prosper. The idea is to keep interest rates low,
and that happens when there is peace in the land and honesty and hard
work among the population.
It would be a lot better if the entire money supply was not owed to
bankers, along with the interest on it, which was never created and
can not be paid.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
There needs to be a money supply in circulation that is not owed to
any bankers. To create it we
who is we?
The citizens in a nation.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Who wants to pay policemen and govt. workers? The bankers
need them the most in order to collect their loans, both principals
and interest. With no bankers, police etc we become a hunter-gatherer
society, or a stone age society based upon barter. Such systems were
very stable, for they lasted for thousands of years.
Barter doesn't work when there are lots of people involved. People
need to get paid in money rather than in potatoes or whatever. It is
much more efficient.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If no one works as no one has money to pay for work, how can there be
money for paying taxes? The Govt has to print money to pay police et
al, and that means there will be inflation and the value of currency
will go down. Like in Zimbabwe.
Everyone should work. And creating new money should only be for having
the right amount of currency in circulation. There should also be new
money for loans, but without interest, and without parasites getting
rich.

We need to scrap the debt-money system. This site explains it for
those who don't know:
http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm

We need a money supply that is not owed to bankers. The government
should print the money without borrowing anything from anyone. Money
would be brought into circulation by paying policemen and other public
servants. Once there is a debt-free money supply in circulation, the
police and other things would then be paid for by taxes. New money
would still be created when needed but we would control the amount of
it so there is no inflation.

Loans for houses and cars and business should be from the
government and at zero interest. This would initially add to the money
in circulation but when the loan is repaid the money would be removed
circulation, so there is no net increase and no inflation.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
So can the island. Import and exporting should be done without money.
Countries, or islands, should barter with what they have to get what
they need.
Money was invented as barter does not work very well. Bartering leads
to a very static society. Which means that surpluses and shortages
are not well balanced so there is spoil and deficiency.
Money is needed within a nation. But between nations barter is fine.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
The US is ruled by the Jews and that is the problem.
No problem for most USAns, evidently. You are in the minority.
Post by Topaz
   Franklin  Roosevelt did some things to help people. But he didn't
really upset the money bag parasites who rule over us. Only Hitler did
that.
And how.
Really?
"I know you expect no deep expression of feelings, for feelings cannot
be clothed in words. But please imagine this: jobless, without any
money. For two years! For four years! For six years! A desperate
woman, broken in body and soul, with three young children.
How often did I see their hungry eyes looking toward me with vain
expectation. Nothing is more tortuous than such looks from children.
My faith in him, the fanatical fighter, was what kept me and mine from
what lured us - and anyone else in our situation - Suicide!

And today?
A happy mother who is always singing with her children. No one can see
in her the miserable, desperate woman she once was. Instead of three
unhappy hollow-cheeked children, four little devils making noise far
and wide.

Look at them! There may be families with better behaved children, but
none with children as cheerful and happy! That is what the Führer
means to me and mine.

I turned my back very early to a foreign worldview because it left my
whole life meaningless. The Führer gave me his worldview a firm place
to stand, for it is nothing but a knowledge of the eternal laws that
are behind the universe.

His deeds are a joyful fulfillment of these laws. His successes do not
seem to me, as one hears all too often, the result of good luck,
rather as the natural consequences of his nature. This faith, no, this
certainty, enables me to understand the Führer when his actions would
otherwise require blind confidence.

Such obvious confidence is the most wonderful feeling that I can
imagine. Admiration? Recognition? Thanks? They are nothing when
compared to the full understanding of a people of 80 million for the
mission of its Führer. That alone would be crowning of his sacrificial
struggle.

This fulfillment of this wish is my prayer for the Führer."
Fred. Ch., Poppelau

"The Führer is everything to us, he is our faith, security and hope.
As a bearer of the blood medal, I have always believed in this man,
who guided and inspired us, who led us in the fight for Germany's
greatness. We, me, my wife and our seven children, believe only in
him, Adolf Hitler. Is there a belief more understandable, more real,
more natural than this?

Has the Führer not done everything for us that one could do for the
good of a family? Did he not give me a job and the ability to decently
feed and clothe my family? Has he not given my children a future that
no other country could so easily give?

The Führer is with us in every situation! Look, sometimes the world is
hard on a family. There are difficult situations that cannot be
overcome. In just such hours I go to my living room, and there is a
picture of my Führer.

I look Adolf Hitler in the face and remember his great struggle, his
great will and accomplishments, and my miserable mood is gone and
thinking of the Führer gives me new strength.

How can I fail when I see the greatness in and around Adolf Hitler?
My children know the Führer as the man who rules all, arranges all,
who built their world. The Führer is the embodiment of what people had
such difficulty describing to us children before. But this is the
enormous difference: The Führer moves among the people so that one can
celebrate him, so that our love for him is rewarded through his ever
new deeds.

The Führer is hope for us in every situation. Look, my dear comrade,
according to the Führer's own words, raising seven children is a great
responsibility to the state and a holy duty.

To form these young souls, to raise them to be decent adults, is such
a wonderful task only because the Führer has given us the sure
foundations that are necessary. He is our hope, for only through his
generous measures are we with many children also able to "lead an
decent life," as anyone should be able to do. He protects our strength
through the NSV, through subventions for children, through the support
the state gives women and children, through the high status he gave
children.

Once people mocked those with many children. Today people honor them.
Now my wife and I have become respected members of the state. That is
why we have such hope for the future of our children, for the Führer
has provided all that is necessary for them so that they too will be
able to establish families and contribute to the security and
protection of the great Fatherland.

Is it not wonderful to know what a wonderful future awaits our
children. One cannot but remember our own youth during the postwar
period, during the inflation, the days of hunger and so much that had
terrible effects on our youth and development.

Our children have no fears of such things, for they know that our
Führer plans everything, foresees everything, and prepares the best
for us.

Is it not obvious why the Führer means everything to us?"
Toni Dominik Sch., Unterammergau

"I can still remember the first time I saw and heard the Führer in
1920 in the Zirkus Krone in Munich. This was the introduction: "Adolf
Hitler will speak!" A somewhat slight young man stood before me, with
a short coat, soft collar and crumpled tie, poorly clothed. I was
curious to hear what this man had to say to me.

As I heard his voice, the passion of his words (something unheard of
at the time), the growing tension of his words, it became clear to me:
This man or no one! To this day, this inner feeling has not left me.
The greatness of this man, his deeds, his historic successes seem
enormous to me. But yet I always see him as a man of the people, one
of us in my mind's eye. It fills me with pride that Providence choice
one of our brothers to fulfill German history.

I honor the great figures of German history, but my feelings for the
Führer are different. I believe that love is the best word to describe
them.

One of us, who came from the people, has done amazing deeds, yet
remained the same from the first day I saw him until today.
I admire this man so much that I would defend him even if he were in
the wrong, but he cannot be wrong since he is truth and justice
themselves."
Gr. F., Munich
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If there was a national currency, then I don't understand how the
Nazis started to issue their own money. Every sovereign country can
issue its own currency - that is one of the most key aspects of
sovereignty. I cannot see how the Jews or anyone can stop any
sovereign country from issuing its own currency.
The National Socialist and very sound money. Hitler nationalized the
banks.

"Life is not a problem of financial speculations, but always a problem
of work. The folk community does not exist on the fictitious value of
money, but on the results of productive labor, which is what gives
money its value. This production, and not a bank or gold reserve, is
the first cover for a currency."

Adolf Hitler
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Where did he get that money from? Who was the creditor and what
credit did he have?
The National Socialist created money and it's value was based on the
production of the people, not on a bank or a gold reserve.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So the Jews did not like this and so called for a global boycott?
Correct
Post by Arindam Banerjee
But how did they pay back the debt owed to the Jewish bankers?
They didn't
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Did
the Jews take the certificates? Was the debt ever repaid in any way?
I just don't understand this.
Hitler must have done something wonderful, to change the public mood
so drastically. But what exactly did he do?
A receipt has no worth, as it is not gold nor anything useful.
Here is part of Hitler's speech at Rheinmetall-Borsig Works, Berlin,
on December 10, 1940:

They claim to be fighting for the maintenance of the gold standard as
the currency basis. That I can well believe, for the gold is in their
hands. We, too, once had gold, but it was stolen and extorted from us.
When I came to power, it was not malice which made me abandon the gold
standard. Germany simply had no gold left. Consequently, quitting the
gold standard presented no difficulties, for it is always easy to part
with what one does not have. We had no gold. We had no foreign
exchange. They had all been stolen and extorted from us during the
previous fifteen years. But, my fellow countrymen, I did not regret
it, for we have constructed our economic system on a wholly different
basis. In our eyes, gold is not of value in itself. It is only an
agent by which nations can be suppressed and dominated.
When I took over the government, I had only one hope on which to
build, namely, the efficiency and ability of the German nation and the
German workingman; the intelligence of our inventors, engineers,
technicians, chemists, and so forth. I built on the strength which
animates our economic system. One simple question faced me: Are we to
perish because we have no gold; am I to believe in a phantom which
spells our destruction? I championed the opposite opinion: Even though
we have no gold, we have capacity for work.
The German capacity for work is our gold and our capital, and with
this gold I can compete successfully with any power in the world. We
want to live in houses which have to be built. Hence, the workers must
build them, and the raw materials required must be procured by work.
My whole economic system has been built up on the conception of work.
We have solved our problems while, amazingly enough, the capitalist
countries and their currencies have suffered bankruptcy.
Sterling can find no market today. Throw it at any one and he will
step aside to avoid being hit. But our Reichsmark, which is backed by
no gold, has remained stable. Why? It has no gold cover; it is backed
by you and by your work. You have helped me to keep the mark stable.
German currency, with no gold coverage, is worth more today than gold
itself. It signifies unceasing production. This we owe to the German
farmer, who has worked from daybreak till nightfall. This we owe to
the German worker, who has given us his whole strength. The whole
problem has been solved in one instant, as if by magic.
My dear friends, if I had stated publicly eight or nine years ago: 'In
seven or eight years the problem of how to provide work for the
unemployed will be solved, and the problem then will be where to find
workers,' I should have harmed my cause. Every one would have
declared: 'The man is mad. It is useless to talk to him, much less to
support him. Nobody should vote for him. He is a fantastic creature.'
Today, however, all this has come true. Today, the only question for
us is where to find workers. That, my fellow countrymen, is the
blessing which work brings.
Work alone can create new work; money cannot create work. Work alone
can create values, values with which to reward those who work. The
work of one man makes it possible for another to live and continue to
work. And when we have mobilized the working capacity of our people to
its utmost, each individual worker will receive more and more of the
world's goods.
We have incorporated seven million unemployed into our economic
system; we have transformed another six millions from part-time into
full-time workers; we are even working overtime. And all this is paid
for in cash in Reichsmarks which maintained their value in peacetime.
In wartime we had to ration its purchasing capacity, not in order to
devalue it, but simply to earmark a portion of our industry for war
production to guide us to victory in the struggle for the future of
Germany...

I wish to put before you a few basic facts: The first is that in the
capitalistic democratic world the most important principle of economy
is that the people exist for trade and industry, and that these in
turn exist for capital. We have reversed this principle by making
capital exist for trade and industry, and trade and industry exist for
the people. In other words, the people come first. Everything else is
but a means to this end. When an economic system is not capable of
feeding and clothing a people, then it is bad, regardless of whether a
few hundred people say: 'As far as I am concerned it is good,
excellent; my dividends are splendid.'
However, the dividends do not interest me at all. Here we have drawn
the line. They may then retort: 'Well, look here, that is just what we
mean. You jeopardize liberty.'
Yes, certainly, we jeopardize the liberty to profiteer at the expense
of the community, and, if necessary, we even abolish it...
Post by Arindam Banerjee
What Hitler seems to have done is what I now call Quantitative
Explosion, that is, releasing a very large amount of money (in this
case as certificates) into a honest and hard-working population. Wow
that worked didn't it!
From a German pamphlet:

Do you remember the state of Germany and the German people in the days
before the aged Reich President von Hindenburg chose Adolf Hitler and
his party as the last hope of saving Germany from certain political,
social and economic collapse that would lead to chaos? Tens of
thousands of factories had closed their gates. Millions of workers and
employees lost their jobs and were thrown ruthlessly into the gray
misery of mass unemployment. There seemed no way out...
By the end of 1933, 2 million citizens had jobs again. By September
1936, the number of unemployed had fallen beneath a million. By 1937
unemployment had vanished...
One of the foundations of National Socialism is the knowledge that
only work creates value and prosperity...
But not only the dreadful misery before 1933 reduced the desire of
countless Germans to have children. Crass egotism and materialism also
played a role. The System Era saw having children as foolish and
backward. The transformation that has occurred is clear in the rising
German birth rate...
The National Socialist state gives major tax reductions to fathers for
each child. Families with three or more children receive payments of
10 and 20 marks monthly. By the end of 1937, 510,000 children were
receiving such support...
By the end of 1937, 252,000 mothers had received free vacations...
The Winterhilfswerk is the most beautiful expression of the new German
people's community. It is not the work of a small group of rich
people. No, each German, all of us, rich and poor, manual laborers,
farmers and city-dwellers cooperate in fulfilling the Führer's will:
No German may be hungry or cold!
One does not know whom to admire more: the cheerful willingness of
those who collect, or the rising amount of the gifts, to which even
the poorest contribute their share. The success of the
Winterhilfswerk, written permanently into the law of 1 December 1936,
demonstrates the efforts of the entire German nation. Gifts of money
alone totaled over 920 million marks during the four winters from
1933/34 to 1936/37. An additional 570 million marks of goods were
contributed. 50,000 freight cars alone would have been needed for the
potatoes contributed in the past years. The three million meters of
clothing given out by the WHW would stretch from Berlin to the Middle
East. The two million kilograms of coal would form a wall ten meters
high around all of Germany. These few examples, and more could be
given, prove the strength of the German people's will to be active
socialists..
Another sign of this socialism is the entirely different status of the
German worker in factories. The social honor of each working German is
guaranteed by law. The state's representatives ensure that exploiting
workers is impossible. The legal working conditions correspond to
National Socialism's high opinion of work. Workers have a right to a
vacation and for paid holidays, even hourly and temporary workers.
There is nothing like this elsewhere in the world.
The dignity of labor is evidenced by improvements in the appearance of
the work place. Wherever one looks in Germany, ugly dark buildings are
vanishing. The "Beauty of Labor" movement in today's Germany is not
empty talk or an impossible demand, but living reality. Large sums
that formerly would have been wasted in strikes and lockouts have been
used since 1933 to improve work places. 23,000 places have been
transformed form soulless drudgery to pleasant places to work. 6,000
factory courtyards now offer space for real relaxation, which was not
true in the past. 17,000 canteens and lounges, 13,000 shower and
changing rooms have been transformed. The dirtier the work, the
cleaner the workers. More than 800 community buildings and 1200 sport
facilities , including over 200 swimming pools, have been established.
The crew quarters in over 3500 ships have also been improved.
The NS Society Kraft durch Freude brings cheer and pleasure to
workplaces through concerts and art exhibits. The art exhibits alone
introduced more than 2,5 million workers to the creations of true
German art. Just five years ago, it was obvious that the great works
of German culture belonged to a small group of the upper class.
Besides the factory concerns and art exhibitions, the NS Society Kraft
durch Freude uses theatrical performances, other concerts, singing and
musical groups to introduce the creations of German art to every
working German. 22 million citizens have attended theatrical
performances..
Of no less importance is the KdF's vacation program. Earlier, German
workers did not know what to do with their, at best, five days of
annual vacation. They could not visit the beauties of the German
landscape, much less travel abroad. The NS Society Kraft durch Freude
gave German workers the possibility of vacationing at the beach or in
the mountains, or to explore the homeland. Over 20 million have
participated in KdF trips since 1934. That is more than a quarter of
Germany's population. 19 million citizens participated in 60,000
vacation trips at home. Hand to hand, they would stretch from Berlin
to Tokyo. KdF trains have traveled 2,160,000 kilometers, or 54 times
around the world. The nine large KdF cruise ships have covered a
distance equal to twice the distance from the earth to the moon. They
have carried German workers to Madeira, Italy and Norway, broadening
their horizons and giving them unforgettable experiences. Three
additional ships will be added the KdF's own fleet of four. A KdF
resort is being built on the island of Rügen. It will not be the only
one. A series of other vacation and spa resorts will be built. They
will fulfill the Führer's wishes at the start of the NS Society Kraft
durch Freude: to lead a cheerful, creative and strong people to
success in the world.
The goal of bringing German culture to the entire German people,
regardless of their income, is especially clear with the German radio.
Thanks to the People's Radio Set, a solid, inexpensive and capable
receiver, the number of radio listeners has risen from around 4
million in 1932 to 9.1 million today. The un-German programming of the
System Era has been transformed by National Socialism. Now radio
acquaints the German people with the work of their great masters of
music and literature. Alongside these artistic programs, the
entertaining programming provides for the relaxation of hard-working
people.
Clear proof for the rising prosperity of the German people is provided
by the growing consumption of foodstuffs and luxury items of every
variety. During the prewar year 1913, only a little more than 2.9
million tons of meat were consumed. In 1937, that figure had risen to
3.7 million, up about 5% from 1932. Thanks to the elimination of
unemployment, bread consumption increased by about 10%, sugar by 15%.
Butter consumption rose from 420,000 to 519,000 tons. Milk production,
both for drinking and for making butter and cheese, rose from 23.5 to
25.4 billion liters from 1932 to 1937. Coffee consumption rose from
104,000 to 140,000 tons. Beer consumption has risen from 3.3 to 4.4
billion liters. That is an increase of about 3 billion glasses of
beer...
The growing prosperity and rising consumption of foodstuffs and luxury
items required hard work. A people can only consume what it produces.
In the face of this obvious truth, which however only became clear to
us after 1933, all the parliamentary resolutions, all the decisions of
international conferences and the demands of the international unions
become silly talk. The German people have proved that by our own work.
Germany has worked untiringly since 1933, producing itself the goods
it needs to improve its standard of living.
The rising production in all areas, which has never before been seen,
is the fruit of our work. The foundation of our life is agriculture,
whose task is to guarantee that the nation is fed. When the Führer
took power, agriculture was in a ruinous state. Officers of the court
were regular visitors at German farms. The animals and the harvest
were seized ruthlessly because taxes and interests had risen to
impossible levels that German soil could not meet. Forced auctions
drove tens of thousands of German farmers from their land. Desperation
prevailed in the villages. As a result of the desperate situation,
agriculture could not ensure the feeding of the German nation. The
ghost of hunger threatened.
Here too the Führer set to work immediately. Interest and taxes were
lowered, and the German soil was freed from usurious capital. Between
1927 and 1931, German agricultural debt rose by 2,9 billion marks.
From 1933 to 1936, it fell by 800 million marks. The interest burden,
which was over a billion marks in 1931/32, was reduced by National
Socialist actions to 630 million marks. The crowning achievement was
the creation of the Reich Inherited Farm Law, which guaranteed that
the German family farm will always remain the wellspring of the
nation...
Just as for farmers and agricultural workers, the urban population is
also being cared for. Although more than enough willing and able
workers were available in 1932, and although the housing need was
certainly great, the government put workers on the dole and built only
141,265 dwellings. This was an area in which the need for new jobs was
particularly clear. Even in 1933, the number of new dwellings rose to
178,000, with particular attention being given to small and mid-sized
units for those with limited incomes. This number grew year by year,
reaching 340,000 dwellings in 1937, double the number of 1932. In all,
National Socialist has built more than 1.4 million new, and above all
healthy and affordable, dwellings for the German people since 1933.
This is enough to house the entire population of Berlin...
Growing prosperity and production led to a growth in traffic. The
entirely neglected German highway system had to be repaired and
expanded. 40,000 kilometers of highway have been repaired since 1933.
That is enough to go all the way around the world! Then there are the
Reich Autobahns, the most splendid construction project in the world.
2,000 kilometers were open to traffic by the end of 1937. 1,000
kilometers more will be added yearly, until Germany has a highway
network unique in all the world.
Automobile production has reached a level that no one would have
thought possible a few years ago.
The number of motor vehicles in Germany has doubled, exceeding the 3
million mark in 1937. Thanks to the growing prosperity, broad circles
of our nation can now afford a car. 137,141 of the new vehicles in
1937, well over half, were purchased by workers and employees. 30,015
workers and employees were able to buy a car the previous year. Cars
are becoming both better and cheaper. The increase in cars will be
even more striking when the Volkswagen comes on the market. Enormous
factories are even now being built. The best proof for the quality and
good pricing of German cars is the fact that automobile exports have
increased by a factor of eight since 1932!..
The great improvements in the German transportation system have
resulted in a growing stream of foreign visitors. The pulsing life in
Germany is drawing more and more visitors to the Third Reich. The
number of overnights by foreigners has risen from 2.7 million in 1932
is far above 7 million in 1937. These foreigners, who often come to
Germany with false ideas, see with their own eyes the work of the
Führer and the remarkable efforts of the German people. They return
home as the best witnesses of the greatness and strength of the German
Reich...
The Führer has repeatedly reminded the German people that strong
policies are the absolute prerequisite to our economic, social and
cultural health. Only intentional hostility and stupidity can still
deny that the Führer was right in every respect...
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and
Germany was back on it's feet.  It had a solid, stable currency with
no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the US
and other Western countries were still out of work.  Within five
years, Germany went from being the poorest nation in Europe to the
richest!
Wow, QEx did it, now I understand.
All trade is barter anyway - money is just the medium of exchange.
What Hitler really did, from what I understand, is that he suddenly
released a vast amount of valid money into the system in the form of
certificates. These certificates were under tight control, so would
not inflate. They stoked internal growth that made barter possible
with other countries.
And he nationalized banking. There were no parasites getting rich from
money creation.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
What about China and Japan? Do they follow this model?
I don't know.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
In "Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People" (1984), Shelton
"Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which
accounts for Germany's startling rise from the depression to a world
power in five years. The German government financed its entire
operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt.  It took
the entire Capitalist and Communist worlds to destroy the German
revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Jewish
bankers."
Well, this is revealing. It is not difficult to see why the Jewish
bankers are loved so much. It should have to do with religion, with
the masses thinking very highly of the Jewish bankers just because
they are Jewish and so, the Chosen People. Seems to me, they will do
anything for any chance to go to Heaven and so loving the Jews is the
wisest option. Paying interest to keep them happy, or fighting world
wars for their sake, losing empires, etc. seems but a small sacrifice
when Eternity is at stake.
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."

John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
for fear of the Jews"

2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save
one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"

Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our
children."

Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews
have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he
ought not to live any longer."

John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a
liar, and the father of it...Then answered the Jews..."


The religious leaders of the Jews were the Pharisees. Jesus
condemned them in the harshest words.

Matthew 23:33 "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye
escape the damnation of hell?"

The New Jewish Encyclopedia, edited by David Bridger, PH.D in
association with Samual Wolk, Rabbi, J.S.D, copyright 1962, Published
by Behrman House, inc.,1261 Broadway, New York 1, N.Y., Library of
Congress Catalog Card Number: 62-17079, says on page 376:

"The Pharisees are therefore regarded as those authorities who helped
develop and preserve traditional Judaism as it is known today."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Oh I need a lot more than that, to do what I want.
If you have over a million you can be taxed 10% per year on it without
and real suffering, such as what homeless people put up with.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Rubbish. Whites were nothing much only a few centuries ago.
Unscrupulous conduct made them rich and powerful. RICH meant Rob India
Come Home in the colonial days. At least they were honest after a
fashion. Japan and Korea were not much only a few generations ago. The
blacks have their own priorities, much like Indians. The Arabs were
nothing much except as a military force once upon a time , and only
oil has given them something. China was very great in the past, but
like India they have slipped but now they are coming back with a
vengeance.
It's a Wonderful Race

by James Bronson
There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it
all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his
father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to
his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for
all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites throughout
history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the
Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and
we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for
thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations
for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we
are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed
peoples."

George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko
nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie
college professors teach you that?" the father asked.

To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology
professor, Dr.Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr.
Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just
don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist racist
society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as
the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of
your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is
completely colorblind."

The father angrily replied: "That's bullshit! I've always been
fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I
haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong
with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of
people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your
biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage
and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud
of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial
identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"

The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's
the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were
discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human
race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called
"race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And
besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with
the fact that we live in an multicultural
society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist
culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George
said.

Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking cliché
you know that boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European
peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young
George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism
and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have
been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin
with."

Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge
smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone
and lost in a cold open field. An angel named Clarence then appeared
to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."

George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"

The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here
to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or
Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans
never existed."

"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a
racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able
to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world
was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest
motel?"

"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once
called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains
where you can find shelter."

"Caves? No way man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."

"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in
non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build
them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would
you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay
in a tent."

"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a
cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second,
are these Indians friendly or hostile?"

"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some
Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it
doesn't mean they all were" said the angel sarcastically.

"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism.
Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if
they turn out to be violent."

"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend
yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though we
could make a spear with those twigs over there."

"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians
to ask if it's OK."

"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here.
Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed.
No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then" replied George. "I'll sleep
in the damn cave."

Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a
lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence.
"There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European
gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get
warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs
together."

"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks
together for fire?"

"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the
evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the
angel sarcastically.

"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light
a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South
America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to
the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since
European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the
Incans will still be there.
... I need a car"

"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz,
the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were
never born..nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This
is a world without evil Europeans remember?"

"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."

"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans
weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses
of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow
you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly
south."

George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived
in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was
grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to
complain about the heat and humidity.

"Clarence, this hut is a little shithole and I'm sweating up a storm
here. Get me an air-conditioner please."

"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners
here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by
evil White men." "What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2002
these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or
their food cool? a frustrated George asked.

"No George, they haven't. And they never will."

"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I
can't live like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars! Dammit
I'll walk. let's go."

After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to
get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that
he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil
White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over
there if you want to make a torch."

"Never mind that!" George shouted back.

By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the
Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to
Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody
has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone
stop them?"

The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place
here."Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro
never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact,
it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the
Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who
would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them
a better life."

"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible
place. Get me out of this shithole now!" said George.

'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.

George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and
humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where the nearest
airport?"

"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"

"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts
available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic
Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed.
No Phoenicians, no Leif Erickson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus,
no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build
your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and
no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."

"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.

"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll
fly to Africa."

When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked
African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by
other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?"
George asked Clarence.

"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in
Africa long before the whites arrived." Clarence said. "In fact, most
of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave
traders by African tribal leaders."

"That's so sad.' George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King.
Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be
alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an
advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African
masters. Take me to him Clarence."

Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The
naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men
were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to
the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdoctor and spiritual leader.
There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his
neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that?
George asked.

"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never
became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities
or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create
such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He
specializes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"

The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his
henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George
and tied him to a nearby tree.

"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George
hysterically.

"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you George. The good
doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out
while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to
his tribe," laughed Clarence.

"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!

"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet
your hero Reverend King."

George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see
that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established
great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."

Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's
heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the
banks of the river Nile in Egypt.

"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it
Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and
primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented
black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington
Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson,
the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"

Clarence replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa,
exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them.
Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these
people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no
universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than
animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel
hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan
Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and
entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize
their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to
introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no
George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons,
no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans,
no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."

"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great
pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders
of the world .....built by non-Whites"

They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the
nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets
or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans.
The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open
fields."

Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some
toilet paper." George said.

"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."

"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a
rag then".

Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.

"I don't understand. According to my recollections from Geography
class, the great pyramids should be near this very spot. We ought to
be able to see them from miles away," said George.

"Well, George, I'm sure your professors at the college never told you
this, but the ancient Egyptians were not black or brown. They were
Caucasians. The anthropologists who examined the Egyptian mummies
confirmed this fact. There are no pyramids and no Sphinx either. And
the Carthaginians were White too."

George became depressed, but he was determined to prove his beliefs.
"What's in Europe?" he asked.

"Europe became populated by Huns and other Asiatic tribes. They've
settled down a bit but life is much the same as it is in North
America. A nomadic existence based on hunting and food gathering. No
great cities, no science, no buildings, no culture, no fine art - just
a hard daily struggle against life and the elements of nature. In a
Europe without evil Whites, the Roman Empire never existed nor did the
Greeks. There was no Renaissance either."

"Take me to Asia then. Surely the great civilizations of Persia,
India, China, and Japan will suit me" George said. "Clarence, to the
Taj Mahal please." "The Taj Mahal?" replied the angel. "Don't you know
that the ancient Persian and Indian civilizations were established by
ancient Indo-European tribes who crossed the Himalayas? They are the
ones who civilized India and built the Taj Mahal. Those are the great
civilizations
that Marco Polo, Columbus, and others were searching for.Did you know
that Iran is Persian for "land of the Aryan?"

George said: "Don't tell me that the Indians were White men! That
can't be. In the world I came from, I knew many Indians and they were
not White!"

Clarence explained: "As the centuries passed, the Indo-Europeans who
created Indian civilization intermarried with the native majorities
who populated the Indian subcontinent. Gradually there were less and
less evil White people until they faded out completely, along with the
advanced civilization they had built. You will notice that there are
still a few white-skinned and fair-haired Indians and Pakistanis
around today -- in the world you came from that is.

George became worried. He knew he could never fit into the harsh
primitive world he had been thrust into. Suddenly he thought of Japan.
"Japan! I'll show you now Clarence. Take me to Japan. If the Japanese
can make TVs and cameras then I'm sure I'll find a decent civilization
that I can live in."

Clarence transported George to Japan. George observed that Japanese
society was the most orderly, advanced and civil that he had seen, but
it seemed as if almost everyone was either a rice farmer, a fisherman,
or a soldier. There were no cars, no skyscrapers, no lights, no
stereos, no sciences, no technologies, no universities. It was a
stagnant agricultural society that seemed to have reached its high
water mark and was incapable of moving forward. George knew he could
not live here either.

Clarence explained to George: "Even the industrious Japanese and
Chinese peoples had to rely on the evil Europeans to build the modern
Asia that you had in mind. In this world, Japan exists exactly as it
did before Commodore Perry's American naval ships arrived in Japan in
the 1850s. There's no industry, no technology, no Fuji film, no Sony,
no Hitachi, no Panasonic, no Toyota, no Sushi bars, no baseball...none
of the trappings or comforts of modern life. These things don't exist
in Japan or anywhere else because
Europeans weren't there to create them and share them with the rest of
the world. Would you care for a bowl of rice George?"

George began to feel sick in both his body and his mind. Not only was
he depressed, but exposure to the harsh elements of nature had left
him physically ill. "Clarence, I seem to have contracted some type of
sickness. I must have some anti-biotics."

"Anti-biotics? There's no...

"Oh Shut up already! Then just take me back to the world as it was!"

"Sorry George. I'm not authorized to do that. Only my boss can make
that call." Clarence said to him: "You see George. Your father was
right. You really had a wonderful race. Don't you see what a foolish
mistake it is to be ashamed and guilty about your own people, and to
let them die out? This is what the world would be like without the
creative spark of Edison and Ford and Pasteur and Marconi. No great
scientists, or mathematicians, or inventors or fine artists. No
Archimedes, no Aristotle, no Socrates, no
Alexander, no Renaissance, no Newton, no Kepler, no Goddard, no
Mendel, no Tesla, no Faraday, no Guttenberg, no Shakespeare, no
Dickens, no Twain, no Mozart, no Beethoven, no Da Vinci, no
Michelangelo, no Galileo, no Copernicus. No Venice, no Paris, no
Lisbon, no Madrid, no Zurich, no Berlin, no St. Petersburg, no
Budapest, no Rome, no Milan, no Vienna, no London, no New York, no
Rio, no Sydney. No orchestras, no museums, no universities, no
hospitals, no libraries, no theaters, no radio, no books, no
television, no electricity, no refrigeration, no heating, no plumbing,
no houses, no steel, no stadiums, no vaccines, no cars, no planes, no
trains, no ships, no
dentists, no surgeons, no computers, no telephones, and most important
- there's no creative genius to be found that could create and sustain
such a high level of civilization. There's nothing for the people of
this world to build upon. It's just a daily struggle for subsistence.
A brutal planet where the few people who aren't mired in eternal
ignorance and darkness have reached their peak of civilization and are
advancing no further."

Clarence went on to lecture the broken and depressed young man for
seven days straight. He covered everything. History, science,
economics, philosophy, art, literature, fine music, architecture,
medicine, politics, agriculture, religion, and all the creations and
contributions that the European peoples had made in every conceivable
field of human endeavor. George listened closely to every word. He
felt like a man who had been
reborn.

After his lecture, Clarence the Angel floated away towards heaven. "I
hope you have found all this to be educational, and I hope you have
learned an important lesson. Enjoy your world George!" mocked the
departing angel.

George began to sob like a baby. It was the year 2002 and he was alone
and hungry in a backwards world where Europeans had never existed. He
cried out to the stars: "Please God. I see what a fool I've been. I
understand now what my father was trying to tell me. I want to go back
to the world that I came from. A world where Europeans not only
existed, but blessed the rest of humanity world with their unique
creative ability. I want to live in a civilized world. Please
God!...take me back!...take me back!...Oh God....please."

Suddenly George was transported back to his college dormitory. Drunk
with joy, George jumped into the showers before he could even take his
clothes off!.

"Warm water! and soap! Life is beautiful!" he screamed.

George's floor mates looked at him as if he was crazy. "George! Have
you gone crazy?" asked a bewildered schoolmate.

"No my friend. I haven't taken leave of my senses. I've come to them!"
George replied. George then began to sing classic European folk songs
in the shower. Miraculously, he was able to sing in many different
languages. He sang O Sole Mio in Italian, Amazing Grace in English,
Gloire Immortelle in French, Das Ist Der Tag in German, and also
Belgian, Spanish and French ballads and waltzes. Tears of sheer joy
began to stream down his cheeks. The degenerate music of Hip-Hop and
Rap lost all of its appeal to young George.

After his shower, George drove to a nearby restaurant and ordered two
whole entrees. One was Lasagna and the other was a delicious Veal
Marsala. With his Italian food he had a Greek salad with Spanish
olives and Russian dressing, drank a whole bottle of French wine,
followed by a German pastry for dessert. He finished his meal off with
a hot cup of English tea and a Cuban cigar.

George said out loud: "Oh those European peoples and their delicious
cuisine. Clarence was right after all. What a wonderful race!"

George was happy, but at the same time he realized there was much work
to be done. He thought of all those poor whites in Rhodesia and South
Africa who were being murdered and raped ever since they gave up
control of those once-European nations. He thought of the many
thousands of qualified Whites who were passed up for good jobs and
college entrance because of racial quotas that discriminate against
Europeans. He thought about the declining birthrates among all the
European nations of the world. He remembered that
Europeans everywhere were dwindling in numbers every year even as
their own nations were being flooded with third world immigration. He
recalled the O.J. Simpson verdict and how millions of blacks in
America cheered when that brutal double murderer was set free by a
black jury after he stabbed two Whites to death. He remembered the Los
Angeles riots of 1992, where dozens of Whites were dragged out of
their vehicles and killed like dogs in the streets by packs of
White-hating monsters who were never even punished! He remembered the
time when Jesse Jackson led a cheer at Stanford University: "Hey Hey
Ho Ho, Western Civ. has got to go!" His European blood began to
boil in righteous indignation when he recalled how Jesse Jackson once
said he had spit in White people's food when he was a young restaurant
worker. George now understood that that his people were on a collision
course with worldwide disaster and genocide. George realized that this
great people must not perish from the face of the earth.

George could not wait to see his father. He longed to embrace him and
apologize for all of the foolish and disrespectful things he had said
to him. But first, George had a score to settle with a certain college
professor. He walked into Dr. Silverstein's auditorium and quietly
took a seat in the back row. The nasal voiced Silverstein was
lecturing on and on
about racial and gender inequalities in European-centered
civilizations. It was vintage Silverstein. George's impressionable
White schoolmates, with their baggy pants, hip-hop clothes and
backwards baseball caps, were swallowing Silverstein's poison pills
hook, line and sinker. After letting Silverstein spew his cultural
poison for about 15 minutes or so, George raised his hand so that he
could give the professor a piece of his newly educated mind.

"George? Is that you? I remember you from last semester. I wasn't
aware that you were here today. I failed to recognize you in that
shirt and tie, and without your earrings. You must have enjoyed my
course so much that you signed up again eh? Class, I'd like for you to
meet George. He was one of my brightest students last semester. He
truly has a thorough grasp of the ideas presented in this course.
George, would you be so kind as to tell my class about that brilliant
term paper you wrote about European racism,
imperialism, and the need for monetary reparations?"

That's when young George let loose on the unsuspecting Professor.

"ENOUGH! You scheming devil! You mendacious fabricator of falsehoods!
You pusillanimous purveyor of pinko propaganda! How dare you try to
corrupt and manipulate our young minds when your filthy lies. We
Europeans have nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to apologize for, and
everything to be proud of. And most of all, we don't owe anybody
jack-shit - not one thin dime! To the contrary, it is the rest of
humanity that owes us a debt which can never be repaid! We are the
rightful heirs and protectors of a rich cultural heritage. You vile
manipulator! We are the sons of the Romans, the sons of
the Greeks, the Celtics, the Vikings, the Normans, the Saxons. Why do
you inflict shame and guilt upon us? We Europeans didn't just
contribute to civilization...WE ARE CIVILIZATION! And I declare that I
will no longer tolerate you shithead "intellectuals" trying to tear
our people down. Never again will we walk on eggshells when we speak,
always fearing that we might be called "racist." I no longer care what
people think. All that matters is the truth which you have sought to
pervert!"

"What are you up to anyway? Why do you to corrupt my young peers by
shoving false heroes down their throats. Enough of your Marxist games
of divide and conquer, you commie pinko subversive! I don't want to
learn anymore about Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or
Black History Month. They would not have amounted to anything without
the institutions of high civilization created by the European peoples.
I'm going to set this class straight about who the truly great men of
history are - the European
statesmen, scientists, explorers, monarchs, navigators, conquerors,
inventors, artists, writers, philosophers - the innovative giants of
history that you and your ilk have erased from our collective
memories. You speak of a world liberated from European influence?
Permit me tell your students about such a world, Silverstein, because
I can speak from personal experience, you wretched little conspiring
monster!"

Silverstein turned white as a ghost. He was shell-shocked and rendered
speechless for the first time in his career! Never in all of his years
at the University had a student dared to so boldly challenge his
falsehoods. Speaking from the heart as well as the mind, and with an
eloquence he never thought he could muster, George broke out into a
60-minute monologue on history, science, philosophy, culture, and all
the other attributes that
constitute high civilization. The young students were captivated by
George's brilliant oratory. Many were moved to tears. By the end of
his tirade, George's reawakened classmates were thundering their
approval of his speech. The class gave George a standing ovation and
they thanked him for helping them rediscover and reclaim their own
sense of pride and lost identity. The unstoppable power of truth had
melted away years of Marxist guilt tripping, self hate, wimpishness
and cultural brainwashing in just one unforgettable hour. The inspired
students proceeded to storm out of Silverstein's class,
throwing their hip-hop baseball caps and nose earrings at him as they
stampeded out and vowed never to return. They lifted George up upon
their shoulders and carried him out of the auditorium like a
conquering hero. With a glint in his eye, George glanced up towards
the sky, winked and said "Thank you, Clarence."

Dr. Silverstein was left humiliated and visibly shaken. He knew that
these reawakened European kids could never again be brainwashed with
"political correctness" and White guilt. Silverstein's greatest fear
was that more of these proud European youths would one day reawaken
and take their country and civilization back from the Silversteins of
the world.

Silverstein was worried, but he remained confident that most young men
and women would never learn the truth about their glorious past and
unique creative abilities. After all, the mass media, Hollywood, the
music industry, the colleges, and the public schools are all
controlled by "liberals" like Dr. Silverstein. With the power of
political correctness in their hands, they can continue to tear down
our European ancestors, destroy our
institutions and traditions, instigate blacks and other races against
the whites, flood America with third-world immigration, and push
"hip-hop" music, homosexuality, and other garbage onto a weak,
confused and morally degenerate youth. After reflecting upon these
facts, Silverstein smiled a devilish grin and muttered to himself: "A
few of these European sheep may wake up to what's being done to them,
but the majority of these idiots never will." And he smiled
again....and laughed with diabolical Marxist glee. Then
he repeated to himself "No...they will never figure it all out until
it's too late."

Or will they?
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race.
Then why are they the slaves to the Jews, as you say? At least, no
black race is so subservient to the Jews. Whites cannot be so smart
if they are so stupid as you quoted one Nazi as saying about American
attitudes regarding Israel.
It's because controlling the media is so very powerful.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
And a lot less racist to Indians than what the whites were. Japanese
have never considered Indians to be less intelligent based upon
colour. \\\
Post by Topaz
    All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks.
Which then makes it galling for them to have a black US president, no?
Sort of, but the Jews run everything anyway and president are their
puppets.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
White people invented just about everything
important.
What they consider important. Most others have lived without their
inventions for millennia, and had far superior languages, music,
culture, religion, literature, mythology, agriculture, mining and
metallurgy, animal rearing, town-planning, pyramids, moral codes, art,
literacy, grammar, far superior cooking, manners, regard for truth,
family values, regard for law, spirituality, mathematics, astronomy,
medicine etc etc etc.
Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
Post by Topaz
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Those leftists are just as racist as other honest racists. IQ tests
prove nothing except the bias of the testers. Given same chances, all
races do equally well. This is proved by the quality of prize winners
in multicultural public schools of Australia. I was impressed to see
Affirmative action prizes.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If Americans love Israelis so much, why don't they ask all of them to
come and live in the USA?  They could give parts of Texas or Florida
to them, to form their own Zionist state right in their common One
True God's own great land.
That is interesting.
It is also a solution.
Post by Topaz
It is folly to have unscientific beliefs.
Science itself is provisional. Science has nothing to do with emotion
and emotion is the province of all beliefs.
They could be incorrect beliefs then. Beliefs should be based on the
evidence.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
If there was proof of one, it would probably be all over the news.
Why should that happen? The medium could be known only to those
around him. Not everyone wants publicity.
That is not proof.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
All cultures may wish there was life after death. But I don't know of
one ghost story or anything else that is proven true. It may be
possible that the media is covering it up, but if a ghost story is
proven fact, why isn't it on the six o'clock news.
Because the media is not everything, except to the most gullible of
fools. Also, I am not saying that the afterlife is a proven fact like
sliced bread.
No, while the act had the blessings of the priests and the adoration
of the onlookers, essentially it was an exhortary act for improving
the temper of the people - making them better able thus to cope with
life's problems. Indian kings loved their people. They wanted to show
their greatness by example. For instance, one of the greatest kings,
Chandragupta Maurya, died of starvation just to prove a point - to
stretch the limits of endurance. That very high suffering was
dedicated to the people, to shown them fortitude by the most
significant personal example. He was the male equivalent of the sati.
He sounds like a good king, so it would have been better if he lived
longer.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-10 23:45:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 03:29:20 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
The $50 extra will be replaced by $500 with increased  activity.
Debt-free money could increase activity just as well. And the entire
money supply would not be owed to bankers, along with the interest
which was not created but it still owed.
Post by Topaz
That would be foreign currency and the banker doesn't have to accept
it.
It would be a condition that he has to accept it, so far as those
taking loans are concerned.
Foreign money is owed to other bankers somewhere, plus the interest on
it. The island makes the situtation simpler and more clear.
Post by Topaz
He wants $1050 in the same notes that he made, and he knows the
people on the island can not pay.
Unless the people are very stupid or helpless, he cannot hope to fool
them this way.
That is how the system works right now.
Marriner Eccles, then chairman of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, in testimony before the
Banking and Currency Committee of the House of
Representatives on the Banking Act of 1935. Mr. Eccles
testified: "In purchasing offerings of Government bonds,
the banking system as a whole creates new money, or bank
deposits. When the banks buy a billion dollars of
Government bonds as they are offered -- and you have to
consider the banking system as a whole, as a unit -- the
banks credit the deposit account of the Treasury with a
billion dollars. And they debit their Government bond
account a billion dollars, or actually create, by a
bookkeeping entry, a billion dollars."
Zero interest nations have not been great economic successes. I mean
Dark Age Europe, modern communist nations, etc.
ITEM:   In 1922 the Soviets formed their first international bank, It
was not owned and run by the State as would be dictated by Communist
theory, but was put together by a syndicate of private bankers for
profit.  These included, not only former Tsarist bankers, but
representatives of German, Swedish, and American banks.  Most of the
foreign capital came from England.  The man appointed as Director of
the Foreign Division of the new bank was Max May, Vice President of
Morgan's Guaranty Trust Company in New York.
 They are far too
lazy, bigoted and stupid.  Paying off loans makes people work hard and
thus do economies prosper.  The idea is to keep interest rates low,
and that happens when there is peace in the land and honesty and hard
work among the population.
It would be a lot better if the entire money supply  was not owed to
bankers, along with the interest on it, which was never created and
can not be paid.
Post by Topaz
There needs to be a money supply in circulation that is not owed to
any bankers. To create it we
who is we?
The citizens in a nation.
Who wants to pay policemen and govt. workers?  The bankers
need them the most in order to collect their loans, both principals
and interest.  With no bankers, police etc we become a hunter-gatherer
society, or a stone age society based upon barter. Such systems were
very stable, for they lasted for thousands of years.
Barter doesn't work when there are lots of people involved. People
need to get paid in money rather than in potatoes or whatever. It is
much more efficient.
If no one works as no one has money to pay for work, how can there be
money for paying taxes?  The Govt has to print money to pay police et
al, and that means there will be inflation and the value of currency
will go down.  Like in Zimbabwe.
Everyone should work. And creating new money should only be for having
the right amount of currency in circulation. There should also be new
money for loans, but without interest, and without parasites getting
rich.
 We need to scrap the debt-money system. This site explains it for
 http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm
 We need a money supply that is not owed to bankers.  The government
should print the money without borrowing anything from anyone. Money
would be brought into circulation by paying policemen and other public
servants. Once there is a debt-free money supply in circulation, the
police and  other things would then be paid for by taxes. New money
would still be created when needed but we would control the amount of
it so there is no inflation.
    Loans for houses and cars and business should be from the
government and at zero interest. This would initially add to the money
in circulation but when the loan is repaid the money would be removed
circulation, so there is no net increase and no inflation.
Post by Topaz
So can the island. Import and exporting should be done without money.
Countries, or islands, should barter with what they have to get what
they need.
Money was invented as barter does not work very well.  Bartering leads
to a very static society.  Which means that surpluses and shortages
are not well balanced so there is spoil and deficiency.
Money is needed within a nation. But between nations barter is fine.
Post by Topaz
The US is ruled by the Jews and that is the problem.
No problem for most USAns, evidently.  You are in the minority.
Post by Topaz
   Franklin  Roosevelt did some things to help people. But he didn't
really upset the money bag parasites who rule over us. Only Hitler did
that.
And how.
Really?
"I know you expect no deep expression of feelings, for feelings cannot
be clothed in words. But please imagine this: jobless, without any
money. For two years! For four years! For six years! A desperate
woman, broken in body and soul, with three young children.
How often did I see their hungry eyes looking toward me with vain
expectation. Nothing is more tortuous than such looks from children.
My faith in him, the fanatical fighter, was what kept me and mine from
what lured us - and anyone else in our situation - Suicide!
And today?
A happy mother who is always singing with her children. No one can see
in her the miserable, desperate woman she once was. Instead of three
unhappy hollow-cheeked children, four little devils making noise far
and wide.
Look at them! There may be families with better behaved children, but
none with children as cheerful and happy! That is what the Führer
means to me and mine.
I turned my back very early to a foreign worldview because it left my
whole life meaningless. The Führer gave me his worldview a firm place
to stand, for it is nothing but a knowledge of the eternal laws that
are behind the universe.
His deeds are a joyful fulfillment of these laws. His successes do not
seem to me, as one hears all too often, the result of good luck,
rather as the natural consequences of his nature. This faith, no, this
certainty, enables me to understand the Führer when his actions would
otherwise require blind confidence.
Such obvious confidence is the most wonderful feeling that I can
imagine. Admiration? Recognition? Thanks? They are nothing when
compared to the full understanding of a people of 80 million for the
mission of its Führer. That alone would be crowning of his sacrificial
struggle.
This fulfillment of this wish is my prayer for the Führer."
 Fred. Ch., Poppelau
"The Führer is everything to us, he is our faith, security and hope.
As a bearer of the blood medal,  I have always believed in this man,
who guided and inspired us, who led us in the fight for Germany's
greatness. We, me, my wife and our seven children, believe only in
him, Adolf Hitler. Is there a belief more understandable, more real,
more natural than this?
Has the Führer not done everything for us that one could do for the
good of a family? Did he not give me a job and the ability to decently
feed and clothe my family? Has he not given my children a future that
no other country could so easily give?
The Führer is with us in every situation! Look, sometimes the world is
hard on a family. There are difficult situations that cannot be
overcome. In just such hours I go to my living room, and there is a
picture of my Führer.
I look Adolf Hitler in the face and remember his great struggle, his
great will and accomplishments, and my miserable mood is gone and
thinking of the Führer gives me new strength.
How can I fail when I see the greatness in and around Adolf Hitler?
My children know the Führer as the man who rules all, arranges all,
who built their world. The Führer is the embodiment of what people had
such difficulty describing to us children before. But this is the
enormous difference: The Führer moves among the people so that one can
celebrate him, so that our love for him is rewarded through his ever
new deeds.
The Führer is hope for us in every situation. Look, my dear comrade,
according to the Führer's own words, raising seven children is a great
responsibility to the state and a holy duty.
To form these young souls, to raise them to be decent adults, is such
a wonderful task only because the Führer has given us the sure
foundations that are necessary. He is our hope, for only through his
generous measures are we with many children also able to "lead an
decent life," as anyone should be able to do. He protects our strength
through the NSV, through subventions for children, through the support
the state gives women and children, through the high status he gave
children.
Once people mocked those with many children. Today people honor them.
Now my wife and I have become respected members of the state. That is
why we have such hope for the future of our children, for the Führer
has provided all that is necessary for them so that they too will be
able to establish families and contribute to the security and
protection of the great Fatherland.
Is it not wonderful to know what a wonderful future awaits our
children. One cannot but remember our own youth during the postwar
period, during the inflation, the days of hunger and so much that had
terrible effects on our youth and development.
Our children have no fears of such things, for they know that our
Führer plans everything, foresees everything, and prepares the best
for us.
Is it not obvious why the Führer means everything to us?"
 Toni Dominik Sch., Unterammergau
"I can still remember the first time I saw and heard the Führer in
1920 in the Zirkus Krone in Munich. This was the introduction: "Adolf
Hitler will speak!" A somewhat slight young man stood before me, with
a short coat, soft collar and crumpled tie, poorly clothed. I was
curious to hear what this man had to say to me.
As I heard his voice, the passion of his words (something unheard of
This man or no one! To this day, this inner feeling has not left me.
The greatness of this man, his deeds, his historic successes seem
enormous to me. But yet I always see him as a man of the people, one
of us in my mind's eye. It fills me with pride that Providence choice
one of our brothers to fulfill German history.
I honor the great figures of German history, but my feelings for the
Führer are different. I believe that love is the best word to describe
them.
One of us, who came from the people, has done amazing deeds, yet
remained the same from the first day I saw him until today.
I admire this man so much that I would defend him even if he were in
the wrong, but he cannot be wrong since he is truth and justice
themselves."
 Gr. F., Munich
If there was a national currency, then I don't understand how the
Nazis started to issue their own money.  Every sovereign country can
issue its own currency - that is one of the most key aspects of
sovereignty. I cannot see how the Jews or anyone can stop any
sovereign country from issuing its own currency.
The National Socialist and very sound money. Hitler nationalized the
banks.
"Life is not a problem of financial speculations, but always a problem
of work. The folk community does not exist on the fictitious value of
money, but on the results of productive labor, which is what gives
money its value. This production, and not a bank or gold reserve, is
the first cover for a currency."
Adolf Hitler
Where did he get that money from?  Who was the creditor and what
credit did he have?
The National Socialist created money and it's value was based on the
production of the people, not on a bank or a gold reserve.
So the Jews did not like this and so called for a global boycott?
Correct
But how did they pay back the debt owed to the Jewish bankers?
They didn't
 Did
the Jews take the certificates?  Was the debt ever repaid in any way?
I just don't understand this.
Hitler must have done something wonderful, to change the public mood
so drastically.  But what exactly did he do?
A receipt has no worth, as it is not gold nor anything useful.
Here is part of Hitler's speech at Rheinmetall-Borsig Works, Berlin,
They claim to be fighting for the maintenance of the gold standard as
the currency basis. That I can well believe, for the gold is in their
hands. We, too, once had gold, but it was stolen and extorted from us.
When I came to power, it was not malice which made me abandon the gold
standard. Germany simply had no gold left. Consequently, quitting the
gold standard presented no difficulties, for it is always easy to part
with what one does not have. We had no gold. We had no foreign
exchange. They had all been stolen and extorted from us during the
previous fifteen years. But, my fellow countrymen, I did not regret
it, for we have constructed our economic system on a wholly different
basis. In our eyes, gold is not of value in itself. It is only an
agent by which nations can be suppressed and dominated.
When I took over the government, I had only one hope on which to
build, namely, the efficiency and ability of the German nation and the
German workingman; the intelligence of our inventors, engineers,
technicians, chemists, and so forth. I built on the strength which
animates our economic system. One simple question faced me: Are we to
perish because we have no gold; am I to believe in a phantom which
spells our destruction? I championed the opposite opinion: Even though
we have no gold, we have capacity for work.
The German capacity for work is our gold and our capital, and with
this gold I can compete successfully with any power in the world. We
want to live in houses which have to be built. Hence, the workers must
build them, and the raw materials required must be procured by work.
My whole economic system has been built up on the conception of work.
We have solved our problems while, amazingly enough, the capitalist
countries and their currencies have suffered bankruptcy.
Sterling can find no market today. Throw it at any one and he will
step aside to avoid being hit. But our Reichsmark, which is backed by
no gold, has remained stable. Why? It has no gold cover; it is backed
by you and by your work. You have helped me to keep the mark stable.
German currency, with no gold coverage, is worth more today than gold
itself. It signifies unceasing production. This we owe to the German
farmer, who has worked from daybreak till nightfall. This we owe to
the German worker, who has given us his whole strength. The whole
problem has been solved in one instant, as if by magic.
My dear friends, if I had stated publicly eight or nine years ago: 'In
seven or eight years the problem of how to provide work for the
unemployed will be solved, and the problem then will be where to find
workers,' I should have harmed my cause. Every one would have
declared: 'The man is mad. It is useless to talk to him, much less to
support him. Nobody should vote for him. He is a fantastic creature.'
Today, however, all this has come true. Today, the only question for
us is where to find workers. That, my fellow countrymen, is the
blessing which work brings.
Work alone can create new work; money cannot create work. Work alone
can create values, values with which to reward those who work. The
work of one man makes it possible for another to live and continue to
work. And when we have mobilized the working capacity of our people to
its utmost, each individual worker will receive more and more of the
world's goods.
We have incorporated seven million unemployed into our economic
system; we have transformed another six millions from part-time into
full-time workers; we are even working overtime. And all this is paid
for in cash in Reichsmarks which maintained their value in peacetime.
In wartime we had to ration its purchasing capacity, not in order to
devalue it, but simply to earmark a portion of our industry for war
production to guide us to victory in the struggle for the future of
Germany...
I wish to put before you a few basic facts: The first is that in the
capitalistic democratic world the most important principle of economy
is that the people exist for trade and industry, and that these in
turn exist for capital. We have reversed this principle by making
capital exist for trade and industry, and trade and industry exist for
the people. In other words, the people come first. Everything else is
but a means to this end. When an economic system is not capable of
feeding and clothing a people, then it is bad, regardless of whether a
few hundred people say: 'As far as I am concerned it is good,
excellent; my dividends are splendid.'
However, the dividends do not interest me at all. Here we have drawn
the line. They may then retort: 'Well, look here, that is just what we
mean. You jeopardize liberty.'
Yes, certainly, we jeopardize the liberty to profiteer at the expense
of the community, and, if necessary, we even abolish it...
What Hitler seems to have done is what I now call Quantitative
Explosion, that is, releasing a very large amount of money (in this
case as certificates) into a honest and hard-working population.  Wow
that worked didn't it!
Do you remember the state of Germany and the German people in the days
before the aged Reich President von Hindenburg chose Adolf Hitler and
his party as the last hope of saving Germany from certain political,
social and economic collapse that would lead to chaos? Tens of
thousands of factories had closed their gates. Millions of workers and
employees lost their jobs and were thrown ruthlessly into the gray
misery of mass unemployment. There seemed no way out...
By the end of 1933, 2 million citizens had jobs again. By September
1936, the number of unemployed had fallen beneath a million. By 1937
unemployment had vanished...
One of the foundations of National Socialism is the knowledge that
only work creates value and prosperity...
But not only the dreadful misery before 1933 reduced the desire of
countless Germans to have children. Crass egotism and materialism also
played a role. The System Era saw having children as foolish and
backward. The transformation that has occurred is clear in the rising
German birth rate...
The National Socialist state gives major tax reductions to fathers for
each child. Families with three or more children receive payments of
10 and 20 marks monthly. By the end of 1937, 510,000 children were
receiving such support...
By the end of 1937, 252,000 mothers had received free vacations...
The Winterhilfswerk is the most beautiful expression of the new German
people's community. It is not the work of a small group of rich
people. No, each German, all of us, rich and poor, manual laborers,
No German may be hungry or cold!
One does not know whom to admire more: the cheerful willingness of
those who collect, or the rising amount of the gifts, to which even
the poorest contribute their share. The success of the
Winterhilfswerk, written permanently into the law of 1 December 1936,
demonstrates the efforts of the entire German nation. Gifts of money
alone totaled over 920 million marks during the four winters from
1933/34 to 1936/37. An additional 570 million marks of goods were
contributed. 50,000 freight cars alone would have been needed for the
potatoes contributed in the past years. The three million meters of
clothing given out by the WHW would stretch from Berlin to the Middle
East. The two million kilograms of coal would form a wall ten meters
high around all of Germany. These few examples, and more could be
given, prove the strength of the German people's will to be active
socialists..
Another sign of this socialism is the entirely different status of the
German worker in factories. The social honor of each working German is
guaranteed by law. The state's representatives ensure that exploiting
workers is impossible. The legal working conditions correspond to
National Socialism's high opinion of work. Workers have a right to a
vacation and for paid holidays, even hourly and temporary workers.
There is nothing like this elsewhere in the world.
The dignity of labor is evidenced by improvements in the appearance of
the work place. Wherever one looks in Germany, ugly dark buildings are
vanishing. The "Beauty of Labor" movement in today's Germany is not
empty talk or an impossible demand, but living reality. Large sums
that formerly would have been wasted in strikes and lockouts have been
used since 1933 to improve work places. 23,000 places have been
transformed form soulless drudgery to pleasant places to work. 6,000
factory courtyards now offer space for real relaxation, which was not
true in the past. 17,000 canteens and lounges, 13,000 shower and
changing rooms have been transformed. The dirtier the work, the
cleaner the workers. More than 800 community buildings and 1200 sport
facilities , including over 200 swimming pools, have been established.
The crew quarters in over 3500 ships have also been improved.
The NS Society Kraft durch Freude brings cheer and pleasure to
workplaces through concerts and art exhibits. The art exhibits alone
introduced more than 2,5 million workers to the creations of true
German art. Just five years ago, it was obvious that the great works
of German culture belonged to a small group of the upper class.
Besides the factory concerns and art exhibitions, the NS Society Kraft
durch Freude uses theatrical performances, other concerts, singing and
musical groups to introduce the creations of German art to every
working German. 22 million citizens have attended theatrical
performances..
Of no less importance is the KdF's vacation program. Earlier, German
workers did not know what to do with their, at best, five days of
annual vacation. They could not visit the beauties of the German
landscape, much less travel abroad. The NS Society Kraft durch Freude
gave German workers the possibility of vacationing at the beach or in
the mountains, or to explore the homeland. Over 20 million have
participated in KdF trips since 1934. That is more than a quarter of
Germany's population. 19 million citizens participated in 60,000
vacation trips at home. Hand to hand, they would stretch from Berlin
to Tokyo. KdF trains have traveled 2,160,000 kilometers, or 54 times
around the world. The nine large KdF cruise ships have covered a
distance equal to twice the distance from the earth to the moon. They
have carried German workers to Madeira, Italy and Norway, broadening
their horizons and giving them unforgettable experiences. Three
additional ships will be added the KdF's own fleet of four. A KdF
resort is being built on the island of Rügen. It will not be the only
one. A series of other vacation and spa resorts will be built. They
will fulfill the Führer's wishes at the start of the NS Society Kraft
durch Freude: to lead a cheerful, creative and strong people to
success in the world.
The goal of bringing German culture to the entire German people,
regardless of their income, is especially clear with the German radio.
Thanks to the People's Radio Set, a solid, inexpensive and capable
receiver, the number of radio listeners has risen from around 4
million in 1932 to 9.1 million today. The un-German programming of the
System Era has been transformed by National Socialism. Now radio
acquaints the German people with the work of their great masters of
music and literature. Alongside these artistic programs, the
entertaining programming provides for the relaxation of hard-working
people.
Clear proof for the rising prosperity of the German people is provided
by the growing consumption of foodstuffs and luxury items of every
variety. During the prewar year 1913, only a little more than 2.9
million tons of meat were consumed. In 1937, that figure had risen to
3.7 million, up about 5% from 1932. Thanks to the elimination of
unemployment, bread consumption increased by about 10%, sugar by 15%.
Butter consumption rose from 420,000 to 519,000 tons. Milk production,
both for drinking and for making butter and cheese, rose from 23.5 to
25.4 billion liters from 1932 to 1937. Coffee consumption rose from
104,000 to 140,000 tons. Beer consumption has risen from 3.3 to 4.4
billion liters. That is an increase of about 3 billion glasses of
beer...
The growing prosperity and rising consumption of foodstuffs and luxury
items required hard work. A people can only consume what it produces.
In the face of this obvious truth, which however only became clear to
us after 1933, all the parliamentary resolutions, all the decisions of
international conferences and the demands of the international unions
become silly talk. The German people have proved that by our own work.
Germany has worked untiringly since 1933, producing itself the goods
it needs to improve its standard of living.
The rising production in all areas, which has never before been seen,
is the fruit of our work. The foundation of our life is agriculture,
whose task is to guarantee that the nation is fed. When the Führer
took power, agriculture was in a ruinous state. Officers of the court
were regular visitors at German farms. The animals and the harvest
were seized ruthlessly because taxes and interests had risen to
impossible levels that German soil could not meet. Forced auctions
drove tens of thousands of German farmers from their land. Desperation
prevailed in the villages. As a result of the desperate situation,
agriculture could not ensure the feeding of the German nation. The
ghost of hunger threatened.
Here too the Führer set to work immediately. Interest and taxes were
lowered, and the German soil was freed from usurious capital. Between
1927 and 1931, German agricultural debt rose by 2,9 billion marks.
From 1933 to 1936, it fell by 800 million marks. The interest burden,
which was over a billion marks in 1931/32, was reduced by National
Socialist actions to 630 million marks. The crowning achievement was
the creation of the Reich Inherited Farm Law, which guaranteed that
the German family farm will always remain the wellspring of the
nation...
Just as for farmers and agricultural workers, the urban population is
also being cared for. Although more than enough willing and able
workers were available in 1932, and although the housing need was
certainly great, the government put workers on the dole and built only
141,265 dwellings. This was an area in which the need for new jobs was
particularly clear. Even in 1933, the number of new dwellings rose to
178,000, with particular attention being given to small and mid-sized
units for those with limited incomes. This number grew year by year,
reaching 340,000 dwellings in 1937, double the number of 1932. In all,
National Socialist has built more than 1.4 million new, and above all
healthy and affordable, dwellings for the German people since 1933.
This is enough to house the entire population of Berlin...
Growing prosperity and production led to a growth in traffic. The
entirely neglected German highway system had to be repaired and
expanded. 40,000 kilometers of highway have been repaired since 1933.
That is enough to go all the way around the world! Then there are the
Reich Autobahns, the most splendid construction project in the world.
2,000 kilometers were open to traffic by the end of 1937. 1,000
kilometers more will be added yearly, until Germany has a highway
network unique in all the world.
Automobile production has reached a level that no one would have
thought possible a few years ago.
The number of motor vehicles in Germany has doubled, exceeding the 3
million mark in 1937. Thanks to the growing prosperity, broad circles
of our nation can now afford a car. 137,141 of the new vehicles in
1937, well over half, were purchased by workers and employees. 30,015
workers and employees were able to buy a car the previous year. Cars
are becoming both better and cheaper. The increase in cars will be
even more striking when the Volkswagen comes on the market. Enormous
factories are even now being built. The best proof for the quality and
good pricing of German cars is the fact that automobile exports have
increased by a factor of eight since 1932!..
The great improvements in the German transportation system have
resulted in a growing stream of foreign visitors. The pulsing life in
Germany is drawing more and more visitors to the Third Reich. The
number of overnights by foreigners has risen from 2.7 million in 1932
is far above 7 million in 1937. These foreigners, who often come to
Germany with false ideas, see with their own eyes the work of the
Führer and the remarkable efforts of the German people. They return
home as the best witnesses of the greatness and strength of the German
Reich...
The Führer has repeatedly reminded the German people that strong
policies are the absolute prerequisite to our economic, social and
cultural health. Only intentional hostility and stupidity can still
deny that the Führer was right in every respect...
Post by Topaz
Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and
Germany was back on it's feet.  It had a solid, stable currency with
no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the US
and other Western countries were still out of work.  Within five
years, Germany went from being the poorest nation in Europe to the
richest!
Wow, QEx did it, now I understand.
All trade is barter anyway - money is just the medium of exchange.
What Hitler really did, from what I understand, is that he suddenly
released a vast amount of valid money into the system in the form of
certificates.  These certificates were under tight control, so would
not inflate.  They stoked internal growth that made barter possible
with other countries.
And he nationalized banking. There were no parasites getting rich from
money creation.
What about China and Japan? Do they follow this model?
I don't know.
Post by Topaz
In "Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People" (1984), Shelton
"Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which
accounts for Germany's startling rise from the depression to a world
power in five years. The German government financed its entire
operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt.  It took
the entire Capitalist and Communist worlds to destroy the German
revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Jewish
bankers."
Well, this is revealing.  It is not  difficult to see why the Jewish
bankers are loved so much. It should have to do with religion, with
the masses thinking very highly of the Jewish bankers just because
they are Jewish and so, the Chosen People.  Seems to me, they will do
anything for any chance to go to Heaven and so loving the Jews is the
wisest option.  Paying interest to keep them happy, or fighting world
wars for their sake, losing empires, etc. seems but a small sacrifice
when Eternity is at stake.
John 7:1  "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
John 20:19  "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
for fear of the Jews"
2 Co 11:24   "Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save
one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
Mathew 27: 20+25  "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our
children."
Acts 25:24  "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews
have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he
ought not to live any longer."
John 8:42,44,48  "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a
liar, and the father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
     The religious leaders of the Jews were the Pharisees. Jesus
condemned them in the harshest words.
  Matthew 23:33  "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye
escape the damnation of hell?"
     The New Jewish Encyclopedia, edited by David Bridger, PH.D in
association with Samual Wolk, Rabbi, J.S.D,  copyright 1962, Published
by Behrman House, inc.,1261 Broadway, New York 1, N.Y.,  Library of
 "The Pharisees are therefore regarded as those authorities who helped
develop and preserve traditional Judaism as it is known today."
Oh I need a lot more than that, to do what I want.
If you have over a million you can be taxed 10% per year on it without
and real suffering, such as what homeless people put up with.
Rubbish. Whites were nothing much only a few centuries ago.
Unscrupulous conduct made them rich and powerful. RICH meant Rob India
Come Home in the colonial days.  At least they were honest after a
fashion. Japan and Korea were not much only a few generations ago. The
blacks have their own priorities, much like Indians.  The Arabs were
nothing much except as a military force once upon a time , and only
oil has given them something.  China was very great in the past, but
like India they have slipped but now they are coming back with a
vengeance.
It's a Wonderful Race
by James Bronson
There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it
all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his
father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to
his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for
all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites throughout
history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the
Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and
we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for
thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations
for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we
are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed
peoples."
George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko
nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie
college professors teach you that?" the father asked.
To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology
professor, Dr.Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr.
Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just
don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist racist
society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as
the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of
your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is
completely colorblind."
The father angrily replied: "That's bullshit! I've always been
fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I
haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong
with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of
people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your
biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage
and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud
of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial
identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"
The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's
the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were
discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human
race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called
"race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And
besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with
the fact that we live in an multicultural
society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist
culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George
said.
Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking cliché
you know that boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European
peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young
George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism
and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have
been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin
with."
Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge
smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone
and lost in a cold open field. An angel named Clarence then appeared
to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."
George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"
The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here
to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or
Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans
never existed."
"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a
racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able
to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world
was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest
motel?"
"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once
called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains
where you can find shelter."
"Caves? No way man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."
"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in
non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build
them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would
you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay
in a tent."
"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a
cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second,
are these Indians friendly or hostile?"
"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some
Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it
doesn't mean they all were" said the angel sarcastically.
"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism.
Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if
they turn out to be violent."
"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend
yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though we
could make a spear with those twigs over there."
"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians
to ask if it's OK."
"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here.
Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed.
No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then" replied George. "I'll sleep
in the damn cave."
Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a
lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence.
"There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European
gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get
warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs
together."
"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks
together for fire?"
"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the
evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the
angel sarcastically.
"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light
a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South
America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to
the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since
European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the
Incans will still be there.
... I need a car"
"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz,
the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were
never born..nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This
is a world without evil Europeans remember?"
"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."
"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans
weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses
of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow
you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly
south."
George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived
in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was
grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to
complain about the heat and humidity.
"Clarence, this hut is a little shithole and I'm sweating up a storm
here. Get me an air-conditioner please."
"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners
here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by
evil White men." "What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2002
these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or
their food cool? a frustrated George asked.
"No George, they haven't. And they never will."
"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I
can't live like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars! Dammit
I'll walk. let's go."
After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to
get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that
he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil
White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over
there if you want to make a torch."
"Never mind that!" George shouted back.
By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the
Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to
Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody
has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone
stop them?"
The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place
here."Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro
never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact,
it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the
Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who
would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them
a better life."
"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible
place. Get me out of this shithole now!" said George.
'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.
George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and
humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where the nearest
airport?"
"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"
"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts
available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic
Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed.
No Phoenicians, no Leif Erickson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus,
no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build
your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and
no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."
"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.
"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll
fly to Africa."
When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked
African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by
other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?"
George asked Clarence.
"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in
Africa long before the whites arrived." Clarence said. "In fact, most
of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave
traders by African tribal leaders."
"That's so sad.' George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King.
Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be
alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an
advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African
masters. Take me to him Clarence."
Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The
naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men
were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to
the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdoctor and spiritual leader.
There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his
neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that?
George asked.
"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never
became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities
or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create
such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He
specializes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"
The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his
henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George
and tied him to a nearby tree.
"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George
hysterically.
"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you George. The good
doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out
while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to
his tribe," laughed Clarence.
"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!
"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet
your hero Reverend King."
George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see
that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established
great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."
Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's
heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the
banks of the river Nile in Egypt.
"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it
Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and
primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented
black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington
Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson,
the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"
Clarence replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa,
exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them.
Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these
people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no
universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than
animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel
hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan
Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and
entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize
their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to
introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no
George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons,
no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans,
no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."
"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great
pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders
of the world .....built by non-Whites"
They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the
nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets
or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans.
The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open
fields."
Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some
toilet paper." George said.
"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."
"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a
rag then".
Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.
"I don't understand. According to my recollections from Geography
class, the great pyramids should be near this very spot. We ought to
be able to see them from miles away," said George.
"Well, George, I'm sure your professors at the college never told you
this, but the ancient Egyptians were not black or brown. They were
Caucasians. The anthropologists who examined the Egyptian mummies
confirmed this fact. There are no pyramids and no Sphinx either. And
the Carthaginians were White too."
George became depressed, but he was determined to prove his beliefs.
"What's in Europe?" he asked.
"Europe became populated by Huns and other Asiatic tribes. They've
settled down a bit but life is much the same as it is in North
America. A nomadic existence based on hunting and food gathering. No
great cities, no science, no buildings, no culture, no fine art - just
a hard daily struggle against life and the elements of nature. In a
Europe without evil Whites, the Roman Empire never existed nor did the
Greeks. There was no Renaissance either."
"Take me to Asia then. Surely the great civilizations of Persia,
India, China, and Japan will suit me" George said. "Clarence, to the
Taj Mahal please." "The Taj Mahal?" replied the angel. "Don't you know
that the ancient Persian and Indian civilizations were established by
ancient Indo-European tribes who crossed the Himalayas? They are the
ones who civilized India and built the Taj Mahal. Those are the great
civilizations
that Marco Polo, Columbus, and others were searching for.Did you know
that Iran is Persian for "land of the Aryan?"
George said: "Don't tell me that the Indians were White men! That
can't be. In the world I came from, I knew many Indians and they were
not White!"
Clarence explained: "As the centuries passed, the Indo-Europeans who
created Indian civilization intermarried with the native majorities
who populated the Indian subcontinent. Gradually there were less and
less evil White people until they faded out completely, along with the
advanced civilization they had built. You will notice that there are
still a few white-skinned and fair-haired Indians and Pakistanis
around today -- in the world you came from that is.
George became worried. He knew he could never fit into the harsh
primitive world he had been thrust into. Suddenly he thought of Japan.
"Japan! I'll show you now Clarence. Take me to Japan. If the Japanese
can make TVs and cameras then I'm sure I'll find a decent civilization
that I can live in."
Clarence transported George to Japan. George observed that Japanese
society was the most orderly, advanced and civil that he had seen, but
it seemed as if almost everyone was either a rice farmer, a fisherman,
or a soldier. There were no cars, no skyscrapers, no lights, no
stereos, no sciences, no technologies, no universities. It was a
stagnant agricultural society that seemed to have reached its high
water mark and was incapable of moving forward. George knew he could
not live here either.
Clarence explained to George: "Even the industrious Japanese and
Chinese peoples had to rely on the evil Europeans to build the modern
Asia that you had in mind. In this world, Japan exists exactly as it
did before Commodore Perry's American naval ships arrived in Japan in
the 1850s. There's no industry, no technology, no Fuji film, no Sony,
no Hitachi, no Panasonic, no Toyota, no Sushi bars, no baseball...none
of the trappings or comforts of modern life. These things don't exist
in Japan or anywhere else because
Europeans weren't there to create them and share them with the rest of
the world. Would you care for a bowl of rice George?"
George began to feel sick in both his body and his mind. Not only was
he depressed, but exposure to the harsh elements of nature had left
him physically ill. "Clarence, I seem to have contracted some type of
sickness. I must have some anti-biotics."
"Anti-biotics? There's no...
"Oh Shut up already! Then just take me back to the world as it was!"
"Sorry George. I'm not authorized to do that. Only my boss can make
that call." Clarence said to him: "You see George. Your father was
right. You really had a wonderful race. Don't you see what a foolish
mistake it is to be ashamed and guilty about your own people, and to
let them die out? This is what the world would be like without the
creative spark of Edison and Ford and Pasteur and Marconi. No great
scientists, or mathematicians, or inventors or fine artists. No
Archimedes, no Aristotle, no Socrates, no
Alexander, no Renaissance, no Newton, no Kepler, no Goddard, no
Mendel, no Tesla, no Faraday, no Guttenberg, no Shakespeare, no
Dickens, no Twain, no Mozart, no Beethoven, no Da Vinci, no
Michelangelo, no Galileo, no Copernicus. No Venice, no Paris, no
Lisbon, no Madrid, no Zurich, no Berlin, no St. Petersburg, no
Budapest, no Rome, no Milan, no Vienna, no London, no New York, no
Rio, no Sydney. No orchestras, no museums, no universities, no
hospitals, no libraries, no theaters, no radio, no books, no
television, no electricity, no refrigeration, no heating, no plumbing,
no houses, no steel, no stadiums, no vaccines, no cars, no planes, no
trains, no ships, no
dentists, no surgeons, no computers, no telephones, and most important
- there's no creative genius to be found that could create and sustain
such a high level of civilization. There's nothing for the people of
this world to build upon. It's just a daily struggle for subsistence.
A brutal planet where the few people who aren't mired in eternal
ignorance and darkness have reached their peak of civilization and are
advancing no further."
Clarence went on to lecture the broken and depressed young man for
seven days straight. He covered everything. History, science,
economics, philosophy, art, literature, fine music, architecture,
medicine, politics, agriculture, religion, and all the creations and
contributions that the European peoples had made in every conceivable
field of human endeavor. George listened closely to every word. He
felt like a man who had been
reborn.
After his lecture, Clarence the Angel floated away towards heaven. "I
hope you have found all this to be educational, and I hope you have
learned an important lesson. Enjoy your world George!" mocked the
departing angel.
George began to sob like a baby. It was the year 2002 and he was alone
and hungry in a backwards world where Europeans had never existed. He
cried out to the stars: "Please God. I see what a fool I've been. I
understand now what my father was trying to tell me. I want to go back
to the world that I came from. A world where Europeans not only
existed, but blessed the rest of humanity world with their unique
creative ability. I want to live in a civilized world. Please
God!...take me back!...take me back!...Oh God....please."
Suddenly George was transported back to his college dormitory. Drunk
with joy, George jumped into the showers before he could even take his
clothes off!.
"Warm water! and soap! Life is beautiful!" he screamed.
George's floor mates looked at him as if he was crazy. "George! Have
you gone crazy?" asked a bewildered schoolmate.
"No my friend. I haven't taken leave of my senses. I've come to them!"
George replied. George then began to sing classic European folk songs
in the shower. Miraculously, he was able to sing in many different
languages. He sang O Sole Mio in Italian, Amazing Grace in English,
Gloire Immortelle in French, Das Ist Der Tag in German, and also
Belgian, Spanish and French ballads and waltzes. Tears of sheer joy
began to stream down his cheeks. The degenerate music of Hip-Hop and
Rap lost all of its appeal to young George.
After his shower, George drove to a nearby restaurant and ordered two
whole entrees. One was Lasagna and the other was a delicious Veal
Marsala. With his Italian food he had a Greek salad with Spanish
olives and Russian dressing, drank a whole bottle of French wine,
followed by a German pastry for dessert. He finished his meal off with
a hot cup of English tea and a Cuban cigar.
George said out loud: "Oh those European peoples and their delicious
cuisine. Clarence was right after all. What a wonderful race!"
George was happy, but at the same time he realized there was much work
to be done. He thought of all those poor whites in Rhodesia and South
Africa who were being murdered and raped ever since they gave up
control of those once-European nations. He thought of the many
thousands of qualified Whites who were passed up for good jobs and
college entrance because of racial quotas that discriminate against
Europeans. He thought about the declining birthrates among all the
European nations of the world. He remembered that
Europeans everywhere were dwindling in numbers every year even as
their own nations were being flooded with third world immigration. He
recalled the O.J. Simpson verdict and how millions of blacks in
America cheered when that brutal double murderer was set free by a
black jury after he stabbed two Whites to death. He remembered the Los
Angeles riots of 1992, where dozens of Whites were dragged out of
their vehicles and killed like dogs in the streets by packs of
White-hating monsters who were never even punished! He remembered the
time when Jesse Jackson led a cheer at Stanford University: "Hey Hey
Ho Ho, Western Civ. has got to go!" His European blood began to
boil in righteous indignation when he recalled how Jesse Jackson once
said he had spit in White people's food when he was a young restaurant
worker. George now understood that that his people were on a collision
course with worldwide disaster and genocide. George realized that this
great people must not perish from the face of the earth.
George could not wait to see his father. He longed to embrace him and
apologize for all of the foolish and disrespectful things he had said
to him. But first, George had a score to settle with a certain college
professor. He walked into Dr. Silverstein's auditorium and quietly
took a seat in the back row. The nasal voiced Silverstein was
lecturing on and on
about racial and gender inequalities in European-centered
civilizations. It was vintage Silverstein. George's impressionable
White schoolmates, with their baggy pants, hip-hop clothes and
backwards baseball caps, were swallowing Silverstein's poison pills
hook, line and sinker. After letting Silverstein spew his cultural
poison for about 15 minutes or so, George raised his hand so that he
could give the professor a piece of his newly educated mind.
"George? Is that you? I remember you from last semester. I wasn't
aware that you were here today. I failed to recognize you in that
shirt and tie, and without your earrings. You must have enjoyed my
course so much that you signed up again eh? Class, I'd like for you to
meet George. He was one of my brightest students last semester. He
truly has a thorough grasp of the ideas presented in this course.
George, would you be so kind as to tell my class about that brilliant
term paper you wrote about European racism,
imperialism, and the need for monetary reparations?"
That's when young George let loose on the unsuspecting Professor.
"ENOUGH! You scheming devil! You mendacious fabricator of falsehoods!
You pusillanimous purveyor of pinko propaganda! How dare you try to
corrupt and manipulate our young minds when your filthy lies. We
Europeans have nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to apologize for, and
everything to be proud of. And most of all, we don't owe anybody
jack-shit - not one thin dime! To the contrary, it is the rest of
humanity that owes us a debt which can never be repaid! We are the
rightful heirs and protectors of a rich cultural heritage. You vile
manipulator! We are the sons of the Romans, the sons of
the Greeks, the Celtics, the Vikings, the Normans, the Saxons. Why do
you inflict shame and guilt upon us? We Europeans didn't just
contribute to civilization...WE ARE CIVILIZATION! And I declare that I
will no longer tolerate you shithead "intellectuals" trying to tear
our people down. Never again will we walk on eggshells when we speak,
always fearing that we might be called "racist." I no longer care what
people think. All that matters is the truth which you have sought to
pervert!"
"What are you up to anyway? Why do you to corrupt my young peers by
shoving false heroes down their throats. Enough of your Marxist games
of divide and conquer, you commie pinko subversive! I don't want to
learn anymore about Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or
Black History Month. They would not have amounted to anything without
the institutions of high civilization created by the European peoples.
I'm going to set this class straight about who the truly great men of
history are - the European
statesmen, scientists, explorers, monarchs, navigators, conquerors,
inventors, artists, writers, philosophers - the innovative giants of
history that you and your ilk have erased from our collective
memories. You speak of a world liberated from European influence?
Permit me tell your students about such a world, Silverstein, because
I can speak from personal experience, you wretched little conspiring
monster!"
Silverstein turned white as a ghost. He was shell-shocked and rendered
speechless for the first time in his career! Never in all of his years
at the University had a student dared to so boldly challenge his
falsehoods. Speaking from the heart as well as the mind, and with an
eloquence he never thought he could muster, George broke out into a
60-minute monologue on history, science, philosophy, culture, and all
the other attributes that
constitute high civilization. The young students were captivated by
George's brilliant oratory. Many were moved to tears. By the end of
his tirade, George's reawakened classmates were thundering their
approval of his speech. The class gave George a standing ovation and
they thanked him for helping them rediscover and reclaim their own
sense of pride and lost identity. The unstoppable power of truth had
melted away years of Marxist guilt tripping, self hate, wimpishness
and cultural brainwashing in just one unforgettable hour. The inspired
students proceeded to storm out of Silverstein's class,
throwing their hip-hop baseball caps and nose earrings at him as they
stampeded out and vowed never to return. They lifted George up upon
their shoulders and carried him out of the auditorium like a
conquering hero. With a glint in his eye, George glanced up towards
the sky, winked and said "Thank you, Clarence."
Dr. Silverstein was left humiliated and visibly shaken. He knew that
these reawakened European kids could never again be brainwashed with
"political correctness" and White guilt. Silverstein's greatest fear
was that more of these proud European youths would one day reawaken
and take their country and civilization back from the Silversteins of
the world.
Silverstein was worried, but he remained confident that most young men
and women would never learn the truth about their glorious past and
unique creative abilities. After all, the mass media, Hollywood, the
music industry, the colleges, and the public schools are all
controlled by "liberals" like Dr. Silverstein. With the power of
political correctness in their hands, they can continue to tear down
our European ancestors, destroy our
institutions and traditions, instigate blacks and other races against
the whites, flood America with third-world immigration, and push
"hip-hop" music, homosexuality, and other garbage onto a weak,
confused and morally degenerate youth. After reflecting upon these
facts, Silverstein smiled a devilish grin and muttered to himself: "A
few of these European sheep may wake up to what's being done to them,
but the majority of these idiots never will." And he smiled
again....and laughed with diabolical Marxist glee. Then
he repeated to himself "No...they will never figure it all out until
it's too late."
Or will they?
Post by Topaz
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race.
Then why are they the slaves to the Jews, as you say?  At least, no
black race is so subservient to the Jews.  Whites cannot be so smart
if they are so stupid as you quoted one Nazi as saying about American
attitudes regarding Israel.
It's because controlling the media is so very powerful.
And a lot less racist to Indians than what the whites were.  Japanese
have never considered Indians to be less intelligent based upon
colour.  \\\
Post by Topaz
    All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks.
Which then makes it galling for them to have a black US president, no?
Sort of, but the Jews run everything anyway and president are their
puppets.
Post by Topaz
White people invented just about everything
important.
What they consider important.  Most others have lived without their
inventions for millennia, and had far superior languages, music,
culture, religion, literature, mythology, agriculture, mining and
metallurgy, animal rearing, town-planning, pyramids, moral codes, art,
literacy, grammar,  far superior cooking, manners, regard for truth,
family values, regard for law, spirituality, mathematics, astronomy,
medicine etc etc etc.
Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
Post by Topaz
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Those leftists are just as racist as other honest racists.  IQ tests
prove nothing except the bias of the testers. Given same chances, all
races do equally well.  This is proved by the quality of prize winners
in multicultural public schools of Australia.  I was impressed to see
Affirmative action prizes.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If Americans love Israelis so much, why don't they ask all of them to
come and live in the USA?  They could give parts of Texas or Florida
to them, to form their own Zionist state right in their common One
True God's own great land.
That is interesting.
It is also a solution.
Post by Topaz
It is folly to have unscientific beliefs.
Science itself is provisional.  Science has nothing to do with emotion
and emotion is the province of all beliefs.
They could be incorrect beliefs then. Beliefs should be based on the
evidence.
Post by Topaz
If there was proof of one, it would probably be all over the news.
Why should that happen?  The medium could be known only to those
around him.  Not everyone wants publicity.
That is not proof.
Post by Topaz
All cultures may wish there was life after death. But I don't know of
one ghost story or anything else that is proven true. It may be
possible that the media is covering it up, but if a ghost story is
proven fact, why isn't it on the six o'clock news.
Because the media is not everything, except to the most gullible of
fools. Also, I am not saying that the afterlife is a proven fact like
sliced bread.
No, while the act had the blessings of the priests and the adoration
of the onlookers, essentially it was an exhortary act for improving
the temper of the people - making them better able thus to cope with
life's problems. Indian kings loved their people. They wanted to show
their greatness by example.  For instance, one of the greatest kings,
Chandragupta Maurya, died of starvation just to prove a point - to
stretch the limits of endurance. That very high suffering was
dedicated to the people, to shown them fortitude by the most
significant personal example.  He was the male equivalent of the sati.
He sounds like a good king, so it would have been better if he lived
longer.
Your racism and low culture, based upon lies, makes you blind to
idealism and true nobility.
Post by Topaz
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2013-06-11 00:05:37 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 03:29:20 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
The $50 extra will be replaced by $500 with increased =A0activity.
Debt-free money could increase activity just as well. And the entire
money supply would not be owed to bankers, along with the interest
which was not created but it still owed.
Post by Topaz
That would be foreign currency and the banker doesn't have to accept
it.
It would be a condition that he has to accept it, so far as those
taking loans are concerned.
Foreign money is owed to other bankers somewhere, plus the interest on
it. The island makes the situtation simpler and more clear.
Post by Topaz
He wants $1050 in the same notes that he made, and he knows the
people on the island can not pay.
Unless the people are very stupid or helpless, he cannot hope to fool
them this way.
That is how the system works right now.
Marriner Eccles, then chairman of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, in testimony before the
Banking and Currency Committee of the House of
Representatives on the Banking Act of 1935. Mr. Eccles
testified: "In purchasing offerings of Government bonds,
the banking system as a whole creates new money, or bank
deposits. When the banks buy a billion dollars of
Government bonds as they are offered -- and you have to
consider the banking system as a whole, as a unit -- the
banks credit the deposit account of the Treasury with a
billion dollars. And they debit their Government bond
account a billion dollars, or actually create, by a
bookkeeping entry, a billion dollars."
Zero interest nations have not been great economic successes. I mean
Dark Age Europe, modern communist nations, etc.
ITEM: =A0 In 1922 the Soviets formed their first international bank, It
was not owned and run by the State as would be dictated by Communist
theory, but was put together by a syndicate of private bankers for
profit. =A0These included, not only former Tsarist bankers, but
representatives of German, Swedish, and American banks. =A0Most of the
foreign capital came from England. =A0The man appointed as Director of
the Foreign Division of the new bank was Max May, Vice President of
Morgan's Guaranty Trust Company in New York.
=A0They are far too
lazy, bigoted and stupid. =A0Paying off loans makes people work hard and
thus do economies prosper. =A0The idea is to keep interest rates low,
and that happens when there is peace in the land and honesty and hard
work among the population.
It would be a lot better if the entire money supply =A0was not owed to
bankers, along with the interest on it, which was never created and
can not be paid.
Post by Topaz
There needs to be a money supply in circulation that is not owed to
any bankers. To create it we
who is we?
The citizens in a nation.
Who wants to pay policemen and govt. workers? =A0The bankers
need them the most in order to collect their loans, both principals
and interest. =A0With no bankers, police etc we become a hunter-gatherer
society, or a stone age society based upon barter. Such systems were
very stable, for they lasted for thousands of years.
Barter doesn't work when there are lots of people involved. People
need to get paid in money rather than in potatoes or whatever. It is
much more efficient.
If no one works as no one has money to pay for work, how can there be
money for paying taxes? =A0The Govt has to print money to pay police et
al, and that means there will be inflation and the value of currency
will go down. =A0Like in Zimbabwe.
Everyone should work. And creating new money should only be for having
the right amount of currency in circulation. There should also be new
money for loans, but without interest, and without parasites getting
rich.
=A0We need to scrap the debt-money system. This site explains it for
=A0http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm
=A0We need a money supply that is not owed to bankers. =A0The government
should print the money without borrowing anything from anyone. Money
would be brought into circulation by paying policemen and other public
servants. Once there is a debt-free money supply in circulation, the
police and =A0other things would then be paid for by taxes. New money
would still be created when needed but we would control the amount of
it so there is no inflation.
=A0 =A0 Loans for houses and cars and business should be from the
government and at zero interest. This would initially add to the money
in circulation but when the loan is repaid the money would be removed
circulation, so there is no net increase and no inflation.
Post by Topaz
So can the island. Import and exporting should be done without money.
Countries, or islands, should barter with what they have to get what
they need.
Money was invented as barter does not work very well. =A0Bartering leads
to a very static society. =A0Which means that surpluses and shortages
are not well balanced so there is spoil and deficiency.
Money is needed within a nation. But between nations barter is fine.
Post by Topaz
The US is ruled by the Jews and that is the problem.
No problem for most USAns, evidently. =A0You are in the minority.
Post by Topaz
=A0 =A0Franklin =A0Roosevelt did some things to help people. But he di=
dn't
Post by Topaz
Post by Topaz
really upset the money bag parasites who rule over us. Only Hitler did
that.
And how.
Really?
"I know you expect no deep expression of feelings, for feelings cannot
be clothed in words. But please imagine this: jobless, without any
money. For two years! For four years! For six years! A desperate
woman, broken in body and soul, with three young children.
How often did I see their hungry eyes looking toward me with vain
expectation. Nothing is more tortuous than such looks from children.
My faith in him, the fanatical fighter, was what kept me and mine from
what lured us - and anyone else in our situation - Suicide!
And today?
A happy mother who is always singing with her children. No one can see
in her the miserable, desperate woman she once was. Instead of three
unhappy hollow-cheeked children, four little devils making noise far
and wide.
Look at them! There may be families with better behaved children, but
none with children as cheerful and happy! That is what the F=FChrer
means to me and mine.
I turned my back very early to a foreign worldview because it left my
whole life meaningless. The F=FChrer gave me his worldview a firm place
to stand, for it is nothing but a knowledge of the eternal laws that
are behind the universe.
His deeds are a joyful fulfillment of these laws. His successes do not
seem to me, as one hears all too often, the result of good luck,
rather as the natural consequences of his nature. This faith, no, this
certainty, enables me to understand the F=FChrer when his actions would
otherwise require blind confidence.
Such obvious confidence is the most wonderful feeling that I can
imagine. Admiration? Recognition? Thanks? They are nothing when
compared to the full understanding of a people of 80 million for the
mission of its F=FChrer. That alone would be crowning of his sacrificial
struggle.
This fulfillment of this wish is my prayer for the F=FChrer."
=A0Fred. Ch., Poppelau
"The F=FChrer is everything to us, he is our faith, security and hope.
As a bearer of the blood medal, =A0I have always believed in this man,
who guided and inspired us, who led us in the fight for Germany's
greatness. We, me, my wife and our seven children, believe only in
him, Adolf Hitler. Is there a belief more understandable, more real,
more natural than this?
Has the F=FChrer not done everything for us that one could do for the
good of a family? Did he not give me a job and the ability to decently
feed and clothe my family? Has he not given my children a future that
no other country could so easily give?
The F=FChrer is with us in every situation! Look, sometimes the world is
hard on a family. There are difficult situations that cannot be
overcome. In just such hours I go to my living room, and there is a
picture of my F=FChrer.
I look Adolf Hitler in the face and remember his great struggle, his
great will and accomplishments, and my miserable mood is gone and
thinking of the F=FChrer gives me new strength.
How can I fail when I see the greatness in and around Adolf Hitler?
My children know the F=FChrer as the man who rules all, arranges all,
who built their world. The F=FChrer is the embodiment of what people had
such difficulty describing to us children before. But this is the
enormous difference: The F=FChrer moves among the people so that one can
celebrate him, so that our love for him is rewarded through his ever
new deeds.
The F=FChrer is hope for us in every situation. Look, my dear comrade,
according to the F=FChrer's own words, raising seven children is a great
responsibility to the state and a holy duty.
To form these young souls, to raise them to be decent adults, is such
a wonderful task only because the F=FChrer has given us the sure
foundations that are necessary. He is our hope, for only through his
generous measures are we with many children also able to "lead an
decent life," as anyone should be able to do. He protects our strength
through the NSV, through subventions for children, through the support
the state gives women and children, through the high status he gave
children.
Once people mocked those with many children. Today people honor them.
Now my wife and I have become respected members of the state. That is
why we have such hope for the future of our children, for the F=FChrer
has provided all that is necessary for them so that they too will be
able to establish families and contribute to the security and
protection of the great Fatherland.
Is it not wonderful to know what a wonderful future awaits our
children. One cannot but remember our own youth during the postwar
period, during the inflation, the days of hunger and so much that had
terrible effects on our youth and development.
Our children have no fears of such things, for they know that our
F=FChrer plans everything, foresees everything, and prepares the best
for us.
Is it not obvious why the F=FChrer means everything to us?"
=A0Toni Dominik Sch., Unterammergau
"I can still remember the first time I saw and heard the F=FChrer in
1920 in the Zirkus Krone in Munich. This was the introduction: "Adolf
Hitler will speak!" A somewhat slight young man stood before me, with
a short coat, soft collar and crumpled tie, poorly clothed. I was
curious to hear what this man had to say to me.
As I heard his voice, the passion of his words (something unheard of
This man or no one! To this day, this inner feeling has not left me.
The greatness of this man, his deeds, his historic successes seem
enormous to me. But yet I always see him as a man of the people, one
of us in my mind's eye. It fills me with pride that Providence choice
one of our brothers to fulfill German history.
I honor the great figures of German history, but my feelings for the
F=FChrer are different. I believe that love is the best word to describe
them.
One of us, who came from the people, has done amazing deeds, yet
remained the same from the first day I saw him until today.
I admire this man so much that I would defend him even if he were in
the wrong, but he cannot be wrong since he is truth and justice
themselves."
=A0Gr. F., Munich
If there was a national currency, then I don't understand how the
Nazis started to issue their own money. =A0Every sovereign country can
issue its own currency - that is one of the most key aspects of
sovereignty. I cannot see how the Jews or anyone can stop any
sovereign country from issuing its own currency.
The National Socialist and very sound money. Hitler nationalized the
banks.
"Life is not a problem of financial speculations, but always a problem
of work. The folk community does not exist on the fictitious value of
money, but on the results of productive labor, which is what gives
money its value. This production, and not a bank or gold reserve, is
the first cover for a currency."
Adolf Hitler
Where did he get that money from? =A0Who was the creditor and what
credit did he have?
The National Socialist created money and it's value was based on the
production of the people, not on a bank or a gold reserve.
So the Jews did not like this and so called for a global boycott?
Correct
But how did they pay back the debt owed to the Jewish bankers?
They didn't
=A0Did
the Jews take the certificates? =A0Was the debt ever repaid in any way?
I just don't understand this.
Hitler must have done something wonderful, to change the public mood
so drastically. =A0But what exactly did he do?
A receipt has no worth, as it is not gold nor anything useful.
Here is part of Hitler's speech at Rheinmetall-Borsig Works, Berlin,
They claim to be fighting for the maintenance of the gold standard as
the currency basis. That I can well believe, for the gold is in their
hands. We, too, once had gold, but it was stolen and extorted from us.
When I came to power, it was not malice which made me abandon the gold
standard. Germany simply had no gold left. Consequently, quitting the
gold standard presented no difficulties, for it is always easy to part
with what one does not have. We had no gold. We had no foreign
exchange. They had all been stolen and extorted from us during the
previous fifteen years. But, my fellow countrymen, I did not regret
it, for we have constructed our economic system on a wholly different
basis. In our eyes, gold is not of value in itself. It is only an
agent by which nations can be suppressed and dominated.
When I took over the government, I had only one hope on which to
build, namely, the efficiency and ability of the German nation and the
German workingman; the intelligence of our inventors, engineers,
technicians, chemists, and so forth. I built on the strength which
animates our economic system. One simple question faced me: Are we to
perish because we have no gold; am I to believe in a phantom which
spells our destruction? I championed the opposite opinion: Even though
we have no gold, we have capacity for work.
The German capacity for work is our gold and our capital, and with
this gold I can compete successfully with any power in the world. We
want to live in houses which have to be built. Hence, the workers must
build them, and the raw materials required must be procured by work.
My whole economic system has been built up on the conception of work.
We have solved our problems while, amazingly enough, the capitalist
countries and their currencies have suffered bankruptcy.
Sterling can find no market today. Throw it at any one and he will
step aside to avoid being hit. But our Reichsmark, which is backed by
no gold, has remained stable. Why? It has no gold cover; it is backed
by you and by your work. You have helped me to keep the mark stable.
German currency, with no gold coverage, is worth more today than gold
itself. It signifies unceasing production. This we owe to the German
farmer, who has worked from daybreak till nightfall. This we owe to
the German worker, who has given us his whole strength. The whole
problem has been solved in one instant, as if by magic.
My dear friends, if I had stated publicly eight or nine years ago: 'In
seven or eight years the problem of how to provide work for the
unemployed will be solved, and the problem then will be where to find
workers,' I should have harmed my cause. Every one would have
declared: 'The man is mad. It is useless to talk to him, much less to
support him. Nobody should vote for him. He is a fantastic creature.'
Today, however, all this has come true. Today, the only question for
us is where to find workers. That, my fellow countrymen, is the
blessing which work brings.
Work alone can create new work; money cannot create work. Work alone
can create values, values with which to reward those who work. The
work of one man makes it possible for another to live and continue to
work. And when we have mobilized the working capacity of our people to
its utmost, each individual worker will receive more and more of the
world's goods.
We have incorporated seven million unemployed into our economic
system; we have transformed another six millions from part-time into
full-time workers; we are even working overtime. And all this is paid
for in cash in Reichsmarks which maintained their value in peacetime.
In wartime we had to ration its purchasing capacity, not in order to
devalue it, but simply to earmark a portion of our industry for war
production to guide us to victory in the struggle for the future of
Germany...
I wish to put before you a few basic facts: The first is that in the
capitalistic democratic world the most important principle of economy
is that the people exist for trade and industry, and that these in
turn exist for capital. We have reversed this principle by making
capital exist for trade and industry, and trade and industry exist for
the people. In other words, the people come first. Everything else is
but a means to this end. When an economic system is not capable of
feeding and clothing a people, then it is bad, regardless of whether a
few hundred people say: 'As far as I am concerned it is good,
excellent; my dividends are splendid.'
However, the dividends do not interest me at all. Here we have drawn
the line. They may then retort: 'Well, look here, that is just what we
mean. You jeopardize liberty.'
Yes, certainly, we jeopardize the liberty to profiteer at the expense
of the community, and, if necessary, we even abolish it...
What Hitler seems to have done is what I now call Quantitative
Explosion, that is, releasing a very large amount of money (in this
case as certificates) into a honest and hard-working population. =A0Wow
that worked didn't it!
Do you remember the state of Germany and the German people in the days
before the aged Reich President von Hindenburg chose Adolf Hitler and
his party as the last hope of saving Germany from certain political,
social and economic collapse that would lead to chaos? Tens of
thousands of factories had closed their gates. Millions of workers and
employees lost their jobs and were thrown ruthlessly into the gray
misery of mass unemployment. There seemed no way out...
By the end of 1933, 2 million citizens had jobs again. By September
1936, the number of unemployed had fallen beneath a million. By 1937
unemployment had vanished...
One of the foundations of National Socialism is the knowledge that
only work creates value and prosperity...
But not only the dreadful misery before 1933 reduced the desire of
countless Germans to have children. Crass egotism and materialism also
played a role. The System Era saw having children as foolish and
backward. The transformation that has occurred is clear in the rising
German birth rate...
The National Socialist state gives major tax reductions to fathers for
each child. Families with three or more children receive payments of
10 and 20 marks monthly. By the end of 1937, 510,000 children were
receiving such support...
By the end of 1937, 252,000 mothers had received free vacations...
The Winterhilfswerk is the most beautiful expression of the new German
people's community. It is not the work of a small group of rich
people. No, each German, all of us, rich and poor, manual laborers,
No German may be hungry or cold!
One does not know whom to admire more: the cheerful willingness of
those who collect, or the rising amount of the gifts, to which even
the poorest contribute their share. The success of the
Winterhilfswerk, written permanently into the law of 1 December 1936,
demonstrates the efforts of the entire German nation. Gifts of money
alone totaled over 920 million marks during the four winters from
1933/34 to 1936/37. An additional 570 million marks of goods were
contributed. 50,000 freight cars alone would have been needed for the
potatoes contributed in the past years. The three million meters of
clothing given out by the WHW would stretch from Berlin to the Middle
East. The two million kilograms of coal would form a wall ten meters
high around all of Germany. These few examples, and more could be
given, prove the strength of the German people's will to be active
socialists..
Another sign of this socialism is the entirely different status of the
German worker in factories. The social honor of each working German is
guaranteed by law. The state's representatives ensure that exploiting
workers is impossible. The legal working conditions correspond to
National Socialism's high opinion of work. Workers have a right to a
vacation and for paid holidays, even hourly and temporary workers.
There is nothing like this elsewhere in the world.
The dignity of labor is evidenced by improvements in the appearance of
the work place. Wherever one looks in Germany, ugly dark buildings are
vanishing. The "Beauty of Labor" movement in today's Germany is not
empty talk or an impossible demand, but living reality. Large sums
that formerly would have been wasted in strikes and lockouts have been
used since 1933 to improve work places. 23,000 places have been
transformed form soulless drudgery to pleasant places to work. 6,000
factory courtyards now offer space for real relaxation, which was not
true in the past. 17,000 canteens and lounges, 13,000 shower and
changing rooms have been transformed. The dirtier the work, the
cleaner the workers. More than 800 community buildings and 1200 sport
facilities , including over 200 swimming pools, have been established.
The crew quarters in over 3500 ships have also been improved.
The NS Society Kraft durch Freude brings cheer and pleasure to
workplaces through concerts and art exhibits. The art exhibits alone
introduced more than 2,5 million workers to the creations of true
German art. Just five years ago, it was obvious that the great works
of German culture belonged to a small group of the upper class.
Besides the factory concerns and art exhibitions, the NS Society Kraft
durch Freude uses theatrical performances, other concerts, singing and
musical groups to introduce the creations of German art to every
working German. 22 million citizens have attended theatrical
performances..
Of no less importance is the KdF's vacation program. Earlier, German
workers did not know what to do with their, at best, five days of
annual vacation. They could not visit the beauties of the German
landscape, much less travel abroad. The NS Society Kraft durch Freude
gave German workers the possibility of vacationing at the beach or in
the mountains, or to explore the homeland. Over 20 million have
participated in KdF trips since 1934. That is more than a quarter of
Germany's population. 19 million citizens participated in 60,000
vacation trips at home. Hand to hand, they would stretch from Berlin
to Tokyo. KdF trains have traveled 2,160,000 kilometers, or 54 times
around the world. The nine large KdF cruise ships have covered a
distance equal to twice the distance from the earth to the moon. They
have carried German workers to Madeira, Italy and Norway, broadening
their horizons and giving them unforgettable experiences. Three
additional ships will be added the KdF's own fleet of four. A KdF
resort is being built on the island of R=FCgen. It will not be the only
one. A series of other vacation and spa resorts will be built. They
will fulfill the F=FChrer's wishes at the start of the NS Society Kraft
durch Freude: to lead a cheerful, creative and strong people to
success in the world.
The goal of bringing German culture to the entire German people,
regardless of their income, is especially clear with the German radio.
Thanks to the People's Radio Set, a solid, inexpensive and capable
receiver, the number of radio listeners has risen from around 4
million in 1932 to 9.1 million today. The un-German programming of the
System Era has been transformed by National Socialism. Now radio
acquaints the German people with the work of their great masters of
music and literature. Alongside these artistic programs, the
entertaining programming provides for the relaxation of hard-working
people.
Clear proof for the rising prosperity of the German people is provided
by the growing consumption of foodstuffs and luxury items of every
variety. During the prewar year 1913, only a little more than 2.9
million tons of meat were consumed. In 1937, that figure had risen to
3.7 million, up about 5% from 1932. Thanks to the elimination of
unemployment, bread consumption increased by about 10%, sugar by 15%.
Butter consumption rose from 420,000 to 519,000 tons. Milk production,
both for drinking and for making butter and cheese, rose from 23.5 to
25.4 billion liters from 1932 to 1937. Coffee consumption rose from
104,000 to 140,000 tons. Beer consumption has risen from 3.3 to 4.4
billion liters. That is an increase of about 3 billion glasses of
beer...
The growing prosperity and rising consumption of foodstuffs and luxury
items required hard work. A people can only consume what it produces.
In the face of this obvious truth, which however only became clear to
us after 1933, all the parliamentary resolutions, all the decisions of
international conferences and the demands of the international unions
become silly talk. The German people have proved that by our own work.
Germany has worked untiringly since 1933, producing itself the goods
it needs to improve its standard of living.
The rising production in all areas, which has never before been seen,
is the fruit of our work. The foundation of our life is agriculture,
whose task is to guarantee that the nation is fed. When the F=FChrer
took power, agriculture was in a ruinous state. Officers of the court
were regular visitors at German farms. The animals and the harvest
were seized ruthlessly because taxes and interests had risen to
impossible levels that German soil could not meet. Forced auctions
drove tens of thousands of German farmers from their land. Desperation
prevailed in the villages. As a result of the desperate situation,
agriculture could not ensure the feeding of the German nation. The
ghost of hunger threatened.
Here too the F=FChrer set to work immediately. Interest and taxes were
lowered, and the German soil was freed from usurious capital. Between
1927 and 1931, German agricultural debt rose by 2,9 billion marks.
From 1933 to 1936, it fell by 800 million marks. The interest burden,
which was over a billion marks in 1931/32, was reduced by National
Socialist actions to 630 million marks. The crowning achievement was
the creation of the Reich Inherited Farm Law, which guaranteed that
the German family farm will always remain the wellspring of the
nation...
Just as for farmers and agricultural workers, the urban population is
also being cared for. Although more than enough willing and able
workers were available in 1932, and although the housing need was
certainly great, the government put workers on the dole and built only
141,265 dwellings. This was an area in which the need for new jobs was
particularly clear. Even in 1933, the number of new dwellings rose to
178,000, with particular attention being given to small and mid-sized
units for those with limited incomes. This number grew year by year,
reaching 340,000 dwellings in 1937, double the number of 1932. In all,
National Socialist has built more than 1.4 million new, and above all
healthy and affordable, dwellings for the German people since 1933.
This is enough to house the entire population of Berlin...
Growing prosperity and production led to a growth in traffic. The
entirely neglected German highway system had to be repaired and
expanded. 40,000 kilometers of highway have been repaired since 1933.
That is enough to go all the way around the world! Then there are the
Reich Autobahns, the most splendid construction project in the world.
2,000 kilometers were open to traffic by the end of 1937. 1,000
kilometers more will be added yearly, until Germany has a highway
network unique in all the world.
Automobile production has reached a level that no one would have
thought possible a few years ago.
The number of motor vehicles in Germany has doubled, exceeding the 3
million mark in 1937. Thanks to the growing prosperity, broad circles
of our nation can now afford a car. 137,141 of the new vehicles in
1937, well over half, were purchased by workers and employees. 30,015
workers and employees were able to buy a car the previous year. Cars
are becoming both better and cheaper. The increase in cars will be
even more striking when the Volkswagen comes on the market. Enormous
factories are even now being built. The best proof for the quality and
good pricing of German cars is the fact that automobile exports have
increased by a factor of eight since 1932!..
The great improvements in the German transportation system have
resulted in a growing stream of foreign visitors. The pulsing life in
Germany is drawing more and more visitors to the Third Reich. The
number of overnights by foreigners has risen from 2.7 million in 1932
is far above 7 million in 1937. These foreigners, who often come to
Germany with false ideas, see with their own eyes the work of the
F=FChrer and the remarkable efforts of the German people. They return
home as the best witnesses of the greatness and strength of the German
Reich...
The F=FChrer has repeatedly reminded the German people that strong
policies are the absolute prerequisite to our economic, social and
cultural health. Only intentional hostility and stupidity can still
deny that the F=FChrer was right in every respect...
Post by Topaz
Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and
Germany was back on it's feet. =A0It had a solid, stable currency with
no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the US
and other Western countries were still out of work. =A0Within five
years, Germany went from being the poorest nation in Europe to the
richest!
Wow, QEx did it, now I understand.
All trade is barter anyway - money is just the medium of exchange.
What Hitler really did, from what I understand, is that he suddenly
released a vast amount of valid money into the system in the form of
certificates. =A0These certificates were under tight control, so would
not inflate. =A0They stoked internal growth that made barter possible
with other countries.
And he nationalized banking. There were no parasites getting rich from
money creation.
What about China and Japan? Do they follow this model?
I don't know.
Post by Topaz
In "Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People" (1984), Shelton
"Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which
accounts for Germany's startling rise from the depression to a world
power in five years. The German government financed its entire
operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. =A0It too=
k
Post by Topaz
Post by Topaz
the entire Capitalist and Communist worlds to destroy the German
revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Jewish
bankers."
Well, this is revealing. =A0It is not =A0difficult to see why the Jewish
bankers are loved so much. It should have to do with religion, with
the masses thinking very highly of the Jewish bankers just because
they are Jewish and so, the Chosen People. =A0Seems to me, they will do
anything for any chance to go to Heaven and so loving the Jews is the
wisest option. =A0Paying interest to keep them happy, or fighting world
wars for their sake, losing empires, etc. seems but a small sacrifice
when Eternity is at stake.
John 7:1 =A0"After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
John 20:19 =A0"the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
for fear of the Jews"
2 Co 11:24 =A0 "Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save
one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
Mathew 27: 20+25 =A0"But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our
children."
Acts 25:24 =A0"ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews
have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he
ought not to live any longer."
John 8:42,44,48 =A0"Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a
liar, and the father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
=A0 =A0 =A0The religious leaders of the Jews were the Pharisees. Jesus
condemned them in the harshest words.
=A0 Matthew 23:33 =A0"Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye
escape the damnation of hell?"
=A0 =A0 =A0The New Jewish Encyclopedia, edited by David Bridger, PH.D in
association with Samual Wolk, Rabbi, J.S.D, =A0copyright 1962, Published
by Behrman House, inc.,1261 Broadway, New York 1, N.Y., =A0Library of
=A0"The Pharisees are therefore regarded as those authorities who helped
develop and preserve traditional Judaism as it is known today."
Oh I need a lot more than that, to do what I want.
If you have over a million you can be taxed 10% per year on it without
and real suffering, such as what homeless people put up with.
Rubbish. Whites were nothing much only a few centuries ago.
Unscrupulous conduct made them rich and powerful. RICH meant Rob India
Come Home in the colonial days. =A0At least they were honest after a
fashion. Japan and Korea were not much only a few generations ago. The
blacks have their own priorities, much like Indians. =A0The Arabs were
nothing much except as a military force once upon a time , and only
oil has given them something. =A0China was very great in the past, but
like India they have slipped but now they are coming back with a
vengeance.
It's a Wonderful Race
by James Bronson
There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it
all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his
father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to
his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for
all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites throughout
history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the
Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and
we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for
thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations
for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we
are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed
peoples."
George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko
nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie
college professors teach you that?" the father asked.
To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology
professor, Dr.Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr.
Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just
don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist racist
society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as
the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of
your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is
completely colorblind."
The father angrily replied: "That's bullshit! I've always been
fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I
haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong
with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of
people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your
biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage
and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud
of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial
identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"
The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's
the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were
discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human
race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called
"race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And
besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with
the fact that we live in an multicultural
society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist
culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George
said.
Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking clich=E9
you know that boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European
peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young
George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism
and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have
been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin
with."
Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge
smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone
and lost in a cold open field. An angel named Clarence then appeared
to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."
George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"
The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here
to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or
Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans
never existed."
"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a
racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able
to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world
was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest
motel?"
"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once
called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains
where you can find shelter."
"Caves? No way man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."
"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in
non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build
them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would
you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay
in a tent."
"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a
cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second,
are these Indians friendly or hostile?"
"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some
Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it
doesn't mean they all were" said the angel sarcastically.
"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism.
Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if
they turn out to be violent."
"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend
yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though we
could make a spear with those twigs over there."
"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians
to ask if it's OK."
"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here.
Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed.
No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then" replied George. "I'll sleep
in the damn cave."
Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a
lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence.
"There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European
gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get
warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs
together."
"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks
together for fire?"
"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the
evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the
angel sarcastically.
"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light
a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South
America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to
the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since
European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the
Incans will still be there.
... I need a car"
"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz,
the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were
never born..nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This
is a world without evil Europeans remember?"
"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."
"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans
weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses
of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow
you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly
south."
George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived
in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was
grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to
complain about the heat and humidity.
"Clarence, this hut is a little shithole and I'm sweating up a storm
here. Get me an air-conditioner please."
"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners
here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by
evil White men." "What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2002
these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or
their food cool? a frustrated George asked.
"No George, they haven't. And they never will."
"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I
can't live like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars! Dammit
I'll walk. let's go."
After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to
get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that
he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil
White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over
there if you want to make a torch."
"Never mind that!" George shouted back.
By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the
Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to
Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody
has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone
stop them?"
The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place
here."Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro
never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact,
it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the
Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who
would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them
a better life."
"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible
place. Get me out of this shithole now!" said George.
'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.
George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and
humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where the nearest
airport?"
"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"
"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts
available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic
Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed.
No Phoenicians, no Leif Erickson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus,
no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build
your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and
no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."
"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.
"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll
fly to Africa."
When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked
African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by
other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?"
George asked Clarence.
"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in
Africa long before the whites arrived." Clarence said. "In fact, most
of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave
traders by African tribal leaders."
"That's so sad.' George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King.
Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be
alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an
advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African
masters. Take me to him Clarence."
Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The
naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men
were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to
the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdoctor and spiritual leader.
There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his
neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that?
George asked.
"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never
became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities
or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create
such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He
specializes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"
The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his
henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George
and tied him to a nearby tree.
"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George
hysterically.
"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you George. The good
doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out
while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to
his tribe," laughed Clarence.
"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!
"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet
your hero Reverend King."
George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see
that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established
great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."
Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's
heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the
banks of the river Nile in Egypt.
"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it
Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and
primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented
black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington
Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson,
the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"
Clarence replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa,
exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them.
Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these
people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no
universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than
animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel
hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan
Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and
entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize
their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to
introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no
George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons,
no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans,
no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."
"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great
pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders
of the world .....built by non-Whites"
They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the
nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets
or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans.
The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open
fields."
Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some
toilet paper." George said.
"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."
"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a
rag then".
Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.
"I don't understand. According to my recollections from Geography
class, the great pyramids should be near this very spot. We ought to
be able to see them from miles away," said George.
"Well, George, I'm sure your professors at the college never told you
this, but the ancient Egyptians were not black or brown. They were
Caucasians. The anthropologists who examined the Egyptian mummies
confirmed this fact. There are no pyramids and no Sphinx either. And
the Carthaginians were White too."
George became depressed, but he was determined to prove his beliefs.
"What's in Europe?" he asked.
"Europe became populated by Huns and other Asiatic tribes. They've
settled down a bit but life is much the same as it is in North
America. A nomadic existence based on hunting and food gathering. No
great cities, no science, no buildings, no culture, no fine art - just
a hard daily struggle against life and the elements of nature. In a
Europe without evil Whites, the Roman Empire never existed nor did the
Greeks. There was no Renaissance either."
"Take me to Asia then. Surely the great civilizations of Persia,
India, China, and Japan will suit me" George said. "Clarence, to the
Taj Mahal please." "The Taj Mahal?" replied the angel. "Don't you know
that the ancient Persian and Indian civilizations were established by
ancient Indo-European tribes who crossed the Himalayas? They are the
ones who civilized India and built the Taj Mahal. Those are the great
civilizations
that Marco Polo, Columbus, and others were searching for.Did you know
that Iran is Persian for "land of the Aryan?"
George said: "Don't tell me that the Indians were White men! That
can't be. In the world I came from, I knew many Indians and they were
not White!"
Clarence explained: "As the centuries passed, the Indo-Europeans who
created Indian civilization intermarried with the native majorities
who populated the Indian subcontinent. Gradually there were less and
less evil White people until they faded out completely, along with the
advanced civilization they had built. You will notice that there are
still a few white-skinned and fair-haired Indians and Pakistanis
around today -- in the world you came from that is.
George became worried. He knew he could never fit into the harsh
primitive world he had been thrust into. Suddenly he thought of Japan.
"Japan! I'll show you now Clarence. Take me to Japan. If the Japanese
can make TVs and cameras then I'm sure I'll find a decent civilization
that I can live in."
Clarence transported George to Japan. George observed that Japanese
society was the most orderly, advanced and civil that he had seen, but
it seemed as if almost everyone was either a rice farmer, a fisherman,
or a soldier. There were no cars, no skyscrapers, no lights, no
stereos, no sciences, no technologies, no universities. It was a
stagnant agricultural society that seemed to have reached its high
water mark and was incapable of moving forward. George knew he could
not live here either.
Clarence explained to George: "Even the industrious Japanese and
Chinese peoples had to rely on the evil Europeans to build the modern
Asia that you had in mind. In this world, Japan exists exactly as it
did before Commodore Perry's American naval ships arrived in Japan in
the 1850s. There's no industry, no technology, no Fuji film, no Sony,
no Hitachi, no Panasonic, no Toyota, no Sushi bars, no baseball...none
of the trappings or comforts of modern life. These things don't exist
in Japan or anywhere else because
Europeans weren't there to create them and share them with the rest of
the world. Would you care for a bowl of rice George?"
George began to feel sick in both his body and his mind. Not only was
he depressed, but exposure to the harsh elements of nature had left
him physically ill. "Clarence, I seem to have contracted some type of
sickness. I must have some anti-biotics."
"Anti-biotics? There's no...
"Oh Shut up already! Then just take me back to the world as it was!"
"Sorry George. I'm not authorized to do that. Only my boss can make
that call." Clarence said to him: "You see George. Your father was
right. You really had a wonderful race. Don't you see what a foolish
mistake it is to be ashamed and guilty about your own people, and to
let them die out? This is what the world would be like without the
creative spark of Edison and Ford and Pasteur and Marconi. No great
scientists, or mathematicians, or inventors or fine artists. No
Archimedes, no Aristotle, no Socrates, no
Alexander, no Renaissance, no Newton, no Kepler, no Goddard, no
Mendel, no Tesla, no Faraday, no Guttenberg, no Shakespeare, no
Dickens, no Twain, no Mozart, no Beethoven, no Da Vinci, no
Michelangelo, no Galileo, no Copernicus. No Venice, no Paris, no
Lisbon, no Madrid, no Zurich, no Berlin, no St. Petersburg, no
Budapest, no Rome, no Milan, no Vienna, no London, no New York, no
Rio, no Sydney. No orchestras, no museums, no universities, no
hospitals, no libraries, no theaters, no radio, no books, no
television, no electricity, no refrigeration, no heating, no plumbing,
no houses, no steel, no stadiums, no vaccines, no cars, no planes, no
trains, no ships, no
dentists, no surgeons, no computers, no telephones, and most important
- there's no creative genius to be found that could create and sustain
such a high level of civilization. There's nothing for the people of
this world to build upon. It's just a daily struggle for subsistence.
A brutal planet where the few people who aren't mired in eternal
ignorance and darkness have reached their peak of civilization and are
advancing no further."
Clarence went on to lecture the broken and depressed young man for
seven days straight. He covered everything. History, science,
economics, philosophy, art, literature, fine music, architecture,
medicine, politics, agriculture, religion, and all the creations and
contributions that the European peoples had made in every conceivable
field of human endeavor. George listened closely to every word. He
felt like a man who had been
reborn.
After his lecture, Clarence the Angel floated away towards heaven. "I
hope you have found all this to be educational, and I hope you have
learned an important lesson. Enjoy your world George!" mocked the
departing angel.
George began to sob like a baby. It was the year 2002 and he was alone
and hungry in a backwards world where Europeans had never existed. He
cried out to the stars: "Please God. I see what a fool I've been. I
understand now what my father was trying to tell me. I want to go back
to the world that I came from. A world where Europeans not only
existed, but blessed the rest of humanity world with their unique
creative ability. I want to live in a civilized world. Please
God!...take me back!...take me back!...Oh God....please."
Suddenly George was transported back to his college dormitory. Drunk
with joy, George jumped into the showers before he could even take his
clothes off!.
"Warm water! and soap! Life is beautiful!" he screamed.
George's floor mates looked at him as if he was crazy. "George! Have
you gone crazy?" asked a bewildered schoolmate.
"No my friend. I haven't taken leave of my senses. I've come to them!"
George replied. George then began to sing classic European folk songs
in the shower. Miraculously, he was able to sing in many different
languages. He sang O Sole Mio in Italian, Amazing Grace in English,
Gloire Immortelle in French, Das Ist Der Tag in German, and also
Belgian, Spanish and French ballads and waltzes. Tears of sheer joy
began to stream down his cheeks. The degenerate music of Hip-Hop and
Rap lost all of its appeal to young George.
After his shower, George drove to a nearby restaurant and ordered two
whole entrees. One was Lasagna and the other was a delicious Veal
Marsala. With his Italian food he had a Greek salad with Spanish
olives and Russian dressing, drank a whole bottle of French wine,
followed by a German pastry for dessert. He finished his meal off with
a hot cup of English tea and a Cuban cigar.
George said out loud: "Oh those European peoples and their delicious
cuisine. Clarence was right after all. What a wonderful race!"
George was happy, but at the same time he realized there was much work
to be done. He thought of all those poor whites in Rhodesia and South
Africa who were being murdered and raped ever since they gave up
control of those once-European nations. He thought of the many
thousands of qualified Whites who were passed up for good jobs and
college entrance because of racial quotas that discriminate against
Europeans. He thought about the declining birthrates among all the
European nations of the world. He remembered that
Europeans everywhere were dwindling in numbers every year even as
their own nations were being flooded with third world immigration. He
recalled the O.J. Simpson verdict and how millions of blacks in
America cheered when that brutal double murderer was set free by a
black jury after he stabbed two Whites to death. He remembered the Los
Angeles riots of 1992, where dozens of Whites were dragged out of
their vehicles and killed like dogs in the streets by packs of
White-hating monsters who were never even punished! He remembered the
time when Jesse Jackson led a cheer at Stanford University: "Hey Hey
Ho Ho, Western Civ. has got to go!" His European blood began to
boil in righteous indignation when he recalled how Jesse Jackson once
said he had spit in White people's food when he was a young restaurant
worker. George now understood that that his people were on a collision
course with worldwide disaster and genocide. George realized that this
great people must not perish from the face of the earth.
George could not wait to see his father. He longed to embrace him and
apologize for all of the foolish and disrespectful things he had said
to him. But first, George had a score to settle with a certain college
professor. He walked into Dr. Silverstein's auditorium and quietly
took a seat in the back row. The nasal voiced Silverstein was
lecturing on and on
about racial and gender inequalities in European-centered
civilizations. It was vintage Silverstein. George's impressionable
White schoolmates, with their baggy pants, hip-hop clothes and
backwards baseball caps, were swallowing Silverstein's poison pills
hook, line and sinker. After letting Silverstein spew his cultural
poison for about 15 minutes or so, George raised his hand so that he
could give the professor a piece of his newly educated mind.
"George? Is that you? I remember you from last semester. I wasn't
aware that you were here today. I failed to recognize you in that
shirt and tie, and without your earrings. You must have enjoyed my
course so much that you signed up again eh? Class, I'd like for you to
meet George. He was one of my brightest students last semester. He
truly has a thorough grasp of the ideas presented in this course.
George, would you be so kind as to tell my class about that brilliant
term paper you wrote about European racism,
imperialism, and the need for monetary reparations?"
That's when young George let loose on the unsuspecting Professor.
"ENOUGH! You scheming devil! You mendacious fabricator of falsehoods!
You pusillanimous purveyor of pinko propaganda! How dare you try to
corrupt and manipulate our young minds when your filthy lies. We
Europeans have nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to apologize for, and
everything to be proud of. And most of all, we don't owe anybody
jack-shit - not one thin dime! To the contrary, it is the rest of
humanity that owes us a debt which can never be repaid! We are the
rightful heirs and protectors of a rich cultural heritage. You vile
manipulator! We are the sons of the Romans, the sons of
the Greeks, the Celtics, the Vikings, the Normans, the Saxons. Why do
you inflict shame and guilt upon us? We Europeans didn't just
contribute to civilization...WE ARE CIVILIZATION! And I declare that I
will no longer tolerate you shithead "intellectuals" trying to tear
our people down. Never again will we walk on eggshells when we speak,
always fearing that we might be called "racist." I no longer care what
people think. All that matters is the truth which you have sought to
pervert!"
"What are you up to anyway? Why do you to corrupt my young peers by
shoving false heroes down their throats. Enough of your Marxist games
of divide and conquer, you commie pinko subversive! I don't want to
learn anymore about Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or
Black History Month. They would not have amounted to anything without
the institutions of high civilization created by the European peoples.
I'm going to set this class straight about who the truly great men of
history are - the European
statesmen, scientists, explorers, monarchs, navigators, conquerors,
inventors, artists, writers, philosophers - the innovative giants of
history that you and your ilk have erased from our collective
memories. You speak of a world liberated from European influence?
Permit me tell your students about such a world, Silverstein, because
I can speak from personal experience, you wretched little conspiring
monster!"
Silverstein turned white as a ghost. He was shell-shocked and rendered
speechless for the first time in his career! Never in all of his years
at the University had a student dared to so boldly challenge his
falsehoods. Speaking from the heart as well as the mind, and with an
eloquence he never thought he could muster, George broke out into a
60-minute monologue on history, science, philosophy, culture, and all
the other attributes that
constitute high civilization. The young students were captivated by
George's brilliant oratory. Many were moved to tears. By the end of
his tirade, George's reawakened classmates were thundering their
approval of his speech. The class gave George a standing ovation and
they thanked him for helping them rediscover and reclaim their own
sense of pride and lost identity. The unstoppable power of truth had
melted away years of Marxist guilt tripping, self hate, wimpishness
and cultural brainwashing in just one unforgettable hour. The inspired
students proceeded to storm out of Silverstein's class,
throwing their hip-hop baseball caps and nose earrings at him as they
stampeded out and vowed never to return. They lifted George up upon
their shoulders and carried him out of the auditorium like a
conquering hero. With a glint in his eye, George glanced up towards
the sky, winked and said "Thank you, Clarence."
Dr. Silverstein was left humiliated and visibly shaken. He knew that
these reawakened European kids could never again be brainwashed with
"political correctness" and White guilt. Silverstein's greatest fear
was that more of these proud European youths would one day reawaken
and take their country and civilization back from the Silversteins of
the world.
Silverstein was worried, but he remained confident that most young men
and women would never learn the truth about their glorious past and
unique creative abilities. After all, the mass media, Hollywood, the
music industry, the colleges, and the public schools are all
controlled by "liberals" like Dr. Silverstein. With the power of
political correctness in their hands, they can continue to tear down
our European ancestors, destroy our
institutions and traditions, instigate blacks and other races against
the whites, flood America with third-world immigration, and push
"hip-hop" music, homosexuality, and other garbage onto a weak,
confused and morally degenerate youth. After reflecting upon these
facts, Silverstein smiled a devilish grin and muttered to himself: "A
few of these European sheep may wake up to what's being done to them,
but the majority of these idiots never will." And he smiled
again....and laughed with diabolical Marxist glee. Then
he repeated to himself "No...they will never figure it all out until
it's too late."
Or will they?
Post by Topaz
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race.
Then why are they the slaves to the Jews, as you say? =A0At least, no
black race is so subservient to the Jews. =A0Whites cannot be so smart
if they are so stupid as you quoted one Nazi as saying about American
attitudes regarding Israel.
It's because controlling the media is so very powerful.
And a lot less racist to Indians than what the whites were. =A0Japanese
have never considered Indians to be less intelligent based upon
colour. =A0\\\
Post by Topaz
=A0 =A0 All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks.
Which then makes it galling for them to have a black US president, no?
Sort of, but the Jews run everything anyway and president are their
puppets.
Post by Topaz
White people invented just about everything
important.
What they consider important. =A0Most others have lived without their
inventions for millennia, and had far superior languages, music,
culture, religion, literature, mythology, agriculture, mining and
metallurgy, animal rearing, town-planning, pyramids, moral codes, art,
literacy, grammar, =A0far superior cooking, manners, regard for truth,
family values, regard for law, spirituality, mathematics, astronomy,
medicine etc etc etc.
Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
Post by Topaz
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Those leftists are just as racist as other honest racists. =A0IQ tests
prove nothing except the bias of the testers. Given same chances, all
races do equally well. =A0This is proved by the quality of prize winners
in multicultural public schools of Australia. =A0I was impressed to see
Affirmative action prizes.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If Americans love Israelis so much, why don't they ask all of them to
come and live in the USA? =A0They could give parts of Texas or Florid=
a
Post by Topaz
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
to them, to form their own Zionist state right in their common One
True God's own great land.
That is interesting.
It is also a solution.
Post by Topaz
It is folly to have unscientific beliefs.
Science itself is provisional. =A0Science has nothing to do with emotion
and emotion is the province of all beliefs.
They could be incorrect beliefs then. Beliefs should be based on the
evidence.
Post by Topaz
If there was proof of one, it would probably be all over the news.
Why should that happen? =A0The medium could be known only to those
around him. =A0Not everyone wants publicity.
That is not proof.
Post by Topaz
All cultures may wish there was life after death. But I don't know of
one ghost story or anything else that is proven true. It may be
possible that the media is covering it up, but if a ghost story is
proven fact, why isn't it on the six o'clock news.
Because the media is not everything, except to the most gullible of
fools. Also, I am not saying that the afterlife is a proven fact like
sliced bread.
No, while the act had the blessings of the priests and the adoration
of the onlookers, essentially it was an exhortary act for improving
the temper of the people - making them better able thus to cope with
life's problems. Indian kings loved their people. They wanted to show
their greatness by example. =A0For instance, one of the greatest kings,
Chandragupta Maurya, died of starvation just to prove a point - to
stretch the limits of endurance. That very high suffering was
dedicated to the people, to shown them fortitude by the most
significant personal example. =A0He was the male equivalent of the sati.
He sounds like a good king, so it would have been better if he lived
longer.
http://www.ihr.org/=A0http://nationalvanguard.org/=A0http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Your racism and low culture, based upon lies, makes you
blind to idealism and true nobility.
Someone had to say it.

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Topaz
2013-06-11 09:21:52 UTC
Permalink
"Weep you mothers, whose children will inherit the diverse and
fractured country of America. Do you think that America will be great
once Whites have been displaced, as they have already been
dispossessed? You know better! You know that when you drive through
areas, even at midday, that have already been purged of Whites, you do
not feel safe. Your most feared nightmare is to have your car break
down in one of those areas at night. There is no amount of money that
you would be willing to accept in payment for moving your family into
one of those areas. You say, "Why can't we all just get along?" But
you know in your heart of hearts that we cannot, and we never will.
As you cry for the lost security you have been forced to finally face
up to with the destruction of the World Trade Center, try at the same
time to understand that the foundation for this loss was laid through
the planning, and execution of those plans, occuring within our own
country.

It was the policies of "our" government that supplied these
perpetrators the opportunity to commit the act. They were allowed by
our open borders policy to not only enter this country unhindered, but
to live here as if they belonged.

It was the policies of "our" government that provided the perpetrators
with the motive for the horrendous event that we have all had our
hearts torn over. The people in our government have taken the cause
and the will of the Israeli nation as the cause and the will of the
American nation. We have bombed Israel's enemies, not because they
were our enemies, or because they posed any sort of threat to us, but
simply because it was in Israel's best interest. We have killed nearly
a million Iraqis, in order to further Israel's aims. The total number
of all American soldiers who have ever been killed, in all of our wars
combined, is about a million. We have killed soldiers, women and
children in Iraq in the hundreds of thousands. Why have we done this?
Because it HELPED ISRAEL, not because it helped America. What would
you be willing to do if another nation had bombed and starved your own
children in those kinds of numbers? (Just think what are you willing
to do for having perhaps 5,000 of your people killed on September
11th?) That is what is called motive.

The part that the government is today focusing on the most, is the
weapon. It is the least important part of the equation. If friendly,
and caring people all are wearing guns, we will be safe, even if
completely surrounded by them. However, bare hands will be enough to
end our lives, if we are surrounded by those that hate us. One who is
set upon revenge will always find a weapon.

Societies tend to end up generally in the model of either one or the
other of two possible arrangements: a free country populated by
law-abiding citizens; or a police state that watches each and every
move its controlled and unhappy citizens make.

Our own society was much freer in the 1950s than it is today. It could
afford to be. It was nearly all White, and the citizens nearly all
came from a similar background, and lived by the same ethical
standard. The ones who were not willing to live by that standard were
either ostracized from society, or they were locked up if they broke
the law. The security that was everywhere felt in America then was
infinitely stronger than what is felt today in America. Why? Because
Americans looked alike, thought alike, and were interested in
cooperating in maintaining a safe and prosperous society.

We have been moving rapidly away from a free society towards a police
state, as our actions have become more and more restricted. We can no
longer freely choose who we will hire or fire in our businesses. We
can no longer choose who we are going to live next to, or who our
children will attend school with. We are evermore rigidly controlled
in what we can say, do, and even think. Our children are programmed by
the state to accept concepts that were not approved by the parents,
and now we have young adults who have literally been brainwashed into
thinking that having a society like the White one in the 1950s is
somehow evil. They have been taught that the diverse struggling mess
we have created on our soil today is somehow superior to the White
nation of America that existed when I was a child. That is not
freedom. That is the type of thing that everyone used to condemn the
Soviet Union for. Brainwashing children, against what the parents want
their children to be taught is totalitarianism at its worse, because
it will destroy the roots, and heritage of an entire society, just
like it is doing to America right now. The one thing that could save
us is being programmed right out of our children: pride in who they
are.

Now that the policies of "our" government have created enthusiastic
enemies for our nation, and given those enemies the opportunity to
commit destructive and lethal acts upon our citizens, that same
government continues to perform acts that will increase the enthusiasm
of our enemies for our destruction, and is doing nothing that will
prevent those enemies from coming to our land. It instead is working
towards eliminating more of our freedom, and trying to control
weapons, neither of which will protect us from those who desire so
strongly to kill us, but both of which will make our lives more
miserable.

So, weep mothers of America, the evil is not only continuing, it going
to grow. We are going to lose more of our children and more of our
loved ones, because of what our government is doing. Each day that
passes, the White backbone of America grows smaller, and is displaced
by the non-White invaders an additional amount, adding up to millions
every year.

No one seems to be thinking about the fact that you do not mix clay
and grass in with your concrete when you are laying the foundation of
your house. The foundation of the United States of America has always
been the White people who founded her. It is pure insanity to think
that mixing in other peoples into our society will allow the
foundation to remain as strong as it was before. Plain common sense
told many this fact, before we started changing our land in the 1960s.
Many spoke out against the policies that have since proved to be so
destructive. Today, anyone who would dare to speak out, saying the
very mainstream things that many of our leaders said in the 1950s or
early 1960s said, would be instantly branded a racist and a hater.

Why? Because the people who have been behind this entire process know
that the only hope White America has of ever recovering its strength
and its security, is to return to its all-White composition. That can
never happen as long as those in power have the weapon of smearing
anyone speaking the truth, with the dreaded "racist" label, and while
White Americans are more terrified of being called a "racist" than
they are of having their daughters raped and their sons murdered.
I am completely amazed by people who still email me, calling me a
racist. Do they actually think that is something I am ashamed of?
Obviously they do. They cannot even see the words on my web page! They
only know that what is being said goes against their brainwashing, and
therefore it must be wrong. The very idea that a group of people, who
can control what is being thought by the average citizen in this
fashion, just might not have the welfare of the average White American
at heart, never even enters their mind for a second before it is
rejected. It does not even cross the threshold of their understanding.
They take their propaganda programming as pure truth, and gauge
everything else from it.

Yes, I am a racist, and naturally, so is every other human on earth.
It is clear from simple observation. We see men who are non-White,
applauded in the media for standing up for the needs and wants of
their own races. What is a Black leader other than a pure racist? He
is concerned with the welfare of his own race, over and above all
others. People know this is natural and good. Each race must stand up
for itself if it is to survive.

It has taken a huge amount of propaganda to destroy that natural
tendency in White Americans. Every day you see posters, and
advertisements laden with the propaganda message that diversity is
wonderful. Why is that propaganda necessary? Obviously, it is a
message that does not come naturally to people. It is a concept that
is abnormal, and must therefore be continually forced upon people who
would otherwise think of diversity as it truly is: death to any
society that embraces it. It is in order to kill that natural tendency
to want to live and work with those of your own kind, that the daily
propaganda barrage continues. The poster pictures of White and
non-White hands clasped, push the lie. The billboard photos of happy
people in a group, each of whom is a member of a different race, or a
mixture of races, force the idea home. The slogans telling you to
celebrate the cancer of diversity would hardly be needed if it were
really worthy of celebration.

And while this overwhelming flood of propaganda filth floods our
lives, at the same time, any attempt to run against the current of the
propaganda is attacked aggressively. The natural racist tendencies of
non-Whites are promoted as healthy, and all are demanded to accept
them, and even celebrate them. The natural racist tendencies of
Whites, are called hate, and continually condemned through every media
outlet in existence. This hypocritical, inconsistency slaps the numbed
White Americans every day squarely across the face. But it has been
going on for so long, they think that insult to their intelligence is
perfectly normal. They even join in! They write emails to me calling
me a "RACIST," without realizing that by doing so, they are saying
that I am a healthy White American who is proud of his race and wants
it to continue to exist, and to rule the country it created. They are
so far gone that they don't realized what they are saying. They really
think that giving up their lives, their children, their future, and
their nation to other people is "healthy" and "caring," while fighting
to save your people and your nation is "sick" and "heartless."
I feel sorry for these people. It is very sad that such mind
manipulation could go on for so long in a country as rich and powerful
as this country is. To have this many White Americans be this
confused, after a few decades of mental manipulation, is a frightening
thing to behold. These are the ones who have to one day awaken, or we
will sink into third world suicide.

Mothers of America, cry for your children, for they are doomed by your
own actions. Cry for your nation, that is rotting from the inside out,
because of your attitudes. Cry for daughters and sisters, as they are
being tormented by rape at a rate of 20,000 each year by the
non-Whites in our lands. Cry for the squalor that awaits your
grandchildren and the extinction that awaits theirs. If you do not
change what you are doing, all that will be left to you is to weep, as
all that is dear to you as an American is taken from your unresisting
hands."

http://www.whitefuture.com


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-11 09:20:24 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:45:33 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Your racism and low culture, based upon lies, makes you blind to
idealism and true nobility.
Racial equality is the lie, compare Europe to Africa. Race mixing
leads to low culture. Idealism and true nobility should be based on
truth.


"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/

Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.

He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.

He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.

He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.

Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.

He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."

Tommy

http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-11 11:33:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:45:33 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Your racism and low culture, based upon lies, makes you blind to
idealism and true nobility.
Racial equality is the lie, compare Europe to Africa. Race mixing
leads to low culture.
Such as ancient Egypt? It was a mixture of Europe and African races.
Ditto for ancient India, a mixture of all races. The plain fact is
that race mixing, on the basis of love, provides the most vibrant
cultures. So, Obama is a far better man and leader than his
predecessor.



Idealism and true nobility should be based on
Post by Topaz
truth.
Exactly. So your racist lies are most revolting.
Post by Topaz
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the Url below if ya want.http://www.davidduke.com/
Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.
He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."
Tommy
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-12 20:48:08 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."

Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98

The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.

Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249

The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.

Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8

"A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.

A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49

The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.

Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68

Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.

Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216

The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.

Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99

A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.

De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26

Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red
hair.

National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103

An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.

Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53

A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.

Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and
blond hair.

Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739

Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.

Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI

The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.

Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94

A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking
man with blond hair.

Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65

Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.

A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.

The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.

Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67

It was once painted sunburned red.

Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168

The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.

The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003

Here is a sculpture of a scribe from the Egyptian Old Kingdom

http://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-1-seated-scribe-c2620-2500-bce
Post by Arindam Banerjee
It was a mixture of Europe and African races.
Ditto for ancient India, a mixture of all races.
Egypt was once great. Not any more. That's race mixing. Ditto for
India.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The plain fact is
that race mixing, on the basis of love, provides the most vibrant
cultures.
White cultures are awesome.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So, Obama is a far better man and leader than his
predecessor.
Whatever, America is ruled by the Jews anyway.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Idealism and true nobility should be based on
Post by Topaz
truth.
Exactly. So your racist lies are most revolting.
You are revolted by the truth because you don't like it. But the
planet earth would be in a bad way without the wonderful White race.



http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-13 01:14:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
Post by Topaz
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98
   The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249
   The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
    "A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.
A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
   The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216
The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
   A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.
De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26
     Amenhotep III's tomb painting  shows him as having light red
hair.
National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103
    An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
      A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.
     Queen Thi  is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and
blond hair.
Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
    Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.
Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI
     The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94
   A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking
man with blond hair.
Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
    Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
    A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.
    The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
    It was once painted sunburned red.
Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168
      The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
       The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003
Here is a sculpture of a scribe from the Egyptian Old Kingdom
http://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-1-seated-scribe-c2620-2500-bce
Post by Arindam Banerjee
It was a mixture of Europe and African races.
Ditto for ancient India, a mixture of all races.
Egypt was once great. Not any more. That's race mixing. Ditto for
India.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
 The plain fact is
that race mixing, on the basis of love, provides the most vibrant
cultures.
White cultures are awesome.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So, Obama is a far better man and leader than his
predecessor.
Whatever, America is ruled by the Jews anyway.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Idealism and true nobility should be based on
Post by Topaz
truth.
Exactly.  So your racist lies are most revolting.
You are revolted by the truth because you don't like it. But the
planet earth would be in a bad way without the wonderful White race.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2013-06-13 01:25:33 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
[ The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
[ - Arindam Banerjee

A few posters here have tried to spread the lie that I am
white (instead of trying to make me believe that I am
white, as in your case). Such efforts can be seen as both
pathetic and hilarious at the same time.

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Post by Topaz
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98
=A0 =A0The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249
=A0 =A0The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
=A0 =A0 "A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.
A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
=A0 =A0The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216
The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
=A0 =A0A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colore=
d
Post by Topaz
ones.
De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26
=A0 =A0 =A0Amenhotep III's tomb painting =A0shows him as having light red
hair.
National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103
=A0 =A0 An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
=A0 =A0 =A0 A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.
=A0 =A0 =A0Queen Thi =A0is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes=
and
Post by Topaz
blond hair.
Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
=A0 =A0 Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.
Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI
=A0 =A0 =A0The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94
=A0 =A0A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-lookin=
g
Post by Topaz
man with blond hair.
Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
=A0 =A0 Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
=A0 =A0 A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.
=A0 =A0 The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
=A0 =A0 It was once painted sunburned red.
Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168
=A0 =A0 =A0 The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The information above is part of the information compiled =
by
Post by Topaz
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003
Here is a sculpture of a scribe from the Egyptian Old Kingdom
http://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-1-seated-scribe-c2620-2500-bce
Post by Arindam Banerjee
It was a mixture of Europe and African races.
Ditto for ancient India, a mixture of all races.
Egypt was once great. Not any more. That's race mixing. Ditto for
India.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
=A0The plain fact is
that race mixing, on the basis of love, provides the most vibrant
cultures.
White cultures are awesome.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So, Obama is a far better man and leader than his
predecessor.
Whatever, America is ruled by the Jews anyway.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Idealism and true nobility should be based on
Post by Topaz
truth.
Exactly. =A0So your racist lies are most revolting.
You are revolted by the truth because you don't like it. But the
planet earth would be in a bad way without the wonderful White race.
http://www.ihr.org/=A0http://nationalvanguard.org/=A0http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
People then and now - soc.culture.indian | Google Groups
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian/msg/b3b519d55f99f7af?hl=en&dmode=source
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-13 02:59:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
[ The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
[ - Arindam Banerjee
A few posters here have tried to spread the lie that I am
white (instead of trying to make me believe that I am
white, as in your case). Such efforts can be seen as both
pathetic and hilarious at the same time.
Well, there is a photograph around of a bearded guy with a distinct
Indian-Hindu look, that goes under your name. Whether you claim that
or not, is your business. As for myself, I am visible to all and
sundry, for what I am.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2013-06-14 01:49:06 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
[ The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
[ - Arindam Banerjee
A few posters here have tried to spread the lie that I am
white (instead of trying to make me believe that I am
white, as in your case). Such efforts can be seen as both
pathetic and hilarious at the same time.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
Well, there is a photograph around of a bearded guy with a distinct
Indian-Hindu look, that goes under your name. Whether you claim that
or not, is your business. As for myself, I am visible to all and
sundry, for what I am.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
If you can point to the picture's URL, I'd like to take a
look at it. Also, is your picture online somewhere?

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-14 12:27:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
[ The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
[ - Arindam Banerjee
A few posters here have tried to spread the lie that I am
white (instead of trying to make me believe that I am
white, as in your case). Such efforts can be seen as both
pathetic and hilarious at the same time.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
Well, there is a photograph around of a bearded guy with a distinct
Indian-Hindu look, that goes under your name.  Whether you claim that
or not, is your business. As for myself, I am visible to all and
sundry, for what I am.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
If you can point to the picture's URL, I'd like to take a
look at it.
https://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&authuser=0&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=673&q=jai+maharaj&oq=Jai+Maharaj&gs_l=img.1.0.0j0i24l2.3408.5814.0.9537.11.10.0.1.1.0.294.1842.1j2j6.9.0...0.0...1ac.1.17.img.cg_ri8_rGVw#q=jai%20maharaj&hl=en&authuser=0&tbm=isch&tbs=simg%3ACAQSHwnamWDRZA3WphoLCxCo1NgEGgIIFwwhPxHaqwSo6LQ&ei=HAu7UePnLIyGkQWWt4CwDg&ved=0CAYQhxw&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.47883778,d.aGc&fp=e43600a764aed938&biw=1366&bih=673

wow, that was a long string for a very small image! See if you can
get it. I did Google Images for Jai Maharaj. Did that for myself,
too, and found no image of mine in Internet. I used to be there in
Facebook, but I have deactivated my account. Once upon a time, I had
a website with some photos of myself and family, but that site has
been defunct for a long while now.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee


Also, is your picture online somewhere?
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2013-06-14 18:38:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Che=
ops,
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Topaz
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas rel=
iefs
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Topaz
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her =
skin
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Topaz
is white."
[ The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
[ - Arindam Banerjee
A few posters here have tried to spread the lie that I am
white (instead of trying to make me believe that I am
white, as in your case). Such efforts can be seen as both
pathetic and hilarious at the same time.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
Well, there is a photograph around of a bearded guy with a distinct
Indian-Hindu look, that goes under your name. =A0Whether you claim that
or not, is your business. As for myself, I am visible to all and
sundry, for what I am.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
If you can point to the picture's URL, I'd like to take a
look at it. Also, is your picture online somewhere?
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
https://www.google.com.au/search?hl=3Den&authuser=3D0&site=3Dimghp&tbm=3Dis=
ch&source=3Dhp&biw=3D1366&bih=3D673&q=3Djai+maharaj&oq=3DJai+Maharaj&gs_l=
=3Dimg.1.0.0j0i24l2.3408.5814.0.9537.11.10.0.1.1.0.294.1842.1j2j6.9.0...0.0=
....1ac.1.17.img.cg_ri8_rGVw#q=3Djai%20maharaj&hl=3Den&authuser=3D0&tbm=3Dis=
ch&tbs=3Dsimg%3ACAQSHwnamWDRZA3WphoLCxCo1NgEGgIIFwwhPxHaqwSo6LQ&ei=3DHAu7Ue=
PnLIyGkQWWt4CwDg&ved=3D0CAYQhxw&bav=3Don.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=3Dbv.47883778,=
d.aGc&fp=3De43600a764aed938&biw=3D1366&bih=3D673
wow, that was a long string for a very small image! See if you can
get it. I did Google Images for Jai Maharaj. Did that for myself,
too, and found no image of mine in Internet. I used to be there in
Facebook, but I have deactivated my account. Once upon a time, I had
a website with some photos of myself and family, but that site has
been defunct for a long while now.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Dhanyavaad, yes that's my picture and I uploaded it. Here's its location:

Loading Image...

If you had your picure on the web then it's probably still there.

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-15 08:20:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Che=
ops,
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Topaz
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas rel=
iefs
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Topaz
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her =
skin
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Post by Topaz
is white."
[ The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
[ - Arindam Banerjee
A few posters here have tried to spread the lie that I am
white (instead of trying to make me believe that I am
white, as in your case). Such efforts can be seen as both
pathetic and hilarious at the same time.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
Well, there is a photograph around of a bearded guy with a distinct
Indian-Hindu look, that goes under your name. =A0Whether you claim that
or not, is your business. As for myself, I am visible to all and
sundry, for what I am.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
If you can point to the picture's URL, I'd like to take a
look at it. Also, is your picture online somewhere?
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
https://www.google.com.au/search?hl=3Den&authuser=3D0&site=3Dimghp&tb...
ch&source=3Dhp&biw=3D1366&bih=3D673&q=3Djai+maharaj&oq=3DJai+Maharaj&gs_l=
=3Dimg.1.0.0j0i24l2.3408.5814.0.9537.11.10.0.1.1.0.294.1842.1j2j6.9.0...0.0­=
....1ac.1.17.img.cg_ri8_rGVw#q=3Djai%20maharaj&hl=3Den&authuser=3D0&tbm=3Di­s=
ch&tbs=3Dsimg%3ACAQSHwnamWDRZA3WphoLCxCo1NgEGgIIFwwhPxHaqwSo6LQ&ei=3DHAu7Ue­=
PnLIyGkQWWt4CwDg&ved=3D0CAYQhxw&bav=3Don.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=3Dbv.47883778,­=
d.aGc&fp=3De43600a764aed938&biw=3D1366&bih=3D673
wow, that was a long string for a very small image!  See if you can
get it.  I did Google Images for Jai Maharaj.  Did that for myself,
too, and found no image of mine in Internet.  I used to be there in
Facebook, but I have deactivated my account.  Once upon a time, I had
a website with some photos of myself and family, but that site has
been defunct for a long while now.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
http://www.p-g-a.org/images/jai.jpg
Well, if that is so, then you are an absolutely authentic Indian-Hindu
possibly hailing from Northern UP.
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
If you had your picure on the web then it's probably still there.
Maybe. Recently some acting shots of myself as the genocidal
Pakistani Major Ijaz Ahmed in Humayun Ahmed's play "1971" were posted
in Facebook. I suppose they will still be there.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Topaz
2013-06-14 00:39:15 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:14:08 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks. We should
preserve the White race. Probably no one wants you to believe that you
are White.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-14 12:46:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:14:08 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
The racists would like to make me believe that I am white.
Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks.
I see no evidence of that.

We should
Post by Topaz
preserve the White race.
What a fake concern.


Probably no one wants you to believe that you
Post by Topaz
are White.
Well, that would show some intelligence on their part. But there is
such a concept among then whites as "honorary" white, which I find
demeaning.
Post by Topaz
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-14 21:45:15 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:46:01 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks.
I see no evidence of that.
All IQ test prove it.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
What a fake concern.
Safest / Most Dangerous Cities and Percentage of Blacks

Safest Cities (75,000 or more) per
http://advertisers.americancityandcounty.com/ar/government_amherst_ny_tops/

1. Amherst, N.Y 3.9%
http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/popInfo.php?locIndex=91

2. Newton, Mass. 2.0%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Newton-Massachusetts.html

3. Mission Viejo, Calif. 1.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Mission-Viejo-California.html

4. Cary, N.C. 6.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Cary-North-Carolina.html

5. Brick Township, N.J. (Less than 1% as computed by dividing 75,325
population into 751 blacks)
http://www.co.ocean.nj.us/planning/databook/09RACE2000.htm

6. Simi Valley, Calif. 1.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Simi-Valley-California.html

7. Sunnyvale, Calif. 2.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Sunnyvale-California.html

8. Colonie, N.Y. 3.5%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Colonie-New-York.html

9. Sterling Heights, Mich. 1.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Sterling-Heights-Michigan.html

10. Clarkstown, N.Y 7.9%
http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/popInfo.php?locIndex=409
____________________

Most Dangerous Cities (75,000 or more) per
http://advertisers.americancityandcounty.com/ar/government_amherst_ny_tops/

1. Detroit 81.6%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Detroit-Michigan.html

2. Atlanta 61.4%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Atlanta-Georgia.html

3. St. Louis 51.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/St.-Louis-Missouri.html

4. Baltimore 64.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Baltimore-Maryland.html

5. Gary, Ind. 84.0%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Gary-Indiana.html

6. Camden, N.J. 53.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Camden-New-Jersey.html

7. Tampa 26.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Tampa-Florida.html

8. West Palm Beach, Fla. 32.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/West-Palm-Beach-Florida.html

9. Compton, Calif. 40.3% (White non-Hispanic 1.0%)
http://www.city-data.com/city/Compton-California.html

10. Memphis, Tenn. 61.4%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Memphis-Tennessee.html
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Well, that would show some intelligence on their part. But there is
such a concept among then whites as "honorary" white, which I find
demeaning.
You are an enemy of the White race.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-15 08:25:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:46:01 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks.
I see no evidence of that.
All IQ test prove it.
IQ tests don't prove anything. They merely indicate.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Well, that would show some intelligence on their part.  But there is
such a concept among then whites as "honorary" white, which I find
demeaning.
You are an enemy of the White race.
Fortunately, all whites have been very good to me, always. Which
proves, that you are an ass.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Topaz
2013-06-15 09:23:24 UTC
Permalink
No Way Out But Through the Jews
A Review of Paul Gottfried's The Conservative Movement
by Alex Linder

Executive summary: The Jews have taken over the American right, and
they have the money and media access to shut out any contenders.
Meaning: Unless you build a movement that explicitly forbids Jewish
participation and focuses on Jews as the political enemy, you are
destined to be coopted or crushed. Or at least rendered impotent, like
the Old Right, and left broke and fuming on the sidelines. Caveat: The
Internet isn't accounted for in Gottfried's calculus.

...the review

In his 1993 book The Conservative Movement, Jew Paul Gottfried
provides an excellent short history of post-WWII conservatism, and one
that provides a clear, if implicit, message for today's White
nationalist. That message is the title of this review: No way out but
through the Jews. If you plan to pursue the political goal of a
civilized White America, these Jews will be at your throat every step
of the way. So you might as well not kid yourself about that but set
your phaser on "kill" from the start.

Gottfried never comes right out and says it, but the upshot of his
history is that the right has been taken over by Jews. Centered around
the Podhoretz and Kristol families, this Jewish movement pushes an
anti-American ideology. Where George Washington and Thomas Jefferson
advocated no entangling alliances abroad and local rule at home, the
neocons promote a plus-sized managerial state at home, and global
democratic crusades abroad. Since their infiltration in the late
sixties, early seventies, says Gottfried, these Jewish "conservatives"
have garnered the lion's share of money and media access,
marginalizing the traditional right. And although he nowhere mentions
talk radio or the Internet, Gottfried sees virtually no options at the
disposal of those who would usurp the usurpers.

Who are the neoconservatives? Essentially, they are a small group of
East Coast Jewish intellectuals of regular private morality. They are
former reds or red-diaper babies who departed from the New Left when
it started advocating odd sex and communism and other policies they
felt were potentially anti-Semitic. As they emerged from this sixties
morass, they gravitated to the right, where they found allies in the
anti-communist cause; friends with foundation money that could be used
to construct a bulwark against their crazier New Left brethren. Over
the course of the seventies, the Jewish neoconservatives took over one
foundation after another, supplanting the Christian traditionalist
bias of American conservatism with their detailed policy studies and
position papers. These bore proof of their sociological and
statistical cast of mind, different from the Kirkian
religious-literary bias of traditionalists.

By the time of Reagan, they had achieved dominance. Any conservative
hoping to make a career of it, whether in politics or writing or
commentating, had to hew to their specific vision of the America they
wished to conserve if he wished to preserve his own office, air-time
or sheet space. Any vestigial strains of racial feeling or regional
sympathy were anathema to these racist philo-Semitic anti-racists who
are unstinting in their anathematizing of anyone who diverges from
their pluralist, democratic dogmas. Any American, that is. The
dogmatic democratic pluralism disappears when it comes to Israel,
where Semitic chauvinism is, quite rightly they think, the law. What
White racialists want for America is no different from what Jewish
neoconservatives want for Israel. But they will try to shout down
anyone who makes the equation, just ask Joe Sobran. Only Jews have a
right to an ethnostate; democratic pluralism is good enough for the
rest of us. This hypocritical double-standard springs directly from
the gut Jewish feeling that an America made up of many conflicting
groups, riven by cultural standards, divided by ethnicity, history and
behavior, is the America in which the Jew is safest, and can move
about most freely. A strong, sure White nation scares the Jew. So
whether it's America or Europe, he tries to undercut it with
anthropological lies about the unreality of race, falsified histories
("diversity has always been our greatest strength") support for open
immigration, suppression of free speech and the destruction of free
association-all in the name of "civil rights." Neoconservatives are
Jews, no need to look further than that. Jews, whether left or right,
ask only one question: Is it good for the Jews? They hide behind
universalist rhetoric, but their concern is for themselves. And you
can be absolutely sure of this: Their interests are not our
interests..

David Horowitz would be a prime example of an expert deployer of a
plausible, counterfeit theory and history of America to suck in
potential White racialists and get them four-square behind a nutty,
extremist, ahistorical view of politics that can only lead America
into South Africa's pit of horrors. The triumph of individual rights
in Black lands means the triumph of the jungle. It is extremist,
rationalist and counter-historical to elevate a political process over
the character of the people. How can ignorant, 75-IQ blacks produce
civilization protecting the individual rights these neoconservatives
claim to love? Can one-man, one-vote really produce that miracle? Of
course not, and these Jews know it. And they know that the Founders
knew it. So they lie. The truth, as they know and cover up, is that
the Founders understood that only civilized, self-controlled White men
were capable of civilization, and that to expect dissolute, lazy,
TV-drenched slobs mixed with mulattoes and Negroes and Mexicans to
vote in ordered liberty was to expect the impossible. But David
Horowitz, living in Los Angeles, can look out the window and tell you
it's possible. Never underestimate the power of Jewish duplicity in
furthering Jewish self-interest. That's a second corollary to
Gottfried's study.

We asked above whether or not these neoconservative Jews were really
conservative. Perhaps that question isn't important. One point
Gottfried does develop, writing in 1993, is just how little difference
there is in today's political discourse between left and right. As I
write, George W. Bush is battling Al Gore, so the point is hardly
stale. Effectively, the left and right may differ in degree, but
everybody supports a capitalist welfare state and global democracy.
Everybody is "inclusive." Everybody bows before the great God of
Diversity. Are the Jews conservative? In the deeper sense, no. They
are still radicals, intent on spreading their lies about human
fungibility, from which they aone are exempt as the "Chosen" people.
Left or right, they are eager to destroy our White civilization to
further their group interests.

On the second most important political issue of the day-leaving the
borders open to the third world-the Jews speak with one voice: no
patrols. Note this well: Never in American history has a majority of
Whites favored colored immigration. The Jews alone favored it, for
reasons outlined above. Now whose policy is followed today? -- that of
the Jewish minority, which doesn't think like you and I do. You
thought the majority was supposed to prevail in a democracy? Wrong.
Political control in a democracy, as Aristotle observed, is vested in
those who control television. This is part of what certain Americans
are getting at with the 'ZOG' formulation that all the
pseudo-sophisticated college-educated folk laugh at (as TV has taught
them to). The Jews almost to a man push open-borders immigration, and
they denounce anyone who differs as an evil racist/nativist/xenophobe.
All the Jewish lies dovetail intellectually, and all of them advance
Jewish interests. I recommend, I urge, I wish I could force everyone
who hasn't to read Kevin MacDonald's paper on the Jewish influence in
the hundred years of debate preceding the nation-killing 1965
immigration act that opened the floodgates to the third world. The
Jewish hatred of the White world is the story that doesn't make the
news, even as it remakes your neighborhood. I doubt the plush-paunched
Republicans watching TV politics as spectator sport will ever pick up
on it. You will run a long way before you meet an average American
with the slightest historical awareness-nor the interest in developing
one. But the arguments are lying there, exactly as I've presented
them, and perhaps in a crisis people will take a hard look at what
brought us to our current position. For all the disinformation out
there, it's still not too hard to detect the patterns once you have
the facts. . .

So we've seen that Jews claiming themselves "conservatives" but not
all that different from their leftist brethren have come in and
dominated the right. Where does this leave whatever is left of the
non-Jewish right? I would break this set into two subsets: those who
are openly racist (which Gottfried avoids) and those who make veiled
or open Semitically Incorrect arguments while attempting to maintain
their "respectability." The former have no political power, while the
latter are desperate to hang on to their columns and speaking
engagements.

Although there are a handful of Jews pushing standard White-racist
arguments, and who would receive even less notice than they do get if
they weren't Jewish, these same never take into account that Jews can
never simply be another ethnic group assimilated into a purified White
America. The nature and qualities and history of their group shows
just that-they are a group. And since they are a group that recognizes
itself as a group and fights against other groups on that basis-they
must be opposed as a group. This is not so much guilt by association
as guilt by genetics and behavior and history. As a group they have
strategized to destroy the civilized White America they felt
threatened by, and anything we do to them in return is more than
deserved. Treating them as individuals, just like we are, has failed.
The correct path is to treat them as the radical alien outsiders and
eliminate their influence. We need to take their flag off the
courthouse, so to speak.

Getting back to the lesson at the top of the page, Jews have so
strategized their evolution (see Kevin MacDonald's work) as to be
considerably more intelligent than their hosts, with an average IQ of
115, a standard-deviation above the White mean. This intelligence and
their proven historical character combine to ensure Jews will always
be the yeast, the irritants, the makers-uncomfortable, the
revolutionaries. Wherever they exist in White society they will be a
force for disruption. The fact that some can exist as peaceful ethnics
among the White majority does not negate this Big Truth (for if there
can be Big Lies, there can also be Big Truths). Because
class-arguments can be abused, and because injustice will be meted out
to individual non-Whites when we rebuild civilization, the Jews
enforcing their dogma of individualism will always have points to make
that resonate with our myopic right-wing individualists. But just as
surely as these Jews averted their eyes from the general horrors
ensuing in South Africa after their racial-and-political equality
dogmas were enacted, the pro-White right must be louder than ever in
showing that their ethnic Jewish self-interest can only end in the
extinction of the White race. Really. Those are the stakes.
The media neoconservatives can't afford to admit the evidence of the
failure of their dogma in South Africa, rape and murder capital of the
world; rather they redouble their insistence on individualism to evade
the Big Truth that colored demographics and political democracy doom
White minorities everywhere. And taking a global perspective-as we are
all supposed to do, nowadays-the White race is a small minority, and
growing smaller every day. Our White kinsmen are already being
butchered in their homes and driven off their farms in South Africa
and Zimbabwe. Literally tens of millions of Whites have become victims
of violent Black assault in America since the Jew-eased passage of
"Civil Rights" legislation. The Jews well know these facts, and that
is why they avoid reporting them. They hated South Africa when it was
ruled by civilized Whites. They don't give a damn what happens to
Whites once their beloved Negroes are carrying the whip. Foolish,
foolish White man-will you not wake up while there is time?

What we are discussing is a very simple: the Jews are a class fighting
to dominate other classes, just as Benjamin Stein saw in his report on
the TV Weltanschauung, The View from Sunset Boulevard. Jew Stein, like
Jew Michael Levin (Feminism and Freedom), will never name his people
as that class, pointing to "writers and producers," "feminists," and
"neoconservatives." (It is really truly amazing the way that Jews are
able to camouflage their interests, always presenting their specific
goal as a general good, and that their terms are tacitly accepted in
their opponents' rhetoric. It's like we all are under contract to
agree that the Jews aren't a group and don't have any specific
interests and certainly don't work to advance those interests and even
if they do, they aren't in conflict with ours. But notice that on the
flip side, the opposite conditions obtain: Jews always attack their
opponents by class (right-wing Christian extremists, racist haters,
Arabs), lingering lovingly on the specific interests of their
undifferentiated opponents; always forestalling counter-arguments as
"anti-Semitism" driven by the only motive Jews ever allow their
opponents-all together now-"hate." The Jews can only get away with
this clever I-criticize-you-and-you
criticize-that-bag-of-flour-over-there setup because they exert
extraordinary control over television and newspapers. And their backup
line of defense, of course, is to denounce anyone who notices the
strategies behind their tactics as an anti-Semitic conspiracymonger.
This is a second aspect of what the 'ZOG'-minded are pointing to.
Stein is writing about the class of TV writers and producers;

Gottfried is writing about neoconservatives; Levin is writing about
feminists. All of them mean Jews, none of them can afford to say it.
When you become a Jew, it's almost as though you have to sign a sheet
saying you will either avoid mentioning negative Jewish
characteristics or-pace Marx and Freud-reinterpret specific, offensive
Jewish behaviors or patterns as generically human: i.e., repression,
or characteristic of an exploited class. (An excellent book, The
Ordeal of Civility, by John Murray Cuddihy, covers this topic in
depth.) The one thing none of these rightist Jews wants is a civilized
White society where Jews are nonexistent. Or ghettoized. Or looked
down on socially. Or in which you are free to speak and write and talk
about Jews as specific people who act, look and think in generalizable
ways. Jews may be physically ugly duplicitous socialist troublemakers,
but they don't want you saying that. They will propagandize through
the schools and TV until you are practically unable to notice it
because the whole context in which you might make such an observation
has been destroyed. They will make hard to find the few books that
dare discuss it. (Just try finding Cuddihy's book.) History is nothing
but a propaganda tool to them. In living memory they were kept out of
the better hotels and clubs and colleges, and since treatment of the
Jews, to Jews, is the true measure of civilization, any time they were
legally or socially treated as other than the God-sent gift they
present themselves (that is, all history up until about fifty years
ago) must be falsified into Dark Ages (Jews out of power) preceding
today's Enlightened Age (Jews running the show). Let alone the
ghettoes of old Europe, these people are capable of portraying the
fifties in America as some sort of racist hellhole, saved only through
heroic Blacks led by saintly Jews in the name of civil rights or
federal tyranny, if you prefer your descriptions accurate. What is
clear to every Jew seems to be unclear to most White Americans,
especially those on the right who ought to know better:

this is a war of classes, a war for power and dominance between a
small but smart and well-positioned ethnic group and the vast majority
of civilized White people. The Jews instinctively recognize this
battle, feel it in their blood, and are fighting hard for their side.

Most on our side aren't even aware a war is going on.
Gottfried points to two symbolic episodes that show the transfer of
power from the traditional right to the neocons: 1) Rockford's firing
of John Neuhaus, and his subsequent denunciation of traditionalist
racism and anti-Semitism among the Old Right; and, 2) the neocons'
successful defeat of M.E. Bradford, a traditionalist historian, as
head of the National Endowment of Humanity. What was the traditional
right to do? Basically, it retreated, licked its wounds, and looked
about in search of allies and money and media outlets. What has
happened, and this is clearer now than when Gottfried completed the
book, is that the American political system under Clinton has gotten
so corrupt that even average people began to notice. This alone has
strengthened the traditional right's never-too-strong confidence, and
strengthened its new ally, the libertarians, too. And both sides have
benefited hugely from the Internet, which at once strengthens small
groups and somewhat threatens established media institutions. By 2000,
there were enough ganglia of pro-Whites on the Internet to get
mainstream Jewish groups scribbling "hate crimes" model statutes,
anti-gun legislation, and politically correct browser censorware at
top speed.

It might have been expected that the loss of power and funding would
have resulted in the radicalization of the traditional right, at least
to the point of open talk about taking the American right back from
the Jews. There was very little of such talk, none of it open-at least
among those with one eye on "respectability," that ever leftward
moving boundary observed by fools.

What we still see on the right in the year 2000 are leading non-Jewish
right-wing Whites couching what they know to be racial arguments in
regional or race-neutral terms. Sam Francis speaks of Middle American
Revolutionaries. He means Whites, but he's afraid to come out and say
it. Of course, he gets called racist just the same. And he got fired
from the neocon Washington Times just the same. But Jews, to him, are
just people with a different religion, and he can still find a way to
fit minorities into that Middle American revolution.

Then there are the various Southern separatist groups. All are
carefully non-racial. All get accused of being racist. All fail to
draw the correct conclusion. It is amusing in a sick and increasingly
irritating way. Is there nobody left who can think clearly and isn't
afraid to voice his conclusions publicly? No, the Southern Semitically
Correct separatists present as sorry a face as they always do. Always
trying for that elusive respectability, always failing to achieve it,
and always losing the few-and merely symbolic-battles they do engage
in. For people who brag incessantly "on" their heroic Confederate
ancestors, they show little courage and less intelligence.

I'll say it again, a little louder now, so Johnny Reb can hear me:
THERE IS NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS. IT DOES YOU NO GOOD TO BE OR
PRETEND TO BE NON-RACIST. YOU ARE THREATENED AS A GROUP, BY A GROUP,
AND YOU'D BETTER GET THOSE GROUPS STRAIGHT IN YOUR HEAD TO HAVE ANY
HOPE OF PRESERVING THE LAND AND PEOPLE YOU LOVE.
A little more on the Southern-rights groups. The left always froths
over them, as though people too scared and powerless to say what they
mean openly are going to achieve anything. This frothing is more a
measure of media boredom and the fact that the left is so dominant it
has forgotten what real opposition feels like that it goes overboard.
The left so buys its own frothing demagoguery it can't even realize
these people have ceded the essential point before they even start
arguing. Pity the poor Southern separatist. He can't even keep the
flag in the air or the Blacks from pooping on the statue of his
great-grandaddy. Even with all that Confederate heroism running in his
blood, he's still selling his problem as Northerners, not Blacks. As
though America hasn't been homogenized by TV into one big mall or
airport lobby. As though the guy in Arkansas is worried about the
White man just over the Missouri line, more than the Black next door.
How pitiful and obvious he is, our man of gray, thinking the media
will buy that he's really not racist. He can't see that it doesn't
matter in the slightest if he isn't, and if he is, he's contemptible
for not arguing openly. Ditch the gray and go for black and white,
Southern Man.

How many times does the right have to learn that the media really is
controlled by Jews, by intimidation where not by ownership; that Jews
really are leftist; and that anyone preaching anything remotely
resembling White pride gets treated like a human showing emotion in
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (that is, squawked at and pointed out
to the cops by the aliens who are taking over the planet) - so that he
might as well oppose the Jew's anti-White hatred openly. You can't win
where the other guy defines the terms, sets the labels, interprets the
law. You must oppose him openly, directly, explicitly and give him no
quarter. Why are you always on the defensive? Could it be the same
reason you always lose? Here we come to a deep-lying problem with
conservatism. First of all, nobody's ever satisfactorily defined it. A
branch of that problem is that there is no philosophical basis for
incorporating political attack. A new conservatism must be envisioned
that incorporates not merely the preservation of custom and tradition,
but one that can accommodate formless spiritual or psychic drives that
are even more important than patterned behaviors: questing,
exploration, simple competitiveness. Even blood-lust. What could be
more conservative than blood-lust? But where do you find it among the
Republicans; over at the Jew-intimidated National Review? Among the
foundation-based low-tax remonstrators?

The funny thing is that once you say, Yes, I am a racist. Just like
George Washington. And you are a White-hating Jew-the poison is drawn.
They have set the terms of this political game we all play, and only
by refusing to play do we stand a chance of winning. It is utmost
foolishness, as anybody who has published conservative articles
anywhere in the world will tell you, to try to escape the racist tag.
You can't, and in any case it ain't a meaningful word, people-it's
just a way to smear and discredit you. Fight the smearers and
discrediters directly, refuse to play on their terms. Love and
fairness no more conquer hate than they conquer bullets. Prefixing
your conservative arguments with "I'm not a racist, but..." and
expecting to achieve your political goals is like one of those African
rebel guerillas smearing himself with magical pig grease thinking it
will stop bullets.

Apart from your opinion of the Nazis, consider their tactics. Did they
win-democratically-by adopting the tactics of the respectable American
right, or did they gain converts by their physical courage and their
willingness to confront the Jew-led communists? How much worse can the
Old Right do than it is doing right now? Not much. The mainstream
right-as I write, G.W. Bush and the Republican convention are in full
swing, every other speaker addressing the hall is a colored-has
decided to ape the liberals. In the words of the song, Freedom's just
another word for nothing left to lose. Well, what on earth do the Sam
Francises and Thomas Flemings and the Pat Buchanans have left to lose?
A column in an obscure magazine? A speech to a few dozen like-mindeds?
Is it possible they will turn to effective tactics out of sheer
boredom? Sam Francis (you'll serve as representative here), how could
you possibly do worse than you are doing now by openly criticizing
Jews instead of making pusillanimous attacks on East Coast elitists
and New World Order bureaucrats? How could you possibly fare any worse
by defending the Black-and-White truths of the Founders in
black-and-white terms?

Then you've got the libertarians, trying to get government off our
backs without any recourse to racial explanations or group interests
in explaining human behavior. Trying to understand the world one
person at a time. Some of these libertarians are products of Silicon
Valley, and to the extent they philosophize, they are Randian
individualists. They believe in free trade and free movement of
peoples, and make no distinctions between them. Libertarians seem to
instinctively turn away from any historical recognition of the
circumstances under which the freedoms they demand were actually
realized. Even their few (and in many ways impressive) intellectuals
who are interested in history tend to fall in line with the
politically safe Jewish lie about the non-racial aspect of our
founding, building their future utopias in that tired old,
misunderstood, misrepresented "all men are created equal."
Politically, libertarians are laughable, beyond their useful ability
to supply policy papers. Imagine a whole bunch of computer geeks and
economics professors marching on Washington under the fear-inspiring
banner of "Me!" Now there's an Army even our heroic neo-Confederates
could take! Libertarians maybe never will realize that, again I yell,
BLOOD AND RACE ARE WHAT MOVE PEOPLE, NOT THE RIGHT TO SMOKE DOOBIES
AND BUGGER YOUR BOYFRIEND. NOT EVEN ECONOMICS. Am I really the only
idiot to notice that when Whites ruled America, White people were
free? And that when Jews and Blacks rule America, they're slaves? But
most "right-wing" libertarians would rather support a minimum wage
hike than acknowledge this simple historical fact. They are too
rationalist in temperament, too much like our liberal dictators. Too
in love with their idea of
people-as-individuals-in-the-low-tax-multicultural-utopia-of-tomorrow
to pay attention to street-level political and historical reality.
Many of us want individual liberty, but it only obtains under certain
circumstances. There sure doesn't seem to be much of it around in
these days of "civil rights" for everybody except the people who
created the idea of 'em in the first place. If there's anything that
gives the lie to what passes for "conservatism" these days, it's right
here: Genuine civil rights-association, property, speech,
self-defense-were much better protected in the days before the prating
Jews and their colored parasite minions rose to the fore. Yet
recognition of the race-based nature of practical, effective, genuine
freedom will get you kicked out of the Libertarian party faster than
you can say Don't Do Drugs!

Libertarians take one aspect of looking at the world and inflate it
into the entire cosmos. This is their built-in bias. When you combine
it with their standard right-wing fear of crossing the Semitical
Correctness line, you have a second hurdle between them and racialism.
The conservative Christians share these political flaws. Their concern
is not for the race or the group, but for the salvation of the
individual soul. Of course, since in years past the Good Book has been
used to support virtually every position under the sun including
communism, there is a bit more hope for their conversion on the racial
issue, should the powers that be change. TV Christians have proven
able adopters of the Semitically Correct line. Israel is good and
racialism is bad. That's the message they're getting from New York,
and that's the message Pat Robertson is putting out to rural North
Carolina. The libertarians have their hated parties, but these are
always anonymous "bureaucrats" or "statists," or "socialists"-never
anyone you can actually get your hands on. Same with the Christian
conservatives. They are the equivalent of the libertarians in that the
former are excellent at certain types of economic reasoning (Why We
Should Privatize Trash Collection) while the Christians retain solid
moral and character-development advice. They are both good on the
small-picture stuff. But neither group can take a realistic look at
the general; they are both concerned about saving Heaven or Liberty
one soul at a time. They both simply refuse to make necessary
generalizations.

Christians, again like Libertarians, invariably throw their
opprobrium on carefully generic targets: Atheists, secular humanists
(gays are the one exception, and even here they say "Hate the sinner,
not the sin," as though that doesn't conflict with their doctrine of
free will). A Jew or a black or a Mexican is a vivid image,
immediately recognizable. The abstractions countered by the Christians
and the libertarians are creatures that nobody would recognize on a
public street. They are fighting abstactly against abstractions,
instead of coherently for something concrete.

Never do the Christians go after the Jews who are killing their
doctrines; never do they speak the name of their real enemy despite
the spittingly obscene provocations to which he has subjected them.
This is why, with tens of millions in numerical advantage, the
Christians aren't even masters of the civilization they created. In
fact, much of the leadership class of the Christians has become so
enthralled with Jewish ideas that now the church will bend any which
way the Jews require, whether it's removing the Commandments from the
classroom the way the Jew judge and Jew-created and -run ACLU tell
them to, or rewriting history to avoid the fact that Jews condemned
their own Savior to die (as in the revised [read: Semitically Correct]
Passion Plays)! They may think they are only turning the other cheek,
but self-abasing worms is what these new Christians truly are. This
used to be a religion whose adherents killed others in glorious
crusade for their Truth, and died at the stake before renouncing their
Faith. Today, the biggest name in Christendom hobnobs with nutty
Buddhists and faxes apologies to Jerusalem. For all its residual focus
on humility and self-discipline (welcome antacids to the Jewish public
school lies about self-esteem, which is really self-absorption and
self-worship; in a word, selfishness), the Christian church in America
is today furthering the racial evils that Jewish ideologues,
especially those misappropriating the name conservative, have
subjected us to. Pat Robertson has no problem with those influxing
Mexican chicken-pluckers heaping his collection plates, and has
publicly advocated miscegenation as the long-term solution to our
racial ills. If he preached miscegenation as a sin, as his hardier
forebears did, he would be burned at the stake. Pardon me, I mean, he
wouldn't be on TV. The fact that any evangelicals are on TV at all is
conditioned on their support for Israel and their multiracialism. This
is what makes their leaders despicable-not the hypocrisy and
White-trashiness the left and right would have us sneer at them for.
Recently Bush's first national campaign ad aired. It shows him at a
school surrounded by little black and brown kids, all well on their
way to becoming the computer programmers and doctors and lawyers and
Republicans of tomorrow. It seems the GOP has made up its mind which
way it's going. It's everyvato's party; down with the homies, too.
Make any show that persuades in order to capture power. The old
Clinton strategy. After all, reality is that waves of wets wash over
the border every night, and at some point they and their kids will
vote. The bulk White population is fading, and the core demographic
supporting conservative principles simply won't be there to swing a
presidential election in another ten years.

Even Jew-genuflecting National Review has noticed this Californication
of America, as has been termed in a different context. But sucking up
to the powers that be, angling for a spot, doing what he's told, is
something the middle-manager mind that makes up the Republican ranks
well understands. Ya got to roll with the punches, ya know?

White man, you have to decide. If you choose not to decide, you still
have made a choice, to make a phrase. You can pull a Christian
Scientist, and pretend that that brown spot on our national chest will
just go away if we think positive thoughts long enough, refuse to
acknowledge it. But it won't. Those coloreds swamping the border,
those grasping welfare niggers, those lying Jewish press manipulators
won't disappear of their own accord. Twenty years from now, George
Bush-Brown will be president, and all the things you fear today-
your kids blood-libeled at school; yourself discriminated against on
the job; your taxes higher than ever; your wife subject to insults,
rape or assault; your big cities gang-dominated; your small cities
dominated by nigger "music" and clothing pollution; your guns
outlawed; your political opinions criminalized; your TV louder and
more intrusive and hateful-will be worse. As Paul Gottfried shows,
but doesn't tell, the same Jews that have made the present possible
are working hard to make this future inevitable. But there is still a
window of opportunity. But only if you recognize that we-you and I
and the others reading this-are part of the White race, share
interests, and must band together. And that, politically, culturally
and socially, to achieve a civilized future, there is
NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS!

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/v1/index5.htm

http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-15 13:19:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
No Way Out But Through the Jews
A Review of Paul Gottfried's The Conservative Movement
by Alex Linder
Executive summary: The Jews have taken over the American right, and
they have the money and media access to shut out any contenders.
Meaning: Unless you build a movement that explicitly forbids Jewish
participation and focuses on Jews as the political enemy, you are
destined to be coopted or crushed. Or at least rendered impotent, like
the Old Right, and left broke and fuming on the sidelines. Caveat: The
Internet isn't accounted for in Gottfried's calculus.
...the review
In his 1993 book The Conservative Movement, Jew Paul Gottfried
provides an excellent short history of post-WWII conservatism, and one
that provides a clear, if implicit, message for today's White
nationalist. That message is the title of this review: No way out but
through the Jews. If you plan to pursue the political goal of a
civilized White America, these Jews will be at your throat every step
of the way. So you might as well not kid yourself about that but set
your phaser on "kill" from the start.
Gottfried never comes right out and says it, but the upshot of his
history is that the right has been taken over by Jews. Centered around
the Podhoretz and Kristol families, this Jewish movement pushes an
anti-American ideology. Where George Washington and Thomas Jefferson
advocated no entangling alliances abroad and local rule at home, the
neocons promote a plus-sized managerial state at home, and global
democratic crusades abroad. Since their infiltration in the late
sixties, early seventies, says Gottfried, these Jewish "conservatives"
have garnered the lion's share of money and media access,
marginalizing the traditional right. And although he nowhere mentions
talk radio or the Internet, Gottfried sees virtually no options at the
disposal of those who would usurp the usurpers.
Who are the neoconservatives? Essentially, they are a small group of
East Coast Jewish intellectuals of regular private morality. They are
former reds or red-diaper babies who departed from the New Left when
it started advocating odd sex and communism and other policies they
felt were potentially anti-Semitic. As they emerged from this sixties
morass, they gravitated to the right, where they found allies in the
anti-communist cause; friends with foundation money that could be used
to construct a bulwark against their crazier New Left brethren. Over
the course of the seventies, the Jewish neoconservatives took over one
foundation after another, supplanting the Christian traditionalist
bias of American conservatism with their detailed policy studies and
position papers. These bore proof of their sociological and
statistical cast of mind, different from the Kirkian
religious-literary bias of traditionalists.
By the time of Reagan, they had achieved dominance. Any conservative
hoping to make a career of it, whether in politics or writing or
commentating, had to hew to their specific vision of the America they
wished to conserve if he wished to preserve his own office, air-time
or sheet space. Any vestigial strains of racial feeling or regional
sympathy were anathema to these racist philo-Semitic anti-racists who
are unstinting in their anathematizing of anyone who diverges from
their pluralist, democratic dogmas. Any American, that is. The
dogmatic democratic pluralism disappears when it comes to Israel,
where Semitic chauvinism is, quite rightly they think, the law. What
White racialists want for America is no different from what Jewish
neoconservatives want for Israel. But they will try to shout down
anyone who makes the equation, just ask Joe Sobran. Only Jews have a
right to an ethnostate; democratic pluralism is good enough for the
rest of us. This hypocritical double-standard springs directly from
the gut Jewish feeling that an America made up of many conflicting
groups, riven by cultural standards, divided by ethnicity, history and
behavior, is the America in which the Jew is safest, and can move
about most freely. A strong, sure White nation scares the Jew. So
whether it's America or Europe, he tries to undercut it with
anthropological lies about the unreality of race, falsified histories
("diversity has always been our greatest strength") support for open
immigration, suppression of free speech and the destruction of free
association-all in the name of "civil rights." Neoconservatives are
Jews, no need to look further than that. Jews, whether left or right,
ask only one question: Is it good for the Jews? They hide behind
universalist rhetoric, but their concern is for themselves. And you
can be absolutely sure of this: Their interests are not our
interests..
David Horowitz would be a prime example of an expert deployer of a
plausible, counterfeit theory and history of America to suck in
potential White racialists and get them four-square behind a nutty,
extremist, ahistorical view of politics that can only lead America
into South Africa's pit of horrors. The triumph of individual rights
in Black lands means the triumph of the jungle. It is extremist,
rationalist and counter-historical to elevate a political process over
the character of the people. How can ignorant, 75-IQ blacks produce
civilization protecting the individual rights these neoconservatives
claim to love? Can one-man, one-vote really produce that miracle? Of
course not, and these Jews know it. And they know that the Founders
knew it. So they lie. The truth, as they know and cover up, is that
the Founders understood that only civilized, self-controlled White men
were capable of civilization, and that to expect dissolute, lazy,
TV-drenched slobs mixed with mulattoes and Negroes and Mexicans to
vote in ordered liberty was to expect the impossible. But David
Horowitz, living in Los Angeles, can look out the window and tell you
it's possible. Never underestimate the power of Jewish duplicity in
furthering Jewish self-interest. That's a second corollary to
Gottfried's study.
We asked above whether or not these neoconservative Jews were really
conservative. Perhaps that question isn't important. One point
Gottfried does develop, writing in 1993, is just how little difference
there is in today's political discourse between left and right. As I
write, George W. Bush is battling Al Gore, so the point is hardly
stale. Effectively, the left and right may differ in degree, but
everybody supports a capitalist welfare state and global democracy.
Everybody is "inclusive." Everybody bows before the great God of
Diversity. Are the Jews conservative? In the deeper sense, no. They
are still radicals, intent on spreading their lies about human
fungibility, from which they aone are exempt as the "Chosen" people.
Left or right, they are eager to destroy our White civilization to
further their group interests.
On the second most important political issue of the day-leaving the
borders open to the third world-the Jews speak with one voice: no
patrols. Note this well: Never in American history has a majority of
Whites favored colored immigration. The Jews alone favored it, for
reasons outlined above. Now whose policy is followed today? -- that of
the Jewish minority, which doesn't think like you and I do. You
thought the majority was supposed to prevail in a democracy? Wrong.
Political control in a democracy, as Aristotle observed, is vested in
those who control television. This is part of what certain Americans
are getting at with the 'ZOG' formulation that all the
pseudo-sophisticated college-educated folk laugh at (as TV has taught
them to). The Jews almost to a man push open-borders immigration, and
they denounce anyone who differs as an evil racist/nativist/xenophobe.
All the Jewish lies dovetail intellectually, and all of them advance
Jewish interests. I recommend, I urge, I wish I could force everyone
who hasn't to read Kevin MacDonald's paper on the Jewish influence in
the hundred years of debate preceding the nation-killing 1965
immigration act that opened the floodgates to the third world. The
Jewish hatred of the White world is the story that doesn't make the
news, even as it remakes your neighborhood. I doubt the plush-paunched
Republicans watching TV politics as spectator sport will ever pick up
on it. You will run a long way before you meet an average American
with the slightest historical awareness-nor the interest in developing
one. But the arguments are lying there, exactly as I've presented
them, and perhaps in a crisis people will take a hard look at what
brought us to our current position. For all the disinformation out
there, it's still not too hard to detect the patterns once you have
the facts. . .
So we've seen that Jews claiming themselves "conservatives" but not
all that different from their leftist brethren have come in and
dominated the right. Where does this leave whatever is left of the
non-Jewish right? I would break this set into two subsets: those who
are openly racist (which Gottfried avoids) and those who make veiled
or open Semitically Incorrect arguments while attempting to maintain
their "respectability." The former have no political power, while the
latter are desperate to hang on to their columns and speaking
engagements.
Although there are a handful of Jews pushing standard White-racist
arguments, and who would receive even less notice than they do get if
they weren't Jewish, these same never take into account that Jews can
never simply be another ethnic group assimilated into a purified White
America. The nature and qualities and history of their group shows
just that-they are a group. And since they are a group that recognizes
itself as a group and fights against other groups on that basis-they
must be opposed as a group. This is not so much guilt by association
as guilt by genetics and behavior and history. As a group they have
strategized to destroy the civilized White America they felt
threatened by, and anything we do to them in return is more than
deserved. Treating them as individuals, just like we are, has failed.
The correct path is to treat them as the radical alien outsiders and
eliminate their influence. We need to take their flag off the
courthouse, so to speak.
Getting back to the lesson at the top of the page, Jews have so
strategized their evolution (see Kevin MacDonald's work) as to be
considerably more intelligent than their hosts, with an average IQ of
115, a standard-deviation above the White mean. This intelligence and
their proven historical character combine to ensure Jews will always
be the yeast, the irritants, the makers-uncomfortable, the
revolutionaries. Wherever they exist in White society they will be a
force for disruption. The fact that some can exist as peaceful ethnics
among the White majority does not negate this Big Truth (for if there
can be Big Lies, there can also be Big Truths). Because
class-arguments can be abused, and because injustice will be meted out
to individual non-Whites when we rebuild civilization, the Jews
enforcing their dogma of individualism will always have points to make
that resonate with our myopic right-wing individualists. But just as
surely as these Jews averted their eyes from the general horrors
ensuing in South Africa after their racial-and-political equality
dogmas were enacted, the pro-White right must be louder than ever in
showing that their ethnic Jewish self-interest can only end in the
extinction of the White race. Really. Those are the stakes.
The media neoconservatives can't afford to admit the evidence of the
failure of their dogma in South Africa, rape and murder capital of the
world; rather they redouble their insistence on individualism to evade
the Big Truth that colored demographics and political democracy doom
White minorities everywhere. And taking a global perspective-as we are
all supposed to do, nowadays-the White race is a small minority, and
growing smaller every day. Our White kinsmen are already being
butchered in their homes and driven off their farms in South Africa
and Zimbabwe. Literally tens of millions of Whites have become victims
of violent Black assault in America since the Jew-eased passage of
"Civil Rights" legislation. The Jews well know these facts, and that
is why they avoid reporting them. They hated South Africa when it was
ruled by civilized Whites. They don't give a damn what happens to
Whites once their beloved Negroes are carrying the whip.  Foolish,
foolish White man-will you not wake up while there is time?
What we are discussing is a very simple: the Jews are a class fighting
to dominate other classes, just as Benjamin Stein saw in his report on
the TV Weltanschauung, The View from Sunset Boulevard. Jew Stein, like
Jew Michael Levin (Feminism and Freedom), will never name his people
as that class, pointing to "writers and producers," "feminists," and
"neoconservatives." (It is really truly amazing the way that Jews are
able to camouflage their interests, always presenting their specific
goal as a general good, and that their terms are tacitly accepted in
their opponents' rhetoric. It's like we all are under contract to
agree that the Jews aren't a group and don't have any specific
interests and certainly don't work to advance those interests and even
if they do, they aren't in conflict with ours. But notice that on the
flip side, the opposite conditions obtain: Jews always attack their
opponents by class (right-wing Christian extremists, racist haters,
Arabs), lingering lovingly on the specific interests of their
undifferentiated opponents; always forestalling counter-arguments as
"anti-Semitism" driven by the only motive Jews ever allow their
opponents-all together now-"hate." The Jews can only get away with
this clever I-criticize-you-and-you
criticize-that-bag-of-flour-over-there setup because they exert
extraordinary control over television and newspapers. And their backup
line of defense, of course, is to denounce anyone who notices the
strategies behind their tactics as an anti-Semitic conspiracymonger.
This is a second aspect of what the 'ZOG'-minded are pointing to.
Stein is writing about the class of TV writers and producers;
Gottfried is writing about neoconservatives; Levin is writing about
feminists. All of them mean Jews, none of them can afford to say it.
When you become a Jew, it's almost as though you have to sign a sheet
saying you will either avoid mentioning negative Jewish
characteristics or-pace Marx and Freud-reinterpret specific, offensive
Jewish behaviors or patterns as generically human: i.e., repression,
or characteristic of an exploited class. (An excellent book, The
Ordeal of Civility, by John Murray Cuddihy, covers this topic in
depth.) The one thing none of these rightist Jews wants is a civilized
White society where Jews are nonexistent. Or ghettoized. Or looked
down on socially. Or in which you are free to speak and write and talk
about Jews as specific people who act, look and think in generalizable
ways. Jews may be physically ugly duplicitous socialist troublemakers,
but they don't want you saying that. They will propagandize through
the schools and TV until you are practically unable to notice it
because the whole context in which you might make such an observation
has been destroyed. They will make hard to find the few books that
dare discuss it. (Just try finding Cuddihy's book.) History is nothing
but a propaganda tool to them. In living memory they were kept out of
the better hotels and clubs and colleges, and since treatment of the
Jews, to Jews, is the true measure of civilization, any time they were
legally or socially treated as other than the God-sent gift they
present themselves (that is, all history up until about fifty years
ago) must be falsified into Dark Ages (Jews out of power) preceding
today's Enlightened Age (Jews running the show). Let alone the
ghettoes of old Europe, these people are capable of portraying the
fifties in America as some sort of racist hellhole, saved only through
heroic Blacks led by saintly Jews in the name of civil rights or
federal tyranny, if you prefer your descriptions accurate. What is
clear to every Jew seems to be unclear to most White Americans,
this is a war of classes, a war for power and dominance between a
small but smart and well-positioned ethnic group and the vast majority
of civilized White people. The Jews instinctively recognize this
battle, feel it in their blood, and are fighting hard for their side.
Most on our side aren't even aware a war is going on.
Gottfried points to two symbolic episodes that show the transfer of
power from the traditional right to the neocons: 1) Rockford's firing
of John Neuhaus, and his subsequent denunciation of traditionalist
racism and anti-Semitism among the Old Right; and, 2) the neocons'
successful defeat of M.E. Bradford, a traditionalist historian, as
head of the National Endowment of Humanity. What was the traditional
right to do? Basically, it retreated, licked its wounds, and looked
about in search of allies and money and media outlets. What has
happened, and this is clearer now than when Gottfried completed the
book, is that the American political system under Clinton has gotten
so corrupt that even average people began to notice. This alone has
strengthened the traditional right's never-too-strong confidence, and
strengthened its new ally, the libertarians, too. And both sides have
benefited hugely from the Internet, which at once strengthens small
groups and somewhat threatens established media institutions. By 2000,
there were enough ganglia of pro-Whites on the Internet to get
mainstream Jewish groups scribbling "hate crimes" model statutes,
anti-gun legislation, and politically correct browser censorware at
top speed.
It might have been expected that the loss of power and funding would
have resulted in the radicalization of the traditional right, at least
to the point of open talk about taking the American right back from
the Jews. There was very little of such talk, none of it open-at least
among those with one eye on "respectability," that ever leftward
moving boundary observed by fools.
What we still see on the right in the year 2000 are leading non-Jewish
right-wing Whites couching what they know to be racial arguments in
regional or race-neutral terms. Sam Francis speaks of Middle American
Revolutionaries. He means Whites, but he's afraid to come out and say
it. Of course, he gets called racist just the same. And he got fired
from the neocon Washington Times just the same. But Jews, to him, are
just people with a different religion, and he can still find a way to
fit minorities into that Middle American revolution.
Then there are the various Southern separatist groups. All are
carefully non-racial. All get accused of being racist. All fail to
draw the correct conclusion. It is amusing in a sick and increasingly
irritating way. Is there nobody left who can think clearly and isn't
afraid to voice his conclusions publicly? No, the Southern Semitically
Correct separatists present as sorry a face as they always do. Always
trying for that elusive respectability, always failing to achieve it,
and always losing the few-and merely symbolic-battles they do engage
in. For people who brag incessantly "on" their heroic Confederate
ancestors, they show little courage and less intelligence.
THERE IS NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS. IT DOES YOU NO GOOD TO BE OR
PRETEND TO BE NON-RACIST. YOU ARE THREATENED AS A GROUP, BY A GROUP,
AND YOU'D BETTER GET THOSE GROUPS STRAIGHT IN YOUR HEAD TO HAVE ANY
HOPE OF PRESERVING THE LAND AND PEOPLE YOU LOVE.
A little more on the Southern-rights groups. The left always froths
over them, as though people too scared and powerless to say what they
mean openly are going to achieve anything. This frothing is more a
measure of media boredom and the fact that the left is so dominant it
has forgotten what real opposition feels like that it goes overboard.
The left so buys its own frothing demagoguery it can't even realize
these people have ceded the essential point before they even start
arguing. Pity the poor Southern separatist. He can't even keep the
flag in the air or the Blacks from pooping on the statue of his
great-grandaddy. Even with all that Confederate heroism running in his
blood, he's still selling his problem as Northerners, not Blacks. As
though America hasn't been homogenized by TV into one big mall or
airport lobby. As though the guy in Arkansas is worried about the
White man just over the Missouri line, more than the Black next door.
How pitiful and obvious he is, our man of gray, thinking the media
will buy that he's really not racist. He can't see that it doesn't
matter in the slightest if he isn't, and if he is, he's contemptible
for not arguing openly. Ditch the gray and go for black and white,
Southern Man.
How many times does the right have to learn that the media really is
controlled by Jews, by intimidation where not by ownership; that Jews
really are leftist; and that anyone preaching anything remotely
resembling White pride gets treated like a human showing emotion in
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (that is, squawked at and pointed out
to the cops by the aliens who are taking over the planet) - so that he
might as well oppose the Jew's anti-White hatred openly. You can't win
where the other guy defines the terms, sets the labels, interprets the
law. You must oppose him openly, directly, explicitly and give him no
quarter. Why are you always on the defensive? Could it be the same
reason you always lose? Here we come to a deep-lying problem with
conservatism. First of all, nobody's ever satisfactorily defined it. A
branch of that problem is that there is no philosophical basis for
incorporating political attack. A new conservatism must be envisioned
that incorporates not merely the preservation of custom and tradition,
but one that can accommodate formless spiritual or psychic drives that
are even more important than patterned behaviors: questing,
exploration, simple competitiveness. Even blood-lust. What could be
more conservative than blood-lust? But where do you find it among the
Republicans; over at the Jew-intimidated National Review? Among the
foundation-based low-tax remonstrators?
The funny thing is that once you say, Yes, I am a racist. Just like
George Washington. And you are a White-hating Jew-the poison is drawn.
They have set the terms of this political game we all play, and only
by refusing to play do we stand a chance of winning. It is utmost
foolishness, as anybody who has published conservative articles
anywhere in the world will tell you, to try to escape the racist tag.
You can't, and in any case it ain't a meaningful word, people-it's
just a way to smear and discredit you. Fight the smearers and
discrediters directly, refuse to play on their terms. Love and
fairness no more conquer hate than they conquer bullets. Prefixing
your conservative arguments with "I'm not a racist, but..." and
expecting to achieve your political goals is like one of those African
rebel guerillas smearing himself with magical pig grease thinking it
will stop bullets.
Apart from your opinion of the Nazis, consider their tactics. Did they
win-democratically-by adopting the tactics of the respectable American
right, or did they gain converts by their physical courage and their
willingness to confront the Jew-led communists? How much worse can the
Old Right do than it is doing right now? Not much. The mainstream
right-as I write, G.W. Bush and the Republican convention are in full
swing, every other speaker addressing the hall is a colored-has
decided to ape the liberals. In the words of the song, Freedom's just
another word for nothing left to lose. Well, what on earth do the Sam
Francises and Thomas Flemings and the Pat Buchanans have left to lose?
A column in an obscure magazine? A speech to a few dozen like-mindeds?
Is it possible they will turn to effective tactics out of sheer
boredom? Sam Francis (you'll serve as representative here), how could
you possibly do worse than you are doing now by openly criticizing
Jews instead of making pusillanimous attacks on East Coast elitists
and New World Order bureaucrats? How could you possibly fare any worse
by defending the Black-and-White truths of the Founders in
black-and-white terms?
Then you've got the libertarians, trying to get government off our
backs without any recourse to racial explanations or group interests
in explaining human behavior. Trying to understand the world one
person at a time. Some of these libertarians are products of Silicon
Valley, and to the extent they philosophize, they are Randian
individualists. They believe in free trade and free movement of
peoples, and make no distinctions between them. Libertarians seem to
instinctively turn away from any historical recognition of the
circumstances under which the freedoms they demand were actually
realized. Even their few (and in many ways impressive) intellectuals
who are interested in history tend to fall in line with the
politically safe Jewish lie about the non-racial aspect of our
founding, building their future utopias in that tired old,
misunderstood, misrepresented "all men are created equal."
Politically, libertarians are laughable, beyond their useful ability
to supply policy papers. Imagine a whole bunch of computer geeks and
economics professors marching on Washington under the fear-inspiring
banner of "Me!" Now there's an Army even our heroic neo-Confederates
could take! Libertarians maybe never will realize that, again I yell,
BLOOD AND RACE ARE WHAT MOVE PEOPLE, NOT THE RIGHT TO SMOKE DOOBIES
AND BUGGER YOUR BOYFRIEND. NOT EVEN ECONOMICS. Am I really the only
idiot to notice that when Whites ruled America, White people were
free? And that when Jews and Blacks rule America, they're slaves? But
most "right-wing" libertarians would rather support a minimum wage
hike than acknowledge this simple historical fact. They are too
rationalist in temperament, too much like our liberal dictators. Too
in love with their idea of
people-as-individuals-in-the-low-tax-multicultural-utopia-of-tomorrow
to pay attention to street-level political and historical reality.
Many of us want individual liberty, but it only obtains under certain
circumstances. There sure doesn't seem to be much of it around in
these days of "civil rights" for everybody except the people who
created the idea of 'em in the first place. If there's anything that
gives the lie to what passes for "conservatism" these days, it's right
here: Genuine civil rights-association, property, speech,
self-defense-were much better protected in the days before the prating
Jews and their colored parasite minions rose to the fore. Yet
recognition of the race-based nature of practical, effective, genuine
freedom will get you kicked out of the Libertarian party faster than
you can say Don't Do Drugs!
Libertarians take one aspect of looking at the world and inflate it
into the entire cosmos. This is their built-in bias. When you combine
it with their standard right-wing fear of crossing the Semitical
Correctness line, you have a second hurdle between them and racialism.
The conservative Christians share these political flaws. Their concern
is not for the race or the group, but for the salvation of the
individual soul. Of course, since in years past the Good Book has been
used to support virtually every position under the sun including
communism, there is a bit more hope for their conversion on the racial
issue, should the powers that be change. TV Christians have proven
able adopters of the Semitically Correct line. Israel is good and
racialism is bad. That's the message they're getting from New York,
and that's the message Pat Robertson is putting out to rural North
Carolina. The libertarians have their hated parties, but these are
always anonymous "bureaucrats" or "statists," or "socialists"-never
anyone you can actually get your hands on. Same with the Christian
conservatives. They are the equivalent of the libertarians in that the
former are excellent at certain types of economic reasoning (Why We
Should Privatize Trash Collection) while the Christians retain solid
moral and character-development advice. They are both good on the
small-picture stuff. But neither group can take a realistic look at
the general; they are both concerned about saving Heaven or Liberty
one soul at a time. They both simply refuse to make necessary
generalizations.
 Christians, again like Libertarians, invariably throw their
opprobrium on carefully generic targets: Atheists, secular humanists
(gays are the one exception, and even here they say "Hate the sinner,
not the sin," as though that doesn't conflict with their doctrine of
free will). A Jew or a black or a Mexican is a vivid image,
immediately recognizable. The abstractions countered by the Christians
and the libertarians are creatures that nobody would recognize on a
public street. They are fighting abstactly against abstractions,
instead of coherently for something concrete.
Never do the Christians go after the Jews who are killing their
doctrines; never do they speak the name of their real enemy despite
the spittingly obscene provocations to which he has subjected them.
This is why, with tens of millions in numerical advantage, the
Christians aren't even masters of the civilization they created. In
fact, much of the leadership class of the Christians has become so
enthralled with Jewish ideas that now the church will bend any which
way the Jews require, whether it's removing the Commandments from the
classroom the way the Jew judge and Jew-created and -run ACLU tell
them to, or rewriting history to avoid the fact that Jews condemned
their own Savior to die (as in the revised [read: Semitically Correct]
Passion Plays)! They may think they are only turning the other cheek,
but self-abasing worms is what these new Christians truly are. This
used to be a religion whose adherents killed others in glorious
crusade for their Truth, and died at the stake before renouncing their
Faith. Today, the biggest name in Christendom hobnobs with nutty
Buddhists and faxes apologies to Jerusalem. For all its residual focus
on humility and self-discipline (welcome antacids to the Jewish public
school lies about self-esteem, which is really self-absorption and
self-worship; in a word, selfishness), the Christian church in America
is today furthering the racial evils that Jewish ideologues,
especially those misappropriating the name conservative, have
subjected us to. Pat Robertson has no problem with those influxing
Mexican chicken-pluckers heaping his collection plates, and has
publicly advocated miscegenation as the long-term solution to our
racial ills. If he preached miscegenation as a sin, as his hardier
forebears did, he would be burned at the stake. Pardon me, I mean, he
wouldn't be on TV. The fact that any evangelicals are on TV at all is
conditioned on their support for Israel and their multiracialism. This
is what makes their leaders despicable-not the hypocrisy and
White-trashiness the left and right would have us sneer at them for.
Recently Bush's first national campaign ad aired. It shows him at a
school surrounded by little black and brown kids, all well on their
way to becoming the computer programmers and doctors and lawyers and
Republicans of tomorrow. It seems the GOP has made up its mind which
way it's going. It's everyvato's party; down with the homies, too.
Make any show that persuades in order to capture power. The old
Clinton strategy. After all, reality is that waves of wets wash over
the border every night, and at some point they and their kids will
vote. The bulk White population is fading, and the core demographic
supporting conservative principles simply won't be there to swing a
presidential election in another ten years.
Even Jew-genuflecting National Review has noticed this Californication
of America, as has been termed in a different context. But sucking up
to the powers that be, angling for a spot, doing what he's told, is
something the middle-manager mind that makes up the Republican ranks
well understands. Ya got to roll with the punches, ya know?
White man, you have to decide.
Oy racist, I am brown. All this is gibberish to me.

If you choose not to decide, you still
Post by Topaz
have made a choice, to make a phrase. You can pull a Christian
Scientist, and pretend that that brown spot on our national chest will
just go away if we think positive thoughts long enough, refuse to
acknowledge it. But it won't. Those coloreds swamping the border,
those grasping welfare niggers, those lying Jewish press manipulators
won't disappear of their own accord. Twenty years from now, George
Bush-Brown will be president, and all the things you fear today-
your kids blood-libeled at school; yourself discriminated against on
the job; your taxes higher than ever; your wife subject to insults,
rape or assault; your big cities gang-dominated; your small cities
dominated by nigger "music" and clothing pollution; your guns
outlawed; your political opinions criminalized; your TV louder and
more intrusive and hateful-will be worse. As Paul Gottfried shows,
but doesn't tell, the same Jews that have made the present possible
are working hard to make this future inevitable. But there is still a
window of opportunity. But only if you recognize that we-you and I
and the others reading this-are part of the White race, share
interests, and must band together. And that, politically, culturally
and socially, to achieve a civilized future, there is
NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/v1/index5.htm
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-13 04:45:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Such as ancient Egypt?
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98
   The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249
   The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
    "A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.
A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
   The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216
The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
   A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.
De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26
     Amenhotep III's tomb painting  shows him as having light red
hair.
National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103
    An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
      A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.
     Queen Thi  is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and
blond hair.
Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
    Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.
Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI
     The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94
   A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking
man with blond hair.
Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
    Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
    A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.
    The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
    It was once painted sunburned red.
Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168
      The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
       The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003
Here is a sculpture of a scribe from the Egyptian Old Kingdom
http://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-1-seated-scribe-c2620-2500-bce
Post by Arindam Banerjee
It was a mixture of Europe and African races.
Ditto for ancient India, a mixture of all races.
Egypt was once great. Not any more. That's race mixing. Ditto for
India.
Egypt and India were always into race mixing. Blacks and whites made
up brown Egyptians, whereas in India we also got Asian genes.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
 The plain fact is
that race mixing, on the basis of love, provides the most vibrant
cultures.
White cultures are awesome.
I agree. They have done very well in the past 50 years, and we browns
have been let down by our stupid and corrupt leaders. And all things
considered, over the last 600 years. But prior to that, they were not
much. They did not even have coal, horrid teeth and no sense of
hygiene! In short, they had been miserable for thousands of years.
But come da Vinci, they learnt scientific methods and used them very
well to their advantage.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So, Obama is a far better man and leader than his
predecessor.
Whatever, America is ruled by the Jews anyway.
Much better for America, than being ruled by racist Nazis. The Jews
are just for Jews, and the wannabe-Jews who suck up to them. They are
casteists, not racists. Caste is more practical and less obnoxious
than racism.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Idealism and true nobility should be based on
Post by Topaz
truth.
Exactly.  So your racist lies are most revolting.
You are revolted by the truth because you don't like it.
Oh no, I am a devotee of Absolute Truth. I depend upon truth for my
life and living. The truth is that racism is certainly there, but
only someone anonymous and unimportant like yourself dares to flaunt
it openly. On the other hand, you could be a Jew in Nazi clothing,
sending out Nazi signals to attract real Nazis for extermination.
Hmm, that could be it!

But the
Post by Topaz
planet earth would be in a bad way without the wonderful White race.
Other races never missed them, until a few generations ago. All other
races did reasonably well, without them. Not that I am not awed by
white achievements (both good and bad) - just that, they are far more
relevant for the whites than the non-whites who have, or at least used
to have, their own sources of amusement and happiness.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole god among lotsa
devils.
Post by Topaz
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-14 01:00:18 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:45:28 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Egypt and India were always into race mixing. Blacks and whites made
up brown Egyptians, whereas in India we also got Asian genes.
If the White race was preserved, Egypt would still be great today.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
I agree. They have done very well in the past 50 years, and we browns
have been let down by our stupid and corrupt leaders. And all things
considered, over the last 600 years. But prior to that, they were not
much. They did not even have coal, horrid teeth and no sense of
hygiene! In short, they had been miserable for thousands of years.
But come da Vinci, they learnt scientific methods and used them very
well to their advantage.
The White race was always awesome. In "1984" it says that he who
controls the present controls the past. And the Jews control the
present.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Much better for America, than being ruled by racist Nazis. The Jews
are just for Jews, and the wannabe-Jews who suck up to them. They are
casteists, not racists. Caste is more practical and less obnoxious
than racism.
"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE
problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the
third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white
countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan,
but nobody says Japan should solve this RACE problem by
bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote
with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY
white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e.,
intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem
would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were
brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a
RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK
problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and
what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of
genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable
conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Oh no, I am a devotee of Absolute Truth. I depend upon truth for my
life and living. The truth is that racism is certainly there, but
only someone anonymous and unimportant like yourself dares to flaunt
it openly.
Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks. And we should
preserve the White race.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
On the other hand, you could be a Jew in Nazi clothing,
sending out Nazi signals to attract real Nazis for extermination.
Hmm, that could be it!
no
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Other races never missed them, until a few generations ago. All other
races did reasonably well, without them. Not that I am not awed by
white achievements (both good and bad) - just that, they are far more
relevant for the whites than the non-whites who have, or at least used
to have, their own sources of amusement and happiness.
Thank White people for:

- that computer you're typing on
- the software that drives it
- recorded music
- motion pictures
- tv
- radio
- camera
- telephone
- light bulb
- the automobile
- rocketry
- satellites
- spacecraft
- airplanes
- skyscrapers
- metallurgy (most discoveries)
- materials science (plastics, compounds, & most other synthetics)
- 95% of medical advancements
- 95% of life saving pharmaceutical drugs
- most scientific breakthroughs over the past 1000 years
- the bulk of mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology
- discovery of DNA
- laser technology and it's myriad of uses
- harnessing electricity
- nuclear energy
- wireless technology
- air conditioning devices
- refrigeration
- modern agricultural techniques

Where would the world be without White people? Stuck in the stone
age, that's where.

So the next time you get in your car, pick up your cell phone, fly a
plane, etc. thank White people.

jimj


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-14 13:26:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:45:28 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Egypt and India were always into race mixing. Blacks and whites made
up brown Egyptians, whereas in India we also got Asian genes.
If the White race was preserved, Egypt would still be great today.
What nonsense. Egypt was a mixed race for thousands of years, and
they did very well. Just like Indians.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
I agree.  They have done very well in the past 50 years, and we browns
have been let down by our stupid and corrupt leaders.  And all things
considered, over the last 600 years.  But prior to that, they were not
much. They did not even have coal, horrid teeth and no sense of
hygiene!  In short, they had been miserable for thousands of years.
But come da Vinci, they learnt scientific methods and used them very
well to their advantage.
The White race was always awesome.
Not always. Whites were sold as slaves in slave markets, they
stupidly fought each other in tribal battles, they never had good
religions, metaphysics, literature, music, family values, etc.


In "1984" it says that he who
Post by Topaz
controls the present controls the past. And the Jews control the
present.
They are the leaders of the English-speaking whites, generally
speaking. The English speakers won WW2, remember? So the Jews are
ontop.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Much better for America, than being ruled by racist Nazis.  The Jews
are just for Jews, and the wannabe-Jews who suck up to them.  They are
casteists, not racists.  Caste is more practical and less obnoxious
than racism.
"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE
problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the
third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white
countries."
What can they do? With such stupid and corrupt leaders as they have,
their own lands are not well managed so they have to emigrate.
Hopefully with better quality of leadership, they will return to their
own lands in due course and let the whites alone. Then there is always
the scope of superior technology, to fix matters. World wars were
fought over concerns of perceived shortages. But, with technical
advances, those concerns have been proved to be baseless.
Post by Topaz
"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan,
but nobody says Japan should solve this RACE problem by
bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote
with them."
I don't see any sense here. Japan does let lots of foreign workers
in, but they have specific visas which expire. Ditto for Arab
countries. There is no reason why EU cannot do that. Now I
understand workers can come in and work but they get no benefits, so
they have to find some job. In other words, they are cheap labour.
This cheap labour does help whites on the whole, though I suppose not
the poor whites who are then inclined to racism. So this is an
internal problem for the whites, for them to solve.
Post by Topaz
"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY
white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e.,
intermarry, with all those non-whites."
What race problem? The prejudices of some individuals do not count in
the personal matters of others who are free to do what they like.
Post by Topaz
"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem
would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were
brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"
There is no race problem. There is only the economic problem, or need
to survive. Non-blacks these days have no incentive to go to say
places like India, for India has already been bled dry and has nothing
to offer.
Post by Topaz
"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a
RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK
problem?"
So what is that, another set of showers? Won't work, with Jews in
control.
Post by Topaz
"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and
what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"
Incoherent.
Post by Topaz
"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of
genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable
conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."
Since there is no genocide going on against the white race, they would
be correct except that given your earlier sentiment relating to "final
solution" they would change the numbers of potential kills and add all
non-whites to jews.
Post by Topaz
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
No one around in anti-white. They are looking out for their own
interests, as this is the way things work these days.
Post by Topaz
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
Oh, racism is not just directed against whites. It is a fairly basic
and universal phenomenon. As for being anti-white, most of the time
the whites were anti each other, as they have fought each other most
bitterly. So, whites have been their own worst enemies.
Post by Topaz
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Oh no, I am a devotee of Absolute Truth.  I depend upon truth for my
life and living.  The truth is that racism is certainly there, but
only someone anonymous and unimportant like yourself dares to flaunt
it openly.
Whites are on average much more intelligent than Blacks.
The Blacks are not whining like you are, about all this anti-racism
and anti-white stuff. If the whites are much more intelligent then
why so much whining from you as their representative?


And we should
Post by Topaz
preserve the White race.
If the Nazis form a caste system, where white Nazis marry white Nazis,
then they will preserve the white race. Point then is, why cannot
they from such a caste system to protect their whiteness?
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
 On the other hand, you could be a Jew in Nazi clothing,
sending out Nazi signals to attract real Nazis for extermination.
Hmm, that could be it!
no
Then why haven't you been killed by the Jews? You must admit, they
have been tolerant.
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Other races never missed them, until a few generations ago.  All other
races did reasonably well, without them.  Not that I am not awed by
white achievements (both good and bad) - just that, they are far more
relevant for the whites than the non-whites who have, or at least used
to have, their own sources of amusement and happiness.
- that computer you're typing on
- the software that drives it
- recorded music
- motion pictures
- tv
- radio
- camera
- telephone
- light bulb
- the automobile
- rocketry
- satellites
- spacecraft
- airplanes
- skyscrapers
- metallurgy (most discoveries)
- materials science (plastics, compounds, & most other synthetics)
- 95% of medical advancements
- 95% of life saving pharmaceutical drugs
- most scientific breakthroughs over the past 1000 years
- the bulk of mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology
- discovery of DNA
- laser technology and it's myriad of uses
- harnessing electricity
- nuclear energy
- wireless technology
- air conditioning devices
- refrigeration
- modern agricultural techniques
I am awed, yes. Moved, no.
Post by Topaz
Where would the world be  without White people?  Stuck in the stone
age, that's where.
Now, that is just where I actually am, in the ideological and even
practical sense. Life was wonderful in the stone age - great
spirituality, lovely health, fresh food, superb family values, no
tension or stress relating to mortgages, employment, divorce etc. Plus
music and story-telling, acting and dancing. Lots of greenery,
bucolic life... As an engineer I certainly enjoy the fruits of
western science and technology, but they are only conveniences, not
essentials.
Post by Topaz
So the next time you get in your car, pick up your cell phone, fly a
plane, etc. thank White people.
I don't have a car, so I use my legs and that is helping my health. I
hate cell phones and I hate flying.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
jimj
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-14 22:09:54 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:26:32 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
What nonsense. Egypt was a mixed race for thousands of years, and
they did very well. Just like Indians.
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."

Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98

The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.

Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249

The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.

Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8

"A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.

A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museum. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49

The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.

Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68

Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.

Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216

The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.

Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99

A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.

De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26

Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red
hair.

National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103

An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.

Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53

A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.

Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and
blond hair.

Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739

Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.

Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI

The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.

Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94

A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking
man with blond hair.

Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65

Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.

A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.

The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.

Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67

It was once painted sunburned red.

Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168

The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.

The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003

Here is a sculpture of a scribe from the Egyptian Old Kingdom

http://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-1-seated-scribe-c2620-2500-bce
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Not always. Whites were sold as slaves in slave markets, they
stupidly fought each other in tribal battles, they never had good
religions, metaphysics, literature, music, family values, etc.
Only if you call rap good.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
They are the leaders of the English-speaking whites, generally
speaking. The English speakers won WW2, remember? So the Jews are
ontop.
They rule over us, but they are our greatest enemies.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
What can they do? With such stupid and corrupt leaders as they have,
their own lands are not well managed so they have to emigrate.
Hopefully with better quality of leadership, they will return to their
own lands in due course and let the whites alone. Then there is always
the scope of superior technology, to fix matters. World wars were
fought over concerns of perceived shortages. But, with technical
advances, those concerns have been proved to be baseless.
Yes, they should have better leadership.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
I don't see any sense here. Japan does let lots of foreign workers
in, but they have specific visas which expire. Ditto for Arab
countries. There is no reason why EU cannot do that. Now I
understand workers can come in and work but they get no benefits, so
they have to find some job. In other words, they are cheap labour.
This cheap labour does help whites on the whole, though I suppose not
the poor whites who are then inclined to racism. So this is an
internal problem for the whites, for them to solve.
True
Post by Arindam Banerjee
What race problem? The prejudices of some individuals do not count in
the personal matters of others who are free to do what they like.
We should not allow racial intermarriage.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
There is no race problem. There is only the economic problem, or need
to survive. Non-blacks these days have no incentive to go to say
places like India, for India has already been bled dry and has nothing
to offer.
So what is that, another set of showers? Won't work, with Jews in
control.
The Germans had delousing chambers which were too small for humans.
They put clothes in there to fumigate them with Zyklon B to kill lice.
That is why they had Zyklon B in the camps. These delousing chambers
are still loaded with cyanide in the walls now.

In both the two existing delousing chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau
Concentration Camp in Poland, there is irrefutable visual and forensic
evidence that Zyklon B cyanide had been used to kill lice which
carried deadly typhus. The blue markings inside and outside through
twenty-six centimeters of brickwork are still there today sixty years
after the end of WWII.

In the alleged gas chambers there is NO visual or forensic evidence of
Zyklon B cyanide ever being used.


"Toward the end of World War II I was a US Army captain on the staff
of Ambassador Robert Murphy, political advisor to General Eisenhower.
I was at Dachau about a month after it had been liberated, either the
end of May or the beginning of June, 1945. *There was no gas chamber
there, nor did I see one in the process of construction.* What did
occur was that some higher authority in the American occupation
government, whether a civilian or military, I don't know, decreed that
a gas chamber should be built, which was subsequently done.
I was also at the Buchenwald camp a few days after it was liberated on
April
11, 1945. There was a crematory there but no gas chamber."
Homer G. Richey
Charlottesville, Virginia
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2_Letters.html


How did the prisoners die?

-Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged war-torn
Europe during the war, as well as from starvation and lack of medical
attention during the final months of the conflict, when virtually all
road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies.

http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=35&products_id=357
Filmed on location at the Auschwitz camp site in Poland, this stunning
video by Jewish-American investigator David Cole shows that the "gas
chamber" that has been displayed to hundreds of thousands of tourists
is actually a propaganda prop. Alicia, an official tour guide, assures
David Cole, on camera, that the "gas chamber" in the main camp that is
shown to visitors is in its original, unaltered state. Then Dr.
Franciszek Piper, head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum,
acknowledges to Cole that this "gas chamber" is actually a postwar
creation. This video also tackles other Holocaust claims, including
the "human soap" fable. Shows that fraudulent "proofs" of homicidal
gassings were produced after the end of World War II, and that
visitors to the Auschwitz camp site have been systematically deceived
for decades.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Incoherent.
Race-mixers only want to destroy the White race. If Eskimos or anyone
besides Whites want to have their own country they say that is
perfectly fine.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Since there is no genocide going on against the white race, they would
be correct except that given your earlier sentiment relating to "final
solution" they would change the numbers of potential kills and add all
non-whites to jews.
Race mixing would eventually destroy the White race.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
No one around in anti-white. They are looking out for their own
interests, as this is the way things work these days.
By having affirmative action and such.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Oh, racism is not just directed against whites. It is a fairly basic
and universal phenomenon. As for being anti-white, most of the time
the whites were anti each other, as they have fought each other most
bitterly. So, whites have been their own worst enemies.
The Blacks are not whining like you are, about all this anti-racism
and anti-white stuff. If the whites are much more intelligent then
why so much whining from you as their representative?
Blacks whine about "racism" all the time. I tell clear facts. We
should preserve the White race.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If the Nazis form a caste system, where white Nazis marry white Nazis,
then they will preserve the white race. Point then is, why cannot
they from such a caste system to protect their whiteness?
Fine, but we should have our own government, since the Jews want to
destroy the White race.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Then why haven't you been killed by the Jews? You must admit, they
have been tolerant.
I am awed, yes. Moved, no.
Now, that is just where I actually am, in the ideological and even
practical sense. Life was wonderful in the stone age - great
spirituality, lovely health, fresh food, superb family values, no
tension or stress relating to mortgages, employment, divorce etc. Plus
music and story-telling, acting and dancing. Lots of greenery,
bucolic life... As an engineer I certainly enjoy the fruits of
western science and technology, but they are only conveniences, not
essentials.
I don't have a car, so I use my legs and that is helping my health. I
hate cell phones and I hate flying.
What about air conditioning?


http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-15 10:39:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:26:32 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
What nonsense.  Egypt was a mixed race for thousands of years, and
they did very well.  Just like Indians.
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98
   The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249
   The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
    "A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.
A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museum. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
   The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216
The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
   A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.
De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26
     Amenhotep III's tomb painting  shows him as having light red
hair.
National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103
    An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
      A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.
     Queen Thi  is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and
blond hair.
Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
    Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.
Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI
     The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94
   A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking
man with blond hair.
Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
    Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
Hmm, old Rameses looked like my maternal grandfather. King Tut looked
as Indian as Egyptian, when I saw all the wonderful Egyptian artefacts
from his tomb in the Melbourne museum. Indeed, the Pharaohs look very
much European-African, like modern Arabs and Egyptians. But the
Pharaohs were inbred, unlike the ordinary Egyptians whose genes have
not changed for thousands of years. To pretend that the Egyptians
were or are Europeans, is ridiculous.
Post by Topaz
    A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.
    The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
    It was once painted sunburned red.
Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168
      The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
       The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003
Here is a sculpture of a scribe from the Egyptian Old Kingdom
http://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-1-seated-scribe-c2620-2500-bce
Not always.  Whites were sold as slaves in slave markets, they
stupidly fought each other in tribal battles, they never had good
religions, metaphysics, literature, music, family values, etc.
Only if you call rap good.
They are the leaders of the English-speaking whites, generally
speaking.  The English speakers won WW2, remember?  So the Jews are
ontop.
They rule over us, but they are our greatest enemies.
If they rule over you, they are ifso facto superior to you.
Post by Topaz
What can they do?  With such stupid and corrupt leaders as they have,
their own lands are not well managed so they have to emigrate.
Hopefully with better quality of leadership, they will return to their
own lands in due course and let the whites alone. Then there is always
the scope of superior technology, to fix matters.  World wars were
fought over concerns of perceived shortages.  But, with technical
advances, those concerns have been proved to be baseless.
Yes, they should have better leadership.
I don't see any sense here.  Japan does let lots of foreign workers
in, but they have specific visas which expire.  Ditto for Arab
countries.  There is no reason why EU cannot do that.  Now I
understand workers can come in and work but they get no benefits, so
they have to find some job.  In other words, they are cheap labour.
This cheap labour does help whites on the whole, though I suppose not
the poor whites who are then inclined to racism.  So this is an
internal problem for the whites, for them to solve.
True
What race problem? The prejudices of some individuals do not count in
the personal matters of others who are free to do what they like.
We should not allow racial intermarriage.
If by "we" you mean racists of all sorts, then yes by logic racists
should not allow racial intermarriage. Now, that sort of "we" does
not have the clout to prevent inter-racial marriage as any laws
preventing such marriages would violate fundamental human rights.
Most marriages are intra-racial anyway. Racial intermarriage leads to
leaps in human advancement, as seen in Egypt and India. Being a
beneficiary of racial intermarriage that has gone on for untold
thousands of years in India, I am all for it.
Post by Topaz
There is no race problem.  There is only the economic problem, or need
to survive. Non-blacks these days have no incentive to go to say
places like India, for India has already been bled dry and has nothing
to offer.
So what is that, another set of showers?  Won't work, with Jews in
control.
The Germans had delousing chambers which were too small for humans.
They put clothes in there to fumigate them with Zyklon B to kill lice.
That is why they had Zyklon B in the camps. These delousing chambers
are still loaded with cyanide in the walls now.
In both the two existing delousing chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau
Concentration Camp in Poland, there is irrefutable visual and forensic
evidence that Zyklon B cyanide had been used to kill lice which
carried deadly typhus. The blue markings inside and outside through
twenty-six centimeters of brickwork are still there today sixty years
after the end of WWII.
In the alleged gas chambers there is NO visual or forensic evidence of
Zyklon B cyanide ever being used.
"Toward the end of World War II I was a US Army captain on the staff
of Ambassador Robert Murphy, political advisor to General Eisenhower.
I was at Dachau about a month after it had been liberated, either the
end of May or the beginning of June, 1945. *There was no gas chamber
there, nor did I see one in the process of construction.* What did
occur was that some higher authority in the American occupation
government, whether a civilian or military, I don't know, decreed that
a gas chamber should be built, which was subsequently done.
I was also at the Buchenwald camp a few days after it was liberated on
April
11, 1945. There was a crematory there but no gas chamber."
Homer G. Richey
Charlottesville, Virginiahttp://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2_Letters.html
How did the prisoners die?
    -Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged war-torn
Europe during the war, as well as from starvation and lack of medical
attention during the final months of the conflict, when virtually all
road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies.
http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=35&produc...
Filmed on location at the Auschwitz camp site in Poland, this stunning
video by Jewish-American investigator David Cole shows that the "gas
chamber" that has been displayed to hundreds of thousands of tourists
is actually a propaganda prop. Alicia, an official tour guide, assures
David Cole, on camera, that the "gas chamber" in the main camp that is
shown to visitors is in its original, unaltered state. Then Dr.
Franciszek Piper, head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum,
acknowledges to Cole that this "gas chamber" is actually a postwar
creation. This video also tackles other Holocaust claims, including
the "human soap" fable. Shows that fraudulent "proofs" of homicidal
gassings were produced after the end of World War II, and that
visitors to the Auschwitz camp site have been systematically deceived
for decades.
So what was the Final Solution you were talking about that you
expunged in this post?
Post by Topaz
Incoherent.
Race-mixers only want to destroy the White race.
If by White race you mean stupid, ignorant and mendacious racists,
extraordinarily ill-behaved and narrow-minded, what is bad about
that? Evolution leaves losers behind.

If Eskimos or anyone
Post by Topaz
besides Whites want to have their own country they say that is
perfectly fine.
Whites have their own countries in Europe where they originally
belonged, and Whites have expanded to the Americas, Australia, NZ.
True they are ruling the whole world as they did once, true that they
are not selling non-whites in markets and not exploiting their lands
as they used to. I don't see why non-whites need to be sorry about
the latter bit.
Post by Topaz
Since there is no genocide going on against the white race, they would
be correct except that given your earlier sentiment relating to "final
solution" they would change the numbers of potential kills and add all
non-whites to jews.
Race mixing would eventually destroy the White race.
Not if the whites marry whites. Nobody is forcing white men and white
women to marry non-whites. They are that way in no way similar to the
unfortunate black female slaves who had no choice. I can understand
how tough it must be for the unattractive white male to attract any
sort of female. He cannot get slaves now. Tough. There are ways out
of this situation, though. That the dominant race in the world is
whining about eventual extinction, while at the same time boasting
about superiority, is peculiar indeed.
Post by Topaz
No one around in anti-white.  They are looking out for their own
interests, as this is the way things work these days.
By having affirmative action and such.
Well yes. I was not a believer of affirmative action, but such was the
low attitude of the racist whites who always tried to pull me down at
my jobs, that I have changed my mind from hard experience. The only
way to deal with nasty racists is affirmative action, I am sorry to
say. For the racist really does not care how brilliant the non-white
person is. He being a racist will always try to pull him down.
Post by Topaz
Oh, racism is not just directed against whites.  It is a fairly basic
and universal phenomenon.  As for being anti-white, most of the time
the whites were anti each other, as they have fought each other most
bitterly.  So, whites have been  their own worst enemies.
The Blacks are not whining like you are, about all this anti-racism
and anti-white stuff.  If the whites are much more intelligent then
why so much whining from you as their representative?
Blacks whine about "racism" all the time. I tell clear facts.
Blacks have facts to whine about, and they certainly are not whining
in the ngs unlike you. Your facts are only biased self-serving
opinions.
Post by Topaz
We
should preserve the White race.
Do so by all means.
Post by Topaz
If the Nazis form a caste system, where white Nazis marry white Nazis,
then they will preserve the white race.  Point then is, why cannot
they from such a caste system to protect their whiteness?
Fine, but we should have our own government, since the Jews want to
destroy the White race.
You racists lost the last world war, so the Jews who are a cleverer
lot are ruling the white race with great success for the white race.
The whites are doing very well without need for behaving like mad dog
Englishmen in solar topees, physically ruling the thirdworld. With
financial manipulation, media control, etc. the Jews have done wonders
for their wannabes.
Post by Topaz
Then why haven't you been killed by the Jews? You must admit, they
have been tolerant.
So looks like, you really are a Jew in Nazi clothing.
Post by Topaz
I am awed, yes. Moved, no.
Now, that is just where I actually am, in the ideological and even
practical sense.  Life was wonderful in the stone age - great
spirituality, lovely health, fresh food, superb family values, no
tension or stress relating to mortgages, employment, divorce etc. Plus
music and story-telling, acting and dancing.  Lots of greenery,
bucolic life...  As an engineer I certainly enjoy the fruits of
western science and technology, but they are only conveniences, not
essentials.
I don't have a car, so I use my legs and that is helping my health.  I
hate cell phones and I hate flying.
What about air conditioning?
It is not anything essential. People have done without it for
millennia.
Post by Topaz
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-16 09:50:32 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 03:39:03 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Hmm, old Rameses looked like my maternal grandfather. King Tut looked
as Indian as Egyptian, when I saw all the wonderful Egyptian artefacts
from his tomb in the Melbourne museum. Indeed, the Pharaohs look very
much European-African, like modern Arabs and Egyptians. But the
Pharaohs were inbred, unlike the ordinary Egyptians whose genes have
not changed for thousands of years. To pretend that the Egyptians
were or are Europeans, is ridiculous.
So then you are ignoring all of this:

"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."

Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98

The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.

Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249

The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.

Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8

"A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.

A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the British
Museum. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49

The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.

Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68

Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.

Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216

The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.

Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99

A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.

De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26

Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red
hair.

National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103

An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.

Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53

A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.

Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and
blond hair.

Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739

Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.

Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI

The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.

Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94

A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking
man with blond hair.

Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65

Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.

A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.

The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.

Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67

It was once painted sunburned red.

Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168

The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.

The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003

Here is a sculpture of a scribe from the Egyptian Old Kingdom

http://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-1-seated-scribe-c2620-2500-bce
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If they rule over you, they are ifso facto superior to you.
They are superior at money grubbing.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
We should not allow racial intermarriage.
If by "we" you mean racists of all sorts, then yes by logic racists
should not allow racial intermarriage. Now, that sort of "we" does
not have the clout to prevent inter-racial marriage as any laws
preventing such marriages would violate fundamental human rights.
Most marriages are intra-racial anyway. Racial intermarriage leads to
leaps in human advancement, as seen in Egypt and India. Being a
beneficiary of racial intermarriage that has gone on for untold
thousands of years in India, I am all for it.
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.

All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So what was the Final Solution you were talking about that you
expunged in this post?
Expell the Jews. Madagascar was a good plan.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If by White race you mean stupid, ignorant and mendacious racists,
extraordinarily ill-behaved and narrow-minded, what is bad about
that? Evolution leaves losers behind.
Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
preserve the White race. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:

"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
technical developments and discoveries, are the products of the
creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their
first beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of
civilization is wholly dependant on such peoples. Should they perish,
all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the
grave."

"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the blood."

"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science
and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact
fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded
a superior type of humanity"

"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the
native Japanese culture, although this characterizes the external
features of the country, which features strike the eye of European
observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but the
real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous
scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is
to say, of Aryan peoples."
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
manifestations. A disintegrated national character is the inevitable
consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the
change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a
people is only an effect of the change that had modified its racial
substance."

"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and Negroid all
ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized
future for our humanity would be lost forever."

"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a
superior race inter-mixes with an inferior one."

"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if
the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should
disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual
needs of the superior nations to-day would also disappear."

"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a
revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as
revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined
by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only
by our duty to follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing
this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer
insight"

"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no
more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquility, so that
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity
which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Whites have their own countries in Europe where they originally
belonged, and Whites have expanded to the Americas, Australia, NZ.
Those places are ruled by Jews who hate the White race. Race mixing
and the destruction of the White race is the main goal of these
governments.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
True they are ruling the whole world as they did once, true that they
are not selling non-whites in markets and not exploiting their lands
as they used to. I don't see why non-whites need to be sorry about
the latter bit.
The reason America is rich is because it was made by White people. The
former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
countries are the third world. Leftist blame all the problems in the
world on the Whites. The real reason Black countries are the third
world is that Blacks are on average much less intelligent than Whites
as all IQ tests have proven.

In the past White people built colonies in Africa and brought
civilization there. The Blacks were much better off with schools and
hospitals and a lot of food. They were exporting food. But the
liberals didn't like White people being in charge so they put a stop
to the colonies. And they brought the starvation and misery back to
Africa.

The liberal plan of just giving food to the Blacks also causes more
suffering. It always causes them to greatly increase their population
and then there are a lot more people starving and needing even more
food.

Since the Liberals didn't like the colonies because Whites were
running them, I propose that American Blacks be sent there. Many
American Blacks are not very dark and have a lot of White blood in
them and they are more intelligent than the African Blacks. They could
teach the Africans how to farm and educate them in many other ways.
With the proper leadership the starvation in Africa could be stopped.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Not if the whites marry whites. Nobody is forcing white men and white
women to marry non-whites.
The fact that Whites should marry Whites is not allowed to be said in
the schools or anywhere else.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
They are that way in no way similar to the
unfortunate black female slaves who had no choice. I can understand
how tough it must be for the unattractive white male to attract any
sort of female. He cannot get slaves now. Tough. There are ways out
of this situation, though. That the dominant race in the world is
whining about eventual extinction, while at the same time boasting
about superiority, is peculiar indeed.
The problem is that we lost the war, WWII.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Well yes. I was not a believer of affirmative action, but such was the
low attitude of the racist whites who always tried to pull me down at
my jobs, that I have changed my mind from hard experience. The only
way to deal with nasty racists is affirmative action, I am sorry to
say. For the racist really does not care how brilliant the non-white
person is. He being a racist will always try to pull him down.
We should have a nation of White people, to get away from the
non-Whites who are against us, and to preserve the wonderful White
race.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Blacks have facts to whine about, and they certainly are not whining
in the ngs unlike you. Your facts are only biased self-serving
opinions.
The fact is that Whites are on average much more intelligent than
Blacks. And Blacks try to blame it on Whites when they are poor and
their neighborhoods are pathetic.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
We
should preserve the White race.
Do so by all means.
You racists lost the last world war, so the Jews who are a cleverer
lot are ruling the white race with great success for the white race.
The whites are doing very well without need for behaving like mad dog
Englishmen in solar topees, physically ruling the thirdworld. With
financial manipulation, media control, etc. the Jews have done wonders
for their wannabes.
"There are various names for the ideology of the elite. Some call it
"political correctness." Others call it "Cultural Marxism." But the
labels don't matter as long as one understands what is going on: the
ruling elites are waging a cultural and racial war against Western
values, Western civilization, and particularly Western man, i.e., the
white man. In the name of the feel-good mantras of diversity and
multiculturalism, all the values of traditional white civilization
have been declared bad and everything opposed to them declared good.
Every idea, attitude, and institution that protects the white race and
promotes its continued existence is being destroyed, as a precondition
for the physical destruction of the race itself. No arena of life is
spared this agenda's icy grip. Every movie, television show, news
story, book, and sermon must advance it, under the watchful eye of an
army of censors and snitches demanding unyielding fidelity to the
agenda. No argument or evidence is allowed to challenge it."

J.B. Cash
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So looks like, you really are a Jew in Nazi clothing.
no
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
What about air conditioning?
It is not anything essential. People have done without it for
millennia.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-16 11:26:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 03:39:03 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Hmm, old Rameses looked like my maternal grandfather. King Tut looked
as Indian as Egyptian, when I saw all the wonderful Egyptian artefacts
from his tomb in the Melbourne museum. Indeed, the Pharaohs look very
much European-African, like modern Arabs and Egyptians.  But the
Pharaohs were inbred, unlike the ordinary Egyptians whose genes have
not changed for thousands of years.  To pretend that the Egyptians
were or are Europeans, is ridiculous.
Yes. It does not matter what the pharaohs may have looked like. What
matters is what most Egyptians looked like. They looked brown/gray
and being between Europe and Africa this is most natural and evident.
As for the pharaohs, I spied with my eye that they looked much like
Indians. They were an inbred lot, anyway.
Post by Topaz
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98
   The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249
   The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
    "A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.
A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the  British
Museum. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
   The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216
The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
   A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.
De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26
     Amenhotep III's tomb painting  shows him as having light red
hair.
National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103
    An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
      A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.
     Queen Thi  is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and
blond hair.
Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
    Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.
Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI
     The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94
   A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking
man with blond hair.
Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
    Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
    A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.
    The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
    It was once painted sunburned red.
Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168
      The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
       The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003
Here is a sculpture of a scribe from the Egyptian Old Kingdom
http://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-1-seated-scribe-c2620-2500-bce
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If they rule over you, they are ifso facto superior to you.
They are superior at money grubbing.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
We should not allow racial intermarriage.
If by "we" you mean racists of all sorts, then yes by logic racists
should not allow racial intermarriage.  Now, that sort of "we" does
not have the clout to prevent inter-racial marriage as any laws
preventing such marriages would violate fundamental human rights.
Most marriages are intra-racial anyway.  Racial intermarriage leads to
leaps in human advancement, as seen in Egypt and India.  Being a
beneficiary of racial intermarriage that has gone on for untold
thousands of years in India, I am all for it.
    The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
    All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So what was the Final Solution you were talking about that you
expunged in this post?
Expell the Jews. Madagascar was a good plan.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If by White race you mean stupid, ignorant and mendacious racists,
extraordinarily ill-behaved and narrow-minded, what is bad about
that?  Evolution leaves losers behind.
Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
technical developments and discoveries, are the products of the
creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their
first beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of
civilization is wholly dependant on such peoples. Should they perish,
all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the
grave."
"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the blood."
"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science
and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact
fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded
a superior type of humanity"
"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the
native Japanese culture, although this characterizes the external
features of the country, which features strike the eye of European
observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but the
real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous
scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is
to say, of Aryan peoples."
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
manifestations. A disintegrated national character is the inevitable
consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the
change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a
people is only an effect of the change that had modified its racial
substance."
"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and Negroid all
ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized
future for our humanity would be lost forever."
"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a
superior race inter-mixes with an inferior one."
"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if
the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should
disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual
needs of the superior nations to-day would also disappear."
"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a
revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as
revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined
by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only
by our duty to follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing
this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer
insight"
"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no
more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquility, so that
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity
which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Whites have their own countries in Europe where they originally
belonged, and Whites have expanded to the Americas, Australia, NZ.
Those places are ruled by Jews who hate the White race. Race mixing
and the destruction of the White race is the main goal of these
governments.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
True they are ruling the whole world as they did once, true that they
are not selling non-whites in markets and not exploiting their lands
as they used to.  I don't see why non-whites need to be sorry about
the latter bit.
The reason America is rich is because it was made by White people. The
former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
countries are the third world. Leftist blame all the problems in the
world on the Whites. The real reason Black countries are the third
world is that Blacks are on average much less intelligent than Whites
as all IQ tests have proven.
In the past White people built colonies in Africa and brought
civilization there. The Blacks were much better off with schools and
hospitals and a lot of food. They were exporting food. But the
liberals didn't like White people being in charge so they put a stop
to the colonies. And  they brought the starvation and misery back to
Africa.
The liberal plan of just giving food to the Blacks also causes more
suffering. It always causes them to  greatly increase their population
and then there are a lot more people starving and needing  even more
food.
Since the Liberals didn't like the colonies because Whites were
running them, I propose that American Blacks be sent there. Many
American Blacks are not very dark and have a lot of White blood in
them and they are more intelligent than the African Blacks. They could
teach the Africans how to farm and educate them in many other ways.
With the proper leadership the starvation in Africa could be stopped.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Not if the whites marry whites.  Nobody is forcing white men and white
women to marry non-whites.
The fact that Whites should marry Whites is not allowed to be said in
the schools or anywhere else.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
 They are that way in no way similar to the
unfortunate black female slaves who had no choice.  I can understand
how tough it must be for the unattractive white male to attract any
sort of female.  He cannot get slaves now. Tough.  There are ways out
of this situation, though.  That the dominant race in the world is
whining about eventual extinction, while at the same time boasting
about superiority, is peculiar indeed.
The problem is that we lost the war, WWII.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Well yes. I was not a believer of affirmative action, but such was the
low attitude of the racist whites who always tried to pull me down at
my jobs, that I have changed my mind from hard experience. The only
way to deal with nasty racists is affirmative action, I am sorry to
say. For the racist really does not care how brilliant the non-white
person is.  He being a racist will always try to pull him down.
We should have a nation of White people, to get away from the
non-Whites who are against us, and to preserve the wonderful White
race.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Blacks have facts to whine about, and they certainly are not whining
in the ngs unlike you.  Your facts are only biased self-serving
opinions.
The fact is that Whites are on average much more intelligent than
Blacks. And Blacks try to blame it on Whites when they are poor and
their neighborhoods are pathetic.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
We
should preserve the White race.
Do so by all means.
You racists lost the last world war, so the Jews who are a cleverer
lot are ruling the white race with great success for the white race.
The whites are doing very well without need for behaving like mad dog
Englishmen in solar topees, physically ruling the thirdworld.  With
financial manipulation, media control, etc. the Jews have done wonders
for their wannabes.
"There are various names for the ideology of the elite. Some call it
"political correctness." Others call it "Cultural Marxism." But the
labels don't matter as long as one understands what is going on: the
ruling elites are waging a cultural and racial war against Western
values, Western civilization, and particularly Western man, i.e., the
white man. In the name of the feel-good mantras of diversity and
multiculturalism, all the values of traditional white civilization
have been declared bad and everything opposed to them declared good.
Every idea, attitude, and institution that protects the white race and
promotes its continued existence is being destroyed, as a precondition
for the physical destruction of the race itself. No arena of life is
spared this agenda's icy grip. Every movie, television show, news
story, book, and sermon must advance it, under the watchful eye of an
army of censors and snitches demanding unyielding fidelity to the
agenda. No argument or evidence is allowed to challenge it."
J.B. Cash
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So looks like, you really are a Jew in Nazi clothing.
no
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
What about air conditioning?
It is not anything essential.  People have done without it for
millennia.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-17 13:27:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So what was the Final Solution you were talking about that you
expunged in this post?
Expell the Jews. Madagascar was a good plan.
Why not settle them in Florida? Why bother the people of Madagascar
like the Palestinians are bothered?
Post by Topaz
Post by Arindam Banerjee
If by White race you mean stupid, ignorant and mendacious racists,
extraordinarily ill-behaved and narrow-minded, what is bad about
that?  Evolution leaves losers behind.
Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
Portugal is a fine place, I am reliably informed. Very charming,
friendly, lively people. I would rather stay there than say Sweden.
Post by Topaz
"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
technical developments and discoveries, are the products of the
creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their
first beginnings must be attributed to one race.
How are the Breiviks and Bayleys of that great race responsible for
such achievements? According to racist theory, the worst white is
better than the best non-white, for the non-white is an animal. Isn't
this so? Yes, some individuals are responsible, but not the race.
The concerned individuals are never racist, but God-loving people like
da Vinci, Newton, and Tesla.

The maintenance of
Post by Topaz
civilization is wholly dependant on such peoples. Should they perish,
all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the
grave."
Ah well, what matters more is not the creative people, but their
creations. Which are appreciated by all who have a minimum of decency
and good taste. Now, this excludes the racists who cannot see
anything good in anyone not of their race, or some honorary
affiliation to their race.
Post by Topaz
"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the blood."
Idiotic statement. Great civilisations die because the excite envy
from external barbarians. Like, the barbarian Alexander was
responsible for the fall of the great Indian civilisation. His
failure promoted further aggression from the West. While repulsed,
the losers promoted Buddhism as an alternative to Aryan thinking
carried by Brahmanism. Which over centuries, led to the downfall of
India.
Post by Topaz
"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science
and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact
fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded
a superior type of humanity"
That is true, in that the Vedas are the finest and noblest product of
the human mind, and the source of all worthy knowledge and good
living. However, the Vedas were unknown to the Nazis. In fact, the
term Aryan was unknown to the Germans only four centuries ago.
Post by Topaz
"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the
native Japanese culture, although this characterizes the external
features of the country, which features strike the eye of European
observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but the
real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous
scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is
to say, of Aryan peoples."
Heh-heh, Aryan peoples belonged and belong to the Indian subcontinent,
and at a stretch to ancient Iranians.
Post by Topaz
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
manifestations. A disintegrated national character is the inevitable
consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the
change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a
people is only an effect of the change that had modified its racial
substance."
"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and Negroid all
ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized
future for our humanity would be lost forever."
"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a
superior race inter-mixes with an inferior one."
"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if
the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should
disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual
needs of the superior nations to-day would also disappear."
"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a
revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as
revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined
by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only
by our duty to follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing
this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer
insight"
"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no
more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquility, so that
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity
which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Whites have their own countries in Europe where they originally
belonged, and Whites have expanded to the Americas, Australia, NZ.
Those places are ruled by Jews who hate the White race. Race mixing
and the destruction of the White race is the main goal of these
governments.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
True they are ruling the whole world as they did once, true that they
are not selling non-whites in markets and not exploiting their lands
as they used to.  I don't see why non-whites need to be sorry about
the latter bit.
The reason America is rich is because it was made by White people. The
former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
countries are the third world. Leftist blame all the problems in the
world on the Whites. The real reason Black countries are the third
world is that Blacks are on average much less intelligent than Whites
as all IQ tests have proven.
In the past White people built colonies in Africa and brought
civilization there. The Blacks were much better off with schools and
hospitals and a lot of food. They were exporting food. But the
liberals didn't like White people being in charge so they put a stop
to the colonies. And  they brought the starvation and misery back to
Africa.
The liberal plan of just giving food to the Blacks also causes more
suffering. It always causes them to  greatly increase their population
and then there are a lot more people starving and needing  even more
food.
Since the Liberals didn't like the colonies because Whites were
running them, I propose that American Blacks be sent there. Many
American Blacks are not very dark and have a lot of White blood in
them and they are more intelligent than the African Blacks. They could
teach the Africans how to farm and educate them in many other ways.
With the proper leadership the starvation in Africa could be stopped.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Not if the whites marry whites.  Nobody is forcing white men and white
women to marry non-whites.
The fact that Whites should marry Whites is not allowed to be said in
the schools or anywhere else.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
 They are that way in no way similar to the
unfortunate black female slaves who had no choice.  I can understand
how tough it must be for the unattractive white male to attract any
sort of female.  He cannot get slaves now. Tough.  There are ways out
of this situation, though.  That the dominant race in the world is
whining about eventual extinction, while at the same time boasting
about superiority, is peculiar indeed.
The problem is that we lost the war, WWII.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Well yes. I was not a believer of affirmative action, but such was the
low attitude of the racist whites who always tried to pull me down at
my jobs, that I have changed my mind from hard experience. The only
way to deal with nasty racists is affirmative action, I am sorry to
say. For the racist really does not care how brilliant the non-white
person is.  He being a racist will always try to pull him down.
We should have a nation of White people, to get away from the
non-Whites who are against us, and to preserve the wonderful White
race.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Blacks have facts to whine about, and they certainly are not whining
in the ngs unlike you.  Your facts are only biased self-serving
opinions.
The fact is that Whites are on average much more intelligent than
Blacks. And Blacks try to blame it on Whites when they are poor and
their neighborhoods are pathetic.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
We
should preserve the White race.
Do so by all means.
You racists lost the last world war, so the Jews who are a cleverer
lot are ruling the white race with great success for the white race.
The whites are doing very well without need for behaving like mad dog
Englishmen in solar topees, physically ruling the thirdworld.  With
financial manipulation, media control, etc. the Jews have done wonders
for their wannabes.
"There are various names for the ideology of the elite. Some call it
"political correctness." Others call it "Cultural Marxism." But the
labels don't matter as long as one understands what is going on: the
ruling elites are waging a cultural and racial war against Western
values, Western civilization, and particularly Western man, i.e., the
white man. In the name of the feel-good mantras of diversity and
multiculturalism, all the values of traditional white civilization
have been declared bad and everything opposed to them declared good.
Every idea, attitude, and institution that protects the white race and
promotes its continued existence is being destroyed, as a precondition
for the physical destruction of the race itself. No arena of life is
spared this agenda's icy grip. Every movie, television show, news
story, book, and sermon must advance it, under the watchful eye of an
army of censors and snitches demanding unyielding fidelity to the
agenda. No argument or evidence is allowed to challenge it."
J.B. Cash
Post by Arindam Banerjee
So looks like, you really are a Jew in Nazi clothing.
no
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
What about air conditioning?
It is not anything essential.  People have done without it for
millennia.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2013-06-17 22:21:11 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:27:25 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Why not settle them in Florida? Why bother the people of Madagascar
like the Palestinians are bothered?
An island would be better.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
How are the Breiviks and Bayleys of that great race responsible for
such achievements? According to racist theory, the worst white is
better than the best non-white, for the non-white is an animal.
Rubbish, stop listening to Jews.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Isn't
this so?
no
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Yes, some individuals are responsible, but not the race.
The concerned individuals are never racist, but God-loving people like
da Vinci, Newton, and Tesla.
They were White.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Ah well, what matters more is not the creative people, but their
creations. Which are appreciated by all who have a minimum of decency
and good taste. Now, this excludes the racists who cannot see
anything good in anyone not of their race, or some honorary
affiliation to their race.
What matters more is the creative people. Of course non-Whites hate
the truth and have their spin.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by Topaz
"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the blood."
Idiotic statement.
Outstanding statement, actually.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Great civilisations die because the excite envy
from external barbarians. Like, the barbarian Alexander was
responsible for the fall of the great Indian civilisation. His
failure promoted further aggression from the West. While repulsed,
the losers promoted Buddhism as an alternative to Aryan thinking
carried by Brahmanism. Which over centuries, led to the downfall of
India.
That is true, in that the Vedas are the finest and noblest product of
the human mind, and the source of all worthy knowledge and good
living. However, the Vedas were unknown to the Nazis.
Rubbish, the National Socialists knew about everything.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
In fact, the
term Aryan was unknown to the Germans only four centuries ago.
Heh-heh, Aryan peoples belonged and belong to the Indian subcontinent,
and at a stretch to ancient Iranians.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-18 00:10:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:27:25 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Why not settle them in Florida?  Why bother the people of Madagascar
like the Palestinians are bothered?
An island would be better.
How are the Breiviks and Bayleys of that great race responsible for
such achievements?  According to racist theory, the worst white is
better than the best non-white, for the non-white is an animal.
Rubbish, stop listening to Jews.
Okay.
Joe Cooper
2013-06-18 04:34:41 UTC
Permalink
Okay.
Methinks we should stop listening to racist bastards like Alex Vangel.
After all, he hates Jews, and, of course, people of color.

Yes - he's a jerk.
--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/

"I am merely pointing out that President Obama has been going about the
business of demonizing his political enemies, and then hiring thugs to
destroy them without regard to the law, in precisely the same way that
Hitler and his fascists did it in Germany. This isn't an accusation;
it's an observation." (Herb Mayer)
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-05 14:05:25 UTC
Permalink
. . . as is difficult to see how Europeans or
people of European origin have not gone around exploiting non-whites
ever since they learnt to sail the oceans.
How different were the European empires from the way the Mongols
exploited non-Mongols,
There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled only
temporarily.  Mongols now are insignificant compared to the Europeans
outside Europe.
This redirects from exploitation (AB1) to extermination (AB2).
I was showing the difference as asked for, without referring to
extermination which is your input.
the way the Turks exploited non-Turks,
I don't think the Turks ever made a convincing science out of racism,
to justify slavery the way the European intelligentsia did.
Sciences of racism are not integral to slavery.
Which is the difference between Turkish exploitation and European,
that I indicated as asked for.

Ancient Greeks and
Romans maintained slavery 2000 years ago without predicating it on
any theory of race.   So did traditional Arab societies since the 7th
century, as do a few Moslem communities today:  i.e. slavery
continues independently of whether slaves (or slave-owners) are
black or white.
That non-whites were basically non-human was the modern European
racists' main point, and such was not the case with others. For the
groups you mentioned, slavery was the humane alternative to slaughter
after defeat in battle. Thus, it was an unfortunate condition, not
any genetic inferiority based upon group-serving science. This, then,
is the difference, again, as asked for.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
the way the Japanese exploited non-Japanese, and so on?
Their occupation did not last for very long.  The Japanese were
officially claiming to fight for non-whites, by fighting white
domination.
The overseas Japanese empire ruled places like Formosa and
Korea.  Japan acquired these territories from indigenous Asians,
not white Europeans.  (The argument that Japan represented
the non-white races was first proposed at Versailles in 1919,
to justify Japan's claim to Kwantung, China, heretofore a
Geman "concession."   With Allied approval, Japan during
WW1 had seized various Pacific islands that had been German
colonies, i.e.continued the expansion begun in the 1890s.)
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
hari+kumar
2013-06-05 15:01:57 UTC
Permalink
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled only
temporarily. =A0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the Europeans
outside Europe."

It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of people on
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.

His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire carried
them everywhere.

There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an genetic
impact.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-06 06:12:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari+kumar
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled only
temporarily. =A0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the Europeans
outside Europe."
It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of people on
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.
His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire carried
them everywhere.
There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an genetic
impact.
In my school I did know a guy who claimed to be a descendant of
Genghis Khan.
Steve Hayes
2013-06-06 09:51:20 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:12:18 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Post by hari+kumar
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled only
temporarily. =A0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the Europeans
outside Europe."
It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of people on
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.
His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire carried
them everywhere.
There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an genetic
impact.
In my school I did know a guy who claimed to be a descendant of
Genghis Khan.
That's the kind of claim that is difficult to refute.
--
Steve Hayes
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/LITMAIN.HTM
http://www.goodreads.com/hayesstw
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/Methodius
hari.kumar
2013-06-06 12:30:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari+kumar
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled only
temporarily. =3DA0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the Europeans
outside Europe."
It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of people on
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.
His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire
carri=
ed
Post by hari+kumar
them everywhere.
There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an
geneti=
c
Post by hari+kumar
impact.
"In my school I did know a guy who claimed to be a descendant of Genghis
Khan."

As could be you, s. asia one area to recieve his genes.

As for slavery, there always and currently is always a ready excuse to
permit it. Slavery exists now under other names and other excuses such as
child slavery as debt slaves.

By whatever name or excuse it is evil.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-07 00:19:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.kumar
Post by hari+kumar
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled only
temporarily. =3DA0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the Europeans
outside Europe."
It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of people on
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.
His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire
carri=
ed> them everywhere.
Post by hari+kumar
There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an
geneti=
c
Post by hari+kumar
impact.
"In my school I did know a guy who claimed to be a descendant of Genghis
Khan."
As could be you, s. asia one area to recieve his genes.
Not a chance, for me. That person I talked about traced his ancestry
to Babar, the founder of the Mogul Empire in India and a descendant of
GK.
Post by hari.kumar
As for slavery, there always and currently is always a ready excuse to
permit it.  Slavery exists now under other names and other excuses such as
child slavery as debt slaves.
The slavery I am referring to is not so diluted. It relates to
depriving humans of all rights including their right to be considered
human, and thus allowing them to be bought and sold in markets like
any commodity; to be beaten or killed at the master's whim, etc.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by hari.kumar
By whatever name or excuse it is evil.
hari.=kumar
2013-06-07 12:36:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari+kumar
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled only
temporarily. =3D3DA0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the
Europ=
eans
Post by hari+kumar
outside Europe."
It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of people
=
on
Post by hari+kumar
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.
His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire
carri=3D
ed> them everywhere.
Post by hari+kumar
There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an
geneti=3D
c
Post by hari+kumar
impact.
"In my school I did know a guy who claimed to be a descendant of Genghis
Khan."
As could be you, s. asia one area to recieve his genes.
"Not a chance, for me. That person I talked about traced his ancestry to
Babar, the founder of the Mogul Empire in India and a descendant of GK."

It is not known by family stories of descent but only by genetic tests.
Your chances are on the order of 1 in 6 that you have his genetic markers.
As for slavery, there always and currently is always a ready excuse to
permit it. =A0Slavery exists now under other names and other excuses
such=
as
child slavery as debt slaves.
"The slavery I am referring to is not so diluted. It relates to depriving
humans of all rights including their right to be considered human, and thus
allowing them to be bought and sold in markets like any commodity; to be
beaten or killed at the master's whim, etc."

The factors you mention are a difference without distinction, especially
from the prspective of the slave not the owner.

Debt slaves are considered less worthy, and even less human, which is how
the owners rationalize owning them and their treatment of them. And
physical punishment is common. If the dept ownership is sold or otherwise
transferred the slave goes with it.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-07 13:11:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.=kumar
Post by hari+kumar
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled only
temporarily. =3D3DA0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the
Europ=
eans> > outside Europe."
Post by hari+kumar
It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of people
=
on
Post by hari+kumar
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.
His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire
carri=3D
ed> them everywhere.
Post by hari+kumar
There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an
geneti=3D
c
Post by hari+kumar
impact.
"In my school I did know a guy who claimed to be a descendant of Genghis
Khan."
As could be you, s. asia one area to recieve his genes.
"Not a chance, for me.  That person I talked about traced his ancestry to
Babar, the founder of the Mogul Empire in India and a descendant of GK."
It is not known by family stories of descent but only by genetic tests.
Your chances are on the order of 1 in 6 that you have his genetic markers.
Why do you think so? It is a big deal among some people to be a
descendant of Genghis Khan. So they are told about it.
Post by hari.=kumar
As for slavery, there always and currently is always a ready excuse to
permit it. =A0Slavery exists now under other names and other excuses
such=
 as
child slavery as debt slaves.
"The slavery I am referring to is not so diluted.  It relates to depriving
humans of all rights including their right to be considered human, and thus
allowing them to be bought and sold in markets like any commodity; to be
beaten or killed at the master's whim, etc."
The factors you mention are a difference without distinction, especially
from the prspective of the slave not the owner.
If by child slavery you mean child labour which is common in poor
countries, then yes it is a sad thing. However as they grow up they
have more choices and freedoms than those children born to slave
parents and will remain forever slaves as a result.
Post by hari.=kumar
Debt slaves are considered less worthy, and even less human, which is how
the owners rationalize owning them and their treatment of them.
Debt slaves have to work off their debt and after doing that they
become free of debt. As the creditors want their money back, they
have to treat them with at least some regard for their well-being
otherwise they will lose the labour.

And
Post by hari.=kumar
physical punishment is common.  If the dept ownership is sold or otherwise
transferred the slave goes with it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
hari.=kumar
2013-06-07 13:39:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Arindam Banerjee
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled on=
ly
temporarily. =3D3D3DA0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the
Europ=3D
eans> > outside Europe."
It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of peopl=
e
=3D
on
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.
His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire
carri=3D3D
ed> them everywhere.
There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an
geneti=3D3D
c
impact.
"In my school I did know a guy who claimed to be a descendant of Genghi=
s
Khan."
As could be you, s. asia one area to recieve his genes.
"Not a chance, for me. =A0That person I talked about traced his ancestry =
to
Babar, the founder of the Mogul Empire in India and a descendant of GK."
It is not known by family stories of descent but only by genetic tests.
Your chances are on the order of 1 in 6 that you have his genetic markers=
.
Why do you think so? It is a big deal among some people to be a
descendant of Genghis Khan. So they are told about it.
Because the genetic testing gave that result, regardless of any knowledge
of the men having the markers or not and/or family stories of descent.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
As for slavery, there always and currently is always a ready excuse to
permit it. =3DA0Slavery exists now under other names and other excuses
such=3D
=A0as
child slavery as debt slaves.
"The slavery I am referring to is not so diluted. =A0It relates to depriv=
ing
humans of all rights including their right to be considered human, and th=
us
allowing them to be bought and sold in markets like any commodity; to be
beaten or killed at the master's whim, etc."
The factors you mention are a difference without distinction, especially
from the prspective of the slave not the owner.
If by child slavery you mean child labour which is common in poor
countries, then yes it is a sad thing. However as they grow up they
have more choices and freedoms than those children born to slave
parents and will remain forever slaves as a result.
That is how children often become slaves, they are forced to work off the
debt of their parents.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
Debt slaves are considered less worthy, and even less human, which is how
the owners rationalize owning them and their treatment of them.
Debt slaves have to work off their debt and after doing that they
become free of debt. As the creditors want their money back, they
have to treat them with at least some regard for their well-being
otherwise they will lose the labour.
But the reality is that the debt slave can never by his labour gain
freedom. The owner of the slave has every incentive to make sure the
interest and/or the additional items added to the debt make it so. That is
why the debt of the parents is passed to the children.

Every form of slavery has the owner looking out for the physical welfare of
his investment, just as he does for the physical welfare of his animals for
the same reason.
Post by Arindam Banerjee
And
physical punishment is common. =A0If the dept ownership is sold or otherw=
ise
transferred the slave goes with it.- Hide quoted text -
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-08 04:16:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.=kumar
"There are plenty++ of non-Mongols left in areas the Mongols ruled on=
ly
temporarily. =3D3D3DA0Mongols now are insignificant compared to the
Europ=3D
eans> > outside Europe."
It is calculated from modern genetic studies that 16 percent of peopl=
e
=3D
on
the euro-asian land mass carry the genes of Genghis Khan.
His many many sons and their sons etc. who ruled in his vast empire
carri=3D3D
ed> them everywhere.
There is no single other person who ever lived who has had such an
geneti=3D3D
c
impact.
"In my school I did know a guy who claimed to be a descendant of Genghi=
s
Khan."
As could be you, s. asia one area to recieve his genes.
"Not a chance, for me. =A0That person I talked about traced his ancestry =
to
Babar, the founder of the Mogul Empire in India and a descendant of GK."
It is not known by family stories of descent but only by genetic tests.
Your chances are on the order of 1 in 6 that you have his genetic markers=
.
Why do you think so?  It is a big deal among some people to be a
descendant of Genghis Khan.  So they are told about it.
Because the genetic testing gave that result, regardless of any knowledge
of the men having the markers or not and/or family stories of descent.h
A great deal depends upon the honesty and motives of those doing such
testing. They may want to "prove" some point!!
Why on earth should one want to waste money doing such tests, when far
better uses for money could be had?
Post by hari.=kumar
As for slavery, there always and currently is always a ready excuse to
permit it. =3DA0Slavery exists now under other names and other excuses
such=3D
=A0as
child slavery as debt slaves.
"The slavery I am referring to is not so diluted. =A0It relates to depriv=
ing
humans of all rights including their right to be considered human, and th=
us
allowing them to be bought and sold in markets like any commodity; to be
beaten or killed at the master's whim, etc."
The factors you mention are a difference without distinction, especially
from the prspective of the slave not the owner.
If by child slavery you mean child labour which is common in poor
countries, then yes it is a sad thing.  However as they grow up they
have more choices and freedoms than those children born to slave
parents and will remain forever slaves as a result.
That is how children often become slaves, they are forced to work off the
debt of their parents.
Where does this happen? I do not know a single case of this
happening.
Post by hari.=kumar
Debt slaves are considered less worthy, and even less human, which is how
the owners rationalize owning them and their treatment of them.
Debt slaves have to work off their debt and after doing that they
become free of debt.  As the creditors want their money back, they
have to treat them with at least some regard for their well-being
otherwise they will lose the labour.
But the reality is that the debt slave can never by his labour gain
freedom.
He certainly does. Even in the Roman times there were slaves who
became free and then middle class traders.


 The owner of the slave has every incentive to make sure the
Post by hari.=kumar
interest and/or the additional items added to the debt make it so.  That is
why the debt of the parents is passed to the children.
Every form of slavery has the owner looking out for the physical welfare of
his investment, just as he does for the physical welfare of his animals for
the same reason.
And
physical punishment is common. =A0If the dept ownership is sold or otherw=
ise
transferred the slave goes with it.- Hide quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
hari.=kumar
2013-06-08 11:44:57 UTC
Permalink
Time to stop speaking hypothetically and deal with the reality of modern
slavery.

'Generations pay off debts through slavery'

http://thecnnfreedomproject.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/08/generations-pay-off-debts-through-slavery/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_bondage_in_India
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-08 12:44:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.=kumar
Time to stop speaking hypothetically and deal with the reality of modern
slavery.
'Generations pay off debts through slavery'
http://thecnnfreedomproject.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/08/generations-pay-...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_bondage_in_India
There is no bonded labour that I have seen in the parts I grew up and
worked in - Jharkhand, West Bengal, Delhi. With low castes in power,
for decades, I don't see how UP can have bonded labour. From what I
heard from the UP taxi drivers who now are in Kolkata in substantial
numbers, it is a fairly equal fight between the lower and higher
castes. The social situation is admittedly horrid, on the whole a
stalemate, but talk of bonded labour in India ended way back in the
sixties. Any number of political initiatives were taken to get rid of
bonded labour.

On the other hand, I can see good reasons why the vested foreign
interests will try to given the people of India a bad name. Heh-heh,
I had surmised that it would come to this! I never believe anything
Western sources say about India - I spent 4 months touring India, saw
no sign of any slavery anywhere. What I found most interesting and
also infuriating was how happy and contented they really were, not
that they did not complain when they got the chance. A bit more
effort, to keep things clean and efficient, would result in huge
benefits.
hari=.kumar
2013-06-08 13:39:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.=kumar
Time to stop speaking hypothetically and deal with the reality of modern
slavery.
'Generations pay off debts through slavery'
http://thecnnfreedomproject.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/08/generations-pay-...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_bondage_in_India
"There is no bonded labour that I have seen in the parts I grew up and
worked in - Jharkhand, West Bengal, Delhi. With low castes in power, for
decades, I don't see how UP can have bonded labour. From what I heard from
the UP taxi drivers who now are in Kolkata in substantial numbers, it is a
fairly equal fight between the lower and higher castes. The social
situation is admittedly horrid, on the whole a stalemate, but talk of
bonded labour in India ended way back in the sixties. Any number of
political initiatives were taken to get rid of bonded labour.

On the other hand, I can see good reasons why the vested foreign interests
will try to given the people of India a bad name. Heh-heh, I had surmised
that it would come to this! I never believe anything Western sources say
about India - I spent 4 months touring India, saw no sign of any slavery
anywhere. What I found most interesting and also infuriating was how happy
and contented they really were, not that they did not complain when they
got the chance. A bit more effort, to keep things clean and efficient,
would result in huge benefits."

Of course, to many indians the slaves are invisible, only those people
doing the jobs all around them as the links describe. It is a common
dearly held stereotype and excuse of the old slave days in america that the
"darkies" were happy in their slavery, just look how they joke about and
sing.

I tire quickly of the excuse that it is because others point out a reality
we would rather dismiss that it is false. It often takes those external
eyes to see what is invisible to us.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-08 14:29:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
Post by hari.=kumar
Time to stop speaking hypothetically and deal with the reality of modern
slavery.
'Generations pay off debts through slavery'
http://thecnnfreedomproject.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/08/generations-pay-...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_bondage_in_India
"There is no bonded labour that I have seen in the parts I grew up and
worked in - Jharkhand, West Bengal, Delhi.  With low castes in power, for
decades, I don't see how UP can have bonded labour.  From what I heard from
the UP taxi drivers who now are in Kolkata in substantial numbers, it is a
fairly equal fight between the lower and higher castes.  The social
situation is admittedly horrid, on the whole a stalemate, but talk of
bonded labour in India ended way back in the sixties.  Any number of
political initiatives were taken to get rid of bonded labour.
On the other hand, I can see good reasons why the vested foreign interests
will try to given the people of India a bad name.  Heh-heh, I had surmised
that it would come to this!  I never believe anything Western sources say
about India - I spent 4 months touring India, saw no sign of any slavery
anywhere.  What I found most interesting and also infuriating was how happy
and contented they really were, not that they did not complain when they
got the chance.  A bit more effort, to keep things clean and efficient,
would result in huge benefits."
Of course, to many indians the slaves are invisible,
Because they do not exist, save in the minds of those who want to
convert Indians to their religion and so must do what they can to
demean whatever remains of the existing setup. This strategy is all
too well known.


only those people
Post by hari=.kumar
doing the jobs all around them as the links describe.
Why on earth any genuine Indian should believe anything the corrupting
foreign sources write, they who serve masters with but one aim, to
exploit and to fool, is something that I think has last penetrated the
more aware Indian.
hari.=kumar
2013-06-08 15:11:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
Post by hari.=kumar
Time to stop speaking hypothetically and deal with the reality of
moder=
n
Post by hari=.kumar
Post by hari.=kumar
slavery.
'Generations pay off debts through slavery'
http://thecnnfreedomproject.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/08/generations-pay-...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_bondage_in_India
"There is no bonded labour that I have seen in the parts I grew up and
worked in - Jharkhand, West Bengal, Delhi. =A0With low castes in power,
f=
or
Post by hari=.kumar
decades, I don't see how UP can have bonded labour. =A0From what I heard
=
from
Post by hari=.kumar
the UP taxi drivers who now are in Kolkata in substantial numbers, it is
=
a
Post by hari=.kumar
fairly equal fight between the lower and higher castes. =A0The social
situation is admittedly horrid, on the whole a stalemate, but talk of
bonded labour in India ended way back in the sixties. =A0Any number of
political initiatives were taken to get rid of bonded labour.
On the other hand, I can see good reasons why the vested foreign
interest=
s
Post by hari=.kumar
will try to given the people of India a bad name. =A0Heh-heh, I had
surmi=
sed
Post by hari=.kumar
that it would come to this! =A0I never believe anything Western sources
s=
ay
Post by hari=.kumar
about India - I spent 4 months touring India, saw no sign of any slavery
anywhere. =A0What I found most interesting and also infuriating was how
h=
appy
Post by hari=.kumar
and contented they really were, not that they did not complain when they
got the chance. =A0A bit more effort, to keep things clean and efficient,
would result in huge benefits."
Of course, to many indians the slaves are invisible,
"Because they do not exist, save in the minds of those who want to convert
Indians to their religion and so must do what they can to demean whatever
remains of the existing setup. This strategy is all too well known.


only those people
Post by hari=.kumar
doing the jobs all around them as the links describe.
"Why on earth any genuine Indian should believe anything the corrupting
foreign sources write, they who serve masters with but one aim, to exploit
and to fool, is something that I think has last penetrated the more aware
Indian."

Then let us ask indians about the problem:

'Mission to end India's child slave labour'



There are none so blind as those who would not see.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-10 23:39:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.=kumar
"Why on earth any genuine Indian should believe anything the corrupting
foreign sources write, they who serve masters with but one aim, to exploit
and to fool, is something that I think has last penetrated the more aware
Indian."
'Mission to end India's child slave labour'
http://youtu.be/HKynQG9pnsw
There are none so blind as those who would not see.
Good. Tell that to all the proudly low-caste (Dalit) politicians who
are ruling the areas where child slave labour is said to flourish -
what are they doing about it? Also do ask the Sikhs and Christians
who are ruling India at the Centre, what are they doing.
hari=.kumar
2013-06-11 00:14:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.=kumar
"Why on earth any genuine Indian should believe anything the corrupting
foreign sources write, they who serve masters with but one aim, to exploit
and to fool, is something that I think has last penetrated the more aware
Indian."
'Mission to end India's child slave labour'
http://youtu.be/HKynQG9pnsw
There are none so blind as those who would not see.
"Good. Tell that to all the proudly low-caste (Dalit) politicians who are
ruling the areas where child slave labour is said to flourish - what are
they doing about it? Also do ask the Sikhs and Christians who are ruling
India at the Centre, what are they doing."

Perhaps this series of 3 7 minute videos will help answer:

'Slavery in india'







If there remain questions we can post other videos that look at the topic.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-13 04:52:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Post by hari.=kumar
"Why on earth any genuine Indian should believe anything the corrupting
foreign sources write, they who serve masters with but one aim, to
exploit
Post by hari.=kumar
and to fool, is something that I think has last penetrated the more aware
Indian."
'Mission to end India's child slave labour'
http://youtu.be/HKynQG9pnsw
There are none so blind as those who would not see.
"Good.  Tell that to all the proudly low-caste (Dalit) politicians who are
ruling the areas where child slave labour is said to flourish - what are
they doing about it?  Also do ask the Sikhs and Christians who are ruling
India at the Centre, what are they doing."
'Slavery in india'
http://youtu.be/sAy3O6_O_XM
http://youtu.be/lXLM8aAzOT0
http://youtu.be/xbqB58cm120
If there remain questions we can post other videos that look at the topic.
Child slavery must be abolished everywhere, however there is a
distinction between child employment and child slavery. Homeless kids
have to work for their living. If they are lucky, they are taken care
of by kindly people. Like, I have an adopted nephew who had to leave
home as his father was abusive. He was very small, but he got a job in
a tea shop. Like very many small boys who get such jobs, all over
India. While he could get minimal education, he could survive by
working there. Later on, he found out where his elder brother was
living (at my parents' home, that boy had been adopted earlier) so he
knocked at our door and there he was. Today, both of them have very
good jobs, are married and doing well. I don't think they would say
they endured child slavery at any time.

India does not have a state like firstworlders with their
bureaucracies, but India does have a society. When the society works,
the gains are wonderful, being efficient and inexpensive and also
personally satisfying.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
hari=kumar
2013-06-13 12:46:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
'Slavery in india'



If there remain questions we can post other videos that look at the
topic

"Child slavery must be abolished everywhere, however there is a distinction
between child employment and child slavery."

Agreed, but as when we first started this discussion it is a distinction
without a difference from the perspective of the slave. What
rationalizations the slave owner uses is of minimal interest.

It is not only children of course who are slaves in india, many adults are
also among the more then 20 million plus defined as coming under that
definition. The topic can be explored more fully here:

'Ancient Slavery in Modern India'


Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-13 13:16:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=kumar
Post by hari=.kumar
'Slavery in india'
http://youtu.be/3DsAy3O6_O_XM
http://youtu.be/3DlXLM8aAzOT0
http://youtu.be/3DxbqB58cm120
If there remain questions we can post other videos that look at the
topic
"Child slavery must be abolished everywhere, however there is a distinction
between child employment and child slavery."
Agreed, but as when we first started this discussion it is a distinction
without a difference from the perspective of the slave.  What
rationalizations the slave owner uses is of minimal interest.
It is not only children of course who are slaves in india, many adults are
also among the more then 20 million plus defined as coming under that
'Ancient Slavery in Modern India'
http://youtu.be/SNRNOVS0b3Q
No doubt that is for Indian politicians, social workers, academics,
journalists, philanthropists, playwrights, actors, publicity seekers
etc. to handle.
hari.=kumar
2013-06-13 13:58:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=kumar
topic
"Child slavery must be abolished everywhere, however there is a
distincti=
on
Post by hari=kumar
between child employment and child slavery."
Agreed, but as when we first started this discussion it is a distinction
without a difference from the perspective of the slave. =A0What
rationalizations the slave owner uses is of minimal interest.
It is not only children of course who are slaves in india, many adults
ar=
e
Post by hari=kumar
also among the more then 20 million plus defined as coming under that
'Ancient Slavery in Modern India'

"No doubt that is for Indian politicians, social workers, academics,
journalists, philanthropists, playwrights, actors, publicity seekers etc.
to handle."

Here we disagree, it is for anyone with a claim to the most basic morality
to reject slavery by any name or rationalization. Slavery is evil, full
stop.

Whatever other arbitrarily imposed cultural term among which one might be
included, it is at the level of being human that it is evil. To assume a
position of see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil does not serve. There
is no acceptable excuse or rationalization, slavery as practiced and
illustrated in the various videos is evil.

We can post additional videos in illustration if it comes to that.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-14 12:42:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.=kumar
Post by hari=kumar
topic
"Child slavery must be abolished everywhere, however there is a
distincti=
on> between child employment and child slavery."
Post by hari=kumar
Agreed, but as when we first started this discussion it is a distinction
without a difference from the perspective of the slave. =A0What
rationalizations the slave owner uses is of minimal interest.
It is not only children of course who are slaves in india, many adults
ar=
e
Post by hari=kumar
also among the more then 20 million plus defined as coming under that
'Ancient Slavery in Modern India'
http://youtu.be/3DSNRNOVS0b3Q
"No doubt that is for Indian politicians, social workers, academics,
journalists, philanthropists, playwrights, actors, publicity seekers etc.
to handle."
Here we disagree, it is for anyone with a claim to the most basic morality
to reject slavery by any name or rationalization.
This is rubbish, for if slavery is by any name or rationalisation then
anything we do for others is slavery.
Slavery means loss of freedom with no appeal to someone who could sell
you, kill you, mistreat you any way possible. Slavery was the way the
blacks were treated in the US, being brought from Africa in chains,
sold in the markets and they could have no rights.
To dilute this meaning of slavery, is to mix up true slavery with some
other construction. That is evil, for it pardons those who did real
slavery with a good conscience.


 Slavery is evil, full
Post by hari.=kumar
stop.
As per my definition, yes.

Then
Post by hari.=kumar
Whatever other arbitrarily imposed cultural term among which one might be
included, it is at the level of being human that it is evil.
This makes no sense.


 To assume a
Post by hari.=kumar
position of see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil does not serve.
To tell lies, and keep on telling lies, does not serve. To mix up
matters, to obfuscate, giving exaggerated accounts with no balance
with a view to demean for some peculiar purpose, is despicable. To
have no guts to put up even one's name and yet trying to take a moral
stance, is ridiculous. To try to place some person who has nothing to
do with all this stuff as somehow responsible for same, is moral and
intellectual bankruptcy.


 There
Post by hari.=kumar
is no acceptable excuse or rationalization, slavery as practiced and
illustrated in the various videos is evil.
Why one should accept that videos tell the complete truth, is unknown.
If there is any truth in them, the concerned authorities in India
should take care. If they do not, the fault is with them. If no one
is interested, that is because either the videos are all lies, or that
the concerned authorities do not care. If the latter is true, then we
should investigate who the concerned authorities are, and why they are
so indifferent. There is no slavery in any part of India I have been
to. No slavery of any kind. If in some pocket it still exists, then
the wonder is why it has not been reported in the free Indian media,
why no social crusader has not taken up their cause.
Post by hari.=kumar
We can post additional videos in illustration if it comes to that.
hari=.kumar
2013-06-14 23:30:27 UTC
Permalink
There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Slavery of any form by any name or rationalization is evil, full stop.

What are indians doing in their own country to combat this evil? Here is
one example:

"Way back in 1980s, for the first time in India, a politician started a
campaign against rampant bonded labor system in the country, and till
date his struggle continues.

Swami Agnivesh initiated Bandhua Mukti Morcha, or Bonded Labour
Liberation Front, so as to insist India to implement its laws for the
safeguard of the labor class. Till date, the organization has managed
to rescue nearly 200,000 bonded laborers, who have later been
rehabilitated by the government.

SWAMI AGNIVESH, BONDED LABOUR LIBERATION FRONT: When I resigned as
minister for education in 1979, I went straight to the stone quarries
very close to Delhi that is in Faridabad area, and also to some of the
brick kilns, where the laborers were bought and sold like chattel
slavery. Then it was a great shock for me that right under the nose of
our federal parliament and federal judiciary, Supreme Court of India,
this practice was rampant."

This illustrates a large part of the problem. To the middle and upper
class it is an invisible practice hidden in the huge picture of poverty
generally. It exists under their very eyes but is all around them. When
they see kilm workers for example they look for all the world like many
people in poverty, but they are slaves.

Here is a bbc 3 part series of 10 minutes each to illustrate the picture of
slavery in india:






Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-15 08:31:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Slavery of any form by any name or rationalization is evil, full stop.
What are indians doing in their own country to combat this evil?  Here is
"Way back in 1980s, for the first time in India, a politician started a
campaign against rampant bonded labor system in the country, and till
date his struggle continues.
Swami Agnivesh initiated Bandhua Mukti Morcha, or Bonded Labour
Liberation Front, so as to insist India to implement its laws for the
safeguard of the labor class. Till date, the organization has managed
to rescue nearly 200,000 bonded laborers, who have later been
rehabilitated by the government.
SWAMI AGNIVESH, BONDED LABOUR LIBERATION FRONT: When I resigned as
minister for education in 1979, I went straight to the stone quarries
very close to Delhi that is in Faridabad area, and also to some of the
brick kilns, where the laborers were bought and sold like chattel
slavery. Then it was a great shock for me that right under the nose of
our federal parliament and federal judiciary, Supreme Court of India,
this practice was rampant."
This illustrates a large part of the problem.  To the middle and upper
class it is an invisible practice hidden in the huge picture of poverty
generally.  It exists under their very eyes but is all around them.  When
they see kilm workers for example they look for all the world like many
people in poverty, but they are slaves.
Here is a bbc 3 part series of 10 minutes each to illustrate the picture of
It is a long while since I discarded all foreign negative views of
India as absolute rubbish.
Post by hari=.kumar
http://youtu.be/JPf_l6-zj-Y
http://youtu.be/ptalL-EWnEQ
http://youtu.be/KmmRaay3THs
hari.=kumar
2013-06-15 13:02:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
Slavery of any form by any name or rationalization is evil, full stop.
What are indians doing in their own country to combat this evil? =A0Here
=
is
Post by hari=.kumar
"Way back in 1980s, for the first time in India, a politician started a
campaign against rampant bonded labor system in the country, and till
date his struggle continues.
Swami Agnivesh initiated Bandhua Mukti Morcha, or Bonded Labour
Liberation Front, so as to insist India to implement its laws for the
safeguard of the labor class. Till date, the organization has managed
to rescue nearly 200,000 bonded laborers, who have later been
rehabilitated by the government.
SWAMI AGNIVESH, BONDED LABOUR LIBERATION FRONT: When I resigned as
minister for education in 1979, I went straight to the stone quarries
very close to Delhi that is in Faridabad area, and also to some of the
brick kilns, where the laborers were bought and sold like chattel
slavery. Then it was a great shock for me that right under the nose of
our federal parliament and federal judiciary, Supreme Court of India,
this practice was rampant."
This illustrates a large part of the problem. =A0To the middle and upper
class it is an invisible practice hidden in the huge picture of poverty
generally. =A0It exists under their very eyes but is all around them.
=A0=
When
Post by hari=.kumar
they see kilm workers for example they look for all the world like many
people in poverty, but they are slaves.
Here is a bbc 3 part series of 10 minutes each to illustrate the picture
=
of
"It is a long while since I discarded all foreign negative views of India
as absolute rubbish."

Ah, the other side of the coin, the denial from the middle and upper class
in india; more's thepity that evil is given a free ride.

Of course the "view" of indian slavery above is from an indian who is in a
position to know its reality. He a religious man took the moral position
to remove the blinders of fellow indians.

So much for the "outsider" excuse to "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no
evil" place of deluded comfort.

Here is a video done by the swami's group:

'Child slaves freed from bondage in India quarry'



With the label:

'The Bonded Labour Liberation Front to free slaves, including children.'
Post by hari=.kumar



Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-15 13:18:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
Slavery of any form by any name or rationalization is evil, full stop.
What are indians doing in their own country to combat this evil? =A0Here
=
is
Post by hari=.kumar
"Way back in 1980s, for the first time in India, a politician started a
campaign against rampant bonded labor system in the country, and till
date his struggle continues.
Swami Agnivesh initiated Bandhua Mukti Morcha, or Bonded Labour
Liberation Front, so as to insist India to implement its laws for the
safeguard of the labor class. Till date, the organization has managed
to rescue nearly 200,000 bonded laborers, who have later been
rehabilitated by the government.
SWAMI AGNIVESH, BONDED LABOUR LIBERATION FRONT: When I resigned as
minister for education in 1979, I went straight to the stone quarries
very close to Delhi that is in Faridabad area, and also to some of the
brick kilns, where the laborers were bought and sold like chattel
slavery. Then it was a great shock for me that right under the nose of
our federal parliament and federal judiciary, Supreme Court of India,
this practice was rampant."
This illustrates a large part of the problem. =A0To the middle and upper
class it is an invisible practice hidden in the huge picture of poverty
generally. =A0It exists under their very eyes but is all around them.
=A0=
When> they see kilm workers for example they look for all the world like many
Post by hari=.kumar
people in poverty, but they are slaves.
Here is a bbc 3 part series of 10 minutes each to illustrate the picture
=
of
"It is a long while since I discarded all foreign negative views of India
as absolute rubbish."
Ah, the other side of the coin, the denial from the middle and upper class
in india; more's thepity that evil is given a free ride.
It is the middle and upper classes of India that has increased the
well-being of the nation, despite the most hostile western propaganda
and machinations. So many poor are now rich and powerful.
Of course the "view" of indian slavery above is from an indian who is in a
position to know its reality.  He a religious man took the moral position
to remove the blinders of fellow indians.
In which case there should be no problem at all. Anything illegal
that is done, when pointed out, has to be acted upon by the
authorities.
So much for the "outsider" excuse to "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no
evil" place of deluded comfort.
I report what I see, from my travels. I don't need to learn from
motivated outsiders who twist matters. The plain fact is that in
India I have a house in one of the poorest and most neglected areas.
There is no slavery there. Indians value freedom more than anything.
Unscrupulous people will always try to paint a crooked picture,
usually to raise money from the gullible.
'Child slaves freed from bondage in India quarry'
http://youtu.be/YvgmuoYJm6E
'The Bonded Labour Liberation Front to free slaves, including children.'
Post by hari=.kumar
http://youtu.be/3DJPf_l6-zj-Y
http://youtu.be/3DptalL-EWnEQ
Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
hari=.kumar
2013-06-15 13:41:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari.=kumar
"It is a long while since I discarded all foreign negative views of India
as absolute rubbish."
Ah, the other side of the coin, the denial from the middle and upper
clas=
s
Post by hari.=kumar
in india; more's thepity that evil is given a free ride.
"It is the middle and upper classes of India that has increased the
well-being of the nation, despite the most hostile western propaganda and
machinations. So many poor are now rich and powerful."

Irrelevant and a diversion from the topic. Most people in the west know
little and care less about the internal affairs of india. The external
source of india's internal problems is a now very lame excuse.
Post by hari.=kumar
Of course the "view" of indian slavery above is from an indian who is in
=
a
Post by hari.=kumar
position to know its reality. =A0He a religious man took the moral
positi=
on
Post by hari.=kumar
to remove the blinders of fellow indians.
"In which case there should be no problem at all. Anything illegal that is
done, when pointed out, has to be acted upon by the authorities."


And it is when prodded by the good swami and like minded indians. The very
first video posted was of a police raid to free child slaves. This despite
the known corruption of authorities who have to be shamed into taking
action.
Post by hari.=kumar
So much for the "outsider" excuse to "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no
evil" place of deluded comfort.
"I report what I see, from my travels. I don't need to learn from
motivated outsiders who twist matters. The plain fact is that in India I
have a house in one of the poorest and most neglected areas. There is no
slavery there. Indians value freedom more than anything. Unscrupulous
people will always try to paint a crooked picture, usually to raise money
from the gullible."

You report from a point of ignorance and of not wanting to know. It
matters not in the least where you might have a house and where you travel.
Some don't want to be confused by the facts, no?

If you have questions about the good swami's group to fight slavery then
consult him:

http://www.crin.org/organisations/vieworg.asp?id=120#maintable
Post by hari.=kumar
'Child slaves freed from bondage in India quarry'

'The Bonded Labour Liberation Front to free slaves, including children.'
It is now clear you have not consulted the web pages and videos provided
you. It is better it appears to exist in continuing comfort to retain a
dearly held delusion. If one "sees no evil, hears no evil, and speaks no
evil", then one does not have to have a moral position about it, no?
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-16 09:02:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
Post by hari.=kumar
"It is a long while since I discarded all foreign negative views of India
as absolute rubbish."
Ah, the other side of the coin, the denial from the middle and upper
clas=
s
Post by hari.=kumar
in india; more's thepity that evil is given a free ride.
"It is the middle and upper classes of India that has increased the
well-being of the nation, despite the most hostile western propaganda and
machinations.  So many poor are now rich and powerful."
Irrelevant and a diversion from the topic.
No, it is most relevant and to the topic. You are lying when you
propgandise "slavey in India" as if that is institutional )supported
by law and public opinion) as it was in US and elsewhere. And that is
the main topic. In India slavey did not exist as a legal
institution. If it exists, it is illegal; it is a crime that must be
stopped and the criminals punished, by law. To pretend otherwise, is
to lie. That the upper and middle classes of India have done their
best to help the downtrodden, is a most obvious fact. As soon as
India got independence, women got the vote. Zamindari was abolished,
and bonded labour along with zamindari. Socialist measures were
introduced, affirmative action introduced with full vigour. Many poor
people got the chance to get out of poverty. The middle and upper
classes suffered a lot relatively speaking - the elites found their
wealth eroded, and their descendants often sunk into poverty. On the
other hand, many lower middle class people became wealthy with push
and new political connections.


Most people in the west know
Post by hari=.kumar
little and care less about the internal affairs of india.  The external
source of india's internal problems is a now very lame excuse.
Post by hari.=kumar
Of course the "view" of indian slavery above is from an indian who is in
=
a> position to know its reality. =A0He a religious man took the moral
positi=
on
Post by hari.=kumar
to remove the blinders of fellow indians.
"In which case there should be no problem at all.  Anything illegal that is
done, when pointed out, has to be acted upon by the authorities."
And it is when prodded by the good swami and like minded indians.  The very
first video posted was of a police raid to free child slaves.  This despite
the known corruption of authorities who have to be shamed into taking
action.
Post by hari.=kumar
So much for the "outsider" excuse to "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no
evil" place of deluded comfort.
"I report what I see, from my travels.  I don't need to learn from
motivated outsiders who twist matters.  The plain fact is that in India I
have a house in one of the poorest and most neglected areas. There is no
slavery there.  Indians value freedom more than anything. Unscrupulous
people will always try to paint a crooked picture, usually to raise money
from the gullible."
You report from a point of ignorance and of not wanting to know.  It
matters not in the least where you might have a house and where you travel.
Some don't want to be confused by the facts, no?
If you have questions about the good swami's group to fight slavery then
http://www.crin.org/organisations/vieworg.asp?id=120#maintable
Post by hari.=kumar
'Child slaves freed from bondage in India quarry'
http://youtu.be/3DYvgmuoYJm6E
'The Bonded Labour Liberation Front to free slaves, including children.'
It is now clear you have not consulted the web pages and videos provided
you.  It is better it appears to exist in continuing comfort to retain a
dearly held delusion.  If one "sees no evil, hears no evil, and speaks no
evil", then one does not have to have a moral position about it, no?
hari=.kumar
2013-06-17 12:16:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
If you have questions about the good swami's group to fight slavery then
http://www.crin.org/organisations/vieworg.asp?id=3D120#maintable
Post by hari.=kumar
'Child slaves freed from bondage in India quarry'

'The Bonded Labour Liberation Front to free slaves, including
children.=
'
Post by hari=.kumar
It is now clear you have not consulted the web pages and videos provided
you. =A0It is better it appears to exist in continuing comfort to retain
=
a
Post by hari=.kumar
dearly held delusion. =A0If one "sees no evil, hears no evil, and speaks
=
no
Post by hari=.kumar
evil", then one does not have to have a moral position about it, no?
Here another indian group fighting slavery:

'South Asian Coalition on Child servitude'

http://blog.world-citizenship.org/wp-archive/281

Here a video on their work:

'india Slave Girls'



This in a continuing education of the reality of slavery in india. This to
refute the tautology offered that if there is a problem then indians would
be doing something about it. They are in fact. Also refuted at the same
time the very lame excuse it is a conspiracy of "outsiders" to defame
india.


There are none so blind as those who do not see.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-17 13:14:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
If you have questions about the good swami's group to fight slavery then
http://www.crin.org/organisations/vieworg.asp?id=3D120#maintable
Great. Keep it up. The less exploitation of vulnerable people, the
better. That some pockets of injustice remain, is sad but the vast
majority of Indians are doing much better now, thanks to the strength
of Indian society.
hari--kumar
2013-06-17 19:15:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
If you have questions about the good swami's group to fight slavery
the=
n
Post by hari=.kumar
http://www.crin.org/organisations/vieworg.asp?id=3D3D120#maintable
"Great. Keep it up. The less exploitation of vulnerable people, the
better. That some pockets of injustice remain, is sad but the vast
majority of Indians are doing much better now, thanks to the strength of
Indian society."

Had you been consulting the web pages and several videos you would have
also learned the problem is in fact growingin scale.

One theme is that as world demand grows for light manufacturing products in
india the rate of slavery also increases. To compete with other countries
and among themselves, the producers of the products want labour at the
lowest possible cost to them. Slavery is the answer.

As the growth in building grows the demand for the products increases. It
is quarries and kilm producers etc. who are often the users of slave
labour.

And of course the ever existing demand and growing in the sex worker area
finds slavery and throw away girls and women a reality.

And we must not neglect to mention the rural areas where one can find
entire villiages of slaves, and who have been so for generations. All
those urban people want to be fed at the very lowest cost for production.


What first drove the good swami in the above information to take up the
question which existed under his very nose in the national capitol is
increasing.
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-18 00:09:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by hari=.kumar
If you have questions about the good swami's group to fight slavery
the=
n
Post by hari=.kumar
http://www.crin.org/organisations/vieworg.asp?id=3D3D120#maintable
"Great.  Keep it up.  The less exploitation of vulnerable people, the
better.  That some pockets of injustice remain, is sad but the vast
majority of Indians are doing much better now, thanks to the strength of
Indian society."
Had you been consulting the web pages and several videos you would have
also learned the problem is in fact growingin scale.
No. The first video showed a white US guy blabbing away and that
turned me off. I dismissed the whole lot as the usual anti-Hindu crap
from the bigoted western sources, that are always on the lookout to
find something unpleasant in and about India. Anyway, these days I am
very busy with my research work, so I have to prioritise.
One theme is that as world demand grows for light manufacturing products in
india the rate of slavery also increases.  To compete with other countries
and among themselves, the producers of the products want labour at the
lowest possible cost to them.  Slavery is the answer.
Not the slavery that considers the slave inhuman, and so up for sale
in chains, with the slavers making all the laws and all the laws
favouring them. Wage slavery is there for all, including
firstworlders. They also have mortgage slavery, we all have slavery
to our wives, children and pets - not to speak of parents, neighbours,
friends, teachers. In fact you are lucky if you have such slaveries,
you should not be a slave to your enemies, that is all!
As the growth in building grows the demand for the products increases.  It
is quarries and kilm producers etc. who are often the users of slave
labour.
And of course the ever existing demand and growing in the sex worker area
finds slavery and throw away girls and women a reality.
And we must not neglect to mention the rural areas where one can find
entire villiages of slaves, and who have been so for generations.  All
those urban people want to be fed at the very lowest cost for production.
What first drove the good swami in the above information to take up the
question which existed under his very nose in the national capitol is
increasing.
Well, I would say that all this is the result of so-called
globalisation which is nothing but systematic exploitation. The
weakest sections suffer the most. Things were much better in a
socialist India, when Indira Gandhi was in charge. There was genuine
concern; the public sector was strong; people were well-intentioned
and idealistic. Things have become much worse with all the
liberalisation horrors. Of course, nothing good in India can be
expected with a dumb foreign woman in charge, with a monument of
serene and complacent worthlessness as her rubber stamp.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Don Phillipson
2013-06-05 21:23:52 UTC
Permalink
I don't think the Turks ever made a convincing science out of racism,
to justify slavery the way the European intelligentsia did.
Sciences of racism are not integral to slavery. Ancient Greeks and
Romans maintained slavery 2000 years ago without predicating it on
any theory of race. So did traditional Arab societies since the 7th
century, as do a few Moslem communities today: i.e. slavery
continues independently of whether slaves (or slave-owners) are
black or white.
That non-whites were basically non-human was the modern European
racists' main point, and such was not the case with others.
This argument is weak so far as only after European slavery
had been abolished (even land serfdom in Russia) did "modern European
racists" propose that "non-whites were basically non-human" and the
international slave trade abolished by European military initiative.
Slavery
survived only in the USA (where the new race theory was taken up as
justification,
because the political topic was so hot that protagonists looked for evidence
anywhere they could get it) and in parts of the Ottoman Empire, Brazil and
uncolonized Africa (where no race-based justification was needed.)
Actual history suggests "sciences of racism are not integral to slavery."
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Arindam Banerjee
2013-06-06 05:30:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Phillipson
I don't think the Turks ever made a convincing science out of racism,
to justify slavery the way the European intelligentsia did.
Sciences of racism are not integral to slavery. Ancient Greeks and
Romans maintained slavery 2000 years ago without predicating it on
any theory of race. So did traditional Arab societies since the 7th
century, as do a few Moslem communities today: i.e. slavery
continues independently of whether slaves (or slave-owners) are
black or white.
 That non-whites were basically non-human was the modern European
 racists' main point, and such was not the case with others.
This argument is weak so far as only after European slavery
had been abolished (even land serfdom in Russia) did "modern European
racists" propose that "non-whites were basically non-human"  and the
international slave trade abolished by European military initiative.
From white slavery (prevalent for centuries, the Slavs were called so
for a reason) the European winners took up non-white slavery (as it
was less strenuous and more profitable) after they sorted out their
internal issues after a fashion.
Post by Don Phillipson
Slavery
survived only in the USA (where the new race theory was taken up as
justification,
When white slavery did not work after US got independence, it became
Australia's chance to get white slavery which lasted along with black
slavery in US. With time, things became better for the oppressed
peoples.
Post by Don Phillipson
because the political topic was so hot that protagonists looked for evidence
anywhere they could get it) and in parts of the Ottoman Empire, Brazil and
uncolonized Africa (where no race-based justification was needed.)
True, non-Europeans did not need race-based justifications for
slavery. For that matter, ancient Greeks and Romans did not need race-
based justifications for slavery; their attitudes (die or be a slave
if you lose) were similar to the Turks etc.
Post by Don Phillipson
Actual history suggests "sciences of racism are not integral to slavery."
History tells us that USans and other colonists/imperialists of
European origin who were nominally devout Christians needed sciences
of racism to justify slavery.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Post by Don Phillipson
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Francis A. Miniter
2013-06-07 00:24:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Phillipson
I don't think the Turks ever made a convincing science out of racism,
to justify slavery the way the European intelligentsia did.
Sciences of racism are not integral to slavery. Ancient Greeks and
Romans maintained slavery 2000 years ago without predicating it on
any theory of race. So did traditional Arab societies since the 7th
century, as do a few Moslem communities today: i.e. slavery
continues independently of whether slaves (or slave-owners) are
black or white.
That non-whites were basically non-human was the modern European
racists' main point, and such was not the case with others.
This argument is weak so far as only after European slavery
had been abolished (even land serfdom in Russia) did "modern European
racists" propose that "non-whites were basically non-human" and the
international slave trade abolished by European military initiative.
Slavery
survived only in the USA (where the new race theory was taken up as
justification,
because the political topic was so hot that protagonists looked for evidence
anywhere they could get it) and in parts of the Ottoman Empire, Brazil and
uncolonized Africa (where no race-based justification was needed.)
Actual history suggests "sciences of racism are not integral to slavery."
Slavery exists in Mauritania as we discuss this. And it is color based.
Lighter skinned property owners keep darker skinned people as slaves.
CNN did an expose on this a couple years ago. This is
multi-generational slavery.

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/03/world/mauritania.slaverys.last.stronghold/index.html


Francis A. Miniter
i***@gmail.com
2013-05-28 05:10:28 UTC
Permalink
After Mel Gibson's film Passion, many people became anti-Jewish who had previously not been anti-Jewish. We are seeing a lot of hateful rants against Jews on places such as the Internet, and the neo-Nazis have been capitalizing on the anti-Jewish sentiment to spread their ideological poison. With political correctness having been rightfully diminished in power, it is not possible nor is it constitutional to suppress such sentiments. But it is possible to address them with intelligence. Here is one effort to that effect.

Claim: Jews think that they are special.
Answer: Everyone thinks that they are special. Americans believe in American exceptionalism. Germans believe that they are the best at everything. Russians believed under the Tsars that they were the Third Rome, and under Communism they believed that they were the light of the world. The Nazis not only thought that they were special; they believed that they were the master race and deserved to rule everybody. Considering oneself special is merely human.

Claim: Jews crucified Jesus.
Answer: None of the Jews now alive were alive at the time of Jesus, and it is outrageous to blame them for something they haven't done. By the same standard, Germans should forever be equated with Nazism, England and Spain with imperialism, Americans with slave trade and Australians with destruction of the aborigines. All of the above wrongs took place a lot more recently than crucifixion of Jesus and resulted in rapes, maimings, enslavings and deaths of millions of innocent people. It is wrong to attack Jewish people living today for something that they had nothing to do with - unless of course one is to forever equate the Germans, the English, the Spanish, the Americans and the Australians with much more recent and much greater crimes.

Claim: The Muslims became America's enemies because of Israel and the Jews.
Answer: Ayatollah did not call Israel the Great Satan; he called America the Great Satan. The Afghans became anti-American not because of the Jews, but because America abandoned them after the war. And the Islamofascists are attacking not Israel's social institutions, which are culturally conservative, but the "western" social institutions, such as women's rights and civil liberties.



Claim: Jews are leading people to believe that Arabs are the enemy.
Answer: All sorts of people are against Islamofascism, and they should be. These people not only want to destroy Israel and America, they want to control the whole world. Most Christians are against Islamism, and some are against Islam as such.

Claim: Holocaust never happened.
Answer: And the Earth is flat.

Claim: The white people are genetically superior and deserve to rule the world.
Answer: White people were at the bottom of the world for 1,000 years that were the Dark Ages and could not hold their heads up to China, India, Baghdad and Timbuktu. They got ahead through superior methodology that was science and technology. Now that other races, such as the Chinese and the Hindu, are adopting similar methodologies, they are catching up fast.

Claim: The media does not say anything negative about the Jews.
Answer: For that matter, media does not publish hate rants against black people or Native Americans or Australian aborigines either. It is seen as hate-mongering and ethnic slander; and there is enough evidence from history to know where that leads.

Claim: The Jews control the media.
Answer: There are people in the media of all sorts of ethnicities. Jews have a strong representation in the media for the same reason that they have a strong representation in science and film. They are good at it. Alongside this media, there is also the liar media such as Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh; and these people also exercise influence for the same reason.

Claim: Jews caused the Wall Street collapse.
Answer: If that is true, then Jews also caused the vast growth in Wall Steet capitalization that preceded the collapse. If Wall Street is, as some say, a Jewish institution, then America owes vastly to the Jews economically. The Wall Street is recovering; and if the collapse is to be blamed on the Jews then the recovery should be credited to them likewise. In reality, Wall Street has both Jewish and non-Jewish people, and both the credit and the blame belongs with both.

Claim: One is never allowed to say that Jews are the enemy.
Answer: That is because Jews are not the enemy. The Orthodox Jews tend to keep to themselves, and the reform and conservative Jews have been vast contributors to the Western civilization. They are its best scientists, filmmakers, teachers, doctors, and some of its best businessmen. Jews have done vast amount of good for the Western Civilization, and only idiots would claim that they are its enemy.

Claim: The Jews run America.
Answer: America hasn't had a Jewish president, even though it had an Irish president, a black president, and presidents who came from poverty. There are Jewish people in position of influence, and there should be. In a place that does not practice ethnic discrimination, the bright people who are willing to work hard get to the top. This is testimony to the rightness of American system on this matter, and Americans should be proud of such a thing. What this means is that the system has worked as originally intended by the founders and is a mark of America's success.
Bret Cahill
2013-05-28 05:27:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by i***@gmail.com
Claim: Jews think that they are special.
Answer: Everyone thinks that they are special.
That's not the best answer for 2 reasons:

1. That's not always true, and,

2. When people try to think they are special it's a good thing,
especially nowadays when it's so easy to call anyone on it. It forces
them to work harder.

This needs to be emphasized because the source of bigotry / hate is
self hate and the source of the self hate is the constant economic
scamming / class warfare by the rich against the poor.

Do _not_ let the rich or their minions in the legacy media off the
hook on this.


Bret Cahill
Topaz
2013-05-29 01:41:45 UTC
Permalink
At one time or other the Jews have been expelled from every nation in
Europe. When the Jews first began to immigrate to America the early
colonialists in New York, Charleston and Savannah tried to ban their
entry. Benjamin Franklin pleaded with the members of the Continental
Congress to enter a specific ban against Jewish immigration into the
U. S. Constitution to bar them for all time to come.

The Jews claim that they are "only" a religion. The truth is that the
Jews are a RACE. Less than 30% are members of any Synagogue. Whether
they are Orthodox religious, atheists, capitalists or communists -
they still claim to be Jews - members of the Jewish race! Every race
has inherited traits. In the case of the Jews they include trading,
money-changing, usury, and a loathing for "productive labor" which is
scorned as beneath the dignity of the Jews in their "bible" called
"THE TALMUD."

The Jews have not changed since the days when Jesus Christ took up a
whip and drove "the money changers out of the Temple." Jews have
always united to form monopolies. Today they control all the
department store chains and specialty shops along with the lucrative
jewelry and animal fur trade. Jews dominate the fields of all precious
metals such as gold, silver, platinum, tin, lead, etc. They will
always ban together to drive Gentile competitors out of business.
Today America is being flooded with Jewish immigrants from Russia and
even 20,000 per year leave Israel for the U. S. - all with dollar
signs in their eyes. Jews have used their vaunted money-power to seize
control of the Democratic Party and constitute over 50% of all its
financial contributions. Today they are buying up more and more major
U.S. companies. While only 3% of the population, the Jews control over
25% of the nation's wealth and this percentage rises every year. They
are the only racial group totally organized to work for political
domination over America.

Opposition to the Jews did not begin in Germany but dates back before
the birth of Christ over 2,000 years ago! Study the statements made by
"The world's greatest men." They reveal why the "wandering Jews" have
made enemies out of every host country that ever accepted them.
CICERO (Marcus Tullius Cicero). First century B.C. Roman statesman,
writer.

"Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have
already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman.
I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills." (Oration
in Defense of Flaccus)


Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman
official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their
international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself
certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to
"speak softly" shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously
powerful sphere of influence. and on another occasion Cicero wrote:
"The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous
this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise
through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers."
SENECA (Lucius Annaeus Seneca). First century Roman philosopher.
"The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength
that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have
given laws to the conquerors." (De Superstitione)

DIO CASSIUS. Second century Roman historian. Describing the savage
Jewish uprising against the Roman empire that has been acknowledged as
the turning point downward in the course of that great state-form:
"The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh
of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and
daubed themselves with their blood... In all, 220,000 men perished in
Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot
in Cyprus today." (Roman History)

DIODORUS SICULUS. First century Greek historian. Observed that Jews
treated other people as enemies and inferiors.
"Usury" is the practice of lending money at excessive interest rates.
This has for centuries caused great misery and poverty for Gentiles.
It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!

BERNARDINO OF FELTRO. 15th century Italian priest. A mild man who
extolled patience and charity in normal circumstances, he described
himself as a "barking dog" when dealing with Jews:
"Jewish usurers bleed the poor to death and grow fat on their
substance, and I who live on alms, who feed on the bread of the poor,
shall I then be mute before outraged charity? Dogs bark to protect
those who feed them, and I, who am feed by the poor, shall I see them
robbed of what belongs to them and keep silent?" (E. Flornoy, Le
Bienbeureux Bernardin the Feltre)

AQUINAS, THOMAS, Saint. 13th century scholastic philosopher. In his
"On the Governance of the Jews," he wrote:
"The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from
others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so
that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but
becoming avaricious."

HILAIARE BELLOC, in the book THE JEWS, page 9
"There is already something like a Jewish monopoly in high finance.
There is the same element of Jewish monopoly in the silver trade, and
in the control of various other metals, notably lead, nickel,
quicksilver. What is most disquieting of all, this tendency to
monopoly is spreading like a disease."

H. BEAMISH, in New York Speech, October 30, 1937
"The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many
criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the
Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of
South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold;
Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses
controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably
pollute."

W HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1919
"The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not
a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does
not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the
antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation,
if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?"

POPE CLEMENT VIII
"All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies
and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of
poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very
poor.
Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they
were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the
Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as
well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in
whatever country they happen to live."

NESTA WEBSTER, In World Revolution, The Plot against Civilization,
page
163
"Since the earliest times it is as the exploiter that the Jew has been
known amongst his fellow men of all races and creeds. Moreover, he has
persistently shown himself ungrateful... The Jews have always formed a
rebellious element in every state."

FRANZ LISZT, famed composer quoted in Col. E. N. Sanctuary's Are These
Things So?, page 278
"The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling
will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a
question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic
disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever."

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, VIII:44
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye
will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. - then
answered the Jews - "
(which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)
MARTIN LUTHER, Table Talk of Martin Luther, translated by William
Hazlet, page 43
"But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though
overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious
race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a
prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand
from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against
them."

REV. GORDON WINROD, in his book The Keys to Christian Understanding,
pages 114 - 115
"Judaism does not know Jesus Christ. Judaism hates Jesus Christ. When
St. Paul was in Judaism, before he was converted to Christianity, he
hated Jesus Christ and persecuted Christians and Christianity."
Paul said: "You have heard of my earlier career in Judaism - how
furiously I persecuted the Church of God, and made havoc of it; and
how in devotion to Judaism I out-stripped many men of may own age
among my people, being far more zealous than they for the tradition of
my forefathers." (Gal. 1:13, 14, Weymouth Translation)
While in Judaism, Paul persecuted Christians because of his intense
hatred for Christians and because of his conformity to the tradition
of the fathers. This shows that the tradition of teachings of Judaism
are filled with hate for Christians.
Few people know of this because they do not carefully read their
Scriptures and because of the great pains which Jews have take to
deceive the Christians. Care has been exerted by the Jews to hide
their ECONOMIC-POLITICAL conspiracy for complete world domination
UNDER high sounding words that have a "RELIGIOUS" ring in the ears of
Christians. The Jews use such "religious" sounding words as "the
Jewish faith," "the Jewish religion," "Jewish spiritual values,"
"Jewish religious doctrines," and like phrases which deceive and lead
the unlearned into total equanimity.
Behind this mask of religiosity stands a complete plan for world
government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this
world, and the destruction of Christianity.
REV. WILLIAM S. MITCHELL of Philadelphia, quoted in Count
Cherep-Spiridovich's book The Secret World Government, page 194
"If there is an ingrate in history, it is the Jew. In this land which
befriended him he as conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted and
corrupted and (hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of other
folks), dares to contrive and scheme the death of every Christian
principle which has protected him."

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D.
"The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They
wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the
Christian faith."

ST. JOHN, Gospel of St. John VII:1
"After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in
Jewry because the Jews sought to kill him."

M. DE HEEKELINGEN, in Israel: Son Passe, Son Avenir
"The former Rabbi Drach, converted to Catholicism, says that the
Talmud contains "a large number of musing, utterly ridiculous
extravagancies, most revolting indecencies, and, above all, the most
horrible blasphemies against everything which the Christian religion
holds most sacred and most dear."
"In the matter of the translation of the Talmud by non-Jews, we
have always preferred that of Luzsensky, whose accuracy has been
established by the Courts. In 1923, the Public Prosecutor of Hungary
caused his Hungarian Talmud to be seized on account of "attack on
public morals" and "pornography." In delivering its verdict, the Court
declared 'INTER ALIA:'
"The horrors contained in the translation of Alfred Luzsensky are to
be found, without exception, in the Talmud. His translation is
correct, in that it renders these passages, which are actually to be
found in the original text of the Talmud, after their true meaning."
QUINTAS SPETIMUS FLORENS TERTULLIAN (160 - 230 A. D.) Latin Church
Father "The Jews formed the breeding ground of all anti-Christian
actions."

REV. MARTIN LUTHER, sermon at Eisleben, a few days before his death,
February, 1546

"Besides, you also have many Jews living in the country, who do much
harm... You should know the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our
Savior day for day... for that reason you, Milords and men of
authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public
enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our
Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they
give the epithet of changelings and abortions.
Therefore deal with them harshly as they do nothing but excruciatingly
blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, trying to rob us of our lives, our
health, our honor and belongings."

MARIA THERESA, Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 - 1789)
"Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to
remain here without